I constructed a beamer_presentation .Rmd file in R Studio, and tried to compile it with rmarkdown::render(my_file). I am running RStudio Version 1.1.463; R Version 1.1.463 and Ubuntu 16. rmarkdown::render stopped RStudio with several errors (which I don't have access to now) and I needed to kill RStudio in the system. But once I had killed RStudio, my entire computer system; files, folders, everything but the operating system and app files were wiped from the system (including the R and RStudio settings).
Has anyone else had this experience? Unfortunately, I can't share logs, code or other informative items, because they have all been wiped. I restarted my machine, and the screen indicated that I essentially had a new install of Ubuntu 16.
I've had quite a number of operational problems with render and bookdown in the past, but nothing this extreme. I am posting to find if anyone else has had similar problems.
I've tried to reinstall backups, but my disks are scrubbed of anything except system files and folders. I have individual files on Google Cloud, but nothing that would help explain what happened.
I wish I could show code, but the disk is completely wiped.
I've been using R, RStudio and Ubuntu for several years, and never run into this ... I didn't expect this, and I would like to know whether this is an isolated case, or a more common occurrence.
I have to create and configure an eclipse (Mars 2) for a C project. The project is on a SVN repository, and can only be compiled on a specific linux redhat server that has the appropriate toolchain.
What I need is an IDE that would allow me to commit my changes to the repository and that would automagically synchronize them on the Linux server. I tried a few things but none of them worked. I must (to my great regret) avoid the need of a terminal while using that IDE, but of course not while configuring it.
Firstly, I used the Remote System Explorer feature in eclipse. I connected succefully to the server, created a "Remote Project" that I could open in the C/C++ perspective. However, the whole thing is impossible to use, as it has no indexation, I had to create "User Actions" in order to compile (which is on my point of vue pretty anti-ergonomic) and the SVN plugin does not detect the project as an SVN copy. Furthermore, in the C/C++ perspective, there is a 2s gap between the moment I type something, and the moment it appears on my screen.
I also tryed to mount a network filesystem on my local machine, with sshfs, and if it works far better, I still experience lags. Also, I had to write a Makefile and call my compiler via "ssh $(USER)#$(HOST) build.ksh". (one of the point of the projetc is to write a real Makefile...). But SVN is working.
I also tried to run eclipse on the host machine, with X forwarding, and if it works perfectly, there is still lags...
Finally, I tried an sftp synchronisation, but it seems I can't use my SVN plugin features and the sftp together.
I am out of solutions, and pretty frustrated as I feel that this kind of things should be pretty easy. I mean, all I want is that eclipse automatically copy my files on my remote home directory... Thanks for your help...
To me this sounds like a perfect use-case for a continuus integration (CI) system. Generally speaking, this CI system pulls the code from your repository (for example in regular intervals) and then executes the build chain, collects artifacts, informs you about the state of your build, etc.
Although it originated from the Java world, I have successfully used Jenkins for continuus integration of C-projects on a Linux server, but there are others, like TeamCity or GitLab CI (the latter would require you to switch to Git, but it's a really neat system with a YAML configuration for CI).
Of course CI systems have a learning curve - you don't something like a free meal - but it may really be worth the effort.
We just did a move from storing all files locally to a network drive. Problem is that is where my VS projects are also stored now. (No versioning system yet, working on that.) I know I heard of problems with doing this in the past, but never heard of a work-around. Is there a work around?
So my VS is installed locally. The files are on a network drive. How can I get this to work?
EDIT: I know what SHOULD be done, but is there a band-aid I can put on right now to fix this and maintain the network drive?
EDIT 2: I am sure I am not understanding something, but Bob King has the right idea. I'll work with the lead web developer when he gets back into the office to figure out a temporary solution until we get some sort of version control setup. Thanks for the ideas.
While we do use Source Control, we do also run all our projects from Network Drives (not shared directories, private directories on network drives). The network drives are backed up nightly, and also use Volume Shadow Copy, so if you need to revert to something before it made it's way to SC, then you can.
To get projects to run correctly with the right permission, follow these steps.
Basically, you've just got to map the shared directory to a drive, and then grant permission, based on that Url, to all code. Say you map to "N:\", then use "N:\*" as your Url pattern. It isn't obvious you need to wildcard, but you do.
The question is rather generic so I'll give an answer to one issue I was facing.
I run Visual Studio 2010 using a Parallels virtual machine on my Mac while keeping all my projects on the mac side via a network share. Visual Studio however wouldn't load the projects assembly files from there. Trying to set the rights using "caspol" alone didn't help in my case.
What finally worked for me to allow Visual Studio to load assemblies from a network share was to edit the file
"C:\Program Files (x86)\Microsoft Visual Studio 10.0\Common7\IDE\devenv.exe.config" (assuming a default installation).
in the xml "<runtime>" section you have to add
<loadFromRemoteSources enabled="true"/>
You may have to change the permissions on that file to allow write access. Save the file. Restart Visual Studio.
In the interests of actually answering the question, I copied this comment from jcarle.com:
Trusting Network Shares with Visual Studio 2010 / .NET Framework v4.0
January 20, 2011, 4:10 pm
If you are like me and you store all your code on a server, you will have likely learned about trusting a network share using CasPol.exe. However, when moving from Visual Studio 2008 (.NET Framework 2.0/3.0/3.5) over to Visual Studio 2010 (.NET Framework 4.0), you may find yourself scratching your head.
If you are used to using the Visual Studio Command Prompt to quickly get to CasPol, you may find that some of your projects will not seem to respect your new FullTrust settings. The reason is that, unless you are carefully paying attention, the Visual Studio Command Prompt defaults to adding the .NET Framework 4.0 folder to its path. If your project is still running under .NET Framework 2.0/3.0/3.5, it will require setting CasPol for those versions as well. Just a note, I have also personally had more success with using 1 as a code group instead of 1.2.
To trust a network share for all versions of the .NET Framework, simply call CasPol for each version using the full path as below:
C:\Windows\Microsoft.NET\Framework\v2.0.50727\CasPol -m -ag 1 -url file://YourSharePath* FullTrust
C:\Windows\Microsoft.NET\Framework\v4.0.30319\CasPol -m -ag 1 -url file://YourSharePath* FullTrust
I would not recommend doing that if you have (or even if you don't have) multiple people who are working on the projects. You're just asking for trouble.
If you're the only one working on it, on the other hand, you'll avoid much of the trouble. Performance is going to out the window, though. As far as how to get it to work, you just open the solution file from VS. You'll likely run into security issues, but can correct that using CASPOL. As I said, though, performance is going to be terrible. Again, not recommended at all.
Do yourself and your team a favor and install SVN or some other form of source control and put the code in there ASAP.
EDIT: I'll partially retract my comments. Bob King explains below the reason they run VS projects from a network drive and it makes sense. I would say unless you're doing it for a specific reason like Bob, stay away from it. Otherwise, get your ducks in a row before setting up such a development environment.
So I was having a similar issue. Visual Studio wouldn't recognize a network location I had mapped for a drive letter for anything. The funny thing is, it worked for a day. I set up my project and began working on it and had no issues. Then, I shut down and the next day nothing works. I couldn't read/write files in code, output my executables or anything. My project is local but my output was intended to be thrown up on the network.
Anyways, the problem is probably about the administrator context but one way to fix it which I found while digging around online is to get Visual Studio to browse to the drive in question some how. There are plenty of ways to do this but VS will magically be able to recognize mapped drive letters. My solution is to go the the Debug Output Location in the Project Properties, click browse and go to my previously made output location on my network drive and Voila!!!
I wanted to put this up because I spent half a day trying to figure this out and figured it might save someone else some time. Thanks much and good luck!!!
Erik
I understand this is an older thread, but this was the best thread I found when looking to solve a similar issue I had visual studio 2013 on a virtual box (using Win 8.1) and the code on the host machine (Win 7). Although I could open the solution, I could not compile. All of the other answers on this relate to older software, so I am adding this answer to update this frequently found question with the solution that worked for me.
Here's what I did; Made a registry entry to be able to use a UNC path as the current directory.
WARNING: Using Registry Editor incorrectly can cause serious, system-wide problems that may require you to reinstall Windows NT to correct them. Microsoft cannot guarantee that any problems resulting from the use of Registry Editor can be solved. Use this tool at your own risk.
Under the registry path:
HKEY_CURRENT_USER
\Software
\Microsoft
\Command Processor
add the value DisableUNCCheck REG_DWORD and set the value to 0 x 1 (Hex).
WARNING: If you enable this feature and start a Console that has a current directory of an UNC name, start applications from that Console, and then close the Console, it could cause problems in the applications started from that Console.
Found this information at link: http://support.microsoft.com/kb/156276
How about we rephrase this into a question that everyone can answer? I have the exact same problem as the initial poster.
I have a copy of VB 2008 (recently upgraded from VB6). If I store my solutions on the backed up network drive, then it won't run a single thing ever. It gives "partially trusted caller" errors for accessing a module, even when "allowpartiallytrustedcallers" is set in the assembly. If I store the files on my (not backed up) C:, then it will run wonderfully, until I put it on the share drive for everyone to use, and I'm back to my same problem.
This isn't a big request. I just want to be able to put a solution and executable on the share drive and run it without an absurd amount of nonsense about security. I shouldn't have to cram all my work into form files.
-Edit: I found the problem with why it was ignoring the AllowPartialllyTrustedCallers command. I'm trying to reference ADODB, which doesn't allow partially trusted. So, no network executable can access a database? What does Microsoft have against intranets anyway?
I was facing the same issue just recently so this answer is more for the sake of keeping track of my own knowledge. Anyway, should soumeone find it useful, below is the issue and the solution.
Issue:
NET 4.0 projects, SVN repo, checkout folders are on local drives, referenced assemblies are build by build server and available on a network drive. Visual studio on W7 is is able to add the reference but unable to build projects.
Solution:
Since NET 4.0 does not automatically provide a sandbox anymore for network assemblies, you have to make those full-trusted via machine.config update. http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dd409252.aspx
I had a similar problem with opening Visual Studio projects on a network drive, and I fixed it by creating a symbolic link on my local C:\ drive that points to the UNC directory
e.g.
mklink /D "C:\Users\Self\Documents" "\\domain.net\users\self\My Documents"
then you can just open the project using the C:\Users\Self\Documents\ path, instead of the UNC path
(You have to be careful, because Visual Studio will automatically redirect you to the '\\domain.net..' path if you double click the symlink when you're browsing for the project. I had to copy paste the 'C:\Users\' path to get it to open with the drive letter path)
Don't do it. If you have source control (versioning), you do not want your files on a network drive. It totally bypasses all you want to achieve by using source control, because once your files are on a network drive, anyone can modify them .... even while you're currently building your project. Ka-boooom!
PS: this sounds like a typical case of over-engineering to me.
Are you having any specific problems?
If you allow more than one person to open the solution, your first problem will be that the .NCB file (Intellisense) will be locked exclusively and only one user will be able to browse the class tree. And of course you have the potential for one user's changes to overwrite the other user's changes.
You should be warned that some feature in Visual Studio will refuse to work with network drive.
For example, mdf file of SQL Express user instance must be located in local drive.
For another example, if you use UNC path, you have to make sure they are short enought.
i found this helpful while trying use vc11 with parallels which run on mac:
http://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/toolsforwinapps/thread/2ffdcb01-c511-4961-834b-afd5f2fbb8e1, and specifically:
1) You can switch from local debugging to remote debugging and set the machine name as 'localhost'. This will do a remote deployment on your local machine (thus not using the project's directory). You don't need to install the Remote Debugger tools, nor start msvsmon for this to work on localhost.
In case this helps anyone else, I had to do the steps outlined here to add the network share location to Windows intranet zone. In particular, I was having trouble with Visual Studio hanging on load when opening a solution on a network share (i.e. using VMware Fusion and opening a solution from my Mac's hard drive). I also had problems with PostSharp running in this scenario.
If i understand you correctly, your Visual Studio project files are stored on the network drive and you are running them from there. This is what I do and don't have any problems. You will need to make sure that you have set the security policy. You can use Caspol to do this, or via the control panel-admin tools menu.
"How can I get this to work?"
You have a couple choices:
Choice A:
1. Move all files back to your local hard drive
2. Implement some type of backup software on your machine
3. Test said backup solution
4. keep on coding
Choice B:
1. Get a copy of one of the FREE source control products and implement it.
2. Make sure it's being backed up
3. Test it
Choice C:
Use one of the many ONLINE source control repositories available. Google, SourceForge, CodePlex, something.
Well, my question would be why you are asking this. Is it not working when you are storing it on a network drive? I haven't tried this myself, and one problem I could envision would be that .NET code running from a network drive (ie. from the bin\Debug directory, also located on the network drive) would be running in a sandbox mode, unless you mess around with CASPOL (or use 3.5 SP1 which I hear has removed that obstacle).
If you have specific problems, ask about them. Never ask "Why is doing X not working?".
You're not saying if you're just one person or multiple persons accessing the same remote drive, but I'm assuming you're just one for each network directory. Is this correct? If not, no, there is no band-aid. Get version control, move the files back to a local disk.
I am running windows 7 and I am trying to get this IDE to work and I am have an incredibly frustrating time making it work.
I am following these instructions
Quick guide:
File > New > Project
Select "Win32 Console Application"
Enter a name and location, select OK
In the Win32 Application Wizard under "Application Settings", select "Console Application" and select "Empty project".
Click Finish.
On the right (or left) hand pane should be Solution Explorer. Open it and right click on the "Source Files" folder and Add > Add New Item.
Select C++ file (.cpp)
Write code, hit F5 to start with debugging, ctrl+f5 to start without debugging.
After step 4 I get the error, "The platform root directory "E:..........\MSBuild\Microsoft.cpp\v4.0\Platforms" does not exist.
What do I do? I installed it in my E drive, maybe what it wants is on my C drive? It is not possible for me to install it there though because I am using a SSD for my C drive.
Update, I have tried to uninstall and reinstall and then clear my temp folder and then reinstall and then uninstall with the uninstall utility and then reboot and the reinstall and none of that works.
I turning off my firewall and antivirus and installing and running and that did not help at all. Next I am going to format my hard drives and try and install again.
I tried installing the ultimate version and I had the same problem. I have no idea what to do, it seems like I am out of options.
Any ideas?
My best guess now is that I have to manually install the missing files somehow, where can I find those?
I installed Dev C++ and it works fine, should I just continue using this (as far as I can tell superior program) or try and fix Express?
Microsoft Visual C++ 2010 Express
The platforms root directory "E:\Program Files (x86)\MSBuild\Microsoft.Cpp\v4.0\Platforms" does not exist.
OK
--------------------------- The microsoft.cpp part is missing but it exists in the C drive. I copied that over to the E drive and now when I open a project I get a blank screen, if I open older ones it says I need .net framework 4.0 which I do have.
This has to be the worst program I have ever had to deal with, I have played video games in beta that worked better than that.
I think I got this working, I am not sure though.
It appears to be working but I get some strange errors, I am just going to accept this because at least now after an entire weekend I can begin my homework.
Since - as you've pointed out - you've already reinstalled VC++ and nothing seems to work and you've tried everything - you may also try this (if you've not given up yet):
you may try trial version of full visual studio VS2010 trial
you may try to install your VS express on friends PC on 'non-C' drive
perform antivirus check of your system
after installing full version - install service pack (VS SP)
ensure you uninstall all (if any) prior versions of VC, VB, VC# or visual studion that you may have
always reboot after installation
If (1) works this may suggest your VS express is somehow corrupted (would be weird to be able install it than - but I've seen so many weird things that I may believe it ;-)
If (2) works this may suggest your PC/OS is causing problems.
Let me/us know if any of above helps.
I would uninstall and reinstall the whole thing rather than keep spinning your wheels. Honest!
Q: Your "E:" drive is a read-write drive, isn't it?
Q: E: is the drive you installed to, correct?
Q: Hopefully, E: is a normal disk drive, isn't it?
If not (if it's a shared network drive, or a nice'n'slow USB drive), please consider installing VS2010 to a hard drive.
MSVS should not be hard to install or use. It takes awhile ... but it's usually pretty straightforward.
If you've having problems, then I strongly urge you to 1) uninstall, 2) reboot, 3) reinstall.
IMHO...
http://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/vstudio/en-US/69925677-8a07-46a4-8b0e-c9ddef17a7af/visual-studio-2010-fails-in-c-trying-to-set-the-references-parameter?forum=vssetup
The solution in a similar case of installing VS2010 C# on a seperate drive was to copy the Reference Assemblies folder from C:\Program Files to E:\Program Files.
When I had the the same error as the poster above on VS2010 C++, when installing to a different drive, I did the same for the MSBuild Directory and the errors in VS2010 C++ disappeared.
It seems that Visual Studio installs/creates those directories on the same drive as windows 100% of the time, but the registry values still look for them on the same drive that you installed Visual Studio on.