Constexpr if testing one template parameter - c++

If I have a class that has two template parameters, is there any way to branch an if constexpr on just one of those parameters? In the following example I can test if both parameters match, but I would like a single way of matching any version of MyTemplateClass that has char as its first parameter.
#include <iostream>
#include <type_traits>
template<typename T,int32_t N>
class MyTemplateClass
{
};
template<typename C>
void DoStuff(const C& myObj)
{
if constexpr(std::is_base_of_v<MyTemplateClass<char,64>, C>) // how do I remove the hardcoded 64?
{
// test passed!
}
else
{
static_assert(false);
}
}
int main()
{
MyTemplateClass<char, 64> passesObj;
MyTemplateClass<char, 128> shouldPassObj;
MyTemplateClass<wchar_t, 64> failsObj;
DoStuff(passesObj); // passes correctly
DoStuff(shouldPassObj); // currently fails, want to make pass
DoStuff(failsObj); // correctly fails
}

You're too focused on new language features instead of old techniques. If you want a template function that only works if the type given is any instance of MyTemplateClass which takes as its first parameter char, then write that:
template<int32_t N>
void DoStuff(const MyTemplateClass<char, N> &myObj)
{
// test passed!
}
This is standard template argument deduction, not C++17 if constexpr gymnastics. This will fail to be called for any type other than one generated from the MyTemplateClass template instantiated with char.
It's possible to have a more generalized solution using template parameter packs, but since all parameters in a pack must be of one kind of template parameter (type, value, or template), you wouldn't be able to mix type and value template parameters in the same pack:
template<typename ...Args>
void DoStuff(const SomeClass<known, params, ...Args> &myObj);
That would only work if the extra arguments are type parameters, not value or template parameters. You could make Args a value parameter pack with auto, but then they couldn't be types. C++ has no mechanism to make a template parameter of known kind.

If DoStuff() receive only MyTemplateClass objects, you can use template deduction
template <typename T, std::int32_t N>
void DoStuff (MyTemplateClass<T, N> const & myObj)
{
if constexpr ( std::is_same_v<char, T> )
{
// test passed!
}
else
{
// not passed
}
}
Another solution could be add a constexpr value in MyTemplateClass
template <typename T, std::int32_t N>
class MyTemplateClass
{ using type = T };
template<typename C>
void DoStuff(const C& myObj)
{
if constexpr ( std::is_same_v<typename C::type, char> )
{
// test passed!
}
else
{
// not passed
}
}
A third solution could be a custom type-trait to extract N
template <typename>
struct getT;
template <typename T, std::int32_t N>
struct getT<MyTemplateClass<T, N>
{ using type = T };
template<typename C>
void DoStuff(const C& myObj)
{
if constexpr ( std::is_same_v<typename getT<C>::type, char> )
{
// test passed!
}
else
{
// not passed
}
}

Related

How can I have a function pointer template as a template parameter?

I am trying to create a class template that expects a type and a function pointer as template parameters. The function pointer is expected to be a member function of the type passed in. I want the user of the class template to be able to pass in a void member function of the type passed in. That member function will then be called on instances of the type passed in every time a certain function of the class template is called. It's a bit hard to explain but it's supposed to work sort of like this:
template<Type, Function> // For the purpose of explaining it
class Foo
{
public:
template<Args... args>
void callOnAll(Args... args)
{
for(Type* ptr : ptrs_)
{
ptr->Function(std::forward<Args>(args)...);
}
}
private:
std::vector<Type*> ptrs_;
}
Assuming that something like this is possible (which I realize it might not be), the key would have to be getting the template parameters for the class right, and getting the update function right. This is what I've come up with but I still can't get it to work:
template<typename T, template<typename... Args> void(T::*func)(Args... args)>
class EngineSystem
{
public:
template<typename... Args>
void update(Args... args)
{
for (T* handler : handlers_)
{
((*handler).*func)(std::forward<Args>(args)...);
}
}
private:
std::vector<T*> handlers_;
};
The code above does not compile. It points me to the line where I declare the template parameters for the class, underlines void and says expected 'class' or 'typename'.
Is it clear what I'm trying to achieve, and is it possible?
C++ doesn't allow non-type template template parameters. That means you can't have a parameter-pack for your member-function pointer parameter.
Assuming you're using C++17 or newer, you can use an auto template parameter instead:
template<typename T, auto func>
public:
template<typename... Args>
void update(Args... args)
{
for (T* handler : handlers_)
{
(handler->*func)(std::forward<Args>(args)...);
}
}
private:
std::vector<T*> handlers_;
};
Live Demo
Technically that will accept any object for func, but assuming update is called, then (handler->*func)(std::forward<Args>(args)...) still has to be well-formed or compilation will fail.
If you want compilation to fail even if update never gets called, you could use some type traits and a static_assert (or some SFINAE hackery, if you need it) to ensure that func is actually a pointer to a member function of T:
template <typename T, typename U>
struct IsPointerToMemberOf : std::false_type {};
template <typename T, typename U>
struct IsPointerToMemberOf<T, U T::*> : std::true_type {};
template <typename T, typename U>
struct IsPointerToMemberFunctionOf
: std::integral_constant<
bool,
IsPointerToMemberOf<T, U>::value && std::is_member_function_pointer<U>::value
>
{};
template<typename T, auto func>
class EngineSystem
{
static_assert(IsPointerToMemberFunctionOf<T, decltype(func)>::value, "func must be a pointer to a member function of T");
//...
};
Live Demo
#include <iostream>
#include <vector>
template <typename T, typename... Args>
class EngineSystem
{
public:
EngineSystem(void(T::*fun)(Args... args)): fun(fun)
{
}
void update(Args... args)
{
for (T* handler : handlers_)
{
(handler->*fun)(std::forward<Args>(args)...);
}
}
void push(T* t){
handlers_.push_back(t);
}
private:
void(T::*fun)(Args... args);
std::vector<T*> handlers_;
};
struct A {
int x = 3;
void fn(int a, int b){
std::cout << a << b << x;
}
};
template <typename T, typename... Args>
auto makeEngine(void(T::*fun)(Args... args)){
return EngineSystem<T, Args...>(fun);
}
int main() {
EngineSystem<A, int, int> as(&A::fn);
// or deduce types automatically
auto es = makeEngine(&A::fn);
A a;
es.push(&a);
es.update(1,2);
return 0;
}
https://gcc.godbolt.org/z/Pcdf9K9nz

How to make traits to accept a parameter pack?

I define some type traits like this:
template <typename T>
struct has_something
{
static constexpr bool value = false;
};
template <>
struct has_something<int>
{
static constexpr bool value = true;
};
template <typename T>
constexpr bool has_something_v = has_something<T>::value;
And a function template which is has_something_v is a requirement for function parameter:
template <typename T, typename = std::enable_if_t<has_something_v<T>>>
void some_function(const T temp)
{
}
When i call it with wrong type:
struct wrong_type
{
};
void f ()
{
some_function(wrong_type());
}
compiler give me a proper error message:
/tmp/untitled/main.cpp:23: candidate template ignored: requirement 'has_something_v<wrong_type>' was not satisfied [with T = wrong_type]
but when i called with another template function:
template <typename ...T, typename = std::enable_if_t<has_something_v<T...>>>
void some_function(const T... args)
{
(some_function(args), ...);
}
void f ()
{
some_function(1, 2, a());
}
compiler give me really bad and confusing error message because i don't have a parameter pack acceptable traits :
Compiler error message
And if i remove std::enable_if from last template function, everything work fine until i send a wrong_type type to function which result is in crashing program.
For parameter pack, i wrote this:
template <typename ...T>
struct has_something
{
static bool value;
static constexpr bool c(T... args)
{
value = (args && ...);
return value;
}
};
template <>
struct has_something<int>
{
static constexpr bool value = true;
};
template <typename ...T>
const bool has_something_v = has_something<T...>::value;
But it still fail.
How could i write a acceptable parameter pack type traits ?
If you want to make the trait accept a parameter pack and it's value be true only when the parameter pack has a single type and that type is int you need to change only little on your code:
#include <iostream>
#include <type_traits>
template <typename...T>
struct has_something : std::false_type {};
template <>
struct has_something<int> : std::true_type {};
template <typename... T>
constexpr bool has_something_v = has_something<T...>::value;
int main() {
std::cout << has_something_v<int>;
std::cout << has_something_v<double>;
std::cout << has_something_v<int,double>;
}
Using std::true_type and std::false_type makes traits a bit shorter to write. I only had to make the trait accept a parameter pack, the specialization can stay the same.
Last but not least you should pick a better name. For example is_one_int would be much better than something.
PS: SFINAE can be used to create compiler errors, but often a simple static_assert is the better choice to get a clean message:
template <typename...T>
void foo(T...args) {
static_assert( is_one_int_v<T...>, " put nice message here");
}
SFINAE is the tool of choice when you want to disambiguate different overloads, but if a function should simply fail without alternative then a static_assert is simpler.

Variadic template parameter order problem

I have a templated function wrapper that I am attempting to update to C++11 syntax (variadic paremeters).
My issue is that I am caught in a "catch 22" where 'Args...' must be the last template parameter, but at the same time, cannot be defined after the function pointer template parameter.
Any idea if this can actually be solved?
template <typename... Args, void(*Function)(Args...)>
class function
{
public:
void operator ()(Args... args) const
{
(*Function)(std::forward<Args...>(args...));
}
};
A possible way is to use the template specialization
template <typename>
struct myFunc;
template <typename R, typename ... Args>
struct myFunc<R(*)(Args...)>
{
// ...
};
but, this way, you intercept (as template parameter) the type of the function pointer, not the function pointer itself; so you have to pass the function pointer in some way (constructor?).
Also observe that, if you want to use perfect forwarding, you have to transform operator() in a template method receiving arguments as universal references (&&).
Something as follows
template <typename ... As>
R operator() (As && ... args) const
{
return fun(std::forward<As>(args)...);
}
where fun is a pointer of type R(*)(Args...).
The following is a full compiling example
#include <iostream>
#include <utility>
int foo (int, long)
{ return 42; }
template <typename>
struct myFunc;
template <typename R, typename ... Args>
struct myFunc<R(*)(Args...)>
{
using funPnt = R(*)(Args...);
funPnt fun = nullptr;
myFunc (funPnt f0) : fun{f0}
{ }
template <typename ... As>
R operator() (As && ... args) const
{
return fun(std::forward<As>(args)...);
}
};
int main ()
{
myFunc<decltype(&foo)> mf0{&foo};
std::cout << mf0(1, 2l) << std::endl;
}
If you really want the pointer function as template parameter (but, this way, every function determine a different type; this can be a good or a bad thing according to your needs), you can write the myFunc struct receiving before a type (the same pointer type) and then a value of that type.
So
template <typename T, T>
struct myFunc;
template <typename R, typename ... Args, R(*Func)(Args...)>
struct myFunc<R(*)(Args...), Func>
{
template <typename ... As>
R operator() (As && ... args) const
{
return Func(std::forward<As>(args)...);
}
};
that can be declared
myFunc<decltype(&foo), foo> mf0;
If you can use C++17, you can simplify using auto for type of template values; so you can avoid the type
template <auto>
struct myFunc;
template <typename R, typename ... Args, R(*Func)(Args...)>
struct myFunc<Func>
{
template <typename ... As>
R operator() (As && ... args) const
{
return Func(std::forward<As>(args)...);
}
};
and you can create a myFunc object as follows
myFunc<&foo> mf0;
Addendum: if you can use C++17, you can define a deduction guide for the first example (pointer as member, not as template value parameter)
template <typename R, typename ... Args>
myFunc (R(*)(Args...)) -> myFunc<R(*)(Args...)>;
so, instead of
myFunc<decltype(&foo)> mf0{&foo};
you can simply write
myFunc mf0{&foo};
Off Topic: I hope that you know that you're reinventing the wheel. As suggested by NathanOliver, the standard provide std::function.

Function template taking a template non-type template parameter

How does one take a templated pointer to a member function?
By templated I mean that the following types are not known in advance:
template param T is class of the pointer to member
template param R is the return type
variadic template param Args... are the parameters
Non-working code to illustrate the issue:
template <???>
void pmf_tparam() {}
// this works, but it's a function parameter, not a template parameter
template <class T, typename R, typename... Args>
void pmf_param(R (T::*pmf)(Args...)) {}
struct A {
void f(int) {}
};
int main() {
pmf_tparam<&A::f>(); // What I'm looking for
pmf_param(&A::f); // This works but that's not what I'm looking for
return 0;
}
Is it possible to achieve the desired behavior in C++11?
I don't think this notation is possible, yet. There is proposal P0127R1 to make this notation possible. The template would be declared something like this:
template <auto P> void pmf_tparam();
// ...
pmf_tparam<&S::member>();
pmf_tparam<&f>();
The proposal to add auto for non-type type parameters was voted into the C++ working paper in Oulu and the result was voted to become the CD leading towards C++17 also in Oulu. Without the auto type for the non-type parameter, you'd need to provide the type of the pointer:
template <typename T, T P> void pmf_tparam();
// ...
pmf_tparam<decltype(&S::member), &S::member>();
pmf_tparam<decltype(&f), &f>();
As you've not said really what you are after in the function, the simplest is:
struct A {
void bar() {
}
};
template <typename T>
void foo() {
// Here T is void (A::*)()
}
int main(void) {
foo<decltype(&A::bar)>();
}
However if you want the signature broken down, I'm not sure there is a way to resolve the types directly, however you can with a little indirection...
struct A {
void bar() {
std::cout << "Call A" << std::endl;
}
};
template <typename R, typename C, typename... Args>
struct composer {
using return_type = R;
using class_type = C;
using args_seq = std::tuple<Args...>;
using pf = R (C::*)(Args...);
};
template <typename C, typename C::pf M>
struct foo {
static_assert(std::is_same<C, composer<void, A>>::value, "not fp");
typename C::return_type call(typename C::class_type& inst) {
return (inst.*M)();
}
template <typename... Args>
typename C::return_type call(typename C::class_type& inst, Args&&... args) {
return (inst.*M)(std::forward<Args...>(args...));
}
};
template <class T, typename R, typename... Args>
constexpr auto compute(R (T::*pmf)(Args...)) {
return composer<R, T, Args...>{};
}
int main() {
foo<decltype(compute(&A::bar)), &A::bar> f;
A a;
f.call(a);
}
The above should do what you are after...
What you can do is
template <template T, T value>
void pmf_tparam() {}
and then
pmf_tparam<decltype(&A::f), &A::f>();
The problem is not knowing the type of the argument and wanting a template argument of that type.
With an additional decltype (still in the templated parameter), this works:
#include <iostream>
using namespace std;
template <typename T, T ptr>
void foo (){
ptr();
}
void noop() {
cout << "Hello" << endl;
}
int main() {
//Here have to use decltype first
foo<decltype(&noop), noop>();
return 0;
}

Is it possible to place function pointer in template parameter ahead of dependent type?

I have a template that has a function pointer as it's 2nd parameter and a type that the function pointer is dependent on as it's first.
i.e.
template <typename P, typename void(*fn)(P)>
auto function(P) -> otherType<P, fn>;
I want to make it so that I can just specify the function pointer in the template list without having to specify the dependent type as that type should somehow be able to be inferred from the function pointer that I specify (or maybe even the parameter list, but I think that it probably is too far down the line).
My first thought was to defer the conversion to a template parameter value, by passing a template typename and then convert to a value after the fact though template metaprogramming wizardry.
i.e.
template <typename F, typename P>
auto function(P) -> [[ something here to get otherType<P, fn> if F was a function pointer ]]
However, I'm not sure how I can do this. Any ideas?
Edit
What I'm trying to accomplish here is to make a helper function that will generate a class object. So, given what was said by StenSoft, this is what I've come up with. Unfortunately it doesn't work with a failure inside the main() function where it cannot match to the correct function due to deduction failure:
#include <iostream>
#include <functional>
template<typename T, typename F>
struct wrapper_fntor
{
T m_t;
F m_f;
wrapper_fntor(T t, F f) : m_t(t), m_f(f) {}
void invoke() { m_f(m_t); }
};
template<typename T, void(*fn)(T)>
struct wrapper_fn
{
T m_t;
wrapper_fn(T t) : m_t(t) {}
void invoke() { fn(m_t); }
};
template <typename T>
struct Wrapper;
template <typename Ret, typename P>
struct Wrapper<Ret(P)>
{
template <Ret(*fn)(P)>
static Ret function(P p)
{
return fn(std::forward<P>(p));
}
template <Ret(*fn)(P)>
static P get_param_type(P);
typedef decltype(get_param_type<Ret(P)>()) param_t;
};
template<typename F>
wrapper_fn<typename Wrapper<F>::param_t, &Wrapper<F>::function> make_wrapper(typename Wrapper<F>::param_t param)
{
return wrapper_fn<typename Wrapper<F>::param_t, &Wrapper<F>::function>(param);
}
template<typename F>
wrapper_fntor<typename Wrapper<F>::param_t, F> make_wrapper(typename Wrapper<F>::param_t param, F fntor)
{
return wrapper_fntor<typename Wrapper<F>::param_t, F>(param, fntor);
}
void function(int value)
{
std::cout << "function called " << value << std::endl;
}
int main()
{
auto x = make_wrapper<function>(3);
x.invoke();
}
demo
For a similar problem I have used a templated function inside a templated wrapper class and a macro (this actually works with any parameters and return type):
template <typename T>
struct Wrapper;
template <typename Ret, typename... Params>
struct Wrapper<Ret(Params...)>
{
template <Ret(*fn)(Params...)>
static Ret function(Params... params)
{
return fn(std::forward<Params>(params)...);
}
};
#define FUNCTION(fn) \
Wrapper<decltype(fn)>::function<fn>