Suppose I have the following regex that matches a string with a semicolon at the end:
\".+\";
It will match any string except an empty one, like the one below:
"";
I tried using this:
\".+?\";
But that didn't work.
My question is, how can I make the .+ part of the, optional, so the user doesn't have to put any characters in the string?
To make the .+ optional, you could do:
\"(?:.+)?\";
(?:..) is called a non-capturing group. It only does the matching operation and it won't capture anything. Adding ? after the non-capturing group makes the whole non-capturing group optional.
Alternatively, you could do:
\".*?\";
.* would match any character zero or more times greedily. Adding ? after the * forces the regex engine to do a shortest possible match.
As an alternative:
\".*\";
Try it here: https://regex101.com/r/hbA01X/1
Related
Suppose I have the following regex that matches a string with a semicolon at the end:
\".+\";
It will match any string except an empty one, like the one below:
"";
I tried using this:
\".+?\";
But that didn't work.
My question is, how can I make the .+ part of the, optional, so the user doesn't have to put any characters in the string?
To make the .+ optional, you could do:
\"(?:.+)?\";
(?:..) is called a non-capturing group. It only does the matching operation and it won't capture anything. Adding ? after the non-capturing group makes the whole non-capturing group optional.
Alternatively, you could do:
\".*?\";
.* would match any character zero or more times greedily. Adding ? after the * forces the regex engine to do a shortest possible match.
As an alternative:
\".*\";
Try it here: https://regex101.com/r/hbA01X/1
Suppose I have the following regex that matches a string with a semicolon at the end:
\".+\";
It will match any string except an empty one, like the one below:
"";
I tried using this:
\".+?\";
But that didn't work.
My question is, how can I make the .+ part of the, optional, so the user doesn't have to put any characters in the string?
To make the .+ optional, you could do:
\"(?:.+)?\";
(?:..) is called a non-capturing group. It only does the matching operation and it won't capture anything. Adding ? after the non-capturing group makes the whole non-capturing group optional.
Alternatively, you could do:
\".*?\";
.* would match any character zero or more times greedily. Adding ? after the * forces the regex engine to do a shortest possible match.
As an alternative:
\".*\";
Try it here: https://regex101.com/r/hbA01X/1
I have a regex
/([/<=][^/]*[/=?])$/g
I'm trying to capture text between the last slashes in a file path
/1/2/test/
but this regex matches "/test/" instead of just test. What am I doing wrong?
You need to use lookaround assertions.
(?<=\/)[^\/]*(?=\/[^\/]*$)
DEMO
or
Use the below regex and then grab the string you want from group index 1.
\/([^\/]*)\/[^\/]*$
The easy way
Match:
every character that is not a "/"
Get what was matched here. This is done by creating a backreference, ie: put inside parenthesis.
followed by "/" and then the end of string $
Code:
([^/]*)/$
Get the text in group(1)
Harder to read, only if you want to avoid groups
Match exactly the same as before, except now we're telling the regex engine not to consume characters when trying to match (2). This is done with a lookahead: (?= ).
Code:
[^/]*(?=/$)
Get what is returned by the match object.
The issue with your code is your opening and closing slashes are part of your capture group.
Demo
text: /1/2/test/
regex: /\/(\[^\/\]*?)(?=\/)/g
captures a list of three: "1", "2", "test"
The language you're using affects the results. For instance, JavaScript might not have certain lookarounds, or may actually capture something in a non-capture group. However, the above should work as intended. In PHP, all / match characters must be escaped (according to regex101.com), which is why the cleaner [/] wasn't used.
If you're only after the last match (i.e., test), you don't need the positive lookahead:
/\/([^\/]*?)\/$/
This text
"dhdhd89(dd)"
Matched against this regex
.+?(?:\()
..returns "dhdhd89(".
Why is the start parenthesis included in the capture?
Two different tools, as well as the .NET Regex class, returns the same result. So I gather there is something I don't understand about this.
The way I read my regex is.
Match any character, at least one occurrence. As few as possible.
The matched string should be followed by a start parenthesis, but not to be included in the capture.
I can find workaround, but I still want to know what is going on.
Just turn the non-capturing group to positive lookahead assertion.
.+?(?=\()
.+? non-greedy match of one or more characters followed by an opening parenthesis. Assertions won't match any characters but asserts whether a match is possible or not. But the non-capturing group will do the matching operation.
DEMO
You can just use this negation based regex to capture only text before a literal (:
^([^(]+)
When you use:
.+?(?:\()
Regex engine does match ( after initial text but it just doesn't return that in a captured group to you.
You havn't defined capture groups then I guess you display the whole match (group 0), you can do:
(.+?)(?:\()
and the string you want is in group 1
or use lookahead as #AvinashRaj said.
Suppose I have the following regex that matches a string with a semicolon at the end:
\".+\";
It will match any string except an empty one, like the one below:
"";
I tried using this:
\".+?\";
But that didn't work.
My question is, how can I make the .+ part of the, optional, so the user doesn't have to put any characters in the string?
To make the .+ optional, you could do:
\"(?:.+)?\";
(?:..) is called a non-capturing group. It only does the matching operation and it won't capture anything. Adding ? after the non-capturing group makes the whole non-capturing group optional.
Alternatively, you could do:
\".*?\";
.* would match any character zero or more times greedily. Adding ? after the * forces the regex engine to do a shortest possible match.
As an alternative:
\".*\";
Try it here: https://regex101.com/r/hbA01X/1