Are the following two code blocks logically equivalent? - coldfusion

Is there a logical difference between the following two blocks? And is there one form more correct than the other? They would both reside in their own function--something I omitted here.
<cfset local.result = 1 />
<cfset local.i = 1 />
<cfloop from="1" to="5" index="i">
<cfset result = result * i />
</cfloop>
And
<cfset local.result = 1 />
<cfset local.i = 1 />
<cfloop from="1" to="5" index="i">
<cfset local.result = local.result * local.i />
</cfloop>

Yes. In your second example you are making the exact same result; however, you have improved readability by explicitly identifying the scope you intend to modify--which is a good thing.
ColdFusion, will first search the LOCAL scope, so, you have not saved ColdFusion much processing; however, the code is cleaner now. If result existed in the CLIENT or COOKIE scope you would have saved ColdFusion the work of having to first evaluate four or five other scopes.
I once used to use the 'var result = 0;' style of localizing variables to a function, but, I now explicitly identify all my scopes to help ensure I have correctly scoped all variables and make the code easier to understand for others.
To summarize, the code is exactly the same to the machine but is now easier to understand for the human.

One suggestion... change:
<cfset local.i = 1 />
<cfloop from="1" to="5" index="i">
to
<cfloop from="1" to="5" index="local.i">
one less line of code, even more clear what's going on.

Related

Convert name value pairs to struct

It's been awhile since I've written this type of ColdFusion code, hence the question.
I am returning values from a .NET webservice into ColdFusion. The webservice returns an array of strings. The following code...
<cfoutput>
<cfset xArrayItems=#GetRequestedUserSettings.settingValues.getString()#>
<cfset xLen=ArrayLen(GetRequestedUserSettings.settingValues.getString())>
<cfloop index="x" from=1 to="#xLen#">
#xArrayItems[x]#<br />
</cfloop>
</cfoutput>
results in the following output ...
maxsize=50
isdomainadmin=False
seenwelcome=False
I want to put those name/value pairs into a meaningful structure so that I can reference them farther down in the code. I actually need to pass them in as a cfinvokearguments for the next webservice call.
Could someone please be kind enough to remind me how to do this in CF8? Most of what I am finding refers to newer versions.
I ended up with something quite similar to what #Henry you provided.
<cfset UserSettings = structNew()>
<cfset xArrayItems= GetRequestedUserSettings.settingValues.getString()>
<cfset xLen=ArrayLen(GetRequestedUserSettings.settingValues.getString())>
<cfloop index="x" from=1 to="#xLen#">
<cfset varName = ListGetAt(xArrayItems[x], 1, "=")>
<cfset varValue = ListGetAt(xArrayItems[x], 2, "=")>
<cfset "UserSettings.#varname#" = varValue>
</cfloop>
Not sure if an Array or a Struct is a better solution, but the both work in the end.
Slightly more readable version I can come up with that will work with CF8:
<cfset UserSettings = {}>
<cfset xArrayItems = GetRequestedUserSettings.settingValues.getString()>
<cfloop array="#xArrayItems#" index="item">
<cfset varname = ListFirst(item, "=")>
<cfset varvalue = ListRest(item, "=")>
<cfset UserSettings[varname] = varvalue>
</cfloop>

Split the session variable into an array using recreating individual session variables

The typical way government offices make you record mileage is to enter one number per input box like the example below:
So what I am trying to do is create one input box that can split the session variable into an array. Then when that session variable is split into an array I would like it to set each value in the array to its own session variable.
Mileage Input:
123456 -<cfoutput>#session.checkout.vehicle.mileage#</cfoutput>
array [1,2,3,4,5,6]
6 -<cfoutput>#session.checkout.vehicle.mileage1#</cfoutput>
5 -<cfoutput>#session.checkout.vehicle.mileage2#</cfoutput>
4 -<cfoutput>#session.checkout.vehicle.mileage3#</cfoutput>
3 -<cfoutput>#session.checkout.vehicle.mileage4#</cfoutput>
2 -<cfoutput>#session.checkout.vehicle.mileage5#</cfoutput>
1 -<cfoutput>#session.checkout.vehicle.mileage6#</cfoutput>
So then I will be able to prefill in an already created form that has the boxes split for only one per box.
Where I am super confused and trying to comprehend is that there will not always be 6 variables. Let's say the mileage is 2344. I am assuming it will need to know to start backwards, counting from the right to the left. That's why I started 6 at #session.checkout.vehicle.mileage1#
Hopefully I have not super confused anyone with what I am trying to do. And any help would be greatly appreciated!!
<cfparam name="form.mileage" default="#session.checkout.vehicle.mileage#">
...
<label for="mileage">Mileage:</label>
<input type="text" name="mileage"
id="mileage"
value="<cfoutput>#form.mileage#</cfoutput>">
Edit:
The issue I am having with this is let's say the mileage is 9000 all 0's will not show. (which is great for the first two zero's in (009000) but after the 9 those 0's would still need to show.) Do you any ideas for that issue? Or should this be a new question?
<cfset Mileage = "9000" />
<cfif mileage is not "Exempt">
<cfset Mileage = NumberFormat(trim(Mileage),"000000") />
<cfset MilArray = ReMatch("\d",Mileage) />
<cfelse>
<cfset MilArray = ["E","x","e","m","p","t"]>
</cfif>
<cfdump var="#MilArray#">
<cfif MilArray[1] is not "0">
<!---Section6 First box Odometer Reading--->
<cfpdfformparam name="E" value="#MilArray[1]#">
<cfelse>
<cfpdfformparam name="E" value="">
</cfif>
If I'm understanding, you want to divide the string into six easy to work with variables, or whatever the length of the variable is.
<cfset Mileage = "123456" />
<cfset MilArray = ReMatch("\d",Mileage) />
<cfdump var="#MilArray#" />
You can actually stick a Reverse() in there to reverse the string, this may be handy because you can have [1] at the ones place, [2] at tens, [3] at hundreds.
<cfset Mileage = "123456" />
<cfset MileageR = Reverse(Mileage) />
<cfset MilArray = ReMatch("\d",MileageR) />
<cfdump var="#MilArray#" />
\d by itself in regular expressions just means "one digit". It's the same as [0-9].
As the CFDUMP will show, ReMatch will split your mileage into an easy to work with array. If you use the reverse as above, you can say "The last digit of your mileage is #MilArray[1]#.", as an example.
Edit:
you know the \d ? is there a way to have it be either \d or only the word Exempt? is it possible to create both of those?
There are a few ways.
You can say
<cfif mileage is not "Exempt">
...
<cfelse>
<cfset MilArray = ["Exempt"]>
</cfif>
which creates a one dimensional array populated with "Exempt" as the only element, which might be useful later in your code so you know MilArray is always an array, or you can simply always work with the <cfif mileage is not "Exempt">.
A regex to accomplish the same thing is possible but it achieves the same as the above cfif, and you'd have to write exempt backwards if you're using reverse, like this
<cfset MilArray = ReMatchNoCase("\d|^Exempt$|^tpmexE$)",trim(Mileage)) />
<cfif MilArray[1] is "tpmexE"><cfset milArray = ["Exempt"] /></cfif>
Edit #2:
<cfif isDefined("session") and structKeyExists(session, 'checkout') and structKeyExists(session.checkout, 'info') and structKeyExists(session.checkout.info, 'oreading')>
<cfif isDefined("#MilArray[6]#") eq "">
<cfpdfformparam name="E" value="">
<!---Section6 First box Odometer Reading--->
<cfelse>
<cfpdfformparam name="E" value="#MilArray[6]#">
</cfif>
</cfif>
This is a task for ArrayIsDefined() (link)
<cfif isDefined("session") and structKeyExists(session, 'checkout') and structKeyExists(session.checkout, 'info') and structKeyExists(session.checkout.info, 'oreading')>
<cfset MilArray = ReMatch("\d",session.checkout.info.oreading) />
<cfif not ArrayIsDefined(MilArray,6)>
<cfpdfformparam name="E" value="">
<!---Section6 First box Odometer Reading--->
<cfelse>
<cfpdfformparam name="E" value="#MilArray[6]#">
</cfif>
.... I assume that it continues on down from here... <cfif not ArrayIsDefined(MilArray,5)>........</cfif>
</cfif>
Finally, while there's contention here on whether to use StructKeyExists() over IsDefined(), there's a narrow field where isDefined() fails.
(Don't put structures in the top level and in the variables scope. Cold Fusion gets confused--IE, don't create an object called "variables.form" or "variables.url"). Beyond that, It's mostly just semantics.
Anyway. once you have the above code working (because it's your code and your familiar with it), you might find it useful to switch to the easier to read IsDefined() version, because isDefined can check several levels deep in one condition.
<cfif isDefined("session.checkout.info.oreading')>
<cfset MilArray = ReMatch("\d",session.checkout.info.oreading) />
<cfif not ArrayIsDefined(MilArray,6)>
<cfpdfformparam name="E" value="">
<!---Section6 First box Odometer Reading--->
<cfelse>
<cfpdfformparam name="E" value="#MilArray[6]#">
</cfif>
</cfif>
Edit 3:
Leigh points out
Why so complicated? Can't you just left pad the value with spaces or zeroes? Then change the regex to check for either a digit or space? Then the array will always have six elements
This can be achieved like this:
<cfset Mileage = "exempt" />
<cfif mileage is not "Exempt">
<cfset Mileage = NumberFormat(trim(Mileage),"000000") />
<cfset MilArray = ReMatch("\d",Mileage) />
<cfelse>
<cfset MilArray = ["E","x","e","m","p","t"]>
</cfif>
<cfdump var="#MilArray#">
Which would conveniently drop Exempt into place (handy that it's 6 characters).
You need to do some prechecking before you start generating the pdf to make sure that mileage variable is Exempt or or numeric.
<cfif len((trim(mileage)) gt 6 or not ((isNumeric(trim(mileage))
or mileage is "exempt")>
<!--- The 6 above is a len-check, you may need to update that number to
something else later, but you'll have to put the same number of 0s
in the NumberFormat function.
If you change that number, and the 0s, you'll need to pad the
"Exempt array"... ie ["E","x","e","m","p","t"," "] --->
....raise a flag...
</cfif>
Here is a simpler way.
originalNumber = "123";
sixDigitNumber = right(("000000" & originalNumber), 6);
<cfoutput>
<cfloop from="1" to = "6" index="position">
do something useful with #Mid(sixDigitNumber, position, 1)#
</cfloop>
<cfoutput>

Checking for key existence in structure

I have a variable named #cfData# which contains an array of structures. As it's clear from the image, for 1st structure array there are 6 keys and for 2nd, only two keys,viz date and open.
If I run a common loop, to go through each and every key, I will get an error at second array element. So the following only works when all the keys are present in the structure:
<cfset blockedtotal = 0 />
<cfset bouncetotal = 0 />
<cfset blocked = 0/>
<cfset datetotal = 0 />
<cfloop array = #cfData# index = "i">
<cfset blockedtotal += i.blocked />
<cfset bouncetotal += i.bounce />
</cfloop>
After reading online, I got an idea of using StructKeyExists where I think I can proceed in the following way:
<cfif structKeyExists(cfData,"bounce")>
<cfoutput>Bounce:#cfData.bounce#"/></cfoutput>
<cfelse>
<cfoutput> Bounce : [none]<br/></cfoutput>
</cfif>
But I am wondering, where exactly should I insert the above code inside the cfloop? Please advise if my approach is wrong.
Update:
Thanks guys. I got it running by using the following code based on the answers and it's running fine:
<cfloop array="#cfData#" index="i">
<cfif structKeyExists(i, "date")>
<cfset counter++>
<cfoutput>#counter#</cfoutput> Date is: <cfoutput> #i.date#</cfoutput> <br/>
</cfif>
</cfloop>
you don't need a "common loop". You can loop through each struct with
<cfloop array="#cfData#" index="i">
<cfloop collection="#i#" item="key">
struct with key '#key#' has data: #i[key]#
</cfloop>
</cfloop>
Of, if you need to decide if the struct has certain key, do something:
<cfloop array="#cfData#" index="i">
<cfif structKeyExists(i, "someKey")>
<cfset counter++>
</cfif>
</cfloop>

Coldfusion - How to loop over all contents in a list

Making the array:
<cfset tempArr = DeserializeJSON(URL.data) />
<cfset temp1 = "" />
<cfset temp2 = "" />
<cfset selectList1 = "" />
<cfset selectList2 = "" />
<cfloop array=#tempArr# index="i">
<cfset temp1 = GetToken(i,1,":")>
<cfset temp2 = GetToken(i,2,":")>
<cfset selectList1 = listAppend(selectList1, temp1)>
<cfset selectList2 = listAppend(selectList2, temp2)>
</cfloop>
Looping through it??:
<cfquery name="sample" datasource="database">
SELECT *
FROM table
WHERE
<cfloop from="1" to="#listLen(selectList1)#" index="i"/>
#ListGetAt(selectList1, i)# = <cfqueryparam value="#ListGetAt(selectList2)#" />
</cfloop>
<cfif i neq listLen(#selectList1#)>
AND
</cfif>
</cfquery>
My intention is to search dynamically in a table based on the array that was received from the javascript page. The data comes in this form -> columnName:searchBy. ie, a sample piece would be name:Jim. I would like to build in dynamic code that would allow me to search by different columns but I can't get my loop to work. I get this error if it helps:
(Invalid CFML construct found on line 20 at column 59.)
which is this line:
<cfloop from="1" to="#listLen(selectList1)#" index="i" />
Kyle's answer is 100% correct, but here's a better solution. Using lists is a very inefficient process (see below) and using listGetAt will only anger future programmers. You can use an array to house the data and use a default WHERE statement to simplify your looping.
<cfset tempArr = DeserializeJSON(URL.data) />
<cfset temp1 = "" />
<cfset temp2 = "" />
<cfset selectList1 = [] />
<cfset selectList2 = [] />
<cfloop array=#tempArr# index="i">
<cfset temp1 = GetToken(i,1,":")>
<cfset temp2 = GetToken(i,2,":")>
<cfset arrayAppend(selectList1, temp1)>
<cfset arrayAppend(selectList2, temp2)>
</cfloop>
<cfif NOT arrayIsEmpty(tempArr)>
<cfquery name="sample" datasource="database">
SELECT column1, column2, column3
FROM table
WHERE 1 = 1
<cfloop from="1" to="#listLen(selectList1)#" index="i"/>
AND #selectList1[i]# = <cfqueryparam value="#selectList2[i]#" />
</cfloop>
</cfquery>
</cfif>
When you append to a list a new string is created in memory that combines the two previous string and the previous string is deleted. This is definitely premature optimization, but it's still a good practice to avoid using lists especially when you need to access elements in them.
I think your problem might be that the cfloop tag is self closing. Try this instead:
<cfloop from="1" to="#listLen(selectList1)#" index="i">
list attribute can be used in <cfloop>.
<cfloop list="#selectList1#" index="i">
#i# <!--- list element can be processed here with variable name #i# --->
</cfloop>

How To Loop Through Two Lists?

I need to join the output of two separate lists together to output in a CFMAIL, and I'm wondering what the best way to approach this is.
I have two form fields: first_name and last_name
The fields have up to 5 names in each. I need to loop through those names and join the first and last names, then output them to unordered list. I am having trouble visualizing what the right approach to accomplish this is.
Can someone suggest a method in CFML (I don't know CFSCRIPT very well).
Thanks!
EDIT: I should have added that both fields will always have the exact same number of entries. Thanks to all that answered -- proof that there are a lot of ways to skin a cat :)
I would do something like
<cfloop from="1" to="#ListLen(firstnames)#" index="i">
#ListGetAt(firstnames,i)# #ListGetAt(lastnames,i)#<br>
</cfloop>
If this were a list of 5000 you would be better off putting it in a structure or an array, but for a list of ~5 this should be sufficient.
I think this would be the easiest way to accomplish this.
<!--- Create a names container --->
<cfset names = "<ul>">
<!--- Fill some dummy containers --->
<cfset first = "thomas,henry,philip,john,rony">
<cfset last = "smith,baker,crowe,ryan,jones">
<!--- Loop through the lists and append them to the container string --->
<cfloop index="name" to="#listLen(first)#" from="1">
<cfset names &= "<li>" & ListGetAt(first,name) & " " & ListGetAt(last,name) & "</li>">
</cfloop>
<cfset names &= "</ul>">
<cfoutput>#names#</cfoutput>
I would add in a check to make sure that your list values exists at each index, otherwise you will get errors. I would also add in a check to loop through whichever list is greater so that you get all values just in case someone doesn't enter exactly 5 in both:
<Cfset firstnames="Matt,Ian,Brandon,Sam,Tom">
<cfset lastnames="Jones,Smith,Weiss">
<!--- SEE WHICH LIST IS LONGER AND SET THAT AS THE ONE THAT WE WILL USE FOR THE LOOP --->
<cfif ListLen(firstnames) gte ListLen(lastnames)>
<cfset primary=firstnames>
<cfelse>
<cfset primary=lastnames>
</cfif>
<cfset myOutput="<ul>">
<cfloop from="1" to="#ListLen(primary)#" index="i">
<Cfset myOutput &= "<li>">
<cfif ListLen(firstnames) gte i>
<cfset myOutput &= ListGetAt(firstnames,i)>
</cfif>
<cfif ListLen(lastnames) gte i>
<cfset myOutput &= " " & ListGetAt(lastnames,i)>
</cfif>
<Cfset myOutput &= "</li>">
</cfloop>
<Cfset myOutput &= "</ul>">
<cfoutput>#myOutput#</cfoutput>
You could use the "list" attribute with CFLOOP although it means combining list functions within the output. Here is an example though of how it could be done and it makes the assumption the two lists will always have the same lengths. If these names are keyed in by users then I might be afraid of if they put in a comma since that would throw things off with any sort of looping.
<cfset lstFirstNames = "John,Bob,Tom,Jeff" />
<cfset lstLastNames = "Smith,Doe,Rodriguez,Horan" />
<cfloop list="#Variables.lstFirstNames#" index="FirstName" />
#FirstName# #ListGetAt(Variables.LastNames, ListFind(Variables.lstFirstNames, FirstName))#<br />
</cfloop>
try:
<cfset lstFirstNames = "John,Bob,Tom,Jeff" />
<cfset lstLastNames = "Smith,Doe,Rodriguez,Horan" />
<cfloop list="#Variables.lstFirstNames#" index="FirstName">
<cfoutput>#FirstName# #ListGetAt(Variables.lstLastNames, ListFind(Variables.lstFirstNames, FirstName))#</cfoutput><br />
</cfloop>