Which version of openMP is supported by icpc 13.01? - c++

I'm using the icpc, version 13.01 for compiling my c++ code. Since I want to use openMP for parallelization, I want to know which version of it is supported by the compiler. I found some methods to find it out for g++ compiler, but not for ipcp... Can anyone offer a hint?

If it's iteresting for someone else: After spending more time on research I found out, that it should support openmp version 3.1:
https://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/intel-c-and-fortran-compilers-now-support-the-openmp-31-specification/
The comment of Jeff also is very helpful!

Related

Is there a difference between Apple Clang and OpenMP-enabled Clang from Homebrew?

I want to know if there are any advantages in Apple's provided Clang compiler compared to the Clang compiler that comes with OpenMP available from Homebrew?
Will there be any performance loss if switching to OpenMP Clang (regardless of the multi-threading ability)?
I also found this old question that has no good answer
Update
I compiled the OOFEM using Apple's Clang and mainstream Clang and ran the same problem,
Apple's Clang: Real time consumed: 000h:01m:26s
Mainstream Clang: Real time consumed: 000h:01m:24s
With multi-threading enabled also the performance is similar.
One difference that I also noticed, is that Apple's Clang seems to ignore some CMake options e.g. -DOpenMP_CXX_FLAGS="-I/usr/local/opt/libomp/include" has no effect with Apple's Clang while works fine with the mainstream Clang.
Is there a difference?
As stated that answers itself. They're two different compilers and we don't know what Apple have done inside theirs. We do know that they don't provide OpenMP support, so that is at least one difference.
Will there be any performance loss if switching to OpenMP Clang
(regardless of the multi-threading ability)?
I doubt it, but since you're clearly measuring performance and playing with both compilers, you seem in a good position to tell us :-)

Some troubles with compiler mingw_w64

Yesterday I started making some project and today I check out that my compiler (mingw_w64) is the newest one which I find in Internet (8.1) but I don't have all functions from C++20. So maybe someone know how to figure out this? If it somehow help my IDE is QT creator.
C++ ISO standards and compilers do not progress at the same pace or with the same priorities. Also, C++ standards are available (drafts) before they are complete or officially published: quite often, compilers partially support the draft specs. The good side of this is that there are tables telling you what feature of a given standard is supported by a given version of GCC. You can find such a table for GCC here.
The current latest release of GCC is GCC 11 and C++20 support has been available since GCC 10.
Another compiler is LLVM/Clang, but I don't believe their C++20 support is on the same level as GCC yet, though I excpect it to catch up soon.
Get the latest MinGW-w64 GCC build from: http://winlibs.com/

How can i check how much specific g++ version support C++11

I know this website describing how much specific g++ version support C++11
But It seem not clear for me, Because if we consider <thread> or <chrono>, i don't know which Language Feature represent these functionality.
The problem with these two things you mentioned is that these are not features of the compiler, but of the library. Another problem is that support for them depends on the "implementation", so for example it may work on Linux, but not work for given "variant" of MinGW on Windows...
Here is the website that answers your question - documentation of libstdc++ (used in GCC): https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/libstdc++/manual/status.html#status.iso.2011

Run C++ Code Online?

Is there a website I can go to to run C++ code online? I have seen a few compilers, but is there one that can also receive input from cin? I want one that can basically host a C++ .exe online, and even more preferable is if it is like the VC++ platform.
You may want to give rextester a try. Currently g++ 4.7.2 with boost libraries and ability to supply compiler args.
Edit
Visual C++ is also supported now.
http://ideone.com/ Can compile several languages, and supports stdin
Yes, Ideone can do that. It's possible to specify stdin there.
Edit: Microsoft's online compiler seems to no longer be active :(
Microsoft research have made an online version of Visual C++ here: http://webcompiler.cloudapp.net/.
It (currently?) only compiles the code and does not run it so you won't be able to check cin though :(
Running code is now supported.
Currently the best online tools seem to be
Special Online Compilers
https://cppinsights.io shows, how C++ introduces conversions, etc. and interprets the source code (current clang based)
https://godbolt.org compare C++ compilers, show disassembly, run (many current compilers including Microsoft VCC and embedded compilers)
http://quick-bench.com create and compare benchmarks (current g++ and clang)
https://www.onlinegdb.com, includes gdb debugger (g++ 7.4.0)
Online Compilers that let you set compile flags
https://wandbox.org (current g++ and clang)
http://coliru.stacked-crooked.com (g++ 9.2.0)
https://repl.it/languages/cpp11 (clang 7.0.0)
https://www.tutorialspoint.com/compile_cpp11_online.php = codingground (g++ 7.1.1)
https://tio.run/#cpp-clang (g++ 8.3.1 and clang 7.0.1)
https://rextester.com/l/cpp_online_compiler_gcc (g++ 7.4.0, clang 6.0.0, VS C++ 2015 Update 1)
Online Compilers that do not let you set compile flags
https://www.jdoodle.com (g++ 9.2.0)
https://www.codechef.com/ide (g++ 9.1.0)
https://ideone.com (g++ 8.3.0 and clang 8.0.0)
https://paiza.io (clang 8.0.0)
https://www.codiva.io/c (clang 7.1.0)
https://code.labstack.com/cpp (g++ 8.3.0)
All listed compilers support C++17 code
Perhaps the following site is what you're aiming for: http://codepad.org/
There is Wandbox.org, which offers GCC and Clang to its latest versions (as of Nov 2018). It has stdin.
I wouldn't say it's a VC++ platform though.
TutorialsPoint's C++ Coding Ground lets you save and compile multiple source files at a time, which can be useful at times, and gives you a GNU bash console to play around with. It's not as convenient for sharing code as sites like Ideone, however.
[Note: While it only has links to C++, C++0x, and C++11 environments, you can compile code for C++14 by specifying the compiler option -std=c++1y. I'm not sure if it has any experimental C++17 support, however.]
repl.it can compile, run, and execute C++ and C++11. It's also interactive and you can ask for user input in realtime.

C++11 Compiler: Closest to the standard and how close?

I'm interested in learning C++ more thoroughly now that C++11 is apparently ratified. What compiler currently implements the closest thing available to full C++11 support? How close is said compiler to full support? Are there still major features missing or just language lawyer minutiae?
There's a support matrix on the Apache wiki.
I think the one Scott Meyers maintains on his homepage is pretty good:
http://www.aristeia.com/C++0x/C++0xFeatureAvailability.htm
The llvm C++ compiler "clang" has partial C++11 support; you can see its current state at http://clang.llvm.org/cxx_status.html.
There's also GCC C++0x (or C++11) status page : http://gcc.gnu.org/projects/cxx0x.html
IBM's xlC++ compiler has a basic C++11 feature support page.
To anyone reading this now, as of Jan 2013 Clang 3.2 is probably the most complete C++11 compiler, although the latest dev branch of GCC (4.8.x) is going to bring GCC back on par by the looks of it.
http://clang.llvm.org/cxx_status.html
Just look at that support table! Epic stuff. That's only accounting for currently available stable versions as well whereas the GCC table contains some 4.8 entries.
Like I said though, when GCC 4.8 hits stable release, it's going to be tight between the two again:
http://gcc.gnu.org/projects/cxx0x.html