I often encounter the misaligned dots whenever I list the items in xaringan slides for some reason. I think I ensure that there's no extra or unnecessary space between the codes or items. I just want to know what kind of mistakes I usually make in this case. FYI, there is only a single space between # Consistency and #### and #### is for larger fontsize. I know - is a simple way to list but this size is sometimes smaller for my need.
---
# Consistency
#### </li> How does an estimator perform? <li>
Related
Ok, so what I have is going to be 3 cells of data that I need to merge into a link to pictures in my store. What I am looking for is an easy way to do this without double clicking and cntl v pasting for 4x at 100+ lines per page...
Cell 1. Cell 2. Cell 3
Assets/ name. .jpg
Needs to be.... assets/name.jpg
This seems simple, but the problem is most of the names are 2 words and even the single word names when merged look like this...... assets/ name name .jpg
Giving me a space after/ and a space after the second name. If the "name" I am merging with has 2 or more parts I still need to keep those spaces intact or the link will not work the way it's set up currently. I may need to rename the pictures into 1 solid word just for linking purposes, but hoping to avoid an extra step.
Is there a way to merge and remove the spaces I need gone to create the link? I have done a couple pages the hard way, not fun when I have 200+ pages to do.
Any help is appreciated.
Thank you.
Jerry
It seems to me possible that an answer to a completely different Q may be of interest to you:
=TRIM(LOWER((A1))&TRIM(A2)&TRIM(A3))
Can I have a one-line regex code that matches the values between a pipe line "|" independent of the number if items between the pipe lines. E.g. I have the following regex:
^(.*?)\|(.*?)\|(.*?)\|(.*)\|(.*)\|(.*)\|(.*)\|(.*)\|(.*)\|(.*)\|(.*)\|(.*)$
which works only if I have 12 items. How can I make the same work for e.g. 6 items as well?
([^|]+)+
This is the pattern I've used in the past for that purpose. It matches 1 or more group that does not contain the pipe delimeter.
For Adobe Classification Rule Builder (CRB), there is no way to write a regex that will match an arbitrary number of your pattern and push them to $n capture group. Most regex engines do not allow for this, though some languages offer certain ways to more or less effectively do this as returned arrays or whatever. But CRB doesn't offer that sort of thing.
But, it's mostly pointless to want this anyways, since there's nothing upstream or downstream that really dynamically/automatically accommodates this sort of thing anyways.
For example, there's no way in the CRB interface to dynamically populate the output value with an arbitary $1$2$3[$n..] value, nor is there a way to dynamically generate an arbitrary number of rules in the rule set.
In addition, Adobe Analytics (AA) does not offer arbitrary on-the-fly classification column generation anyways (unless you want to write a script using the Classification API, but you can't say the same for CRBs anyways).
For example if you have
s.eVar1='foo1|foo2';
And you want to classify this into 2 classification columns/reports, you have to go and create them in the classification interface. And then let's say your next value sent in is:
s.eVar1='foo1|foo2|foo3';
Well AA does not automatically create a new classification level for you; you have to go in and add a 3rd, and so on.
So overall, even though it is not possible to return an arbitrary number of captured groups $n in a CRB, there isn't really a reason you need to.
Perhaps it would help if you explain what you are actually trying to do overall? For example, what report(s) do you expect to see?
One common reason I see this sort of "wish" come up for is when someone wants to track stuff like header or breadcrumb navigation links that have an arbitrary depth to them. So they push e.g. a breadcrumb
Home > Electronics > Computers > Monitors > LED Monitors
...or whatever to an eVar (but pipe delimited, based on your question), and then they want to break this up into classified columns.
And the problem is, it could be an arbitrary length. But as mentioned, setting up classifications and rules for them doesn't really accommodate this sort of thing.
Usually the best practice for a scenario like this is to to look at the raw data and see how many levels represents the bulk of your data, on average. For example if you look at your raw eVar report and see even though upwards of like 5 or 6 levels in the values can be found, but you can also see that most of values on average are between 1-3 levels, then you should create 4 classification columns. The first 3 classifications represent the first 3 levels, and the 4th one will have everything else.
So going back to the example value:
Home|Electronics|Computers|Monitors|LED Monitors
You can have:
Level1 => Home
Level2 => Electronics
Level3 => Computers
Level4+ => Monitors|LED Monitors
Then you setup a CRB with 4 rules, one for each of the levels. And you'd use the same regex in all 4 rule rows:
^([^|]+)(?:\|([^|]+))?(?:\|([^|]+))?(?:\|(.+))?
Which will return the following captured groups to use in the CRB outputs:
$1 => Home
$2 => Electronics
$3 => Computers
$4 => Monitors|LED Monitors
Yeah, this isn't the same as having a classification column for every possible length, but it is more practical, because when it comes to analytics, you shouldn't really try to be too granular about things in the first place.
But if you absolutely need to have something for every possible amount of delimited values, you will need to find out what the max possible is and make that many, hard coded.
Or as an alternative to classifications, consider one of the following alternatives:
Use a list prop
Use a list variable (e.g. list1)
Use a Merchandising eVar (product variable syntax)
This isn't exactly the same thing, and they each have their caveats, but you didn't provide details for what you are ultimately trying to get out of the reports, so this may or may not be something you can work with.
Well anyways, hopefully some of this is food for thought for you.
I have a list that should display 7 items that each look like this:
Date Weekday Distance Time
Long text that may span many lines
two column text Distance Time
two column text Distance Time
two column text Distance Time
The last lines repeat in a number depending on the data, i e there may be different amounts of such lines for each list item.
I have tried implementing this with a ListCellRenderer that creates a table according to the requirements above, but I have a few problems with it:
The long text that may span many lines is implemented in a SpanLabel. But this text will not display more than one line anyway
Each item in the list will get space for the same number of lines below the first two..
So it seems that items in a list must be of the same size.
Later I also want to be able to detect selection on the entire list item, not just individual fields of it.
Is there a better way to do this?
How do I ensure that the SpanLabel actually gets as much space as it needs?
How do I ensure that the unknown number of lines gets the space they need, depending on how many they are?
Don't use a list: https://www.codenameone.com/blog/deeper-in-the-renderer.html
Lists in Codename One assume every entry is exactly the same height and provide no flexibility here.
I suggest doing something like the property cross demo: https://www.udemy.com/learn-mobile-programming-by-example-with-codename-one/
Where we use a Container with components within to provide a list like behavior with the full flexibility that arbitrary components allow.
I am trying to classify words into a score, the scoring for now is to be very simple in that I just want to classify words based on -1, 0, 1 and sum the scores at the end. This classification would be based on the emotional connotation of the word so positive words like "great,awesome,excellent" would receive score of +1 and negative words like "bad, ill, not" would receive score of -1 and neutral words would receive 0 . For example;text = "I feel bad" would be pushed through a table,DB,library in which words were pre-classied and would summed into "I(0) + feel(0) + bad(-1) = -1
I have gone ahead and as an example stripped a website of its HTML coding using BeautifulSoup and urllib libraries (code below):
import urllib
from bs4 import BeautifulSoup
url = "http://www.greenovergrey.com/living-walls/what-are-living-walls.php"
html = urllib.urlopen(url).read()
soup = BeautifulSoup(html)
# kill all script and style elements
for script in soup(["script", "style"]):
script.extract() # rip it out
# get text
text = soup.get_text()
# break into lines and remove leading and trailing space on each
lines = (line.strip() for line in text.splitlines())
# break multi-headlines into a line each
chunks = (phrase.strip() for line in lines for phrase in line.split(" "))
# drop blank lines
text = '\n'.join(chunk for chunk in chunks if chunk)
print(text)
Output:
What are Living Walls? Definition of Green Wall and Vertical Garden
GREEN OVER CREY
Overview
/
What are living walls
/
Our green wall system vs. modular boxes
What are living walls
L iving walls or green walls are self sufficient vertical gardens that are attached to the exterior or interior of a building. They differ from green façades (e.g. ivy walls) in that the plants root in a structural support which is fastened to the wall itself. The plants receive water and nutrients from within the vertical support instead of from the ground.
The Green over Grey™ living wall system is different than others on the market today. It closely mimics nature and allows plants to grow to their full potential, without limitations. It is also by far the lightest.
Diversity is the key and by utilizing hundreds of different types of plants we create striking patterns and unique designs. We achieve this by utilizing the multitude of colours, textures and sizes that nature provides. Our system accommodates flowering perennials, beautiful foliage plants, ground covers and even allows for bushes, shrubs, and small trees!
Living walls are also referred to as green walls, vertical gardens or in French, mur végétal. The French botanist and artist Patrick Blanc was a pioneer by creating
the first vertical garden over 30 years ago.
Our system
consists of a frame, waterproof panels, an automatic irrigation system, special materials, lights when needed and of course plants. The frame is built in front of a pre existing wall and attached at various points; there is no damage done to the building. Waterproof panels are mounted to the frame; these are rigid and provide structural support. There is a layer of air between the building and the panels which enables the building to breath. This adds beneficial insulating properties and acts like rain-screening to protect the building envelop.
Our green walls are low maintenance thanks to an automatic irrigation system
my question is what would be the best way to run this string through a table or library of pre classified words and would anyone know of any existing libraries of preclassified words based on emotion? how can I create a small table or DB to test with really quick?
Thank you all in advance,
Rusty
If you have such a table you can find a list of such lexicons here: http://mpqa.cs.pitt.edu/lexicons/effect_lexicon/
You could load that list on a dictionary and perform the algorithm you describe. However, if you are looking for quick results, I recommend you use textblob library. It's very easy to use and it has a lot of features. A very nice place to start in a project like what you might be starting.
I dont know how to mark this question as a duplicate, but a quick google search turned this up.
The first answer looks promising. I went to the link and it just requires some information to access the file. I assume it would be in a format that is straightforward to parse.
I have a row setup like so:
<div class="row">
<div class="small-12 small-push-12 large-6 columns">
<!-- Content -->
</div>
<div class="small-12 small-pull-12 large-6 columns">
<!-- Content -->
</div>
</div>
Basically, I want the second column to be pulled before the first column when the screen is small, but keep it at proper order for large screens.
What am I doing wrong here? The document reflows like it always does.
Also, I do realize I can just reverse the order in the HTML itself and it'll work, but just curious if it's possible to make it work this way.
Your question prompted me to look at Foundation’s SCSS source code to see how the grid was implemented since like you I was having trouble getting my columns to shift as I wanted. In the time spent finding an answer I’ve now forgotten what I’d needed to find out originally but having gained insight as to how the grid works I know it will now be much easier to use and I’ll feel more confident that my work is correct. I’ll try to provide some of that insight here.
The simple answer to your question is, No, you can’t make Foundation swap a block of columns in the way you’ve done it. [I’ll call them columns as opposed to grid columns that refer to Foundation’s (usually 12) base columns.] Assuming it might have worked I’d say that the code you wrote would be correct. The actual reason it fails to work is because *there are no 12 column push or pull classes defined in Foundation for small, medium, large or any media size range." Thus, when the media screen size is "small" (in your case) the push and pull classes are silently ignored by CSS and you end up with two columns on two rows in the original order.
The general rule is that you can’t push or pull columns from one row to another; you can only move them along the same row. After seeing that I reread your question which began, "I have a row setup like so…" But that’s not true since the intention is to produce two rows. That one can create multiple rows with one column(s) definition is, I think, just a side effect of how CSS floats work.
Here’s what happens (excuse me for anthropomorphizing the CSS attributes…it's just easier to talk about them as "doing something to something" and often seems to be the best way to clearly understand what's happening):
For every column you specify, it’s width is determined using the current grid column width (plus some "gutter" for spacing) multiplied by the specified number of grid columns from the class name used (large-6, small-2, etc.). Since they have been given the float attribute they are then lined up one against the next starting at the beginning of the row. If there is not enough room on one row to display all the columns the line of columns is split and continues on the "line" below, and so on; those that don't fit are moved to the next row (and so on). Without other classes specified each column will be displayed in this initial position. This is how multiple rows can be formed from one column(s) definition.
When you add push and pull classes the CSS right and left attributes are added to those described above. The offset determined by the specified push or pull class is used to calculate the relative shift which is used to reorder columns if necessary. But the left and right CSS attributes know nothing about where these column-blocks have come from or that there is any row but the one they work on. So each column is moved along the line where it was initially placed and if the amount of shift moves the column outside of the row boundary it will be placed (or partially placed) to the left or right of the row (and possibly out of sight). That’s the reason that your proposed process won't work in general though in your case, as mentioned above, you used a class that wasn't defined (small-push-12) and got a different effect. If you play around a bit with the lower numbered push and pull classes (1 through 11) you can see more clearly how the columns are pushed part way off a row. (the way it is currently done by Foundation, at least) and why I now think (since at first I thought it might be possible myself) that being able to create multiple rows in the base case is a beneficial "side effect" of how CSS happens to work.
For anyone wanting to improve their CSS understanding or who uses Foundation, I highly recommend taking some time to work through one or more of the features that Zurb has implemented in the framework. I find that the SCSS definitions are well designed and cleanly coded (though perhaps not to everyone’s liking since, IMHO, CSS coding opinions seem to be as inflammatory as Mac/Windows opinions and often evoke the same fervor when expressed).
Found the solution in a separate thread! Start with the order you want in the source for mobile, then use the push/pull classes to bend it around for the LARGER sizes. In other words, approach it from the opposite end.
Change order for Foundation small-12 column