I wrote simple word document with one paragraph and one table (with one cell) under that paragraph. I'm using Aspose 16.7 and Aspose 22.9 (on both versions I have same problem).
When I open that word document using aspose it will look like this:
\r\r\r<<AC:doc_title:value>>\r<<AC:doc_title:value>>\a\a\rTest\r\r\r
Replace method won't work when it tries to find and replace <<AC:doc_title:value>> which is in paragraph but when I put same tag in table cell, replace method will find that tag and replace it with given text. This is my replace method call:
node.Range.Replace(new Regex("<<AC:doc_title:value>>"), "Replaced text", new FindReplaceOptions(FindReplaceDirection.Forward));
I tried to call Parse method with different FindReplaceOptions but that didn't give any results.
I also tried Replace method with only two parameters, node.Range.Replace(new Regex("<<AC:doc_title:value>>"), value) and when using this method, I didn't have any problems, it works fine (but problem is that method is Obsolete now).
Thank you for your help.
Range.Replace(Regex, string) overload is no marked as obsolete. So you can use it:
https://reference.aspose.com/words/net/aspose.words/range/replace/#replace_2
This overload internally calls the overload with FindReplaeOptions, so both should work the same:
public int Replace(Regex pattern, string replacement)
{
return Replace(pattern, replacement, new FindReplaceOptions());
}
If you still has problems, please post the question in Aspose.Words support forum and attach your input document there for testing.
Related
In a function I do not control, data is being returned via
return xmlFormat(rc.content)
I later want to do a
<cfoutput>#resultsofreturn#</cfoutput>
The problem is all the HTML tags are escaped.
I have considered
<cfoutput>#DecodeForHTML(resultsofreturn)#</cfoutput>
But I am not sure these are inverses of each other
Like Adrian concluded, the best option is to implement a system to get to the pre-encoded value.
In the current state, the string your working with is encoded for an xml document. One option is to create an xml document with the text and parse the text back out of the xml document. I'm not sure how efficient this method is, but it will return the text back to it's pre-encoded value.
function xmlDecode(text){
return xmlParse("<t>#text#</t>").t.xmlText;
}
TryCF.com example
As of CF 10, you should be using the newer encodeFor functions. These functions account for high ASCII characters as well as UTF-8 characters.
Old and Busted
XmlFormat()
HTMLEditFormat()
JSStringFormat()
New Hotness
encodeForXML()
encodeForXMLAttribute()
encodeForHTML()
encodeForHTMLAttribute()
encodeForJavaScript()
encodeForCSS()
The output from these functions differs by context.
Then, if you're only getting escaped HTML, you can convert it back using Jsouo or the Jakarta Commons Lang library. There are some examples in a related SO answer.
Obviously, the best solution would be to update the existing function to return either version of the content. Is there a way to copy that function in order to return the unescaped content? Or can you just call it from a new function that uses the Java solution to convert the HTML?
Let's say I have the following strings:
"This [color=RGB]is[\color] a string."
"This [color=RGB][bold]is[\bold][\color] another string."
What I'm looking for is a good way to parse the string in order to extract the tag information and then reconstruct the original string without tags.
The tag informations will be used during text rendering.
Obviously I can achieve the goal by working directly with strings (find/substr/replace and so on), but I'm asking if there is another way cleaner, for example using regular expression.
Note:
There are very few tags I need, but there is the possibility to nest them (only of different type).
Can't use Boost.
There's a very simple answer that might work, depending on the complexity of your strings. (And me understanding you correctly, i.e. you just want to get the cleaned up strings, not actually extract the tags.) Just remove all tags. Replace
\[.*?]
with nothing. Example here
Now, if your string should be able to contain tag-like objects this might not work.
Regards
This is my first post on stackoverflow, so please be gentle with me...
I am still learning regex - mostly because I have finally discovered how useful they can be and this is in part through using Sublime Text 2. So this is Perl regex (I believe)
I have done searching on this and other sites but I am now genuinely stuck. Maybe I am trying to do something that can't be done
I would like to find a regex (pattern) that will let me find the function or method or procedure etc that contains a given variable or method call.
I have tried a number of expressions and they seem to get part of the way but not all the way. Particularly when searching in Javascript I pick up multiple function declarations instead of the one nearest to the call/variable that I am looking for.
for example:
I am looking for the function that calls the method save data()
I have learnt, from this excellent site that I can use (?s) to switch . to include newlines
function.*(?=(?s).*?savedata\(\))
however, that will find the first instance of the word function and then all the text unto and including savedata()
if there are multiple procedures then it will start at the next function and repeat until it gets to savedata() again
function(?s).*?savedata\(\) does something similar
I have tried asking it to ignore the second function (I believe) by using something like:
function(?s).*?(?:(?!function).*?)*savedata\(\)
But that doesn't work.
I have done some investigation with look forwards and look backwards but either I am doing it wrong (highly possible) or they are not the right thing.
In summary (I guess), how do I go backwards, from a given word to the nearest occurrence of a different word.
At the moment I am using this to search through some javascript files to try and understand the structure/calls etc but ultimately I am hoping to use on c# files and some vb.net files
Many thanks in advance
Thanks for the swift responses and sorry for not added an example block of code - which I will do now (modified but still sufficient to show the issue)
if I have a simple block of javascript like the following:
function a_CellClickHandler(gridName, cellId, button){
var stuffhappenshere;
var and here;
if(something or other){
if (anothertest) {
event.returnValue=false;
event.cancelBubble=true;
return true;
}
else{
event.returnValue=false;
event.cancelBubble=true;
return true;
}
}
}
function a_DblClickHandler(gridName, cellId){
var userRow = rowfromsomewhere;
var userCell = cellfromsomewhereelse;
//this will need to save the local data before allowing any inserts to ensure that they are inserted in the correct place
if (checkforarangeofthings){
if (differenttest) {
InsSeqNum = insertnumbervalue;
InsRowID = arow.getValue()
blnWasInsert = true;
blnWasDoubleClick = true;
SaveData();
}
}
}
running the regex against this - including the second one that was identified as should be working Sublime Text 2 will select everything from the first function through to SaveData()
I would like to be able to get to just the dblClickHandler in this case - not both.
Hopefully this code snippet will add some clarity and sorry for not posting originally as I hoped a standard code file would suffice.
This regex will find every Javascript function containing the SaveData method:
(?<=[\r\n])([\t ]*+)function[^\r\n]*+[\r\n]++(?:(?!\1\})[^\r\n]*+[\r\n]++)*?[^\r\n]*?\bSaveData\(\)
It will match all the lines in the function up to, and including, the first line containing the SaveData method.
Caveat:
The source code must have well-formed indentation for this to work, as the regex uses matching indentations to detect the end of functions.
Will not match a function if it starts on the first line of the file.
Explanation:
(?<=[\r\n]) Start at the beginning of a line
([\t ]*+) Capture the indentation of that line in Capture Group 1
function[^\r\n]*+[\r\n]++ Match the rest of the declaration line of the function
(?:(?!\1\})[^\r\n]*+[\r\n]++)*? Match more lines (lazily) which are not the last line of the function, until:
[^\r\n]*?\bSaveData\(\) Match the first line of the function containing the SaveData method call
Note: The *+ and ++ are possessive quantifiers, only used to speed up execution.
EDIT:
Fixed two minor problems with the regex.
EDIT:
Fixed another minor problem with the regex.
I have about 100 lines that look like the below:
assertEquals(results.get(0).getID(),1);
They all start with assertEquals and contain two arguments. Im looking for a way to use find and replace all to swap the arguments of all these lines.
Thanks
use the following regexp to find:
assertEquals\((.*),(.*)\);
and this replacement value:
assertEquals(\2,\1);
The regexp means "assertEquals( followed by a first group of chars followed by a comma followed by a second group of chars followed by );".
The replacement value means "assertEquals( followed by the second group of chars found followed by a comma followed by the first group of chars found followed by );".
I don't know how to do it in Eclipse, but if you happen to also have a vim installed you might load your file in it and do
:%s/\(assertEquals(\)\(.*\),\(.*\))/\1\3,\2)/
If you find yourself swapping parameter order in method declarations farily often, I found a plugin that does it for you with a single click.
This plug-in adds two toolbar buttons to the Eclipse Java editor:
Swap backward
Swap forward
With the caret at | in:
void process(int age, String |name, boolean member) {...}
clicking the Swap forward button yields:
void process(int age, boolean member, String |name) {...}
or clicking Swap backward button with the original source yields:
void process(String |name, int age, boolean member) {...}
Here is the article discussing it.
Here is the jar to drop into your eclipse plugin directory.
You can also use Eclipse's built-in method signature refactoring to re-order the arguments.
In the case of converting from JUnit to TestNG (which is what it looks like you're doing), you can copy org.testng.Assert into your project and refactor the assertXYZ methods to transpose the expected/actual arguments.
When you're done, delete your copy of org.testng.Assert
search for
assertEquals\((.*),\s*(.*)\);
and replace with
assertEquals(\2, \1);
Sorry for the more or less superflous answer. But it does work better for me and I think for others as well.
My edit of the first post was rejected.
I recently discussed editors with a co-worker. He uses one of the less popular editors and I use another (I won't say which ones since it's not relevant and I want to avoid an editor flame war). I was saying that I didn't like his editor as much because it doesn't let you do find/replace with regular expressions.
He said he's never wanted to do that, which was surprising since it's something I find myself doing all the time. However, off the top of my head I wasn't able to come up with more than one or two examples. Can anyone here offer some examples of times when they've found regex find/replace useful in their editor? Here's what I've been able to come up with since then as examples of things that I've actually had to do:
Strip the beginning of a line off of every line in a file that looks like:
Line 25634 :
Line 632157 :
Taking a few dozen files with a standard header which is slightly different for each file and stripping the first 19 lines from all of them all at once.
Piping the result of a MySQL select statement into a text file, then removing all of the formatting junk and reformatting it as a Python dictionary for use in a simple script.
In a CSV file with no escaped commas, replace the first character of the 8th column of each row with a capital A.
Given a bunch of GDB stack traces with lines like
#3 0x080a6d61 in _mvl_set_req_done (req=0x82624a4, result=27158) at ../../mvl/src/mvl_serv.c:850
strip out everything from each line except the function names.
Does anyone else have any real-life examples? The next time this comes up, I'd like to be more prepared to list good examples of why this feature is useful.
Just last week, I used regex find/replace to convert a CSV file to an XML file.
Simple enough to do really, just chop up each field (luckily it didn't have any escaped commas) and push it back out with the appropriate tags in place of the commas.
Regex make it easy to replace whole words using word boundaries.
(\b\w+\b)
So you can replace unwanted words in your file without disturbing words like Scunthorpe
Yesterday I took a create table statement I made for an Oracle table and converted the fields to setString() method calls using JDBC and PreparedStatements. The table's field names were mapped to my class properties, so regex search and replace was the perfect fit.
Create Table text:
...
field_1 VARCHAR2(100) NULL,
field_2 VARCHAR2(10) NULL,
field_3 NUMBER(8) NULL,
field_4 VARCHAR2(100) NULL,
....
My Regex Search:
/([a-z_])+ .*?,?/
My Replacement:
pstmt.setString(1, \1);
The result:
...
pstmt.setString(1, field_1);
pstmt.setString(1, field_2);
pstmt.setString(1, field_3);
pstmt.setString(1, field_4);
....
I then went through and manually set the position int for each call and changed the method to setInt() (and others) where necessary, but that worked handy for me. I actually used it three or four times for similar field to method call conversions.
I like to use regexps to reformat lists of items like this:
int item1
double item2
to
public void item1(int item1){
}
public void item2(double item2){
}
This can be a big time saver.
I use it all the time when someone sends me a list of patient visit numbers in a column (say 100-200) and I need them in a '0000000444','000000004445' format. works wonders for me!
I also use it to pull out email addresses in an email. I send out group emails often and all the bounced returns come back in one email. So, I regex to pull them all out and then drop them into a string var to remove from the database.
I even wrote a little dialog prog to apply regex to my clipboard. It grabs the contents applies the regex and then loads it back into the clipboard.
One thing I use it for in web development all the time is stripping some text of its HTML tags. This might need to be done to sanitize user input for security, or for displaying a preview of a news article. For example, if you have an article with lots of HTML tags for formatting, you can't just do LEFT(article_text,100) + '...' (plus a "read more" link) and render that on a page at the risk of breaking the page by splitting apart an HTML tag.
Also, I've had to strip img tags in database records that link to images that no longer exist. And let's not forget web form validation. If you want to make a user has entered a correct email address (syntactically speaking) into a web form this is about the only way of checking it thoroughly.
I've just pasted a long character sequence into a string literal, and now I want to break it up into a concatenation of shorter string literals so it doesn't wrap. I also want it to be readable, so I want to break only after spaces. I select the whole string (minus the quotation marks) and do an in-selection-only replace-all with this regex:
/.{20,60} /
...and this replacement:
/$0"ΒΆ + "/
...where the pilcrow is an actual newline, and the number of spaces varies from one incident to the next. Result:
String s = "I recently discussed editors with a co-worker. He uses one "
+ "of the less popular editors and I use another (I won't say "
+ "which ones since it's not relevant and I want to avoid an "
+ "editor flame war). I was saying that I didn't like his "
+ "editor as much because it doesn't let you do find/replace "
+ "with regular expressions.";
The first thing I do with any editor is try to figure out it's Regex oddities. I use it all the time. Nothing really crazy, but it's handy when you've got to copy/paste stuff between different types of text - SQL <-> PHP is the one I do most often - and you don't want to fart around making the same change 500 times.
Regex is very handy any time I am trying to replace a value that spans multiple lines. Or when I want to replace a value with something that contains a line break.
I also like that you can match things in a regular expression and not replace the full match using the $# syntax to output the portion of the match you want to maintain.
I agree with you on points 3, 4, and 5 but not necessarily points 1 and 2.
In some cases 1 and 2 are easier to achieve using a anonymous keyboard macro.
By this I mean doing the following:
Position the cursor on the first line
Start a keyboard macro recording
Modify the first line
Position the cursor on the next line
Stop record.
Now all that is needed to modify the next line is to repeat the macro.
I could live with out support for regex but could not live without anonymous keyboard macros.