I convert this condition:
LOOP AT gt_zgd_check_smc_st INTO gs_zgd_check_smc_st
SELECT *
FROM ever
INTO wa_ever
WHERE anlage EQ wa_euiinstln-anlage
AND einzdat <= wa_zgd_check_smc_st-data_inizio
AND auszdat >= wa_zgd_check_smc_st-data_inizio.
ENDSELECT.
IF sy-subrc NE 0.
-code error--
ENDIF.
ENDLOOP.
But the client did not like it because it's slower and I changed it into:
SELECT * FROM ever
FOR ALL ENTRIES IN gt_euiinstln
WHERE anlage = gt_euiinstln-anlage
INTO TABLE gt_ever.
...
LOOP AT gt_zgd_check_smc_st INTO gs_zgd_check_smc_st
...
READ TABLE gt_ever INTO gs_ever WITH KEY anlage = gs_euiinstln-anlage.
IF sy-subrc = 0.
IF gs_ever-einzdat ?? gs_zgd_check_smc_st-start_date "date
AND gs_ever-auszdat ?? gs_zgd_check_smc_st-start_date. "date
--CODE WITH RECORD ERROR--
ELSE.
--- CODE WITH RECORD ERROR ---
ENDIF.
ENDLOOP.
I don't know which operator is to be inserted after einzdat and auszdat so that it works like SELECT-ENDSELECT.
thank you all
regards.
Have you tried replace
"<=" with LE
">=" with GE
Hope I understand your question right.
Related
I am working on the this SAS code and would need assistance with joining the two tables below. I am getting errors while trying to join the two tables.
Requirement: i. Left Join Table B to Table A
Table A:
PROC SQL;
create table stand as select distinct
put(datepart(Max(a.REPORT_DATE)),Date9.) as M_Date
, a.BUSINESS_GROUP as PORTF_LEVEL1
, A.SPLIT as PORTF_LEv2
, Count(distinct a.Report_Date) as Number_of_Days
, (B.TOTAL_BREACH/Count(distinct a.Report_Date))*100 as FREQ
, A.MINIMUM_ACCEPTABLE_COUNT
, A.MAX_COUNT
, (case WHEN (B.TOTAL_BREACH/Count(distinct a.Report_Date)) * 100 LT MIN_COUNT
THEN 'TRUE' ELSE 'FALSE' END) as NUMBER__UNDER
, (case WHEN (B.TOTAL_BREACH/Count(distinct a.Report_Date)) * 100 GT MAX_COUNT THEN 'TRUE' ELSE 'FALSE' END) as NUMBER__OVER
from temp a
INNER join
( select BUSINESS_GROUP as PORTF_LEVEL1
,SPLIT AS PORTF_LEv2
,Count(distinct c.Report_Date) as Number_of_Days
from temp c
Inner join temp2 d
on c.Report_Date=d.Report_Date
WHERE &Alert and TENOR = '+'
and datepart(c.REPORT_DATE) ge '31-APR-21'd
and datepart(c.REPORT_DATE) le '31-APR-22'd
Group by BUSINESS_GROUP, SPLIT
)B
on a.BUSINESS_GROUP = b.PORTF_LEVEL1
AND a.SPLIT = b.PORTF_LEVEL2
INNER JOIN temp2 e
on a.REPORT_DATE = e.REPORT_DATE
where &Alert and TENOR = '+'
and datepart(a.REPORT_DATE) ge '31-APR-21'd
and datepart(a.REPORT_DATE) le '31-APR-22'd
Group by Business_GROUP, SPLIT
;
QUIT;
Table B:
In the table B, i am trying to find the median of the variable Data_M. The code seems to be okay. I only need assistance joining the Table B to table A above.
Proc sql outobs=1; create table median_dt1 as select distinct put(datepart(max(REPORT_DATE)), date9.) as M_Date , median(Data_M) as median_data from transp
WHERE datepart(REPORT_DATE) ge '01-APR-22'd and datepart(REPORT_DATE) le '31-APR-22'd group by BUSINESS_GROUP order by Report_Date Desc; quit;
Thank you in advance!
sas
from temp a
INNER join
( select BUSINESS_GROUP as PORTF_LEVEL1
,SPLIT AS PORTF_LEv2
,Count(distinct c.Report_Date) as Number_of_Days
from temp c
Inner join temp2 d
on c.Report_Date=d.Report_Date
WHERE &Alert and TENOR = '+'
and datepart(c.REPORT_DATE) ge '31-APR-21'd
and datepart(c.REPORT_DATE) le '31-APR-22'd
Group by BUSINESS_GROUP, SPLIT
)B
on a.BUSINESS_GROUP = b.PORTF_LEVEL1
AND a.SPLIT = b.PORTF_LEVEL2
You're trying to join on b.PORTF_LEVEL2. However, that column doesn't exist in B. The column "PORTF_LEV2" exists, though. Try that?
If that doesn't resolve the issue, please paste the complete error message that you're receiving.
I'm trying to understand how to code something along the lines of "NOT IN the LIST" type of logic in SAS.
I figured I could do "NOT" + "IN" as something like below.
Data work.OUT;
Set work.IN;
If VAR=1 then OUTPUT=1;
else if VAR=2 then OUTPUT=2;
else if VAR NOT in (1,2) then OUTPUT=3;
else OUTPUT=4;
run;
When I export the dataset all I see is OUTPUT=3 for all records. So something is happening in the derivation and it's transforming all VAR values into OUTPUT 3 values for some reason. Even though I know for a fact that other values exist in the VAR.
I don't understand what the problem is? Can we not combine NOT+IN operators? Alternatively, do you have any other ways of coding this type of logic in SAS? I rather not code each bit of code since I have more than 300 unique values for VAR
Welcome to Stack Overflow Alejandro. Your code assigns values 1 2 or 3 depending on what values are in the variable called var:
data in;
do var = 1 to 5;
output;
end;
run;
Data work.OUT;
set work.IN;
If VAR=1 then OUTPUT=1;
else if VAR=2 then OUTPUT=2;
else if VAR NOT in (1,2) then OUTPUT=3;
else OUTPUT=4;
run;
Your code says check for var = 1 then check for var = 2 and then check if it is not 1 or 2. The final else is never checked because a var will be 1 or 2 or not 1 or 2.
If you have a pile of if checks, you can use a select/when/otherwise/end block. It will check a series of rules (in the order you type them) and then will do something based on whichever rule is true first.
data out;
set in;
select;
when(var = 1) output = 1;
when(var = 2) output = 2;
when(var < 5) output = 3;
when(.) output = -9999999;
otherwise output = 42;
end;
run;
I hope that helps. If not please send up another flare.
There is a scenario where I receive a string to the bigquery function and need to use it as a column name.
here is the function
CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION METADATA.GET_VALUE(column STRING, row_number int64) AS (
(SELECT column from WORK.temp WHERE rownumber = row_number)
);
When I call this function as select METADATA.GET_VALUE("TXCAMP10",149); I get the value as TXCAMP10 so we can say that it is processed as SELECT "TXCAMP10" from WORK.temp WHERE rownumber = 149 but I need it as SELECT TXCAMP10 from WORK.temp WHERE rownumber = 149 which will return some value from temp table lets suppose the value as A
so ultimately I need value A instead of column name i.e. TXCAMP10.
I tried using execute immediate like execute immediate("SELECT" || column || "from WORK.temp WHERE rownumber =" ||row_number) from this stack overflow post to resolve this issue but turns out I can't use it in a function.
How do I achieve required result?
I don't think you can achieve this result with the help of UDF in standard SQL in BigQuery.
But it is possible to do this with stored procedures in BigQuery and EXECUTE IMMEDIATE statement. Consider this code, which simulates the situation you have:
create or replace table d1.temp(
c1 int64,
c2 int64
);
insert into d1.temp values (1, 1), (2, 2);
create or replace procedure d1.GET_VALUE(column STRING, row_number int64, out result int64)
BEGIN
EXECUTE IMMEDIATE 'SELECT ' || column || ' from d1.temp where c2 = ?' into result using row_number;
END;
BEGIN
DECLARE result_c1 INT64;
call d1.GET_VALUE("c1", 1, result_c1);
select result_c1;
END;
After some research and trial-error methods, I used this workaround to solve this issue. It may not be the best solution when you have too many columns but it surely works.
CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION METADATA.GET_VALUE(column STRING, row_number int64) AS (
(SELECT case
when column_name = 'a' then a
when column_name = 'b' then b
when column_name = 'c' then c
when column_name = 'd' then d
when column_name = 'e' then e
end from WORK.temp WHERE rownumber = row_number)
);
And this gives the required results.
Point to note: the number of columns you use in the case statement should be of the same datatype else it won't work
I have some SAS code along the lines of:
DATA MY_SAMPLE;
SET SAMPLE;
BY A;
IF A = 1 THEN B = 1;
ELSE IF A ^= 1 THEN B = 0;
ELSE IF MISSING(A) THEN B = .;
IF FIRST.A;
RUN;
which is returning a set with 0 observations (it shouldn't do this). I have sorted the data by A and tried reading the data into an intermediate dataset before applying the IF FIRST.A but get the same results.
Am I missing something completely obvious? I use the FIRST and LAST all of the time!
Agree with #Robert, the sample code should output records, assuming there are records in your input data and it is sorted.
I would double-check the log from your real program/data, and make sure there are no errors, and that the input dataset has records.
If that doesn't help, I would add some debugging PUT statements, something like below (untested):
DATA MY_SAMPLE;
SET SAMPLE;
BY A;
IF A = 1 THEN B = 1;
ELSE IF A ^= 1 THEN B = 0;
ELSE IF MISSING(A) THEN B = .; *This will never be true ;
put "Before subsetting if " (_n_ A first.A)(=) ;
IF FIRST.A;
put "After subsetting if " (_n_ A first.A)(=) ;
RUN;
As Robert noted, as written your Else if Missing(A) would never be true, because if A is missing the prior Else if A ^= 1 will evaluate to true because SAS uses binary logic (true/false), not trinary logic(true/false/null).
Also I would check for any stray OUTPUT statements in your code.
Checked the log; checked the input; closed MSSQL down; opened it up again and lo and behold, code worked first time. Thanks for the downgrade, but I didn't realize that MSSQL is prone to twitches!
I would like to get a different result to my select statement when a parameter is 0, 1 or 2. I am not very skilled in PLSQL so I am not sure if my code would give the expected result. If i run this code i get a "SQL statement ignored" on line 3.
BEGIN
IF (:PARTYPE = 1) THEN
SELECT * FROM x
WHERE to_date(date) >= (Select to_date(sysdate)from DNV.dual)
ELSE
SELECT * FROM x
WHERE to_date(date) <= (Select to_date(sysdate)from DNV.dual)
END IF;
END;
This is just a example of my SELECT statement. Later this statement will become longer and more complex but I think this shows which results I am trying to get.
Below is a copy of my entire code but because I am not allowed to show this it has become very unreadable:
BEGIN
IF (:PARTYPE = 1) THEN
Select table1.Column1
, table1.Column2
, table1.Column3
, table1.Column4
, table1.Column5
, table1.Column6
, table1.Column7
, table1.Column8
, table1.Column9
, table1.Column10
, table1.Column11
, table1.Column12
, (Select table2.ColumnX From x2 table2 Where somthing) as "something" From x1 table1
WHERE to_date(date) >= (Select to_date(sysdate)from DNV.dual)
Order by columnX
ELSE
Select table1.Column1
, table1.Column2
, table1.Column3
, table1.Column4
, table1.Column5
, table1.Column6
, table1.Column7
, table1.Column8
, table1.Column9
, table1.Column10
, table1.Column11
, table1.Column12
, (Select table2.ColumnX From x2 table2 Where somthing) as "something" From x1 table1
WHERE to_date(date) <= (Select to_date(sysdate)from DNV.dual)
Order by columnX
END IF;
END;
I have created some new code with which i am trying to learn how a case statement works. This might help me with the code above. Unfortunately this code also doesn't work but I think it explanes my situation better. In this excample i use a separate table with data i made up. In some cases user2 is null but user1 is always filled. I want to get all items where user2 equals the parameter but if user2 is null and user1 does equal the paramter i still need that item to apear.
Select t1.user1,
t1.user2
From table t1
Where (Case
When t1.user2 IS NULL Then t1.user1 in (:PARUSER)
ELSE t1.user2 in (:PARUSER)
End Case)
Since the relational operator of the where clause depends on the partype, you cannot do the traditional CASE statement charm here. I'll have to resort with this one:
SELECT * FROM x
WHERE (to_date(date) >= (Select to_date(sysdate)from DNV.dual) AND :PARTYPE = 1)
OR (to_date(date) <= (Select to_date(sysdate)from DNV.dual) AND :PARTYPE != 1)