I have two classes:
class Article(ContentAsset):
title = models.CharField(max_length=2000)
author = models.CharField(max_length=2000, blank=True)
source = models.CharField(max_length=2000, default="")
datePublished = models.DateField(default=datetime.now)
def __unicode__(self):
return self.title
and
class PubMedArticle(Article):
pubMedID = models.CharField(max_length=100)
abstract = models.TextField(max_length=20000)
All of the PubMedArticle instances show up in the admin interface twice -- under the list of all PubMedArticle objects , and list of all Article objects. Is this normal behavior? I'd think that a subclass wouldn't normally show up in the admin list of its superclass. What's the best way to ensure that these PubMedArticle objects show up only under the PubMedArticle admin list?
This is normal behavior. From database point of view table primary key of PubMedArticle just refers to Article table. So for each record in PubMedArticle table must be a record in Article table.
Now to the admin. The are two ways:
1) Make Article model abstarct - a good idea if you dont need unique primary keys to all of your articles.
2) Customize django admin list query.
Related
I have a model OrderPage which is manytomany to Site. In Django admin, I want to restrict the selection of sites(Sites which belong to existing OrderPage can not be selected again). Can I do it with unique_together ? I get an error with following model ManyToManyFields are not supported in unique_together
class OrderPage(models.Model):
description = models.CharField(max_length=255, blank=False)
sites = models.ManyToManyField(Site)
class Meta:
unique_together = (('id', 'sites'),)
class Order(models.Model):
order_page = models.ForeignKey(OrderPage)
class OrderPageAdmin(admin.ModelAdmin):
filter_horizontal = ('sites',)
admin.site.register(OrderPage, OrderPageAdmin)
If an Site can have only one OrderPage, you don't need to worry about unique_together.
Ideally you should subclass Site and use a ForeignKey from that to OrderPage. That would natively give you what you're looking for: each site would be able to have one OrderPage, and each OrderPage multiple Sites. This would be the cleanest but you would have to use your subclass throughout the program in place of the original Site which might be more work than you want right now.
class BetterSite(Site):
order_page = models.ForeignKey('OrderPage')
The dirtier way is to keep your M2M and just set the site as unique, since there should only ever be one entry on each site in the M2M table. You would use a 'through' table so you could set the custom uniqueness value:
class OrderPage(models.Model):
description = models.CharField(max_length=255, blank=False)
sites = models.ManyToManyField(Site, through='OrderPageToSite')
class OrderPageToSite(models.Model):
order_page = models.ForeignKey(OrderPage)
site = models.ForeignKey(Site, unique=True)
(Note that I've left these simple but in your FK fields you should also consider setting on_delete and related_name)
I have just begun to play around with Django admin views, and to start off, I am trying to do something very simple: showing several fields in the listing of objects using list_display as explained here: https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/dev/ref/contrib/admin/
This is my dead simple code:
class ArticleAdmin(admin.ModelAdmin):
list_display = ('title', 'category')
Unfortunately, the list_display option is causing the columnar view to appear, but only some of the objects (40 out of 85) are now displaying in the listing. I cannot deduce why certain objects are showing over the others - their fields look like they are filled similarly. It's clearly not paginating, because when I tried it on an admin of another model, it showed only 2 objects out of about 70 objects.
What might be going on here?
[UPDATE] Article Model:
class Article(models.Model):
revision = models.ForeignKey('ArticleRevision', related_name="current_revision")
category = models.ForeignKey('meta.Category')
language = models.ForeignKey('meta.Language', default=get_default_language)
created = models.DateTimeField(auto_now_add=True, editable=False)
changed = models.DateTimeField(auto_now=True, editable=False)
title = models.CharField(max_length=256)
resources = models.ManyToManyField('oer.Resource', blank=True)
image = models.ManyToManyField('media.Image', blank=True)
views = models.IntegerField(editable=False, default=0)
license = models.ForeignKey('license.License', default=get_default_license)
slug = models.SlugField(max_length=256)
difficulty = models.PositiveIntegerField(editable=True, default=0)
published = models.NullBooleanField()
citation = models.CharField(max_length=1024, blank=True, null=True)
Before adding list_display:
After adding list_display:
[UPDATE] This behaviour occurs only when ForeignKey fields are included in list_display tuple. Any of them.
[UPDATE] Category model code:
class Category(models.Model):
title = models.CharField(max_length=256)
parent = models.ForeignKey('self')
project = models.NullBooleanField(default=False)
created = models.DateTimeField(auto_now_add=True, editable=False)
slug = models.SlugField(max_length=256, blank=True)
def __unicode__(self):
return self.title
This behavior is caused by a foreign key relation somewhere that is not declared as nullable, but nonetheless has a null value in the database. When you have a ManyToOne relationship in list_display, the change list class will always execute the query using select_related. (See the get_query_set method in django.contrib.admin.views.ChangeList).
select_related by default follows all foreign keys on each object, so any broken foreign key found by this query will cause data to drop out when the query is evaluated. This is not specific to the admin; you can interactively test it by comparing the results of Article.objects.all() to Article.objects.all().select_related().
There's no simple way to control which foreign keys the admin will look up - select_related takes some parameters, but the admin doesn't expose a way to pass them through. In theory you could write your own ChangeList class and override get_query_set, but I don't recommend that.
The real fix is to make sure your foreign key model fields accurately reflect the state of your database in their null settings. Personally, I'd probably do this by commenting out all FKs on Article other than Category, seeing if that helps, then turning them back on one by one until things start breaking. The problem doesn't have to be with a FK on an article itself; if a revision, language or category has a broken FK that will still cause the join to miss rows. Or if something they relate to has a broken FK, etc etc.
I am working with an existing database that I can not modify and having some trouble trying to deal with presenting forms for modifying the database in Django. The structure in question is as follows and all models are unmanaged.
class Persons(models.Model):
personid = models.BigIntegerField(primary_key=True, db_column='PersonID')
....
class Phones(models.Model):
phoneid = models.BigIntegerField(primary_key=True, db_column='PhoneID')
number = models.CharField(max_length=60, db_column='Number', blank=True)
type = models.CharField(max_length=15, db_column='Type', blank=True)
...
class Personsphones(models.Model):
personphoneid = models.BigIntegerField(primary_key=True, db_column='PersonPhoneID')
personid = models.ForeignKey(Persons, db_column='PersonID')
phoneid = models.ForeignKey(Phones, db_column='PhoneID')
...
I want to create a form to display all of the 'Phones' associated with a particular 'Persons' and in addition be able to modify/add/remove 'Phones' belonging to a 'Persons'. Right now the only thing I can think of is to display the 'Phones' in a modelformset and then if one is added or removed manually set the 'Personsphones' relation. Any ideas on how to best deal with this model setup?
For making changes to your models you may want to use django-south http://south.aeracode.org/docs/
As far as displaying your 'Phone' under your forms.py you may want to set up class meta like so. With this any changes made to models will reflect on change
class Meta:
model = Persons
exclude = ('user')
In models you may want to use Foreignkey fore relationships between phones and Persons. Better seen in action here https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/dev/ref/models/fields/#foreignkey
I needed to assign one or more categories to a list of submissions, I initially used a table with two foreign keys to accomplish this until I realized Django has a many-to-many field, however following the documentation I haven't been able to duplicate what I did with original table.
My question is : Is there a benefit to using many-to-many field instead of manually creating a relationship table? If better, are there any example on submitting and retrieving many-to-many fields with Django?
From the Django docs on Many-to-Many relationships:
When you're only dealing with simple many-to-many relationships such
as mixing and matching pizzas and toppings, a standard ManyToManyField
is all you need. However, sometimes you may need to associate data
with the relationship between two models.
In short: If you have a simple relationship a Many-To_Many field is better (creates and manages the extra table for you). If you need multiple extra details then create your own model with foreign keys. So it really depends on the situation.
Update :- Examples as requested:
From the docs:
class Person(models.Model):
name = models.CharField(max_length=128)
def __unicode__(self):
return self.name
class Group(models.Model):
name = models.CharField(max_length=128)
members = models.ManyToManyField(Person, through='Membership')
def __unicode__(self):
return self.name
class Membership(models.Model):
person = models.ForeignKey(Person)
group = models.ForeignKey(Group)
date_joined = models.DateField()
invite_reason = models.CharField(max_length=64)
You can see through this example that membership details (date_joined and invite_reason) are kept in addition to the many-to-many relationship.
However on a simplified example from the docs:
class Topping(models.Model):
ingredient = models.CharField(max_length=128)
class Pizza(models.Model):
name = models.CharField(max_length=128)
toppings = models.ManyToManyField(Topping)
There seems no need for any extra data and hence no extra model.
Update 2 :-
An example of how to remove the relationship.
In the first example i gave you have this extra model Membership you just delete the relationship and its details like a normal model.
for membership in Membership.objects.filter(person__pk=1)
membership.delete()
Viola! easy as pie.
For the second example you need to use .remove() (or .clear() to remove all):
apple = Toppings.objects.get(pk=4)
super_pizza = Pizza.objects.get(pk=12)
super_pizza.toppings.remove(apple)
super_pizza.save()
And that one is done too!
I have four models in my models.py which are:
models.py
class Course(models.Model):
course_code = models.CharField(max_length=100,unique=True)
title = models.CharField(max_length=200)
short = models.CharField(max_length=50)
elective_group = models.CharField(max_length=100)
class Unit(models.Model):
title = models.CharField(max_length=100)
short = models.CharField(max_length=50)
course = models.ForeignKey(Course)
class Pattern(models.Model):
pattern_name = models.CharField(max_length=200)
class ExamSchedule(models.Model):
exam_date = models.DateTimeField()
course = models.ForeignKey(Course)
pattern = models.ForeignKey(Pattern)
units = models.ManyToManyField(Units)
I have all these models register with admin site, so that i can use admin functionality for these models.
My problem is when a user creates or edits a ExamSchedule object , i want the units(field) multivalue widget should contains only those values that are associated with a course as every course can have multiple units. So if user creates an Examschedule object and after selecting a course from dropdown the unit widget should only contains those units that related to the course selected.
Django-Smart-Select could have been useful but it only supports foreign key chained and grouped selects nor ManyToManyField chained select.
Thanks
You can send the selected course with a Ajax request and do this to get the related units.
Lets say you select communication networks (cn) as the course you can get the related units like so:
cn_units = Unit.object.filter(course = 'cn').values_list('id',flat=True)
This will return a single list of all the related units to that course.
You can send this list as a response to your ajax request, iterate over this list and populate the select box for unit in ExamSchedule form. I consider plain ajax because its very flexible.