Trying to restrict destination namespace with ArgoCD AppProject. While using AppProject with app of apps patern, child apps giving error "namespace argocd is not permitted in project "argocd-test". Am I missing something? Any suggestions would be apprciated on how to fix the issue.
Created AppProject with destincation namespace, server. Configured parent or root application and child applicationto use that project but child application is failing.
Related
I have deployed my application using copilot deploy which works. It creates a load balancer and when I go to the designated url I can view my react app. However, I'm trying to create a CI workflow using github actions.
My github actions appear to work, they appear to deploy the app. But when I go to the new designated url, I get Uncaught SyntaxError: Unexpected token '<'
If I go to that same url and hit a specific route on it, that actually does work. So I can do url/test and it return "hello world" but it won't return the bundle for the application or it's returning a broken version of it for some reason.
I can't figure out why using copilot deploy normally works, but this doesn't
For context, my app is set up like this. In the root folder there is a Server folder that has the node server file with the routes. In the root folder is also a src folder with the react code. There is a public file. There is the docker file containing instructions. And then there is the build file. So far I've been generating the build ahead of time and then deploying everything. The node server then sends the build.
So presumably, something about the way the docker container is being built via github actions is significantly different than the way it is building using copilot deploy. But, my understanding is that in both cases it is following the same docker file. So I can't figure out what is different about the directory structure it is creating, or maybe its having trouble creating the bundle at all. If anyone has any insight it would be appreciated.
Thanks!
UnhandledPromiseRejectionWarning: Error: ENOENT: no such file or directory, open '/home/vcap/app/dist/cloudfoundryapplication'
Environment: node12
I could not figure out what is the use for '/cloudfoundryapplication' path.
Is that healthcheck for couldfoundry Apps?
Thanks!
These requests are generated by Pivotal/VMware's Apps Manager. When a user navigates to an application in Apps Manager, Apps Manager will probe to see if the application supports this particular endpoint. If it does, then it will expose some additional information in it's UI.
In theory, anyone could implement this interface, but I have only heard about this API being implemented in Spring Boot applications with Actuator support enabled. For non-Java & Spring Boot applications you can simply return a 404, which is usually the default behavior.
See this knowledge base article for reference.
I refereed few links and tried to create a virtual app and but still non-Sitecore app is referring to Sitecore root web.config file.
Sounds like you are trying to setup a child application under Sitecore website in IIS. In this case, if you don't apply inheritance configuration correctly, you'll face the issue when child application uses configuration defined in the parent (Sitecore) web.config. This post should help you with the right configuration: link
I deployed a web service developed using Apache Axis2 on Openshift.
When I try accessing the axis2 index.jsp, I can see the index page which only contains the default Version.
Q:
How do I get to display the web service other web services I created as I can view them on my localhost through the browser in Eclipse?
I have done a few searches online and seen some suggestions as to making adjustments to axis2.xml. In that regard, I have tried changing the contextRoot parameter and the servicePath without no success though I am not too sure if I am making the right changes.
My project structure in Eclipse is shown below:
SieveService
+...
+Java Resources
++src
+++Model
++++some model classes
+++Services
++++SieveServiceService.java
++Libraries
+...
+WebContent
++axis2-web
+++...
I had the same problem and that's occurs because openshift's tomcat server only deploys services in aar format, meanwhile in localhost deploys aar and exploded files too.
You need to create a aar file with your services and put it into your WebContent/WEB-INF/services/ directory. You need to update the services.list file too with the name of your services.
After that you must see your services in your openshift server.
I am trying to create simple flex application, which uses django as a back-end part. Have a question:
Usually when I run my application Flex Builder creates a file in a directory on my local PC and then opens a browser and points to it. Everything was fine, but when I decided to link django server to flex applications via xml data providers I started to get security errors. (Related to absence of crossdomain.xml). When I created the file and put it on the server:
<?xml version="1.0"?>
<!-- http://www.foo.com/crossdomain.xml -->
<cross-domain-policy>
<allow-access-from domain="http://127.0.0.1:8000"/>
<allow-access-from domain="127.0.0.1"/>
</cross-domain-policy>
Then tried the application again, I got error in console of my FB Error: Request for resource at http://127.0.0.1:8000/go/active/ by requestor from file:///Users/oleg/Documents/FB3/usersList/bin-debug/usersList.swf is denied due to lack of policy file permissions.
I don't know how to fix the error. But also the question is there a way to configure FB3 to put my swf files to the server directly, so I will not need any crossdomain?
Thanks
Oleg
We struggled with this a lot. The Flex security stuff didn't strike me as well built, but perhaps we just had different approaches in mind than Adobe's developers. The solution that worked for us was to serve both the SWF and the dynamic data from the same host and port.
On our development boxes, we tell Apache to serve the SWF from a directory in the workspace, and the dynamic data from a local copy of the app. When we push to production, SWF and app get pushed simultaneously to the same virtual host.
If that's inconvenient for you, the Apache ProxyPass directive can be used to make Apache front for other servers. I've not used that in production, but it's been very handy for developer setups.
I don't know a way to get FlexBuilder to automatically deploy your changed SWF; you could certainly look into an automation approach (like Maven and Flex-Mojos) to make that happen.
That said, getting rid of that error is usually just a matter of adding a policy file to the server.
The second error is caused because you're trying to fetch http resources from a "file" location. My recommendation is that you change your Flex Builder project so it outputs to a location within the Django web site, rather than to the flex-bin directory. This setting can be changed in the properties dialog of the project. Then, you should be able to have your front-end and back-end share the same protocol and domain.