My team has a gitlab repo. It has two parts: an NPM package under projects folder and an angular application under src folder. So there are 2 projects in the angular.json file.
We currently have unit tests with coverage setup in our gitlab pipes. The issue is, since we have 2 projects in this repo, we really need to show the coverage for each project.
I noticed in demo image of the gitlab badges documentation (https://docs.gitlab.com/ee/user/project/badges.html), they have a 'JS Coverage' badge. This seems to be a custom badge (I can't find a list of given badges, but I'm not finding anything for 'JS coverage', so I'm assuming it's custom).
So I think I can do something like that to create 2 custom badges that has the code coverage of each project (1 for 'Pkg Coverage' and 1 for 'App Coverage'). But (TBH) the documentation around creating custom badges isn't great. I need to know how to store this custom value to use in the badge, and how to update in the gitlab pipe.
Does anyone know how to achieve this? If I could just figure out how that example is using 'JS Coverage' (and how to update the value in the pipe), then I could figure out what I need to do for my 2 custom badges. Any tips?
Some details, right now we have a gitlab job like this (it runs unit tests and updates the coverage values. Since 'ng test' runs the tests of both projects 1 by 1, the code coverage of the 1st project is saved to the 'coverage' value):
unit-tests:
stage: test
rules:
# Run unit tests, including when merge requests are merged to default branch (so coverage % is updated)
- when: on_success
image: trion/ng-cli-karma:$ANGULAR_VERSION
before_script:
- *angular-env-setup-script
coverage: '/Statements \W+: (\d+\.\d+)%.*/'
script:
- npm run build:ds-prod
- npm install dist/ds
- ng test --code-coverage --progress false --watch false
artifacts:
expose_as: "Coverage Report"
paths:
- coverage/
tags:
- kubernetes-runner
Related
I have been following this official documentation on how to get parallel builds running in AWS CodeBuild using a batch matrix. Right now my buildspec.yml is structured like this:
## buildspec.yml
version: 0.2
batch:
fast-fail: false
build-matrix:
dynamic:
env:
variables:
INSTANCES:
- A
WORKERS:
- 1
- 2
phases:
install:
commands:
- npm ci
build:
commands:
- npx cypress run <params>
In this example we run two parallel workers, though IRL we run 11.
This works well for one use case, where we check out the code and run the Cypress tests against the pre-defined URL of one of our test environments. However, we have another use-case where we need to build the application within the CodeBuild container, start a server on localhost, and then run the Cypress tests against that.
One option, of course, is just to build the app 11 times. However, since CodeBuild pricing is by the machine minute, I'd rather build once instead of 11 times. I also don't like the idea of technically testing 11 different builds (albeit all built off the same commit).
What I'm looking for is behavior similar to Docker's multi-stage build functionality, where you can build the app once in one environment, and then copy that artifact to 11 separate envs, where the parallel tests will then run. Is functionality like this going to be possible within CodeBuild itself, or will I have to do something like have two CodeBuild builds and upload the artifact to S3? Any and all ideas welcome.
I reached the point where I think it makes sense to put my inspec tests in a different repo than my Chef cookbook. I just copied all dirs under test/integration into a new dir and created a repo from that. There are subdirs common, master, and worker. I'm not sure how best to manage this given my Test Kitchen setup.
Original kitchen.yml content:
suites:
- name: master
...
verifier:
inspec_tests:
- test/integration/common
- test/integration/master
...
New content based on reading the docs:
suites:
- name: master
...
verifier:
inspec_tests:
- git#github.com:redacted/inspec-redacted.git
...
As soon as I wrote this, I looked for some way to choose only the 2 desired dirs common and master but I don't see this documented. Is it even possible?
maybe you could narrow it down with specific controls in your suite:
verifier:
inspec_tests:
- git#github.com:redacted/inspec-redacted.git
controls:
- xyz
We have an application that has a number of projects isolated in their own solutions, each with their own UnitTest and IntegrationTest projects within those solutions. What happens on our locally hosted Azure DevOps applications is that the following code forces Azure DevOps to build each project in the solution before running tests. What I'd like to do is to run all tests sequentially on an initial build or at least cut the build time down because on the build server each build takes about a minute or 2 which is the bulk of the time. Since we have XUnit running the tests in say Rider it processes all tests across a solution from multiple projects well within a minute.
Is there a way to cut the build time or is this as good as it gets?
- task: DotNetCoreCLI#2
displayName: Unit Tests
inputs:
command: test
projects: '**/*UnitTest*/*.csproj'
arguments: '--configuration $(BuildConfiguration)'
# run integration tests
- task: DotNetCoreCLI#2
displayName: Integration Tests
inputs:
command: test
projects: '**/*IntegrationTest*/*.csproj'
arguments: '--configuration $(BuildConfiguration)'
What happens on our locally hosted azure devops application is that
the following code below will cause Azure Devops to build each project
in the solution before running tests.
For this issue , you can add --no-build argument to skip the project build on test run.
--no-build:
Doesn't build the test project before running it. This is listed in the Options part of document.
- task: DotNetCoreCLI#2
displayName: 'dotnet test'
inputs:
command: test
projects: '**/*UnitTest*/*.csproj'
arguments: '--configuration $(BuildConfiguration) --no-build'
Here is a case with similar issue , you can refer to it.
I'm trying to understand the GitLab Pipelines and after a few tries I was able to successfully automate my unit tests. Now I'm trying to add the code coverage badge into my project and/or readme file but it always seems to show unknown.
Files:
+ application
+ system
- unit-tests
- tests
UtilTest.php
autoload.php
phpunit
.gitignore
.gitlab-ci.yml
.htaccess
index.php
readme.md
.gitlab-ci.yml:
image: php:5.6
stages:
- test
app:unit-tests:
stage: test
script:
- php ./unit-tests/phpunit --bootstrap ./unit-tests/autoload.php ./unit-tests/tests
coverage: '/Code Coverage: \d+\.\d+/'
On the project's Test coverage parsing section I have this set up:
So I was able to fix this by using PHP 7.2 as the Docker image and installing xdebug on the before_script call.
.gitlab-ci.yml:
image: php:7.2
stages:
- test
before_script:
- pecl install xdebug
- docker-php-ext-enable xdebug
app:unit-tests:
stage: test
script:
- php ./unit-tests/phpunit --bootstrap ./unit-tests/autoload.php ./unit-tests/tests --coverage-text --colors=never
coverage: '/^\s*Lines:\s*\d+.\d+\%/'
I had to use PHP 7.2 because when I tried running pecl install xdebug it said it requires PHP 7. Ideally I would like to use PHP 5.6 because that's what our current server has just so the tests are on similar versions but I'll leave it as it is for now.
I had to add --coverage-text --colors=never on the script call for it to output the numbers. Then on the coverage call I changed it to '/^\s*Lines:\s*\d+.\d+\%/' which I also used under the Test coverage parsing section on the project settings.
And now the code coverage properly shows me my expected values.
I'm trying to setup code coverage for a Java application project.
Project name : NewApp
Project structure:
src/java/** (source code)
src/java-test (unit tests - Jnuit)
test/it-test (integration test)
test/at-tests (acceptance tests)
tomcat/* (contain tomcat start/stop scripts)
xx/.. etc folders which are required for a usual application.
Gradle version : 1.6
Environment : Linux
I have a running gradle build script that fetches application (NewApp) dependencies (i.e. service jars used by the app for build process) from a build artifact repository (artifactory/maven for ex), and builds the app.
Now at this point, I wanted to get code coverage using JaCoCo plugin for my NewApp application project.
I followed the documentation per Gradle/Jacoco but it doesn't seems to create any reports/... folder for jacoco etc where I can find what Jacoco coverage report did.
My questions:
1. For getting code coverage using Unit tests (Junit), I assume all I have to do is the following and it will NOT require me to start/stop the tomcat before running unit test (test task i.e. "gradle test") to get code coverage for/via using unit tests. Please advise/correct. The code (just for Gradle jacoco unit test part) - I'm using is:
apply plugin: 'jacoco'
test {
include 'src/java-test/**'
}
jacocoTestReport {
group = "reporting"
description = "Generate Jacoco coverage reports after running tests."
reports {
xml.enabled true
html.enabled true
csv.enabled false
}
//classDirectories = fileTree(dir: 'build/classes/main', include: 'com/thc/**')
//sourceDirectories = fileTree(dir: 'scr/java', include: 'com/thc/**')
additionalSourceDirs = files(sourceSets.main.allJava.srcDirs)
}
and for Integration tests:
task integrationTest(type: Test) {
include 'test/java/**'
}
As jacocoTestReport is depends upon test task(s), thus they will be called first and then finally jacocoTestReport will report what it found for the code coverage.
For getting code coverage for integration tests, I assume I must start tomcat first (i.e. before running / calling test target for integration tests), then call "gradle integrationTest" or "gradle test" task and then stop tomcat -- to get the code coverage report. From other blog posts I also found that one should setup JAVA_OPTS variable to assign jacoco agent before tomcat starts.
for ex: setting JAVA_OPTS variable like:
export JACOCO="-Xms256m -Xmx512m -XX:MaxPermSize=1024m -javaagent:/production/jenkinsAKS/jobs/NewApp/workspace/jacoco-0.6.3.201306030806/lib/jacocoagent.jar=destfile=/production/jenkinsAKS/jobs/NewApp/workspace/jacoco/jacoco.exec,append=true,includes=*"
export JAVA_OPTS="$JAVA_OPTS $JACOCO"
Being new to Gradle/groovy - I'm not sure what code should I write within build.gradle (build script) to get the above Integration/Unit tests working if it involves start/stop of tomcat. If someone can provide a sample script to do that, I'll try.
I'm not getting any code coverage right now, when I publish Jacoco code coverage in Jenkins (using Jenkins post build action for publishing Jacoco reports). Jenkins build dashboard shows 0% for code coverage (i.e. bars showing all red color, no green for actual code coverage).
Need your advice to get some traction on this.
Question : I assume that your unit tests doesn't depend on tomcat. In this case, you're right, you must not start tomcat upfront.
To create the coverage report you need to execute
gradle jacocoTestReport
without jacocoTestReport gradle won't trigger jacoco to generate the reports.
One additional thing, regarding to your snippet. I assume that you have changed the the default main sourceset to source/java. in this case you don't have to set the additionalSourceDirs.
Integration tests : Yes, you need to start tomcat first, or at least you have to ensure that tomcat is running. You should have a look into Gradle 1.7. It has a new task ordering rule called finalizedBy
With this you could do something like
task integrationtests(type: Test) {
dependsOn startTomcat
finalizedBy stopTomcat
}
where start/stopTomcat are custom tasks.If you have to stay on Gradle 1.6 you have to build a dependsOn chain:
stopTomcat -dependsOn-> integrationtests -dependsOn-> startTomcat
I assume that the blog article is right, I don't have any experience with that.
Starting/Stoping Tomcat : You could do it in a way like this
task startTomcat() << {
def tomcatStartScript = "${project.rootDir}/tomcat/startScript"
tomcatStartScript.execute()
}
The stop script can be written in a similiar way. (Some in from Groovy doc : Executing)
Jenkins & Jacoco : Should be fixed when executing jacocoTestReport
Got it working.
Gradle 1.7
- download the .zip which contains the binaries/src and documentation.
- Go to folder: if you unzip the above .zip at C:\gradle-1.7
C:\gradle-1.7\samples\testing\jacoco\quickstart
Run:
gradle build jacocoTestReport
You’ll see a new folder “build” after the build.
– folder jacoco gets created with classdumps and .exec if only build task is called.
– folder jacoco and jacocoHtml gets created – if both build jacocoTestReport is called
have fun.
I also saw that it’s better to include:
the following section in build.gradle
/////
tasks.withType(Compile) {
options.debug = true
options.compilerArgs = ["-g"]
}
////