I have some code that reads in some data and then transposes it. However, when I tranpose the data, the resulting dataset is missing over 400 columns that were in the input dataset. I have never seen this happen before and can't find any information online as to why this would happen. Any help is much, much appreciated!
The input dataset (mydata) has 716 unique entries in the column "MyCol1". This is the column that becomes the column header in the transposed dataset. The ttransposed dataset has only 269 columns!
libname in "\\folder1\folder2";
data mydata;
set in.mydata; run;
PROC SORT DATA=mydata nodupkey;
BY MyCol3 MyCol4;
RUN;
PROC TRANSPOSE DATA=mydata OUT=mydata_WIDE(DROP=_NAME_);
BY MyCol3 MyCol4;
ID MyCol1;
VAR MyCol2;
RUN;
OK update for anybody else who may have this error: during my proc sort statement I was accidentally deleting a bunch of rows.
You should include MYCOL1 in the BY statement of the PROC SORT. Otherwise only one of the MYCOL1 values will exist per group.
But you probably need to keep the NODUPKEY as duplicate values of MYCOL1 per group will cause trouble for the PROC TRANSPOSE as you cannot make two new variables with the same name.
PROC SORT DATA=mydata nodupkey;
BY MyCol3 MyCol4 MyCol1;
RUN;
PROC TRANSPOSE DATA=mydata OUT=mydata_WIDE(DROP=_NAME_);
BY MyCol3 MyCol4;
ID MyCol1;
VAR MyCol2;
RUN;
Related
I'm a beginner in SAS and i have difficulties with this exercice:
I have a very simple table with 2 columns and three lines
I try to find the request that will return me the name of the most little people (so it must return titi)
All what I found is to return the most little size (157) but i don't want this, I want the name related to the most little value!
Could you help me please?
Larapa
A SQL having clause is a good one for this. SAS will automatically summarize the data and merge it back to the original table, giving you one a one-line table with the name of the smallest value of taille.
proc sql noprint;
create table want as
select nom
from have
having taille = min(taille)
;
quit;
Here are some other ways you can do it:
Using PROC MEANS:
proc means data=have noprint;
id nom;
output out=want
min(taille) = min_taille;
run;
Using sort and a data step to keep only the first observation:
proc sort data=have;
by taille;
run;
data want;
set have;
if(_N_ = 1);
run;
I have approximately 1,000,000 rows and 25 columns of data and I'm trying to return a list of column names, the number of distinct values and whether there are missing values.
I am not able to directly code in column names in PROC SQL and count distinct as I have numerous data sets with different column names and I'm trying to automatically return the desired outcome for all tables with one piece of code.
I've tried running the following code
proc freq nlevels data= &DATASET_NAME;
ods output nlevels=nlevels ;
tables _all_ NOPRINT;
run;
This returns an out of memory error. Is there another way to achieve the result, avoiding the out of memory error.
It is unnecessary to input column name by table _all_, but it possibly makes out of memory by inputting all columns at the same time, try to separate column to do proc freq and then combine results:
proc sql;
create table name as
select name from dictionary.columns where libname='SASHELP' and memname='CLASS';
quit;
data want;
run;
data _null_;
set name;
call execute(
'proc freq data=class nlevels;
table '||name||';
ods output nlevels=nlevels;
run;
data want;
set want nlevels;
run;'
);
run;
This question is very similar to SAS summary statistic from a dataset
The answers cover techniques for
transpose + freq
hash
freq w/ ODS exclude+output
I have the following problem. I need to run PROC FREQ on multiple variables, but I want the output to all be on the same table. Currently, a PROC FREQ statement with something like TABLES ERstatus Age Race, InsuranceStatus; will calculate frequencies for each variable and print them all on separate tables. I just want the data on ONE table.
Any help would be appreciated. Thanks!
P.S. I tried using PROC TABULATE, but it didn't not calculate N correctly, so I'm not sure what I did wrong. Here is my code for PROC TABULATE. My variables are all categorical, so I just need to know N and percentages.
PROC TABULATE DATA = BCanalysis;
CLASS ERstatus PRstatus Race TumorStage InsuranceStatus;
TABLE (ERstatus PRstatus Race TumorStage) * (N COLPCTN), InsuranceStatus;
RUN;
The above code does not return the correct frequencies based on InsuranceStatus where 0 = insured and 1 = uninsured, but PROC FREQ does. Also doesn't calculate correctly with ROWPCTN. So any way that I can get PROC FREQ to calculate multiple variables on one table, or PROC TABULATE to return the correct frequencies, would be appreciated.
Here is a nice image of my output in a simplified analysis of only ERstatus and InsuranceStatus. You can see that PROC FREQ returns 204 people with an ERstatus of 1 and InsuranceStatus of 1. That's correct. The values in PROC TABULATE are not.
OUTPUT
I'll answer this separately as this is answering the other possible interpretation of the question; when it's clarified I'll delete one or the other.
If you want this in a single printed table, then you either need to use proc tabulate or you need to normalize your data - meaning put it in the form of variable | value. PROC FREQ is not capable of doing multiple one-way frequencies in a single table.
For PROC TABULATE, likely your issue is missing data. Any variable that is on the class statement will be checked for missingness, and if any rows are missing data for any of the class variables, those rows are entirely excluded from the tabulation for all variables.
You can override this by adding the missing option on the class statement, or in the table statement, or in the proc tabulate statement. So:
PROC TABULATE DATA = BCanalysis;
CLASS ERstatus PRstatus Race TumorStage InsuranceStatus/missing;
TABLE (ERstatus PRstatus Race TumorStage) * (N COLPCTN), InsuranceStatus;
RUN;
This will result in a slightly different appearance than on your table, though, as it will include the missing rows in places you probably do not want them, and they'll be factored against the colpctn when again you probably don't want them.
Typically some manipulation is then necessary; the easiest is to normalize your data and then run a tabulation (using PROC TABULATE or PROC FREQ, whichever is more appropriate; TABULATE has better percentaging options though) against that normalized dataset.
Let's say we have this:
data class;
set sashelp.class;
if _n_=5 then call missing(age);
if _n_=3 then call missing(sex);
run;
And we want these two tables in one table.
proc freq data=class;
tables age sex;
run;
If we do this:
proc tabulate data=class;
class age sex;
tables (age sex),(N colpctn);
run;
Then we get an N=17 total for both subtables - that's not what we want, we want N=18. Then we can do:
proc tabulate data=class;
class age sex/missing;
tables (age sex),(N colpctn);
run;
But that's not quite right either; I want F to have 8/18 = 44.44% and M 10/18 = 55.55%, not 42% and 53% with 5% allocated to the missing row.
The way I do this is to normalize the data. This means you get a dataset with 2 variables, varname and val, or whatever makes sense for your data, plus whatever identifier/demographic/whatnot variables you might have. val has to be character unless all of your values are numeric.
So for example here I normalize class with age and sex variables. I don't keep any identifiers, but you certainly could in your data, I imagine InsuranceStatus would be kept there if I understand what you're doing in that table. Once I have the normalized table, I just use those two variables, and carefully construct a denominator definition in proc tabulate to have the right basis for my pctn value. It's not quite the same as the single table before - the variable name is in its own column, not on top of the list of values - but honestly that looks better in my opinion.
data class_norm;
set class;
length val $2;
varname='age';
val=put(age,2. -l);
if not missing(age) then output;
varname='sex';
val=sex;
if not missing(sex) then output;
keep varname val;
run;
proc tabulate data=class_norm;
class varname val;
tables varname=' '*val=' ',n pctn<val>;
run;
If you want something better than this, you'll probably have to construct it in proc report. That gives you the most flexibility, but is the most onerous to program in also.
You can use ODS OUTPUT to get all of the PROC FREQ output to one dataset.
ods output onewayfreqs=class_freqs;
proc freq data=sashelp.class;
tables age sex;
run;
ods output close;
or
ods output crosstabfreqs=class_tabs;
proc freq data=sashelp.class;
tables sex*(height weight);
run;
ods output close;
Crosstabfreqs is the name of the cross-tab output, while one-way frequencies are onewayfreqs. You can use ods trace to find out the name if you forget it.
You may (probably will) still need to manipulate this dataset some to get the structure you want ultimately.
It’s the first time that I’ve opened sas today and I’m looking at some code a colleague wrote.
So let’s say I have some data (import) where duplicates occur but I want only those which have a unique number named VTNR.
First she looks for unique numbers:
data M.import;
set M.import;
by VTNR;
if first.VTNR=1 then unique=1;
run;
Then she creates a table with the duplicated numbers:
data M.import_dup1;
set M.import;
where unique^=1;
run;
And finally a table with all duplicates.
But here she is really hardcoding the numbers, so for example:
data M.import_dup2;
set M.import;
where VTNR in (130001292951,130100975613,130107546425,130108026864,130131307133,130134696722,130136267001,130137413257,130137839451,130138291041);
run;
I’m sure there must be a better way.
Since I’m only familiar with R I would write something like:
import_dup2 <- subset(import, is.element(import$VTNR, import_dup1$VTNR))
I guess there must be something like the $ also for sas?
To me it looks like the most direct translation of the R code
import_dup2 <- subset(import, is.element(import$VTNR, import_dup1$VTNR))
Would be to use SQL code
proc sql;
create table import_dup2 as
select * from import
where VTNR in (select VTNR from import_dup1)
;
quit;
But if your intent is to find the observations in IMPORT that have more than one observation per VTNR value there is no need to first create some other table.
data import_dup2 ;
set import;
by VTNR ;
if not (first.VTNR and last.VTNR);
run;
I would use the options in PROC SORT.
Make sure to specify an OUT= dataset otherwise you'll overwrite your original data.
/*Generate fake data with dups*/
data class;
set sashelp.class sashelp.class(obs=5);
run;
/*Create unique and dup dataset*/
proc sort data=class nouniquekey uniqueout=uniquerecs out=dups;
by name;
run;
/*Display results - for demo*/
proc print data=uniquerecs;
title 'Unique Records';
run;
proc print data=dups;
title 'Duplicate Records';
run;
Above solution can give you duplicates but not unique values. There are many possible ways to do both in SAS. Very easy to understand would be a SQL solution.
proc sql;
create table no_duplicates as
select *
from import
group by VTNR
having count(*) = 1
;
create table all_duplicates as
select *
from import
group by VTNR
having count(*) > 1
;
quit;
I would use Reeza's or Tom's solution, but for completeness, the solution most similar to R (and your preexisting code) would be three steps. Again, I wouldn't use this here, it's excess work for something you can do more easily, but the concept is helpful in other situations.
First, get the dataset of duplicates - either her method, or proc sort.
proc sort nodupkey data=have out=nodups dupout=dups;
by byvar;
run;
Then pull those into a macro list:
proc sql;
select byvar
into :duplist separated by ','
from dups;
quit;
Then you have them in &duplist. and can use them like so:
data want;
set have;
if not (byvar in &duplist.);
run;
data want;
set import;
where VTNR in import_dup1;
run;
I have a data set of patient information where I want to count how many patients (observations) have a given diagnostic code. I have 9 possible variables where it can be, in diag1, diag2... diag9. The code is V271. I cannot figure out how to do this with the "WHERE" clause or proc freq.
Any help would be appreciated!!
Your basic strategy to this is to create a dataset that is not patient level, but one observation is one patient-diagnostic code (so up to 9 observations per patient). Something like this:
data want;
set have;
array diag[9];
do _i = 1 to dim(diag);
if not missing(diag[_i]) then do;
diagnosis_Code = diag[_i];
output;
end;
end;
keep diagnosis_code patient_id [other variables you might want];
run;
You could then run a proc freq on the resulting dataset. You could also change the criteria from not missing to if diag[_i] = 'V271' then do; to get only V271s in the data.
An alternate way to reshape the data that can match Joe's method is to use proc transpose like so.
proc transpose data=have out=want(keep=patient_id col1
rename=(col1=diag)
where=(diag is not missing));
by patient_id;
var diag1-diag9;
run;