I want to program an alert system by checking if several lists of keywords are present in one address.
This is my two variables in PHP :
$MyAdress = "210, street Cardinal Avenue, Canada"; (to testing)
$SearchAdress = "210 Cardinal Avenue"; (from my list of possible keywords to find)
I want to test if my SearchAddress is present in my address and check if words are in the good position, how is it possible ?
With Regex ? (It's always been gobbledegook to me)
By example "210 Cardinal Avenue" return TRUE
but "210 Avenue Cardinal" must to return FALSE.
This code PHP check if two keywords occur in String is interesting, but the order is not respected.
Also I resolved problem to transform text in lower and replace foreign characters in a String.
Just wrap the words into \b word boundaries and concatenate them with .+?
(?i)\b210\b.+?\bcardinal\b.+?\bavenue\b
See this demo at regex101 or a PHP demo at tio.run (used i flag for ignorecase)
This would match the words in sequence with one or more of any characters in between.
To also match 210CardinalAvenue drop word boundaries between and use .*? (demo).
Related
Sample input:
___file___name___2000___ed2___1___2___3
DIFFERENT+FILENAME+(2000)+1+2+3+ed10
Desired output (eg, all letters and 4-digit numbers and literal 'ed' followed immediately by a digit of arbitrary length:
file name 2000 ed2
DIFFERENT FILENAME 2000 ed10
I am using:
[A-Za-z]+|[\d]{4}|ed\d+ which only returns:
file name 2000 ed
DIFFERENT FILENAME 2000 ed
I see that there is a related Q+A here:Regular Expression to match specific string followed by number?
eg using ed[0-9]* would match ed#, but unsure why it does not match in the above.
As written, your regex is correct. Remember, however, that regex tries to match its statements from left to right. Your ed\d+ is never going to match, because the ed was already consumed by your [A-Za-z] alternative. Reorder your regex and it'll work just fine:
ed\d+|[a-zA-Z]+|\d{4}
Demo
Nick's answer is right, but because in-order matching can be a less readable "gotcha", the best (order-insensitive) ways to do this kind of search are 1) with specified delimiters, and 2) by making each search term unique.
Jan's answer handles #1 well. But you would have to specify each specific delimiter, including its length (e.g. ___). It sounds like you may have some unusual delimiters, so this may not be ideal.
For #2, then, you can make each search term unique. (That is, you want the thing matching "file" and "name" to be distinct from the thing matching "2000", and both to be distinct from the thing matching "ed2".)
One way to do this is [A-Za-z]+(?![0-9a-zA-Z])|[\d]{4}|ed\d+. This is saying that for the first type of search term, you want an alphabet string which is followed by a non-alphanumeric character. This keeps it distinct from the third search term, which is an alphabet string followed by some digit(s). This also allows you to specify any range of delimiters inside of that negative lookbehind.
demo
You might very well use (just grab the first capturing group):
(?:^|___|[+(]) # delimiter before
([a-zA-Z0-9]{2,}) # the actual content
(?=$|___|[+)]) # delimiter afterwards
See a demo on regex101.com
I am trying to write a regex that matches only strings like this:
89-72
10-123
109-12
122-311(a)
22-311(a)(1)(d)(4)
These strings are embedded in sentences and sometimes there are 2 potential matches in the sentence like this:
In section 10-123 which references section 122-311(a) there is a phone number 456-234-2222
I do not want to match the phone. Here is my current working regex
\d{2,3}\-\d{2,3}(\([a-zA-Z0-9]\))*
see DEMO
I've been looking on Stack and have not found anything yet. Any help would be appreciated. Will be using this in a google sheet and potentially postgres.
Based on regex, suggested by #Wiktor Stribiżew:
=REGEXEXTRACT(A1,REPT("\b(\d{2,3}-\d{2,3}\b(?:\([A-Za-z0-9]\))*)(?:[^-]|$)(?:.*)",LEN(REGEXREPLACE(REGEXREPLACE(A1,"\b(\d{2,3}-\d{2,3}\b(?:\([A-Za-z0-9]\))*)(?:[^-]|$)", char (9)),"[^"&char(9)&"]",""))))
The formula will return all matches.
String:
A
In 22-311(a)(1)(d)(4) section 10-123 which ... 122-311(a) ... number 456-234-2222
Output:
B C D
22-311(a)(1)(d)(4) 10-123 122-311(a)
Solution
To extract all matches from a string, use this pattern:
=REGEXEXTRACT(A1,
REPT(basic_regex & "(?:.*)",
LEN(REGEXREPLACE(REGEXREPLACE(A1,basic_regex, char (9)),"[^"&char(9)&"]",""))))
The tail of a function:
LEN(REGEXREPLACE(REGEXREPLACE(A1,basic_regex, char (9)),"[^"&char(9)&"]","")))
is just for finding number 3 -- how many entries of a pattern in a string.
To not match the phone number you have to indicate that the match must neither be preceded nor followed by \d or -. Google spreadsheet uses RE2 which does not support look around assertion (see the list of supported feature) so as far as I can tell, the only solution is to add a character before and after the match, or the string boundary:
(?:^|[^-\d])\d{2,3}\-\d{2,3}(\([a-zA-Z0-9]\))*(?:$|[^-\d])
(?:^|[^-\d]) means either the start of a line (^) or a character that is not - or \d (you might want to change that, and forbid all letters as well). $ is the end of a line. ^ and $ only do what you want with the /m flag though
As you can see here this finds the correct strings, but with additional spaces around some of the matches.
I'm using this expression and it's perfect for what I need:
.*(cq|conquest).*
It returns any word/phrase/sentence/etc. with the letters 'cq' or the word 'conquest' in it. However, from those matches I want to exclude all that contain the term 'conquest power'.
Examples:
some conquest here (should match)
another cq with some conquest here (should match)
too much cq or conquest power is bad (should not match)
How can I do that to the regex above? It has to be only one regex otherwise the program that I'm using (Advanced Combat Tracker) will create two different tabs.
If you want to match any string which contains "conquest" or "cq", but not if the string contains "conquest power", then the regex is
^(?!.*conquest power).*?(?:cq|conquest).*
The above will attempt to match from the start of the string to the end of the line, if you want to match from the start of each line, switch on multiline mode if available - adding (?m) to the start of the regex may do that.
If you want to match across newlines change . to [\s\S], or switch on singleline mode if available.
You have confused people by stating "I want to match 'cq' or 'conquest'" but also "I want the regex to extract that line".
I assume you don't really want to match just "cq" or "conquest", you want to match strings/lines (?) containing "cq" or "conquest".
From your original question I got that you want to match all strings which contain "cq" or "conquest" but do not contain "power". For this case the following regexp works:
^([^p]|p(?!ower))*(cq|conquest)([^p]|p(?!ower))*$
(regexpal)
I've got a list of email addresses belonging to several domains. I'd like a regex that will match addresses belonging to three specific domains (for this example: foo, bar, & baz)
So these would match:
a#foo
a#bar
b#baz
This would not:
a#fnord
Ideally, these would not match either (though it's not critical for this particular problem):
a#foobar
b#foofoo
Abstracting the problem a bit: I want to match a string that contains at least one of a given list of substrings.
Use the pipe symbol to indicate "or":
/a#(foo|bar|baz)\b/
If you don't want the capture-group, use the non-capturing grouping symbol:
/a#(?:foo|bar|baz)\b/
(Of course I'm assuming "a" is OK for the front of the email address! You should replace that with a suitable regex.)
^(a|b)#(foo|bar|baz)$
if you have this strongly defined a list. The start and end character will only search for those three strings.
Use:
/#(foo|bar|baz)\.?$/i
Note the differences from other answers:
\.? - matching 0 or 1 dots, in case the domains in the e-mail address are "fully qualified"
$ - to indicate that the string must end with this sequence,
/i - to make the test case insensitive.
Note, this assumes that each e-mail address is on a line on its own.
If the string being matched could be anywhere in the string, then drop the $, and replace it with \s+ (which matches one or more white space characters)
should be more generic, the a shouldn't count, although the # should.
/#(foo|bar|baz)(?:\W|$)/
Here is a good reference on regex.
edit: change ending to allow end of pattern or word break. now assuming foo/bar/baz are full domain names.
If the previous (and logical) answers about '|' don't suit you, have a look at
http://metacpan.org/pod/Regex::PreSuf
module description : create regular expressions from word lists
Ok I know you asked for a regex answer.
But have you considered just splitting the string with the '#' char
taking the second array value (the domain)
and doing a simple match test
if (splitString[1] == "foo" && splitString[1] == "bar" && splitString[1] == "baz")
{
//Do Something!
}
Seems to me that RegEx is overkill. Of course my assumption is that your case is really as simple as you have listed.
You don't need a regex to find whether a string contains at least one of a given list of substrings. In Python:
def contain(string_, substrings):
return any(s in string_ for s in substrings)
The above is slow for a large string_ and many substrings. GNU fgrep can efficiently search for multiple patterns at the same time.
Using regex
import re
def contain(string_, substrings):
regex = '|'.join("(?:%s)" % re.escape(s) for s in substrings)
return re.search(regex, string_) is not None
Related
Multiple Skip Multiple Pattern Matching Algorithm (MSMPMA) [pdf]
What do I use to search for multiple words in a string? I would like the logical operation to be AND so that all the words are in the string somewhere. I have a bunch of nonsense paragraphs and one plain English paragraph, and I'd like to narrow it down by specifying a couple common words like, "the" and "and", but would like it match all words I specify.
Regular expressions support a "lookaround" condition that lets you search for a term within a string and then forget the location of the result; starting at the beginning of the string for the next search term. This will allow searching a string for a group of words in any order.
The regular expression for this is:
^(?=.*\bword1\b)(?=.*\bword2\b)(?=.*\bword3\b)
Where \b is a word boundary and the ?= is the lookaround modifier.
If you have a variable number of words you want to search for, you will need to build this regular expression string with a loop - just wrap each word in the lookaround syntax and append it to the expression.
AND as concatenation
^(?=.*?\b(?:word1)\b)(?=.*?\b(?:word2)\b)(?=.*?\b(?:word3)\b)
OR as alternation
^(?=.*?\b(?:word1|word2|word3)\b
^(?=.*?\b(?:word1)\b)|^(?=.*?\b(?:word2)\b)|^(?=.*?\b(?:word3)\b)
Maybe using a language recognition chart to recognize english would work. Some quick tests seem to work (this assumes paragraphs separated by newlines only).
The regexp will match one of any of those conditions... \bword\b is word separated by boundaries word\b is a word ending and just word will match it in any place of the paragraph to be matched.
my #paragraphs = split(/\n/,$text);
for my $p (#paragraphs) {
if ($p =~ m/\bthe\b|\band\b|\ban\b|\bin\b|\bon\b|\bthat\b|\bis\b|\bare\b|th|sh|ough|augh|ing\b|tion\b|ed\b|age\b|’s\b|’ve\b|n’t\b|’d\b/) {
print "Probable english\n$p\n";
}
}
Firstly I'm not certain what you're trying to return... the whole sentence? The words in between your two given words?
Something like:
\b(word1|word2)\b(\w+\b)*(word1|word2)\b(\w+\b)*\.
(where \b is the word boundary in your language)
would match a complete sentence that contained either of the two words or both..
You'd probably need to make it case insensitive so that if it appears at the start of the sentence it will still match
Assuming PCRE (Perl regexes), I am not sure that you can do it at all easily. The AND operation is concatenation of regexes, but you want to be able to permute the order in which the words appear without having to formally generate the permutation. For N words, when N = 2, it is bearable; with N = 3, it is barely OK; with N > 3, it is unlikely to be acceptable. So, the simple iterative solution - N regexes, one for each word, and iterate ensuring each is satisfied - looks like the best choice to me.