Django South alternative? - django

After reading some older posts about Django South's features, I began wondering why there wasn't a similar tool built in to Django itself. Then I was curious if maybe something had been added these last few years.
Has something been added?
Are there any alternatives to South, or is it the accepted way of handling migrations and such?

The same thought django core developers had. Since Django 1.7, migrations is a built-in feature:
Django now has built-in support for schema migrations. It allows
models to be updated, changed, and deleted by creating migration files
that represent the model changes and which can be run on any
development, staging or production database.
Note that 1.7 is not a stable version at the moment.

Related

Django 1.8 and MongoDB?

This question is already asked on StackOverflow,
The asked questions date back to 2013, Its 2015 now and Django has grown up fast.
What is the situation of using mongodb with Django 1.8 as of 2015?
Does Django support Monogodb out of the box (with db adapters)? or another distribution like django-nonrel should be used?
I don't think Django provides out of the box support for MongoDB. It is more tailored for relational databases.
One solution could be using MongoEngine.
MongoEngine is an Object-Document Mapper, written in Python for
working with MongoDB.
You need to just configure MongoEngine with Django and then it should work comfortably.
just my thoughts and somewhat subjective and opinionated but I would say it does not work very well. I quickly disbanded the idea of trying to run Django with MongoDB, since it's auth system is heavily reliant upon a relational database to work.
There are apparently ways around this, but ultimately I decided for my project it was not worth the effort just to use MongoDB.
Does Django support Monogodb out of the box (with db adapters)?
No, it does not. If you can find a django compatible engine for mongodb, then it will work perfectly.
The good news is there is such an engine, called django-mongodb-engine; the bad news is that it relies on django-nonrel which is not updated against the latest stable version of django.
So, if you must - you can use MongoDB at the expense of not having some updated django features available to you (and more importantly, any security patches).
If you want to supplement your main database with mongodb - that is, mongodb will not be your primary database, then the process is a lot easier.
So, in summary:
django 1.8 provides no out-of-the-box support for mongodb (or other non-relational databases) as the primary data store.
support is available using the third party django-nonrel package, which is behind the current django production version.
I came across a new package that does support the latest django on MongoDB: djongo
As stated above, mongoengine does not support all contrib apps of django. Especially the auth app doesn' work on mongoengine
Djongo claims to compile SQL queries into mongodb queries. So its is essentially version agnostic and works for all versions of Django.
Disclosure: I have contributed to this package by making minor bug fixes.
I know that its been three years but for those who are wondering about MongoDB and Django now should know that the situation has not changed. Mongoengine as described earlier is a good enough tool but still there are limitations. For instance when i integrated mongodb with django using mongoengine i was not able the use elastic search with my application. Furthermore with mongoDB you loose you loose Django admin and authentications functionalities. So, MongoDB with Django is still a risky choice

Does Django natively support migrations

I've heard that all the new web frameworks like ROR, Django etc. follow the general principle of Agile and TDD. One part of following Agile and TDD is to make up your own design as you go from one iteration to other. This means that models and their schema will evolve with different versions of the app. I know that ROR supports schema migrations natively, However I'm not sure about django. My major concern is that how can I decide upfront all the schema related issues. Isn't it going back to waterfall kind of design philosophy.
I also know that there are external packages like 'south' for schema migrations. But this question is really about inquiring as to why django doesn't support migrations natively like ROR
Django 1.7 will be the first version providing schema migrations in the core source. check the dev. version of the docs regarding this topic.
Andrew Godwin, the creator of South, did this work, backed by a kickstarter project.
It is currently been added into the framework - refer Migrations and most likely will be available in version 1.7.
There is 3rd party django app south, that can be used for this purpose.
South is excellent Plugin for Schema Migrations. Hands Down.

Do we still need django-nonrel now that GAE (allegedly) supports Django out of the box?

According to this question:
Django on Google App Engine
The easiest way to get started with GAE/Django is with the Django non-rel bundle. However now that the latest Python/GAE SDK includes a build of Django, do we still need this?
What's the best-practice for getting started wth Django on GAE right now?
Thanks
Update: It seems that Web app2 is the easiest choice for new projects.
This guest article suggests that
"App Engine does come with some Django support, but this is mainly
only the templating and views."
non-rel is still seemingly your best bet. Although I'd caution you that further development and/or maintenance may not happen according to their blog.
Normal Django's models doesn't have a backend supporting GAE's datastore. Hence you can't use Django models, and hence, Django's model forms. What you'd have to do use use models derived from GAE's python db.Model(). Instead of using Django's ModelForm class for forms, you would use google.appengine.ext.db.djangoforms. Note, that's specifically for ModelForms, other forms work fine since they're not tied to the database.
I can think of two good reasons to use Django-nonrel:
1a) you have a existing project on Django. Using Django-nonrel would be the laziest way to go. Rewriting models to GAE's models isn't too hard, but it could be a small pain, especially if
1b) you use a lot of existing Django components, and you'd have to go through all of them to update the models and forms.
2) You want to hedge your bets against GAE. Using Django-nonrel will allow you to switch over to MongoDB with very little effort, since Django-nonrel has a functioning MongoDB backend. The current Django-nonrel maintainers seem to be more interested in MongoDB.
Having worked with Django-nonrel, I've so far run into some reasons why it may be a bad choice:
1) No support for ancestor queries. There's an outstanding pull request for this though. It won't be compatible with any other DB backend though.
2) ndb is coming out, and seems like it'll have a few more benefits, that likely won't see support on Django-nonrel.
If you do use GAE's native db API, the main benefit from Django would be the form validation. Otherwise, webapp2+jinja2+gae db.Models() would provide similar functionality to Django.

Migrating Built-in Django Models When Upgrading

We're using an older version of Django (1.1.1) and are preparing to upgrade to the latest version (currently 1.2) soon.
None of my searches have brought up the topic of migrating database tables (auth_user, etc.) across Django versions. Using syncdb only works for creating new tables but has no effect on existing tables.
I'm under the impression that the upgrade is not simply linking to a new version of the Django files but that we also need to manage the migration of our database since we rely on some built-in Django apps (django.contrib.auth, django.contrib.sites, etc.). We're planning to use South to manage the database migration.
Is this something handled internally by Django? Am I trying to solve a problem that doesn't exist?
There are no changes to the django.contrib.auth or django.contrib.sites models between 1.1.1 and 1.2.5 so you won't need to do any database migration.

Django and App Engine

I wanted to check the status of running Django on the Google App Engine currently and what the benefits of running django on GAE over simply using Webapp.
Django main killer feature, IMHO, is the reuseable apps and middleware. Unfortunately, most current Django apps use models or model forms (django-tags, django-reviews, django-profiles, Pinax apps).
So what are the remaining features or benefits that django has that can still run in Google App Engine (other than what's disabled: the popular django apps, session and authentication middleware, users and admin, models, etc).
Also, is there a list of the Django apps that work in App Engine as well?
app-engine-patch currently has the most of django functional, including sessions, contrib.auth, sites, and some other standard django apps. However, its main drawback (my opinion) is that it uses a zip file of a modified version of django to achieve this functionality and the current maintainers don't seem to have kept pace with current django releases. Currently it seems to be the consensus of the past and present maintainers that this approach is too cumbersome to maintain and therefore no one is currently maintaining it.
google-app-engine-django, uses a monkey patch approach of the latest django version included in the production GAE runtime, so as long as google continues to track django releases you'll be kept up to date regarding django. However, it currently has not fully ported contrib.auth, so you can only authenticate with google accounts - which can be a big drawback depending on whether you want contrib.auth User models to work as you know them on sql backends. There is also no django admin support in the helper as there is in app-engine-patch. A fork of django-app-engine-django exists which adds in some of the contrib apps, such as flatpages, sites, and sitemaps. Also note, it only works on django versions up to 1.1, until issue #3230 Django 1.2 is added to use_library, unless you upload django as a zip file.
On the horizon, the original developer of app-engine-patch has been working on the django-nonrel branch, but this may be pretty far away from being included in a django release. This django developers thread has a lot of information about these efforts.
Separately, there is a google summer of code project working on integrating some aspects of nonrel db's.
app-engine-patch gets most of those things working inside AppEngine - so you can (mostly) use straight Modelforms, use the Django users and admin, etc.
I've only used it for fairly simple projects (being quite new to django), but they claim that most Django apps will work with (at most) minor modifications on appengine. For instance, app-engine-patch uses the AppEngine Model classes rather than the Django classes; and there are some of the basic views that are too inefficient to run on Appengine.
added: google-app-engine-django is similar; but provides a BaseModel that appears identical to Django's BaseModel. My understand is that google-app-engine-django was released by Google, then forked to create app-engine-patch. The maintainers of app-engine-patch seem to have some different goals from the creators of google-app-engine-django, so you may find that one of the two suits your needs better than the other.
Google have provided some articles on running Django apps on appengine; the most recent is actually a guest post from the authors of app-engine-patch.
I've had the best success by simply picking and choosing the Django features that I need and patching them into webapp myself. In my latest project I actually just cut out the webapp stuff entirely. I still import and call several webapp utility functions, but it is mostly a hand rolled application built from the good parts of GAE and Django.
You might be interested to check out web2py, another Python framework that supposedly has less friction between GAE and a "normal" web server.
It is now quite easy to use full Django on GAE:
https://developers.google.com/appengine/articles/django-nonrel#ps
The Django version provided with App Engine has been updated to 1.2.5 with the latest SDK release (1.4.2, changelog). This version is available through the use_library() declaration, so you no longer need to mess around with monkey patching to the same extent.
The GoogleAppEngine (GAE) Python 2.7 runtime provides several third-party libraries that your application can use, in addition to the Python standard library, GAE tools, and GAE Python runtime environment. One of them is Django. The below is copied from the GAE docs page on third-party libraries:
To use Django in Python 2.7, specify the WSGI application and Django library in app.yaml:
...
handlers:
- url: /.*
script: main.app # a WSGI application in the main module's global scope
libraries:
- name: django
version: "1.2"