I am using AWS CodeCommit for managing my repository and have an EC2 instance where the code is deployed.
Tried setting up CodePipeline - skipped Build Stage and it seems to work fine but it takes over 10-12 mins to complete. I see the majority of time is taken in the Source stage where I I believe it zips the code, uploads to S3 and then deploy downloads from S3 (which is another concern as this would mean higher S3 and network cost).
Would there be a more optimal way to setup a pipeline that would quickly deploy changes to a branch onto EC2 instance?
Thank you.
Tried to lookup documentation on CodePipeline but there is no much information
In this case to avoid the time taken process at source stage. We can use the same configuration for the code pipeline by skipping build stage, but here we can configure Step 4 : beta page as shown in below figure:
Once we start our pipeline, it will start to run automatically. First, it detects the sample code in source location, bundles up the files, and move to second stage that you defined. During this stage, it passes the code to Elastic Beanstalk, which contains the EC2 instance that will host our code. Elastic Beanstalk handles deploying the code to the EC2 instance.
Related
I am setting up a CI&CD environment for a GCP project involves Cloud Run. While setting up everything via Terraform is pretty much straightforward, I cannot figure out how to update the environment when the code changes.
The documentation says:
Make a change to the configuration file.
But that couples the application deployment to terraform configuration, which should be responsible only for infrastructure deployment.
Ideally, I use terraform to provision the infrastructure, and another CI step to build and deploy the container.
Is there a best-practice here?
Relevant sources: 1.
I ended up separating Cloud Run service creation (which is still done in Terraform) and deployment to two different workflows.
The key component was to make terraform ignore the actual deployed image so that when the code deployment workflow is done, terraform won't complained that the Cloud Run image is different from the one it manages. I achieved this by setting ignore_changes = [template[0].spec[0].containers[0].image] on the google_cloud_run_service resource.
Hello I am unfamiliar with shell scripting but I was wondering if it is possible for the current instance to check if it is the last instance in the deployment and create a Cloudfront invalidation in one of the hooks?
There is no native way to find out if the current instance is the last in the deployment. Such a method is flaky and error prone anyway. There are several different deployment configurations which govern how CodeDeploy service deploys code (AllAtOnce/HalfAtATime) [1] so it is not possible to have 1 instance as last instance as sometimes multiple instances batch maybe the last instance.
So a better engineering approach would be to put your CodeDeploy deployment as a stage in CodePipeline. As a subsequent stage (after deployment), add a Build stage (CodeBuild) and run the invalidation command from the buildspec in CodeBuild. This will make sure that your Build stage (i.e. invalidation command) will only be run after a successful deployment to all instances.
Ref:
[1] https://docs.aws.amazon.com/codedeploy/latest/userguide/deployment-configurations.html
I created a repo in Code Commit for a static s3 website
Then I created a CodePipeline and configured the code build part.
There I set the Build Spec file with the some basic commands:
build and then copy the files in the s3 bucket.
The third step the Code Deploy I'm not sure why it's needed.
When I run it it gets stuck for an hour.
I did disable it and the site was deployed just fine.
Am I missing something?
You can disable the CodeDeploy part if it is working fine for you. Or you can skip the CodeBuild step and use appspec.yml to deploy the static website onto S3.
You have to use either of the steps to make it work, you can't skip both the steps.
CodeDeploy part is present in the CodePipeline in case you need to deploy it on your EC2 fleet or Autoscaling Group after you have built the artifacts. If not needed, just skip it.
Codepipeline has three stages source->codeBuild->codeDeploy. According to Amazon you must use atleast two stages of the Codepipeline, You cannot skip the first stage (i.e source) but you choose any one or both from the remaining. For your use case source and CodeBuild stages are enough you don't need codedeploy. Just remove the codeDeploy stage.
So we are launching an ecommerce store built on magento. We are looking to deploy it on Amazon EC2 instance using RDS as database service and using amazon auto-scaling and elastic load balancer to scale the application when needed.
What I don't understand is this:
I have installed and configured my production magento enviorment on an EC2 instance (database is in RDS). This much is working fine. But now when I want to dynamically scale the number of instances
how will I deploy the code on the dynamically generated instances each time?
Will aws copy the whole instance assign it a new ip and spawn it as a
new instance or will I have to write some code to automate this
process?
Plus will it not be an overhead to pull code from git and deploy every time a new instance is spawned?
A detailed explanation or direction towards some resources on the topic will be greatly appreciated.
You do this in the AutoScalingGroup Launch Configuration. There is a UserData section in the LaunchConfiguration in CloudFormation where you would write a script that is ran when ever the ASG scales up and deploys a new instance.
https://docs.aws.amazon.com/AWSCloudFormation/latest/UserGuide/aws-properties-as-launchconfig.html#cfn-as-launchconfig-userdata
This is the same as the UserData section in an EC2 Instance. You can use LifeCycle hooks that will tell the ASG not to put the EC2 instance into load until everything you want to have configured it set up.
https://docs.aws.amazon.com/AWSCloudFormation/latest/UserGuide/aws-resource-as-lifecyclehook.html
I linked all CloudFormation pages, but you may be using some other CI/CD tool for deploying your infrastructure, but hopefully that gets you started.
To start, do check AWS CloudFormation. You will be creating templates to design how the infrastructure of your application works ~ infrastructure as code. With these templates in place, you can rollout an update to your infrastructure by pushing changes to your templates and/or to your application code.
In my current project, we have a github repository dedicated for these infrastructure templates and a separate repository for our application code. Create a pipeline for creating AWS resources that would rollout an updated to AWS every time you push to the repository on a specific branch.
Create an infrastructure pipeline
have your first stage of the pipeline to trigger build whenever there's code changes to your infrastructure templates. See AWS CodePipeline and also see AWS CodeBuild. These aren't the only AWS resources you'll be needing but those are probably the main ones, of course aside from this being done in cloudformation template as mentioned earlier.
how will I deploy the code on the dynamically generated instances each time?
Check how containers work, it would be better and will greatly supplement on your learning on how launching new version of application work. To begin, see docker, but feel free to check any resources at your disposal
Continuation with my current project: We do have a separate pipeline dedicated for our application, but will also get triggered after our infrastructure pipeline update. Our application pipeline is designed to build a new version of our application via AWS Codebuild, this will create an image that will become a container ~ from the docker documentation.
we have two triggers or two sources that will trigger an update rollout to our application pipeline, one is when there's changes to infrastructure pipeline and it successfully built and second when there's code changes on our github repository connected via AWS CodeBuild.
Check AWS AutoScaling , this areas covers the dynamic launching of new instances, shutting down instances when needed, replacing unhealthy instances when needed. See also AWS CloudWatch, you can design criteria with it to trigger scaling down/up and/or in/out.
Will aws copy the whole instance assign it a new ip and spawn it as a new instance or will I have to write some code to automate this process?
See AWS ElasticLoadBalancing and also check out more on AWS AutoScaling. On the automation process, if ever you'll push through with CloudFormation, instance and/or containers(depending on your design) will be managed gracefully.
Plus will it not be an overhead to pull code from git and deploy every time a new instance is spawned?
As mentioned, earlier having a pipeline for rolling out new versions of your application via CodeBuild, this will create an image with the new code changes and when everything is ready, it will be deployed ~ becomes a container. The old EC2 instance or the old container( depending on how you want your application be deployed) will be gracefully shut down after a new version of your application is up and running. This will give you zero downtime.
I have a site in a S3 bucket, configured for web access, for which I run an aws s3 sync command every time I push on a specific git repository (I'm using Gitlab at the moment).
So if I push to stable branch, a Gitlab runner performs the npm start build command for building the site, and then aws s3 sync to synchronize to a specific bucket.
I want to migrate to CodeCommit and use pure AWS tools to do the same.
So far I was able to successfully setup the repository, create a CodeBuild for building the artifact, and the artifact is being stored (not deployed) to a S3 bucket. Difference is that I can't get it to deploy to the root folder of the bucket instead of a subfolder, seems like the process is not made for that. I need it to be on a root folder because of how the web access is configured.
For the deployment process, I was taking a look at CodeDeploy but it doesn't actually let me deploy to S3 bucket, it only uses the bucket as an intermediary for deployment to a EC2 instance. So far I get the feeling CodeDeploy is useful only for deployments involving EC2.
This tutorial with a similar requirement to mine, uses CodePipeline and CodeBuild, but the deployment step is actually a aws s3 sync command (same as I was doing on Gitlab), and the actual deployment step on CodePipeline is disabled.
I was looking into a solution which involves using AWS features made for this specific purpose, but I can't find any.
I'm also aware of LambCI, but to me looks like what CodePipeline / CodeBuild is doing, storing artifacts (not deploying to the root folder of the bucket). Plus, I'm looking for an option which doesn't require me to learn or deploy new configuration files (outside AWS config files).
Is this possible with the current state of AWS features?
Today AWS has announced as a new feature the ability to target S3 in the deployment stage of CodePipeline. The announcement is here, and the documentation contains a tutorial available here.
Using your CodeBuild/CodePipeline approach, you should now be able to choose S3 as the deployment provider in the deployment stage rather than performing the sync in your build script. To configure the phase, you provide an S3 bucket name, specify whether to extract the contents of the artifact zip, and if so provide an optional path for the extraction. This should allow you to deploy your content directly to the root of a bucket by omitting the path.
I was dealing with similar issue and as far as I was able to find out, there is no service which is suitable for deploying app to S3.
AWS CodeDeploy is indeed for deploying code running as server.
My solution was to use CodePipeline with three stages:
Source which takes source code from AWS CodeCommit
Build with AWS CodeBuild
Custom lambda function which after successful build takes artifact from S3 artifact storage, unzip it and copies files to my S3 website host.
I used this AWS lambda function from SeamusJ https://github.com/SeamusJ/deploy-build-to-s3
Several changes had to be made, I used node-unzip-2 instead of unzip-stream for unziping artifict from s3.
Also I had to change ACLs in website.ts file
Uploading from CodeBuild is currently the best solution available.
There's some suggestions on how to orchestrate this deployment via CodePipeline in this answer.