In the cloud console, I created a new Cloud Spanner View called StudentView which left joined my Student table and a ClassEnrollment table. The update seemed to work as I could see the new View created.
I then looked at my Students table and I got the error:
Cannot read properties of null (reading 'join').
View screenshot of error
The Students table showed no data even though it is populated. I subsequently deleted the StudentView:
DROP VIEW StudentView;
The result is still the same and the Student table displays nothing but the error stated above - even though the StudentView has been dropped.
I have also tried replacing the StudentView View so it does not contain null values, but the error persists.
I am assuming the error refers to the View that I created. If that is not the case, please could you point me in the right direction.
Any idea how to go about this problem?
There was a short-lived bug in the Cloud Spanner UI that was active around the time you asked this question (2022-08-30). Assuming you can see Students now, and StudentView doesn't appear in the UI anymore, the bug probably affected you too. Nothing you're doing wrong, just unlucky timing.
If you ever suspect there's a problem with the Cloud Spanner UI, you can list and query DBs with gcloud spanner .... In this case gcloud should have continued to work while the UI was down.
Related
I need your help.
I create a dashboard for another sector of our company. The data for the dashboard is from google docs, and people from that sector edit it daily (sometimes changing the name of the columns or removing the column), which makes me manually check twice per week to make sure that the dashboard is okay.
After the dashboard was created that sector doesn't want me to continue accessing their data. Is there any solution that: 1/allow me to check the dashboard when it has problem(s) 2/minimize my access to their private data?
No, if you want to be able to check the report you will need access to the workspace. If you can't have access to the data, then a new report owner who does have access to it will have to take it over from you.
The only other way would be to create a copy of the google docs, with anonymised data, for column changes. You base a report on that, change the connection settings, then deploy it to the workspace. But if you can deploy it, you can technically access the live data in the work space.
I am connecting to a local DynamoDB and was able to create 2 tables and added data to each. However I am unable to see the 2nd table under, "Operation builder".
I have tired to commit the table again and get an error saying the table exists. See below
From "Operation builder" I've clicked on the "Table" refresh icon and the 2nd table "grades" will not show up.
I have tried closing down and re-running NoSQL Workbench, but I still getting have the same problem. Committing the missing table again gives me the error it already exist.
As it's stated in this thread, NoSQL Workbench is definitely buggy. I was having similar problems with my recently created GSIs and I am pretty sure I had already tried restarting the APP. Nevertheless, I probably did that by closing and opening the APP with the "X" button above. Still not seeing my updated GSIs. I have just done the same using the "Quit" option from the "Application" menu, and now it worked. Not sure if that was the reason or it was just a matter of time syncing...But you can always try.
recently there was a change in Bigquery UI and it seems that is no longer possible to schedule a stored procedure to execute automatically.
Using the UI, just keeps asking to insert a destination table. If I put a dummy table, the schedule is created but then when tries to execute just throws an error saying that we can't have a destination table when executing a stored procedure.
Is anyone having this issue and has any kind of workaround ?
Thanks in advance.
You can opt out of the preview features by clicking the Hide Preview Features button in the top bar of the UI.
This is a known issue that the BigQuery engineering team is already aware of and are rolling the fix for it soon. You can follow their progress on this Public Issue
If I go to the iCloud dashboard and search (Filter:) for a record by exact recordName, the record is found. However, if I search using any range or inexact methods (i.e. search by date range etc.), the record is not found. Also, the record is not returned inside my Objective C program when I query all records of that type. It appears to be random records that have this characteristic. I recently inserted 40 or more records of this type (via software) and this behavior is only seen in 6 of them. I have tried using the dashboard to update the affected records, in hopes that this might trigger "update" events on the backend. Nothing that I have tried fixes this!!
I should add that my data is in the Development environment, not Production.
I may have found a work around for this problem. In the iCloud dashboard, I deleted the index QUERYABLE on the recordName field (the only index on this field) and then added it back. I then waited about 5 minutes or so and this seemed to fix the problem. However, I believe that this is, perhaps, a bug in the backend iCloud server.
I'm currently running into the problem that I am using a webservice system to load products into magento.
I'm using the REST api in conjunction with Oauth to create products and assign a category. It works and when I go to the admin I can see the products as well as see they are properly assigned to the correct category. When I open the category management in the management console i can see i have (example: 106) items assigned in the category.
However, the problem is: It does not show in the site.. even with refreshing anything that is cache or index.
When I open up the management console and open 1 article and save it without changing any other property and then Save it. I can suddenly see the item in the front end webshop...
I'm lost to why this occurs.. also for 19k product updates it is becoming a bit of an annoying bit of work to update this amount of products since any bulk update method does not do the same as editing just 1 product at a time.
Any help is much appreciated.
In the end I have discovered the answer myself. Thought it might be nice to list it here as well.
In the 'rights' tab i added all the accessrights for the user using the api. This allowed me to read products etc. Very stupid mistake but somehow I overlooked this at first.
IF you'd expect security errors.. you wont get any. just empty lists and null responses.