We use Asterisk CDR and everything works fine, but the web page (Apache) shows call records for today only. So, yesterday there were only yesterday's calls, today there are only today's calls, etc.
Physically the call records are in the folder where trey're supposed to be, but for some reason we can't see them on the web page.
Almost everything is by default here and we even are sure it worked as needed before and we didn't change anything since.
Could you please help me to found out what's the problem?
Thanks.
The first thing we did was restarting all the services and even rebooting the server, but it didn't help.
As I mentioned before we didn't change anything since we installed CDR and it worked fine then. We've checked all the settings and haven't found anything suspicious.
I don't know what is your asterisk GUI. For FREEPBX(most used) you should select exact date to see early records.
Related
My CFIDE just went crazy this morning and I can't locate the what is causing this. When I log in from example.com/cfide/administrator/index.cfm some of the tabs on the left work fine and some are showing the index page of example.com like in an iframe... I restarted the app server but the issue is still there. Any recommendations on how to debug this thing?
So for posterity here is what we found.
There are two possibilities of exploits that could be affecting you:
the bitcoin exploit (miner.d)
the ckeditor file upload exploit (this is the h.cfm file)
There are others but these are common and known. Both tap underlying java to unfold work that either calls something more sinister, delivers server meta data or unrolls a scheduled task to fireoff worker bees to consume resources doing something the admin is unaware of.
So as we discovered we have a varietal of this h.cfm called fusebox.cfm (obfuscated with bonus encrypted CF5 garble). If you can open the file you will see that h.cfm file and open it you will see UGLY and Obfuscated code but not very sophisticated. A lot can be revealed by a coder's code and if you deconstruct and format this particular code you will discern that the developer is not native to CF, and jumps from script style to CMFL style (in caps no-less).
(here is the Stack Overflow link with the raw code (be careful))
It is also named: i.cfm, h9.cfm, r.cfm, adss.cfm or fusebox.cfm here is the black hat page that give you a ton of info. I'm viewing the cached site because I don't trust the blackhat sites. (because one loaded something on my system that raised an antivirus alert).
The file may be unreadable so here is a link to a site that describes some github sourcecode that can decrypt it for you. That is Coldfusion 5 crap that still floats around now and again. (I'm pretty sure it will look similar to that code in the SO link I pasted above).
Post mortum: One more coldfusion serve saved from villainy. Remember, it never hurts to run through your systems and see if anything can be found like this. It also never hurts to make things a little more difficult for would be server exploiters ;)
We have one page that for just one user is occasionally returning nothing but a hash symbol (#). This page works perfectly fine for other users all of the time, and perfectly fine for this user much of the time. We cannot reproduce the problem internally. Unfortunately, this problem is sporadic and occurs within a modal dialog, so we cannot really test outside the modal dialog and we cannot get the html source when it does occur.
I recall running into a similar problem once before. Some random page was returning just a pound sign. Being able to see what was actually going on since it wasn't in a modal dialog, and having it occur in a dev environment, I resolved it pretty quickly then. But it was a while ago and I can't recall any details of the incident. Has anyone else ever seen CF do this before? Any thoughts on what might cause it?
I would be sure that you are not caching the ajax pages, also there could be an extra hash somewhere like on a color ##ffffff for example and certain browser standards are allowing it while it crashed and shows # in others, I would also check your markup for any extra tags, especially closing ones. I have seen this with dialog before. I would love to see code on this if you have it.
I have a CF9 site set up locally on OSX Snow Leopard, and it's started to behave very strangely - probably about 1 out of every 5 times I load any page in the site, it will throw a 'Cannot find CFML template for custom tag' error. I just refresh the page and then everything works fine. It can happen on any page, but it never happens consistently with any one page. Furthermore, this doesn't happen at all on the live server when the code is checked in through SVN, so I figure it has to be some kind of configuration problem on my local instance. I can still do my work, but it's pretty annoying having to refresh pages ALL the time. Has anyone run into similar difficulties?
Try using <cfmodule template="pathTo/yourTag.cfm"> rather than <cf_yourtag>, so you can specify the exact location of the template (in case the server is getting confused as to where it resides).
FYI, this is based on a tip from Raymond Camden's blog post: http://www.raymondcamden.com/index.cfm/2006/8/17/ColdFusion-Custom-Tag-Tips
Chris, odd that I should run into your question now, as this just started happening to me last night. I have all of my CF errors being emailed to me, and I am seeing that similar problems are happening across multiple sites that all run the same software, some of which haven't been touched in a long time. That got me thinking, it's probably a corrupt compiled template in the CF cache. You can recompile the template by making a slight change to it, say add an extra line or a comment or something, then access the site again. Or, purge the whole cache and let CF rebuild everything, which is likely what I'll do since who knows what else might be affected.
Clearing the Cache in Coldfusion Production server
in the MFC application I am working on, I need to have an Internet Explorer (we are using the component CHtmlView) displayed, currently we are able to change the rendering mode the IE works in by using the FEATURE_BROWSER_EMULATION registry keys. However that only allows us to change the rendering mode of all the CHtmlView instances in the application, plus to apply that change, we must restart the application.
The problem is, we would like to have more than one version of the IE displayed side-by-side in our application. I know that it is possible to get multiple IE versions on one computer, but I'm not sure, how to get them all in one application.
We have some ideas, how to solve this problem, but they are not really a trivial solutions, so I want to ask for your ideas. Anyway, here is what we've come up with:
Download the source code of the page, add the document compatibility tag, change all the addresses in the document to the absolute ones, and save this page to the disk. Then reload the page from the disc with the IE. This solution works only partially, because although it makes IE to use the correct rendering mode, the page fails to load some of the resources, because it is in the different location than the original - the addresses we had changed works well, but for example the JavaScript generated ones doesn't. And this solution is generally very messy, so we had dropped that.
Use multiple processes - each IE version would have it's own executable/dll library, we use the browser emulation feature on each executable, and then somehow glue this into one application (I admit, I have no idea how, as I've never used multiple processes with windows/MFC). But I don't know, if that solution would even work...
Create a proxy for our application, that will change the downloaded source code in a similar way as the solution 1 presents - it will add the document compatibility tag, to force the IE into the desired mode, but it can leave the addresses intact, as the IE would see the source as coming from the original location. This solution seems to me like the safest one, but like with the 2. solution, I don't know how to make a proxy layer for our application, and more importantly, how much time would it take.
So do you have any ideas on how else could this be solved? If the solution uses something other than CHtmlView, so be it, we can always change that.
As for the IE versions, we would like to have, it would be nice to support IE6, but it is not necessary, the lowest required version is IE7.
Thanks ahead for your time, any ideas would be appreciated.
In the end I have solved this by using
our own proxy server (implemented using boost asio), and modifying the http request/response headers to force IE into the correct compatibility mode.
several executables with unique names, with the compatibility mode set in the registry. Each browser version ran in a separate process.
As it turned out, the proxy server solution didn't always work as expected. The multi-process solution did work as intended, but in the end, the emulated browsers didn't always work as the real browsers, and the whole solution wasn't 100% reliable.
I hope this will help someone in the future.
A while ago, I worked on an application where a manager can approve/deny xxx applications. When some body selects an action from a drop down, it opens a cfwindow and loads cftextarea richtext="yes" in there, so that they could enter reasons for approval/denial.
Now the culprit is that in production, the fckEditor has a ton of funky chars in IE8. Same thing won't happen in FireFox. Also, the IE8 does not show the same stuff in dev.
I have looked at the scripts in /cf_admin/CFIDE/scripts/ajax/FCKeditor, they are all the same.
Since this wasn't an issue before, I am not sure where to look at. Something got updated on the server which probably causes this problem. Does anybody know what could be the problem?
It turns out the vp put the header X-UA-Compatible: IE=IE7 in IIS to force IE8 emulate IE7. When I made them change this to X-UA-Compatible: IE=EmulateIE7, everything started to work perfectly again. For more details see Introducing IE=EmulateIE7.
Hope it helps others. Thanks.