I want to use the AWS S3 sync command to sync a large bucket with another bucket.
I found this answer that say that the files from the bucket synced over the AWS backbone and are not copied to the local machine but I can't find a reference anywhere in the documentation. Does anyone has a proof for this behavior? any formal documentation that explains how it works?
I tried to find something in the documentation but nothing there.
To learn more about the sync command, check CLI docs. You can directly refer to the section named -
Sync from S3 bucket to another S3 bucket
The following sync command syncs objects to a specified bucket and
prefix from objects in another specified bucket and prefix by copying
s3 objects. An s3 object will require copying if one of the following
conditions is true:
The s3 object does not exist in the specified bucket and prefix
destination.
The sizes of the two s3 objects differ.
The last modified time of the source is newer than the last modified time of the destination.
Use the S3 replication capability if you only want to replicate the data that moves from bucket1 to bucket2.
Related
I have a log archive bucket, and that bucket has 2.5m+ objects.
I am looking to download some specific time period files. For this I have tried different methods but all of them are failing.
My observation is those queries start from oldest file, but the files I seek are the newest ones. So it takes forever to find them.
aws s3 sync s3://mybucket . --exclude "*" --include "2021.12.2*" --include "2021.12.3*" --include "2022.01.01*"
Am I doing something wrong?
Is it possible to make these query start from newest files so it might take less time to complete?
I also tried using S3 Browser and CloudBerry. Same problem. Tried with a EC2 that is inside the same AWS network. Same problem.
2.5m+ objects in an Amazon S3 bucket is indeed a large number of objects!
When listing the contents of an Amazon S3 bucket, the S3 API only returns 1000 objects per API call. Therefore, when the AWS CLI (or CloudBerry, etc) is listing the objects in the S3 bucket it requires 2500+ API calls. This is most probably the reason why the request is taking so long (and possibly failing due to lack of memory to store the results).
You can possibly reduce the time by specifying a Prefix, which reduces the number of objects returned from the API calls. This would help if the objects you want to copy are all in a sub-folder.
Failing that, you could use Amazon S3 Inventory, which can provide a daily or weekly CSV file listing all objects. You could then extract from that CSV file a list of objects you want to copy (eg use Excel or write a program to parse the file). Then, specifically copy those objects using aws s3 cp or from a programming language. For example, a Python program could parse the script and then use download_file() to download each of the desired objects.
The simple fact is that a flat-structure Amazon S3 bucket with 2.5m+ objects will always be difficult to list. If possible, I would encourage you to use 'folders' to structure the bucket so that you would only need to list portions of the bucket at a time.
What is the best way to copy contents of one S3 folder to another using boto3 python client ? I am trying to evaluate boto3 s3 client copy vs upload_file .
Is one more performance efficient over another ?
Under what scenarios one is preferred over another?
To copy an object in Amazon S3, you can use the copy_object() command.
This works:
In the same or different buckets
In the same or different regions
In the same or different accounts
The command is sent to the destination bucket, which then "pulls" the object from the source bucket. There is no need to download/upload the object, so it works fast and does not consume your bandwidth.
The only situation in which a download/upload might be preferable to a Copy might be where it is not possible to give both GET permissions on the source bucket and PUT permissions on the destination bucket for the same set of credentials.
I write an AWS lambda function in Node.js for image resizing and trigger it when images upload.
I have already more than 1,000,000 images existing in bucket.
I want to run this lambda function on that images but not find anything till yet.
How can I run AWS lamdba function on existing images of S3 bucket?
Note:- I know this question already asked on Stack overflow, but issue is that no solution of them given till yet
Unfortunately, Lambda cannot be triggered automatically for objects that are already existing in a S3 bucket.
You will have to invoke your Lambda function manually for each image in your S3 bucket.
First, you will need to list existing objects in your S3 bucket using the ListObjectsV2 action.
For each object in your S3 bucket, you must then invoke your Lambda function and provide the S3 object's information as the Payload.
Yes , it's completely true that lambda cannot be triggered by objects already present there in your s3 bucket, but invoking your lambda manually for each object is a completely dumb idea.
With some clever techniques you can perform your tasks on those images easily :
The hard way is, make a program locally that exactly does the same thing as your lambda function but add two more things, firstly you have to iterate over each object in your bucket, then perform your code on it and then save it to destination path of s3 after resizing. i.e, for all images already stored in your s3 bucket , instead of using lambda, you are resizing the images locally in your computer and saving them back to s3 destination.
The easiest way is, first make sure that you have configured s3 notification's event type to be Object Created (All) as trigger for your lambda.
Then after this, move all your already stored images to a new temporary bucket, and then move those images back to the original bucket, this is how your lambda will get triggered for each image automatically. You can do the moving task easily by using sdk's provided by AWS. For example, for moving files using boto3 in python, you can refer this link to moving example in python using boto3
Instead of using moving , i.e cut and paste , you can use copy and paste commands too.
In addition to Mausam Sharma's comment you can run the copy between buckets using the aws cli:
aws s3 sync s3://SOURCE-BUCKET-NAME s3://DESTINATION-BUCKET-NAME --source-region SOURCE-REGION-NAME --region DESTINATION-REGION-NAME
from here:
https://medium.com/tensult/copy-s3-bucket-objects-across-aws-accounts-e46c15c4b9e1
You can simply copy back to the same bucket with the CLI which will replace the original file with itself and then run the lambda as a result.
aws s3 copy s3://SOURCE-BUCKET-NAME s3://SOURCE-BUCKET-NAME --recursive
You can also include/exclude glob patterns which can be used to selectively run against say a particular day, or specific extensions etc.
aws s3 copy s3://SOURCE-BUCKET-NAME s3://SOURCE-BUCKET-NAME --recursive --exclude "*" --include "2020-01-15*"
It's worth noting that like many of the other answers here, this will incur costs on s3 for read/write etc, so cautiously apply this in the event of buckets containing lots of files.
We have options to :
1. Copy file/object to another S3 location or local path (cp)
2. List S3 objects (ls)
3. Create bucket (mb) and move objects to bucket (mv)
4. Remove a bucket (rb) and remove an object (rm)
5. Sync objects and S3 prefixes
and many more.
But before using the commands, we need to check if S3 service is available in first place. How to do it?
Is there a command like :
aws S3 -isavailable
and we get response like
0 - S3 is available, I can go ahead upload object/create bucket etc.
1 - S3 is not availble, you can't upload object etc. ?
You should assume that Amazon S3 is available. If there is a problem with S3, you will receive an error when making a call with the Amazon CLI.
If you are particularly concerned, then add a simple CLI command first, eg aws s3 ls and throw away the results. But that's really the same concept. Or, you could use the --dry-run option available on many commands that simply indicates whether you would have had sufficient permissions to make the request, but doesn't actually run the request.
It is more likely that you will have an error in your configuration (eg wrong region, credentials not valid) than S3 being down.
I'd like to write a Lambda function that is triggered when files are added or modified in an s3 bucket and processes them and moves them elsewhere, clobbering older versions of the files.
I'm wondering if AWS Lambda can be configured to trigger when files are updated?
After reviewing the Boto3 documentation for s3 it looks like the only things that could happen in a s3 bucket would be creations and deletions.
Additionally, the AWS documentation seems to indicate there is no way to trigger things on 'updates' to S3.
Am I correct in thinking there is no real concept of an 'update' to a file in S3 and that an update would actually be when something was destroyed and recreated? If I'm mistaken, how can I trigger a Lambda function when an S3 file is changed in a bucket?
No, there is no concept of updating a file on S3. A file on S3 is updated the same way it is uploaded in the first place - through a PUT object request. (Relevant answer here.) An S3 bucket notification configured to trigger on a PUT object request can execute a Lambda function.
There is now a new functionality for S3 buckets. Under properties there is the possibility to enable versioning for this bucket. And if you set a trigger for creating on S3 assigned to your Lambda function - this will executed every time if you 'update' the same file as it is a new version.