I have error with field Placement
Placement field it's not a country, but diversification between facebook audience, facebook and instagram... My full request is:
account = AdAccount('act_46605285454545442')
ads = account.get_ads()
params = {
'time_range': {
'since': "2019-06-01",
'until': "2019-06-26"
},
'fields': [
AdsInsights.Field.campaign_id,
AdsInsights.Field.campaign_name,
AdsInsights.Field.adset_name,
AdsInsights.Field.ad_name,
AdsInsights.Field.spend,
AdsInsights.Field.impressions,
AdsInsights.Field.clicks,
AdsInsights.Field.buying_type,
AdsInsights.Field.objective,
AdsInsights.Field.actions,
AdsInsights.Field.cpm,
AdsInsights.Field.account_currency,
AdsInsights.Field.placement,
],
'level': 'ad',
'time_increment': 'all_days',
}
async_job = account.get_insights_async(fields = params.get('fields'), params=params)
And it gives me error: "placement is not valid for fields param"
To my knowledge "country" isn't a field, its a breakdown. Sounds like you have it in the wrong place in your request. Can't know for sure though, because you haven't posted any other details.
Related
I am using Facebook Graph v7.0 to access Instagram data.
I can get comments made on instagram media using the following query:
Request:
https://graph.facebook.com/v7.0/18132613492054980?fields=id,ig_id,caption,timestamp,owner,username,media_type,permalink,children,comments.limit(100){hidden,id,like_count,media,text,timestamp,user,username},comments_count&access_token
Response:
{
"id": "18132613492054980",
"ig_id": "2263043983231761272",
"caption": "Sprite",
"timestamp": "2020-03-12T06:51:27+0000",
"owner": {
"id": "17841430463493290"
},
"username": "jobyjohn123456",
"media_type": "IMAGE",
"permalink": "https://www.instagram.com/p/B9n8oM7nTt4/",
"comments": {
"data": [
{
"hidden": false,
"id": "18132938077057326",
"like_count": 0,
"media": {
"id": "18132613492054980"
},
"text": "Nice sprite \u0040yziaf__07",
"timestamp": "2020-03-12T06:52:27+0000",
"username": "zimba_birbal"
}
]
},
"comments_count": 2
}
In the response, I do not get the User Id of user who commented. It just includes the username of the commenter.
Though, I pass user in the query, the result does not include it.
Do I need any special permission to get user id of the user who commented in the comment response?
There is Facebook API "business discovery" to get the user details of other Instagram User.
API request:
https://graph.facebook.com/178430463490?fields=business_discovery.username(user_name_you_wantto_get_its_IgUserId){followers_count,media_count,username,ig_id}
Response:
We can pass the user name in that API request, then we will get the Instagram User Id.
The documentation says it has one limitation, this will not work for "age-gated Instagram Business IG Users" but I do not exactly know what it means. When I tested for both older Instagram account and new Instagram account (just recently created account) and this API is returning data for both.
When I tested for private Instagram account, it did not work so it seems this api works only for business account.
If that api does not work, there is one workaround. The following request help to get User Id using its username but I have not found any API documentation regarding this API. It looks like this is not a standard API and moreover it does not need any token.
https://www.instagram.com/user_name_you_wantto_get_its_IgUserId/?__a=1
Let's say that I have a SaaS based on Django backend that processes the data of the users and write everything to the Elasticsearch. Now I would like to give users access to search and request their data stored in ES using all possible search requests available in ES. Obviously the user should have only access to his data, not to other user's data. I am aware that it can be done in a lot of different ways but I wonder what is safe and the best solution? At this point I store everything in one index and type in the way shown below but I can do this in any way.
"_index": "example_index",
"_type": "example_type",
"_id": "H2s-lGsdshEzmewdKtL",
"_score": 1,
"_source": {
"user_id": 1,
"field1": "example1",
"field2": "example2",
"field3": "example3"
}
I think that the best way would be to associate every document with the user_id. The user would send for example GET request with body and authorization header with Token. I would use Token to extract id of the user for example in this way
key = request.META.get('HTTP_AUTHORIZATION').split()[1]
user_id = Token.objects.get(key=key).user_id
After this I would redirect his request to ES and only data that meet requirements and belongs to this user would be returned. Of course I could do this like shown above where I also add field user_id. For example I could use post_filter in this way:
To every request I would add something like this:
,
"post_filter": {
"match": {
"user_id": 1
}
}
For example the user sends GET with body
{
"query": {
"regexp": {
"tag": ".*example.*"
}
}
}
and I change this in my backend and redirect request to ES with body:
{
"query": {
"regexp": {
"tag": ".*example.*"
}
},
"post_filter": {
"match": {
"user_id": 1
}
}
}
but it doesn't seem to me that including this field in _source is a good idea. I am almost sure that it can be solved in a more optimal way than post_filtering. I see a lot of information about authorization in ES however I can’t find how can I associate document with user_id and then search only his documents without post_filtering. Any ideas?
UPDATE
My current solution looks in they way shown below however as I mentioned I believe that it is not optimal way. If anyone has an idea how can I solve this in the way described above I will be grateful for help.
I send for example
{
"query": {
"regexp": {
"tag": ".*test.*"
}
}
}
In Django backend I just do
key = request.META.get('HTTP_AUTHORIZATION').split()[1]
user_id = Token.objects.get(key=key).user_id
body = json.loads(request.body)
body['post_filter'] = {"match": {"user_id": user_id}}
res = es.search(index="pictures", doc_type="picture", body=body)
output = []
for hit in res['hits']['hits']:
output.append(hit["_source"])
return Response(
{'output': output},
status=status.HTTP_200_OK)
In elasticsearch 7.1, you have now basic security in the free version of elasticsearch. Thanks to that, you can control per indice thé Access of your user.
What is the proper way to identify if the author of a post is a user or a page?
v2.8/OrangeESP/feed?fields=id,from{id,name,link}
"data": [
{
"id": "118067454874491_1584993008181921",
"from": {
"id": "1112315252115029",
"name": "Clara Barranquero",
"link": "https://www.facebook.com/app_scoped_user_id/1112315252115029/"
}
},
I currently use the "from.link" for that and if it is of form
https://www.facebook.com/app_scoped_user_id// then is a User
if it's of from
https://www.facebook.com/ then it is a Page
In v2.4 I could have included from{category} in the response and if that was not empty it meant the author is a Page.
Include a field that´s only available in the Page or User table:
https://developers.facebook.com/docs/graph-api/reference/page/
https://developers.facebook.com/docs/graph-api/reference/user/
Checking for app_scoped_user_id in the link field is not a bad idea though.
I'm getting my page wall with the open graph.
And when someone posted a photo, I get it on the JSON
{
"id": "27888702146_10150369820322147",
"from": {
"name": "brocoli",
"category": "Record label",
"id": "27888702146"
},
"message": "Vincent Epplay / David Fenech / Jac Berrocal \u00e0 Beaubourg ce soir, 19h, gratos.",
"picture": "http://photos-f.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ak-snc7/305819_10150369820292147_27888702146_8255527_583491475_s.jpg",
"link": "https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=10150369820292147&set=a.386279807146.165840.27888702146&type=1",
"icon": "http://static.ak.fbcdn.net/rsrc.php/v1/yz/r/StEh3RhPvjk.gif",
"type": "photo",
"object_id": "10150369820292147",
"created_time": "2011-10-16T08:22:21+0000",
"updated_time": "2011-10-16T08:22:21+0000",
"likes": {
"data": [
{
"name": "brocoli",
"category": "Record label",
"id": "27888702146"
},
{
"name": "Agathe Morier",
"id": "601668526"
}
],
"count": 2
},
"comments": {
"count": 0
},
"is_published": true
}
The problem is that the picture link is a low resolution copy of the picture.
How can I get the URL of the full picture ?
Thanks!!
Best
Geoffroy
You can get different version of the photo by querying Graph API with its object_id (not photo post_id which is id in results you provided).
Once you'll request the photo by object id you'll get array of images with URLs and dimensions:
http://graph.facebook.com/10150369820292147?fields=images
If you're attempting to access posts on a Facebook Page (such as for a company) instead of typical user profile, you firstly need to fetch the feed like this:
https://graph.facebook.com/v15.0/YOUR_PAGE_ID_HERE/feed?fields=attachments&access_token=...
And then access data[0].attachments.data[0].subattachments.data[0].target.id to get the object ID (or "target ID" in this case) which you can then use to perform an additional query to obtain the higher resolution image. Increment the numbers to get additional posts and images inside each post.
All you need to do is :
http://graph.facebook.com/me?fields=picture.height(961)
// replace 961 with your required height which u want
You can do this from the main posts list now using
/v2.3/105753476132681/posts?limit=5&fields=likes.summary(true),comments.summary(true), attachments
If attachments doesn't work, try full_picture - but that just gave the 100x100 image for me as well.
Attachments returns a data hash with a 640x480 version of the image at least (not sure what my orig. photo size was)
Use this Code. Its Work for me and get Clear Image
String PICTURE_URL;
String getPicture = hashMap.get("picture");
if (getPicture.contains("_t.")) {
PICTURE_URL = getPicture.replaceAll("_t.", "_n.");
} else if (getPicture.contains("_a.")) {
PICTURE_URL = getPicture.replaceAll("_a.", "_n.");
} else if (getPicture.contains("_s.")) {
PICTURE_URL = getPicture.replaceAll("_s.", "_n.");
} else if (getPicture.contains("_q.")) {
PICTURE_URL = getPicture.replaceAll("_q.", "_n.");
}
url=new URL(PICTURE_URL);
Bitmap bitmap=BitmapFactory.decodeStream(url.openConnection().getInputStream());
((ImageView)view.findViewById(R.id.imageView_FullImage)).setImageBitmap(bitmap);
Though requesting a photo by its object_id will return an array of images with different dimensions, in some cases this approach would require an additional call to the Facebook API.
A simpler approach is to add full_picture to your list of parameters, which will extract the highest resolution image associated with the post.
/v2.2/6275848869/posts?fields=full_picture
For example, if you want to extract all the posts from a Facebook page in the past X days, with the object_id approach you'd need to call the API 3 times:
To get the page info.
To extract the list of posts and obtain the object_id for each post.
For each object_id, to retrieve the list of higher resolution images.
I'm trying to create a REST web service that exposes the following Django model:
class Person(models.Model):
uid = models.AutoField(primary_key=True)
name = models.CharField(max_length=40)
latitude = models.CharField(max_length=20)
longitude = models.CharField(max_length=20)
speed = models.CharField(max_length=10)
date = models.DateTimeField(default=datetime.datetime.now)
def __unicode__(self):
return self.name
Here's how I thought about it so far:
Get all Persons
URL: http://localhost/api/persons/
Method: GET
Querystring:
startlat=
endlat=
startlng=
endlng=
Used for getting the Persons that are within the specified coordinate range.
page=
Used for getting the specified page of the response (if the response contains multiple pages).
Returns:
200 OK & JSON
404 Not Found
Example:
Request:
GET http://localhost/api/persons/?startlat=10&endlat=15&startlng=30&endlng=60
Response:
{
"persons":
[
{ "href": "1" },
{ "href": "2" },
{ "href": "3" },
...
{ "href": "100" }
],
"next": "http://localhost/api/persons/?startlat=10&endlat=15&startlng=30&endlng=60&page=2"
}
Get info on a specified Person
URL: http://localhost/api/persons/[id]
Method: GET
Returns:
200 OK & JSON
404 Not Found
Example:
Request:
http://localhost/api/persons/5/
Response:
{
"uid": "5",
"name": "John Smith",
"coordinates": {
"latitude":"14.43432",
"longitude":"56.4322"
},
"speed": "12.6",
"updated": "July 17, 2009, 8:46 a.m."
}
How correct is my attempt so far? Any suggestions are highly appreciated.
{ "href": "1" },
1 is hardly a valid URL. You should use full URLs. Google for HATEOAS.
Also, remember to send a relevant Content-Type header. You may want to make up your own mime-type to describe the format. This gives you the option to later change the content-type (Eg. change the format after publishing). See Versioning REST Web Services
I think query parameters could be simpler and clearer. This would make the URI more readable and would allow more flexibility for future extensions:
GET http://localhost/api/persons/?latitude=10:15&longitude=30:60
You may want to enable these in the future:
GET http://localhost/api/persons/?latitude=10&longitude=60&within=5km
Seems REST-cool. Even i worked on same kind of thing, few days earlier.
The only change, i would love to do in it, is the direct link to the person details. And also some details (like name here) to identify the person, and aid me in decision to navigate further. Like...
{
"persons":
[
{ "name": "John Smith", "href": "http://localhost/api/persons/1/" },
{ "name": "Mark Henry", "href": "http://localhost/api/persons/2/" },
{ "name": "Bruce Wayne", "href": "http://localhost/api/persons/3/" },
...
{ "name": "Karl Lewis", "href": "http://localhost/api/persons/100/" }
],
"next": "http://localhost/api/persons/?startlat=10&endlat=15&startlng=30&endlng=60&page=2"
}
This way, i am giving everything, to present data as,
John
Smith
Mark
Henry
Bruce
Wayne
...
Karl Lewis
Next Page
It's ok to provide shorthand URIs in your JSON responses if you provide some templating system. Like giving a base URI as something like http://whatever.com/persons/{id}/ and then providing IDs. Then with python you can just do a format call on the string. You don't ever want to make the programmer actually look at and understand the meaning of the URIs, which isn't necessary when you use templates.
You might want to take a look at pre-existing REST middleware. I know they saved me a lot of time. I'm using http://code.google.com/p/django-rest-interface/. And a snippet of the urls.py
json_achievement_resource = Collection(
queryset = Achievement.objects.all(),
permitted_methods = ('GET',),
responder = JSONResponder(paginate_by = 10)
)
urlpatterns += patterns('',
url(r'^api/ach(?:ievement)?/(.*?)/json$', json_achievement_resource),
)