Related
I think I have just been staring at this for too long and have worked myself into a corner.
So let's say I have the following data:
I have locations that get monthly utility usage numbers. I want to create a clustered bar chart that shows how many months have data.
The "Merge_Use" column can have numbers, blanks, and N/A. Any number > 0 OR N/A is considered complete. 0 or blank is incomplete.
I want a clustered bar chart that shows % complete, and is split by quarter and metric type, that shows the global total % complete, but can be filtered to show the % complete by region or individual location (relationships for TRT_ID to region is housed in a separate table). For some reason I can't wrap my mind around the measure that would do that.
This was my first try. I used a calculated column, but it wasn't until after I got to the visual stage that I realized that my calculated column is static and won't be affected by filtering. (It sounds silly now but I made a column that assigned each completed field a % out of the total fields, i.e. 1/total # rows, thinking I could just sum these together in the visual).
How would you do this?
I may have solved my own problem.
I added a conditional column with Yes/No for "completed" based off my criteria. (i.e. if "" then "No", else "Yes")
Then added the following measure:
% YES =
DIVIDE (
CALCULATE ( COUNT ( Leadership_Usage_Tracking_v2[Completed] ), Leadership_Usage_Tracking_v2[Completed] = "YES" ),
CALCULATE ( COUNT ( Leadership_Usage_Tracking_v2[Completed] ), ALLSELECTED ( Leadership_Usage_Tracking_v2[Completed] ) )
)
Seems to be working so far!
I have a simple CSV data set such as this.
ID,MainCategory,SubCategory,Type,Value
1,E,E1,Demo,5
2,N,N3,Install,2
3,E,E1,Demo,4
4,E,E2,Install,7
5,D,D1,Install,3
6,S,S2,PM,4
7,N,N2,Install,7
8,N,N2,Demo,1
9,E,E2,Demo,2
10,D,D2,Install,6
11,D,D3,PM,4
12,S,S1,PM,8
13,N,N1,Install,5
14,S,S3,Install,8
15,S,S1,Demo,9
16,E,E3,Demo,5
17,N,N2,Install,3
18,E,E2,PM,6
19,D,D2,PM,6
20,N,N3,Demo,6
21,S,S2,Demo,7
22,E,E3,Install,2
23,S,S1,Install,4
24,S,S2,PM,8
25,D,D1,Install,5
In my Power BI Desktop, I'd like to load this into a table, and conditionally format the Value column based on whether the value in each row is greater than or less than the average for the currently selected data set.
For instance, the average of Value considering the entire table is 5.08, so if there are no filters applied (as in, all my slicers are set to select nothing), I'd like all rows whose Value is 6 or more to be background colored in one color, and the others in another color. For this, I created two measures like so:
AvgOfVal = DIVIDE( SUM(G2G[Value]), COUNTA(G2G[ID]) )
BGColor = IF(SUM(G2G[Value]) > [AvgOfVal], "Light Pink", "Light Blue")
Then I tried to apply the BGColor measure for conditionally formatting the background, but this doesn't work as expected, and instead produces the result below.
I realize that this is due to the fact that the measure is calculated per row, so when conditional formatting is applied, as seen in the AvgOfVal column in the table, it calculates average per row instead of for the entire data set. How can I calculate a measure that takes into account the entire data set (considering slicers), and do the conditional formatting as I need.
Please keep in mind that if a user were to select a slicer filter (say, MainCategory = D), then I want the conditional formatting to reflect this. So in this case, given that AvgOfVal = 4.80 for MainCategory = D entries, I'd like all rows whose Value >= 5 to be in one color, and others in another color.
I realize that this is due to the fact that the measure is calculated per row
Yes. The key is understanding how that happens. When the measure is calculated a "context transition" happens and the current row is added to the filter context.
So what you want is a calculation that removes the row filter that was added in the context transition. So you need ALLSELECTED(), which does precisely that. eg
AvgOvVAl = CALCULATE( AVERAGE('data'[Value]), ALLSELECTED() )
Removing the "innermost" filter which in this case is the filter on the row, but leaving all other filters, ie filters added on the report, page, visual, or filters coming from interactions with other visuals like slicers.
I am new to power BI and stuck with an issue. I have my model as follows:
Date Dimension
Measurement Fact
The date column in Date Dimension is link to measuredate in Measurement Fact
Below is a sample data:
NB: In edit query, I have changed the type of measuredate to Date only.
I have tried the measure below but it doesn't work the way I want. It will sum all the values of the day but what I want is the last value of the day:
day_fuel_consumption =
CALCULATE (
SUM ( measurement[measurementvalue] ),
FILTER (
measurement,
measurement[metername] = "C-FUEL"
&& measurement[measuredate] = MAX ( measurement[measuredate] )
)
)
My Goal is to get 29242, i.e the last value of the day. Remember that measuredate is a Date field and not Datetime (I changed to Date field so that my Year and Month filter can work correctly). I have changed the type in edit query.
Changing your measure to use a variable could be the solution:
DFC =
var maxDate = MAX(measurement[measuredate])
return
CALCULATE(
SUM(measurement[measurementvalue]),
measurement[measuredate] = maxDate
)
However, you should keep the datetime format for measureDate. If you don't want to see the time stamp just change the format I power bi. Otherwise power bi will see two values with max date and sum them, instead of taking the last one.
Well, if you want to avoid creating a measure, you could drag the fields you are filtering over to the visual filters pane. Click your visual, and scroll a tiny bit and you will see the section I am referring to. From there, just drag the field you are trying to filter In this case, your value. Then select "Top N". It will allow you to select a top (number) or bottom (number) based on another field. Strange enough, it does allow you to do top value by top value. It doesn't make sense when you say it out loud, but it works all the same.
This will show you the top values for whatever value field you are trying to use. As an added bonus, you can show how little or how many you want, on the fly.
As far as DAX goes, I'm afraid I am a little DAX illiterate compared to some other folks that may be able to help you.
I had to create two separate measures as shown below for this to work as I wanted:
max_measurement_id_cf = CALCULATE(MAX(measurement[measurementid]), FILTER(measurement, measurement[metername] = "C-FUEL"))
DFC =
var max_id_cf = [max_measurement_id_cf]
return
CALCULATE(SUM(measurement[measurementvalue]), measurement[measurementid] = max_id_cf)
I want to count records in a certain condition and allow people to filter down to the relevant records, but selecting a measure value (which filters so it only counts certain rows) isn't cross-filtering others as I'd expect. Maybe ths isn't possible or maybe I'm just doing it wrong, but I'd appreciate help.
I have a single table:
let
Source = Table.FromRows(Json.Document(Binary.Decompress(Binary.FromText("i45Wci4tLsnPTS1SMFTSUTJUitVBEjICChmgChljCplgajSFCMUCAA==", BinaryEncoding.Base64), Compression.Deflate)), let _t = ((type text) meta [Serialized.Text = true]) in type table [#"Customer Name" = _t, #"Ordered Recently" = _t]),
#"Change to INT" = Table.TransformColumnTypes(Source,{{"Ordered Recently", Int64.Type}}),
#"Change to T/F" = Table.TransformColumnTypes(#"Change to INT",{{"Ordered Recently", type logical}})
in
#"Change to T/F"
The result looks like this:
Customer Name Ordered Recently
Customer 1 True
Customer 2 False
Customer 3 False
Customer 4 True
Customer 5 True
I added two measures:
Count Total = COUNTROWS(Customers)
Count Recent = CALCULATE([Count Total], filter(Customers, Customers[Ordered Recently]))
If I put both measures in a bar chart and highlight the "Count Recent" measure, I'd expect it to know to filter other visuals based on the FILTER statement present in the measure, but that doesn't happen. Selecing this value doesn't impact anything else on my page (including just a count of rows).
The goal is to allow people to select a measure that counts rows and then to see the makeup of the data in those rows (select a count of late projects and filter other visuals to describe those late projects).
Is this possible or am I doing something wrong?
EXAMPLE:
Here's what it looks like now, with nothing selected:
When I select the black bar (the "Ordered Recently" measure), nothing changes right now - but here's what I want to happen (actually achieved with a slicer off screen on the T/F field):
I understand if my measure is a SUM of an integer field, it includes every row in the calculation - even when the row value is zero - and there's no way to filter my dataset based on that. However, in this case, my measure is actually using a FILTER on the dataset so that it only counts rows with a certain criteria set - given that, it should be able to filter the requested table, and then flow that filter through the rest of my dataset (the same way it would if I selected a bar from a chart where I had used that same field as the series - exactly how it works when I do this:
PBIX file to download as an example
No, I don't believe it's possible to make a measure value cross-filter other visuals based on filters within the measure definition.
You can, however, click on i.e. row header Customer 3 and it should cross-filter the other visuals to only include that customer. Any table column you set for the rows or columns of a matrix visual should behave this way.
Here's a hacky workaround:
Create a measure that shows the right values when you use the column you want to use as a filter as the Legend or Axis (like in your last image). For example, in this case, you could do this:
Total Customers =
VAR TF = SELECTEDVALUE ( Customers[Ordered Recently] )
RETURN
COUNTROWS (
FILTER (
ALLSELECTED ( Customers ),
IF ( TF, TF, TF || Customers[Ordered Recently] )
)
)
This behaves how you want, but isn't labeled as you want. To achieve that create a calculated column with the labels you want. For example,
Label = IF(Customers[Ordered Recently], "Ordered Recently", "Total Customers")
Then take Ordered Recently off the axis and put the Label column in the Legend box to get this:
Your Filter argument is really Filter(All(Customers, Customers[Ordered Recently])
You remove all filters on the Customer Table, and then specify Ordered Recently Column as the filter.
Try
[MeasureName] =Calculate([Count Total], All(Customer), Values(Customer[Recently Ordered]), Customer[Recently Ordered] = “True”)
I have a Power-Bi Report where I need to show the hyperlink in the card or table conditionally. the report is having Account_id as slicer value.
If an account_id results more than 4 records in the visual, I need to add a extra row with text "More.." in it. Reference image is below.
Thanks in advance
I don't if it's possible to get exactly what you want, but here's my attempt. Power BI still isn't great if you need a lot of control over formatting.
First, create a ranking column:
Rank = RANKX(
FILTER(ALL(Table1),
Table1[account_id] = EARLIER(Table1[account_id])),
Table1[Partners], , ASC)
Next, a column that displays the top ones and "More..." for any possible 5th items.
Display = IF(Table1[Rank] > 5,
BLANK(),
IF(Table1[Rank] < 5,
Table1[Partners],
"More..."))
Finally, a column that contains the desired URL for the "More..." rows:
Link = IF(Table1[Display] = "More...", "http://www.URL.com", BLANK())
Here's what my sample data table looks like:
Then you can set up a table with the Display and Link column. Make sure to choose "Don't summarize" for the field and choose URL icon on under values formatting options to get the link icon instead of a URL. You'll probably also want to filter out blanks in your visual fitter settings.
For the right-hand table above I changed the column header texts to "Partners" and " " in the table Values box.