we are currently setting up our automatic testing for one of our CakePHP Applications. First of we are trying the Cake Core tests with a fresh CakePHP 2.7.11. (Don't worry as soon as the tests are all up and running, we will be upgrading ;-) ) Unfortunatly the CakeSocketTest::testEnableCrypto() fails everythim with the following message:
SocketException: stream_socket_enable_crypto(): SSL operation failed with code 1. OpenSSL Error messages:
error:1408F10B:SSL routines:SSL3_GET_RECORD:wrong version number
I am guessing it has something to do with the Testservers setup. But I am not sure where to start my search.
If anybody has a hint what I could do it would be very appreciated.
Thanks!
[UPDATE]
public function testEnableCrypto() {
// testing on ssl server
$this->_connectSocketToSslTls();
$this->assertTrue($this->Socket->enableCrypto('sslv3', 'client'));
$this->Socket->disconnect();
// testing on tls server
$this->_connectSocketToSslTls();
$this->assertTrue($this->Socket->enableCrypto('tls', 'client'));
$this->Socket->disconnect();
}
Related
I am using aspnetboilerplate 5.1.0.
In the ProjectName.Web.Tests I have run into a situation that I cannot solve.
I have set up web tests for my controller using [Fact] or [Theory].
When I attempt to run the tests using GetResponseAsString(string url, HttpStatusCode expectedStatusCode = HttpStatusCode.OK) found in the webtestbase class. All the tests fail.
Here is an example of my Test:
[Fact]
public async Task Index_Test()
{
//Act
var response = await GetResponseAsStringAsync(
GetUrl<HomeController>(nameof(HomeController.Index))
);
//Assert
response.ShouldNotBeNullOrEmpty();
}
The Tests all fail on this:
Message:
Shouldly.ShouldAssertException : response.StatusCode
should be
HttpStatusCode.OK
but was
HttpStatusCode.NotFound
I have other aspnetboilerplate projects in version 3.8.3 and 4.2.1 and the web tests work just fine. So I'm not sure why the server is not able to find the action methods on my controllers.
The service tests found in the ProjectName.Tests project run just fine.
I found the culprit. The problem I was experiencing was due to attempting to copy a project for web unit tests from one of the aspnetboilerplate project template repositories and updating all of the references and class names to match the names and namespaces in the destination VS solution.
I submitted a similar question on the aspnetboilerplate github account.
https://github.com/aspnetboilerplate/aspnetboilerplate/issues/5463.
Ultimately, here is what happened.
After going through the same process with a newer project. I found that In the
class file that would by default be named AbpProjectNameWebTestBase.cs in the method
protected override IWebHostBuilder CreateWebHostBuilder()
{
return base
.CreateWebHostBuilder()
.UseContentRoot(ContentRootFolder.Value)
.UseSetting(WebHostDefaults.ApplicationKey, typeof(AbpProjectNameWebModule).Assembly.FullName);
}
I mistakenly replaced AbpProjectNameWebModule with AbpProjectNameTestModule instead of AbpProjectNameWebMvcModule. This was trying to use the Application Service Unit test project as the web project. Therefore it could not find any of the referenced URI's and therefore returned httpStatusCode.NotFound.
After fixing this reference. I started getting exceptions that pertained to the public void Configure(IApplicationBuilder app, IWebHostEnvironment env, ILoggerFactory loggerFactory) method.
These were things like adding app.UseAuthentication() and app.UseAuthorization() as well as needing to add a Middleware to provide a ClaimsIdentity and ClaimsPrincipal for the context.User (i.e. app.UserMiddleware<TestAuthenticationMiddleware>())
Now, I am able to get my web unit tests to run as I had in previous versions.
I tried to follow rigorously this basic "QUnit for Google Apps Script" tutorial: https://blog.ohheybrian.com/2019/11/unit-testing-gas-part-1-qunit-setup/
But when I connect to the deployed web-app, I get this error "Error: An error has occurred on the server. We apologize for this and invite you to try again later. (line 0, "undefined" file)".
So I tried to make a basic web-app with just this code to make sure a simple web-app works fine:
function doGet(e) {
var params = JSON.stringify(e);
return HtmlService.createHtmlOutput(params);
}
And it works.
But when I just had this line "QUnit.helpers(this);" and the QUnit library, I get the error message mentioned before.
Any idea of what is wrong?
I'm really surprised that Google Developers still not provide a builtin testing framework for GAS and related tutorials. It could encourages to make clean code.
Best regards,
Florent
I Was testing EmberJs application with Qunit and karma runner and it was working all good.
Then I had to integrate faye into the application which went well but then on running my test suite, it shows following error and crashes:
ReferenceError: Faye is not defined
The error is thrown where, I am defining the client in emberjs
client = new Faye.Client(uri);
Though this works in development, staging but not in testing.
Overhere, uri = "http://localhost:9292/faye"
faye.js is included in vendor.js(single js file which have all the js plugins including ember.js and ember-data.js itself) which is loaded before app.js(file where above line exists)
The reason of that weird behavior is related to the following lines in Faye:
if (typeof module !== 'undefined')
module.exports = Faye;
else if (typeof window !== 'undefined')
window.Faye = Faye;
Source: https://github.com/faye/faye/blob/master/javascript/faye.js#L143
So if module is not undefined(meaning it is defined) then module.exports will be set object, if not, window.Faye will be set.
If you use a debugger and set a breakpoint on that line you will that module is actually defined, why? it is a QUnit global helper method!
Why Faye does this? I guess because it can be run in a NodeJS environment (you can read more about module.exports here).
As I see it you have 2 possible solutions:
Require Faye before QUnit.
Patch Faye to ignore the existence of module in window.
I've encountered the same behavior while using Teaspoon with QUnit.
Making Teaspoon require Faye before QUnit seems like a bad idea and will be probably in ugly hack.
I've ended up with patching Faye to make it skip the module check, not so beautiful either, but I believe this is reasonable.
The method below is working as intended when running through tests in MS test and through a Console application. When running it through a NUnit test I get an WebException.
Has any one else had this problem, and is there a way around it? It is not an option to use another testing framework.
public void Download(string username, string password, string dwlFileName, string dwlUrl)
{
var webClient = new WebClient();
webClient.Headers.Add("Authorization",
"Basic " +
Convert.ToBase64String(new ASCIIEncoding().GetBytes(username + ":" + password)));
webClient.DownloadFile(dwlUrl, dwlFileName);
}
Exception:
System.Net.WebException was caught
HResult=-2146233079
Message=The remote server returned an error: (403) Forbidden.
Source=System
StackTrace:
at System.Net.WebClient.DownloadFile(Uri address, String fileName)
at System.Net.WebClient.DownloadFile(String address, String fileName)
at TestProject.WebHelper.Download(String username, String password, String dwlFileName, String dwlUrl) in TestProject.WebHelper...
InnerException: null
Enviroment
Visual Studio 2012
NUnit 2.6.3
Any help would be much appreciated. Thanks! :)
EDIT
Have tried Nunit testrunner and resharpner test runner. Both fails.
I used wireshark to examine the the data sent. And found out there is one more call on the nunit test then the ms-test.
Until you answer the question, one thing to keep in mind is that the actual test runs under the process of the test runner. If the runner has some issues/restrictions those might interfere probably.
Do you have multiple tests that try to access that URL? In that case the server might have some security policies and will drop requests that might consider to be Denial of Service(too similar that come in too often).
Try adding a user agent header: webClient.Headers.Add("user-agent", "Other");
I've been having problems to access to my EJB services from a standalone client i've developed on grails 2.0.3. The EJB services are deployed on a glassfish server (Java). I tested this code on a netbeans tester class to access the EJBs:
Properties p = new Properties();
p.put("java.naming.factory.initial", "com.sun.enterprise.naming.SerialInitContextFactory");
p.setProperty("java.naming.factory.url.pkgs", "com.sun.enterprise.naming");
p.setProperty("java.naming.factory.state", "com.sun.corba.ee.impl.presentation.rmi.JNDIStateFactoryImpl");
p.setProperty("org.omg.CORBA.ORBInitialHost", INTEGRATION_IP);
p.setProperty("org.omg.CORBA.ORBInitialPort", CORBA_PORT);
ctx = new InitialContext(p);
try {
this.admAuth = (AdmAuthenticationRemote) this.ctx.lookup(Tester.AUTHENTICATION_SERVICE_JNDI);
}catch(Exception e){
...
}
This Tester.AUTHENTICATION_SERVICE_JNDI is a variable tha contains the path to the deployed service, in this case something like "java:global/..." that represents the address to the service that is being requested. This way of accessing the services works perfectly from the tester, but when i try to do the same from grails doesn't works. I am able to create the context the same way, but when i invoke the ctx.lookup() call i get an exception:
Message: Lookup failed for 'java:global/...' in SerialContext[myEnv={java.naming.factory.initial=com.sun.enterprise.naming.SerialInitContextFactory,
java.naming.factory.state=com.sun.corba.ee.impl.presentation.rmi.JNDIStateFactoryImpl, java.naming.factory.url.pkgs=com.sun.enterprise.naming}
Cause: javax.naming.NamingException: Unable to acquire SerialContextProvider for SerialContext[myEnv={java.naming.factory.initial=com.sun.enterprise.naming.SerialInitContextFactory,
java.naming.factory.state=com.sun.corba.ee.impl.presentation.rmi.JNDIStateFactoryImpl, java.naming.factory.url.pkgs=com.sun.enterprise.naming}
[Root exception is java.lang.RuntimeException: Orb initialization erorr]
The main exception is a naming exception, which means that it failed in the ctx.lookup(), but the cause is the orb initialization exception, which has another exception stack:
java.lang.RuntimeException: Orb initialization erorr
Caused by: java.lang.RuntimeException: java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Can not set long field com.sun.corba.ee.impl.orb.ORBDataParserImpl.waitForResponseTimeout to java.lang.Integer
Caused by: java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Can not set long field com.sun.corba.ee.impl.orb.ORBDataParserImpl.waitForResponseTimeout to java.lang.Integer
I'm really lost here. I've been having a lot of problems to get this going on grails, I had to get all glassfish jars (libs and modules) so it could make the InitialContext() call, but now i'm not sure if this is still a jar problem or a configuration problem or what it is.
I know that IllegalArgumentException occurs when u try to assign incompatible types in java, but i'm not setting anything like that, so i assume its an internal method initialization.
So the question is why is this exception coming up??
Is there another way to invoke my services from grails that works better??
The error is that you're trying to run your web application using the tomcat plugin in grails (using the command grails run-app). The problem is that when you try to create the InitialContext (com.sun.enterprise.naming.SerialInitContextFactory) groovy gives you an error casting some types if you're using the client libraries for GF 3.1. (I know that this is the problem, but I really don't know the reason for this. Because in theory this should work)
If you generate the .war file and you deploy in an AppServer, you can connect to your EJBs without problems. And if you deploy it on another GF server you don't have to import any of the client jars.
This will work perfect on production, the only problem is that you must compile and deploy your app on the GF server with every little change, and this is a bit annoying in development.
If you want to work outside of GF and using the command "grails run-app", you must modify two of the .jar GF 3.1 on your remote server, where you have the grails application:
1- The jar file $GLASSFISH_HOME/modules/glassfish-corba-omgapi.jar
You should search in the web the class com.sun.corba.ee.spi.orb.ParserImplBase, and modify this part
Field field = getAnyField(name);
field.setAccessible(true);
field.set(ParserImplBase.this, value);
for this
if (name.equalsIgnoreCase("waitForResponseTimeout")) {
Object newValue = new Long(1800000);
Field field = getAnyField(name);
field.setAccessible(true);
field.set(ParserImplBase.this, newValue);
} else {
Field field = getAnyField(name);
field.setAccessible(true);
field.set(ParserImplBase.this, value);
}
this should resolve the java.lang.IllegalArgumentException
2- The jar file $GLASSFISH_HOME/modules/glassfish-corba-orb.jar
you must delete the javax.rmi.CORBA.PortableRemoteObjectClass class of this library, because this class have conflicts with one used by the grails plugin
PS:
If you do not want to have the GF client jars in your grails application, you can add to the classpath of your client machine the following libraries
$GLASSFISH_HOME/modules/ejb-container.jar
$GLASSFISH_HOME/modules/ejb.security.jar
$GLASSFISH_HOME/modules/management-api.jar
If you use the grails console with the grails run-app command, must modify the configuration file $GRAILS_HOME/conf/groovy-starter.conf whit this
load $GLASSFISH_HOME/modules/ejb-container.jar
load $GLASSFISH_HOME/modules/ejb.security.jar
load $GLASSFISH_HOME/modules/management-api.jar