I am deploying on amazon using CI/CD pipeline using Github action.Deployed on Amazon successfully but when I run the graphql query on appsync it show that the #aws-sdk/client-dynamodb not found.
You can see the error on this image
succesfully deployed on github
I add dynamodb package on package.json
`{
"name": "Serverless-apix",
"type": "module",
"version": "1.0.0",
"description": "",
"scripts": {
"start": "sls offline start --stage local",
"test": "echo \"Error: no test specified\" && exit 1"
},
"author": "",
"license": "ISC",
"dependencies": {
"#aws-sdk/client-dynamodb": "^3.215.0",
"ramda": "^0.28.0",
"serverless": "^3.24.1",
"serverless-appsync-plugin": "^1.14.0",
"serverless-iam-roles-per-function": "^3.2.0"
},
"devDependencies": {}
}`
Controller Where I call the Dynamodb
`import { PutItemCommand } from "#aws-sdk/client-dynamodb";
import { ddbClient } from "../../dynamodb/db.js";`
Db file
`import { DynamoDBClient } from "#aws-sdk/client-dynamodb";
const REGION = "us-east-1"; //e.g. "us-east-1"
// const client = new DynamoDBClient({
// // region: "us-east-1",
// // accessKeyId: "AKIA272VV64HPNKION2R",
// // secretAccessKeyId: "7IARIpa5q8ZEf0NQKKsUPTDP+oszFaw+Dd5v4s7N",
// // endpoint: "http://localhost:8000"
// region: 'localhost',
// endpoint: 'http://localhost:8000'
// });
const ddbClient = new DynamoDBClient({ region: REGION });
export { ddbClient };å`
Serverless file
`service: image-base-serverless-api
provider:
name: aws
runtime: nodejs14.x
stage: ${opt:stage, 'dev'}
region: us-east-1
environment:
# DYNAMODB_TABLE_NAME: ${self:custom.usersTableName}
STAGE: ${self:provider.stage}
REGION: ${self:provider.region}
APPSYNC_NAME: "${self:custom.defaultPrefix}-appsync"
SERVICE_NAME: ${self:service}-${self:provider.stage}
DYNAMODB: ${self:service}-${self:provider.stage}
TABLE_NAME:
Ref: usersTable
iam:
role:
statements: # permissions for all of your functions can be set here
- Effect: Allow
Action: # Gives permission to DynamoDB tables in a specific region
- dynamodb:*
- lambda:*
- s3:*
Resource:
- arn:aws:dynamodb:${self:provider.region}:*:*
- arn:aws:lambda:${self:provider.region}:*:*
- "Fn::GetAtt": [usersTable, Arn]
plugins: ${file(plugins/plugins-${self:provider.stage}.yml)}
package:
exclude:
- node_modules/**
- venv/**
custom:
usersTableName: users-table-${self:provider.stage}
dynamodb:
stages:
- local
start:
port: 8000
inMemory: false
dbPath: "dynamodb_local_data"
migrate: true
appSync:
name: image-base-serverless-backened-api-${self:provider.stage}
schema: schema.graphql
authenticationType: API_KEY
serviceRole: "AppSyncServiceRole"
mappingTemplates: ${file(appsync/mappingtemplate.yml)}
dataSources: ${file(appsync/datasource.yml)}
appsync-offline: # appsync-offline configuration
port: 62222
dynamodb:
client:
endpoint: "http://localhost:8000"
region: localhost
defaultPrefix: ${self:service}-${self:provider.stage}
functions:
- ${file(src/adminusers/admin-user-route.yml)}
resources:
# Roles
- ${file(resources/roles.yml)}
# DynamoDB tables
- ${file(resources/dynamodb-tables.yml)}
# - ${file(resources/dynamodb.yml)}
# - ${file(resources/iam.yml)}
`
I Shall be very thankfull if you help me to solve this error
I downgrade the node version and also try deploy the amazon directly and also deploy the code using CI/CD pipeline but its show the same error on each tried.I have
I read all aws articles. I followed each one by one. But it didn't work any of them. Let me briefly summarize my situation. I created EKS automation with terraform. 1 vpc, 3 public subnets, 3 private subnets, 3 security group, 1 nat gateway(on public), and 2 autoscaled worker node groups. I checked all infra which created with terraform. There are no problem.
My main problem is that after the installation I can't see the nodes and nodes are not join to the cluster. I applied below steps but didn't worked. What should I do? By the way don't tag my question as a duplication I checked all similar questions on stackoverflow. My steps look true but does not work.
kubectl get nodes
No resources found
Before checking node with above command.Firstly I applied below command for setting kubeconfig.
aws eks update-kubeconfig --name eks-DS7h --region us-east-1
Here my kubeconfig:
apiVersion: v1
clusters:
- cluster:
certificate-authority-data: LS0tLS1CRUdJfgzsfhadfzasdfrzsd.........
server: https://0F97E579A.gr7.us-east-1.eks.amazonaws.com
name: arn:aws:eks:us-east-1:545153234644:cluster/eks-DS7h
contexts:
- context:
cluster: arn:aws:eks:us-east-1:545153234644:cluster/eks-DS7h
user: arn:aws:eks:us-east-1:545153234644:cluster/eks-DS7h
name: arn:aws:eks:us-east-1:545153234644:cluster/eks-DS7h
current-context: arn:aws:eks:us-east-1:545153234644:cluster/eks-DS7h
kind: Config
preferences: {}
users:
- name: arn:aws:eks:us-east-1:545153234644:cluster/eks-DS7h
user:
exec:
apiVersion: client.authentication.k8s.io/v1beta1
args:
- --region
- us-east-1
- eks
- get-token
- --cluster-name
- eks-DS7h
command: aws
After this I checked the nodes again but I still get no resource found. Than I try to edit aws-auth. Before the edit I check my user on the terminal where I triggered all terraform steps installation.
aws sts get-caller-identity
{
"UserId": "ASDFGSDFGDGSDGDFHSFDSDC",
"Account": "545153234644",
"Arn": "arn:aws:iam::545153234644:user/white"
}
I took my user info and I added blank mapuser area in aws-auth. But still getting No resources found.
kubectl get cm -n kube-system aws-auth
apiVersion: v1
data:
mapAccounts: |
[]
mapRoles: |
- "groups":
- "system:bootstrappers"
- "system:nodes"
- "system:masters"
"rolearn": "arn:aws:iam::545153234644:role/eks-DS7h22060508195731770000000e"
"username": "system:node:{{EC2PrivateDNSName}}"
mapUsers: "- \"userarn\": \"arn:aws:iam::545153234644:user/white\"\n \"username\":
\"white\"\n \"groups\":\n - \"system:masters\"\n - \"system:nodes\" \n"
kind: ConfigMap
metadata:
creationTimestamp: "2022-06-05T08:20:02Z"
labels:
app.kubernetes.io/managed-by: Terraform
terraform.io/module: terraform-aws-modules.eks.aws
name: aws-auth
namespace: kube-system
resourceVersion: "4976"
uid: b12341-33ff-4f78-af0a-758f88
Oh also when I check EKS cluster on dashboard I see below warning too. I don't know is it relevant or not. I want to share it too maybe it will help.
I have created an apps cluster deployment on AWS EKS that is deployed using Helm. For proper operation of my app, I need to set env variables, which are secrets stored in AWS Secrets manager. Referencing a tutorial, I set up my values in values.yaml file someway like this
secretsData:
secretName: aws-secrets
providerName: aws
objectName: CodeBuild
Now I have created a secrets provider class as AWS recommends: secret-provider.yaml
apiVersion: secrets-store.csi.x-k8s.io/v1
kind: SecretProviderClass
metadata:
name: aws-secret-provider-class
spec:
provider: {{ .Values.secretsData.providerName }}
parameters:
objects: |
- objectName: "{{ .Values.secretsData.objectName }}"
objectType: "secretsmanager"
jmesPath:
- path: SP1_DB_HOST
objectAlias: SP1_DB_HOST
- path: SP1_DB_USER
objectAlias: SP1_DB_USER
- path: SP1_DB_PASSWORD
objectAlias: SP1_DB_PASSWORD
- path: SP1_DB_PATH
objectAlias: SP1_DB_PATH
secretObjects:
- secretName: {{ .Values.secretsData.secretName }}
type: Opaque
data:
- objectName: SP1_DB_HOST
key: SP1_DB_HOST
- objectName: SP1_DB_USER
key: SP1_DB_USER
- objectName: SP1_DB_PASSWORD
key: SP1_DB_PASSWORD
- objectName: SP1_DB_PATH
key: SP1_DB_PATH
I mount this secret object in my deployment.yaml, the relevant section of the file looks like this:
volumeMounts:
- name: secrets-store-volume
mountPath: "/mnt/secrets"
readOnly: true
env:
- name: SP1_DB_HOST
valueFrom:
secretKeyRef:
name: {{ .Values.secretsData.secretName }}
key: SP1_DB_HOST
- name: SP1_DB_PORT
valueFrom:
secretKeyRef:
name: {{ .Values.secretsData.secretName }}
key: SP1_DB_PORT
further down in same deployment file, I define secrets-store-volume as :
volumes:
- name: secrets-store-volume
csi:
driver: secrets-store.csi.k8s.io
readOnly: true
volumeAttributes:
secretProviderClass: aws-secret-provider-class
All drivers are installed into cluster and permissions are set accordingly
with helm install mydeployment helm-folder/ --dry-run I can see all the files and values are populated as expected. Then with helm install mydeployment helm-folder/ I install the deployment into my cluster but with kubectl get all I can see the pod is stuck at Pending with warning Error: 'aws-secrets' not found and eventually gets timeout. In AWS CloudTrail log, I can see that the cluster made request to access the secret and there was no error fetching it. How can I solve this or maybe further debug it? Thank you for your time and efforts.
Error: 'aws-secrets' not found - looks like CSI Driver isn't creating kubernetes secret that you're using to reference values
Since yaml files looks correctly, I would say it's probably CSI Driver configuration Sync as Kubernetes secret - syncSecret.enabled (which is false by default)
So make sure that secrets-store-csi-driver runs with this flag set to true, for example:
helm upgrade --install csi-secrets-store \
--namespace kube-system secrets-store-csi-driver/secrets-store-csi-driver \
--set grpcSupportedProviders="aws" --set syncSecret.enabled="true"
I am using AWS EKS to deploy an application. I wish to run a cronjob in a Pod to create Job resources periodically.
However, when I exec into a Pod and run kubectl get job, it returns me Error from server (Forbidden): jobs.batch is forbidden: User "system:node:ip-192-168-185-224.ap-southeast-1.compute.internal" cannot list resource "jobs" in API group "batch" in the namespace "xxx"
When I run kubectl get job inside the same Pod, it will show all the Pod I created in the same namespace.
I am wondering if the RBAC is not configured correctly. I created a ClusterRole, as shown below
apiVersion: rbac.authorization.k8s.io/v1
kind: ClusterRole
metadata:
name: job-admin
rules:
- apiGroups: ["batch", "extensions"]
resources: ["jobs"]
verbs: ["get", "watch", "list", "create", "update", "patch", "delete"]
- apiGroups: ["extensions", "apps"]
resources: ["deployments"]
verbs: ["get", "list", "watch", "create", "update", "patch", "delete"]
And after I created the ClusterRole, I created a ClusterRoleBinding by running:
kubectl create clusterrolebinding cluster-system-job-admin --clusterrole=job-admin --user=system:node
However, it does not work, I could not run kubectl get jobs in the Pod. Any solutions to this?
I have been trying to run an external-dns pod using the guide provided by k8s-sig group. I have followed every step of the guide, and getting the below error.
time="2021-02-27T13:27:20Z" level=error msg="records retrieval failed: failed to list hosted zones: WebIdentityErr: failed to retrieve credentials\ncaused by: AccessDenied: Not authorized to perform sts:AssumeRoleWithWebIdentity\n\tstatus code: 403, request id: 87a3ca86-ceb0-47be-8f90-25d0c2de9f48"
I had created AWS IAM policy using Terraform, and it was successfully created. Except IAM Role for service account for which I had used eksctl, everything else has been spun via Terraform.
But then I got hold of this article which says creating AWS IAM policy using awscli would eliminate this error. So I deleted the policy created using Terraform, and recreated it with awscli. Yet, it is throwing the same error error.
Below is my external dns yaml file.
apiVersion: v1
kind: ServiceAccount
metadata:
name: external-dns
# If you're using Amazon EKS with IAM Roles for Service Accounts, specify the following annotation.
# Otherwise, you may safely omit it.
annotations:
# Substitute your account ID and IAM service role name below.
eks.amazonaws.com/role-arn: arn:aws:iam::268xxxxxxx:role/eksctl-ats-Eks1-addon-iamserviceaccoun-Role1-WMLL93xxxx
---
apiVersion: rbac.authorization.k8s.io/v1beta1
kind: ClusterRole
metadata:
name: external-dns
rules:
- apiGroups: [""]
resources: ["services","endpoints","pods"]
verbs: ["get","watch","list"]
- apiGroups: ["extensions","networking.k8s.io"]
resources: ["ingresses"]
verbs: ["get","watch","list"]
- apiGroups: [""]
resources: ["nodes"]
verbs: ["list","watch"]
---
apiVersion: rbac.authorization.k8s.io/v1beta1
kind: ClusterRoleBinding
metadata:
name: external-dns-viewer
roleRef:
apiGroup: rbac.authorization.k8s.io
kind: ClusterRole
name: external-dns
subjects:
- kind: ServiceAccount
name: external-dns
namespace: default
---
apiVersion: apps/v1
kind: Deployment
metadata:
name: external-dns
spec:
strategy:
type: Recreate
selector:
matchLabels:
app: external-dns
template:
metadata:
labels:
app: external-dns
spec:
serviceAccountName: external-dns
containers:
- name: external-dns
image: k8s.gcr.io/external-dns/external-dns:v0.7.6
args:
- --source=service
- --source=ingress
- --domain-filter=xyz.com # will make ExternalDNS see only the hosted zones matching provided domain, omit to process all available hosted zones
- --provider=aws
- --policy=upsert-only # would prevent ExternalDNS from deleting any records, omit to enable full synchronization
- --aws-zone-type=public # only look at public hosted zones (valid values are public, private or no value for both)
- --registry=txt
- --txt-owner-id=Z0471542U7WSPZxxxx
securityContext:
fsGroup: 65534 # For ExternalDNS to be able to read Kubernetes and AWS token files
I am scratching my head as there is no proper solution to this error anywhere in the net. Hoping to find a solution to this issue in this forum.
End result must show something like below and fill up records in hosted zone.
time="2020-05-05T02:57:31Z" level=info msg="All records are already up to date"
I also struggled with this error.
The problem was in the definition of the trust relationship.
You can see in some offical aws tutorials (like this) the following setup:
{
"Version": "2012-10-17",
"Statement": [
{
"Effect": "Allow",
"Principal": {
"Federated": "arn:aws:iam::${AWS_ACCOUNT_ID}:oidc-provider/${OIDC_PROVIDER}"
},
"Action": "sts:AssumeRoleWithWebIdentity",
"Condition": {
"StringEquals": {
"${OIDC_PROVIDER}:sub": "system:serviceaccount:<my-namespace>:<my-service-account>"
}
}
}
]
}
Option 1 for failure
My problem was that I passed the a wrong value for my-service-account at the end of ${OIDC_PROVIDER}:sub in the Condition part.
Option 2 for failure
After the previous fix - I still faced the same error - it was solved by following this aws tutorial which shows the output of using the eksctl with the command below:
eksctl create iamserviceaccount \
--name my-serviceaccount \
--namespace <your-ns> \
--cluster <your-cluster-name> \
--attach-policy-arn arn:aws:iam::aws:policy/AmazonS3ReadOnlyAccess \
--approve
When you look at the output in the trust relationship tab in the AWS web console - you can see that an additional condition was added with the postfix of :aud and the value of sts.amazonaws.com:
So this need to be added after the "${OIDC_PROVIDER}:sub" condition.
I was able to get help from the Kubernetes Slack (shout out to #Rob Del) and this is what we came up with. There's nothing wrong with the k8s rbac from the article, the issue is the way the IAM role is written. I am using Terraform v0.12.24, but I believe something similar to the following .tf should work for Terraform v0.14:
data "aws_caller_identity" "current" {}
resource "aws_iam_role" "external_dns_role" {
name = "external-dns"
assume_role_policy = jsonencode({
"Version": "2012-10-17",
"Statement": [
{
"Effect": "Allow",
"Principal": {
"Federated": format(
"arn:aws:iam::${data.aws_caller_identity.current.account_id}:%s",
replace(
"${aws_eks_cluster.<YOUR_CLUSTER_NAME>.identity[0].oidc[0].issuer}",
"https://",
"oidc-provider/"
)
)
},
"Action": "sts:AssumeRoleWithWebIdentity",
"Condition": {
"StringEquals": {
format(
"%s:sub",
trimprefix(
"${aws_eks_cluster.<YOUR_CLUSTER_NAME>.identity[0].oidc[0].issuer}",
"https://"
)
) : "system:serviceaccount:default:external-dns"
}
}
}
]
})
}
The above .tf assume you created your eks cluster using terraform and that you use the rbac manifest from the external-dns tutorial.
I have a few possibilities here.
Before anything else, does your cluster have an OIDC provider associated with it? IRSA won't work without it.
You can check that in the AWS console, or via the CLI with:
aws eks describe-cluster --name {name} --query "cluster.identity.oidc.issuer"
First
Delete the iamserviceaccount, recreate it, remove the ServiceAccount definition from your ExternalDNS manfiest (the entire first section) and re-apply it.
eksctl delete iamserviceaccount --name {name} --namespace {namespace} --cluster {cluster}
eksctl create iamserviceaccount --name {name} --namespace {namespace} --cluster
{cluster} --attach-policy-arn {policy-arn} --approve --override-existing-serviceaccounts
kubectl apply -n {namespace} -f {your-externaldns-manifest.yaml}
It may be that there is some conflict going on as you have overwritten what you created with eksctl createiamserviceaccount by also specifying a ServiceAccount in your ExternalDNS manfiest.
Second
Upgrade your cluster to v1.19 (if it's not there already):
eksctl upgrade cluster --name {name} will show you what will be done;
eksctl upgrade cluster --name {name} --approve will do it
Third
Some documentation suggests that in addition to setting securityContext.fsGroup: 65534, you also need to set securityContext.runAsUser: 0.
I've been struggling with a similar issue after following the setup suggested here
I ended up with the exception below in the deploy logs.
time="2021-05-10T06:40:17Z" level=error msg="records retrieval failed: failed to list hosted zones: WebIdentityErr: failed to retrieve credentials\ncaused by: AccessDenied: Not authorized to perform sts:AssumeRoleWithWebIdentity\n\tstatus code: 403, request id: 3fda6c69-2a0a-4bc9-b478-521b5131af9b"
time="2021-05-10T06:41:20Z" level=error msg="records retrieval failed: failed to list hosted zones: WebIdentityErr: failed to retrieve credentials\ncaused by: AccessDenied: Not authorized to perform sts:AssumeRoleWithWebIdentity\n\tstatus code: 403, request id: 7d3e07a2-c514-44fa-8e79-d49314d9adb6"
In my case, it was an issue with wrong Service account name mapped to the new role created.
Here is a step by step approach to get this done without much hiccups.
Create the IAM Policy
{
"Version": "2012-10-17",
"Statement": [
{
"Effect": "Allow",
"Action": [
"route53:ChangeResourceRecordSets"
],
"Resource": [
"arn:aws:route53:::hostedzone/*"
]
},
{
"Effect": "Allow",
"Action": [
"route53:ListHostedZones",
"route53:ListResourceRecordSets"
],
"Resource": [
"*"
]
}
]
}
Create the IAM role and the service account for your EKS cluster.
eksctl create iamserviceaccount \
--name external-dns-sa-eks \
--namespace default \
--cluster aecops-grpc-test \
--attach-policy-arn arn:aws:iam::xxxxxxxx:policy/external-dns-policy-eks \
--approve
--override-existing-serviceaccounts
Created new hosted zone.
aws route53 create-hosted-zone --name "hosted.domain.com." --caller-reference "grpc-endpoint-external-dns-test-$(date +%s)"
Deploy ExternalDNS, after creating the Cluster role and Cluster role binding to the previously created service account.
---
apiVersion: rbac.authorization.k8s.io/v1beta1
kind: ClusterRole
metadata:
name: external-dns
rules:
- apiGroups: [""]
resources: ["services","endpoints","pods"]
verbs: ["get","watch","list"]
- apiGroups: ["extensions","networking.k8s.io"]
resources: ["ingresses"]
verbs: ["get","watch","list"]
- apiGroups: [""]
resources: ["nodes"]
verbs: ["list","watch"]
---
apiVersion: rbac.authorization.k8s.io/v1beta1
kind: ClusterRoleBinding
metadata:
name: external-dns-viewer
roleRef:
apiGroup: rbac.authorization.k8s.io
kind: ClusterRole
name: external-dns
subjects:
- kind: ServiceAccount
name: external-dns-sa-eks
namespace: default
---
apiVersion: apps/v1
kind: Deployment
metadata:
name: external-dns
spec:
strategy:
type: Recreate
selector:
matchLabels:
app: external-dns
template:
metadata:
labels:
app: external-dns
# If you're using kiam or kube2iam, specify the following annotation.
# Otherwise, you may safely omit it.
annotations:
iam.amazonaws.com/role: arn:aws:iam::***********:role/eksctl-eks-cluster-name-addon-iamserviceacco-Role1-156KP94SN7D7
spec:
serviceAccountName: external-dns-sa-eks
containers:
- name: external-dns
image: k8s.gcr.io/external-dns/external-dns:v0.7.6
args:
- --source=service
- --source=ingress
- --domain-filter=hosted.domain.com. # will make ExternalDNS see only the hosted zones matching provided domain, omit to process all available hosted zones
- --provider=aws
- --policy=upsert-only # would prevent ExternalDNS from deleting any records, omit to enable full synchronization
- --aws-zone-type=public # only look at public hosted zones (valid values are public, private or no value for both)
- --registry=txt
- --txt-owner-id=my-hostedzone-identifier
securityContext:
fsGroup: 65534 # For ExternalDNS to be able to read Kubernetes and AWS token files
Update Ingress resource with the domain name and reapply the manifest.
For ingress objects, ExternalDNS will create a DNS record based on the host specified for the ingress object.
- host: myapp.hosted.domain.com
Validate new records created.
BASH-3.2$ aws route53 list-resource-record-sets --output json
--hosted-zone-id "/hostedzone/Z065*********" --query "ResourceRecordSets[?Name == 'hosted.domain.com..']|[?Type == 'A']"
[
{
"Name": "myapp.hosted.domain.com..",
"Type": "A",
"AliasTarget": {
"HostedZoneId": "ZCT6F*******",
"DNSName": "****************.elb.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com.",
"EvaluateTargetHealth": true
}
} ]
In our case this issue occurred when using the Terraform module to create the eks cluster, and eksctl to create the iamserviceaccount for the aws-load-balancer controller. It all works fine the first go-round. But if you do a terraform destroy, you need to do some cleanup, like delete the CloudFormation script created by eksctl. Somehow things got crossed, and the CloudTrail was passing along a resource role that was no longer valid. So check the annotation of the service account to ensure it's valid, and update it if necessary. Then in my case I deleted and redeployed the aws-load-balancer-controller
%> kubectl describe serviceaccount aws-load-balancer-controller -n kube-system
Name: aws-load-balancer-controller
Namespace: kube-system
Labels: app.kubernetes.io/managed-by=eksctl
Annotations: eks.amazonaws.com/role-arn: arn:aws:iam::212222224610:role/eksctl-ch-test-addon-iamserviceaccou-Role1-JQL4R3JM7I1A
Image pull secrets: <none>
Mountable secrets: aws-load-balancer-controller-token-b8hw7
Tokens: aws-load-balancer-controller-token-b8hw7
Events: <none>
%>
%> kubectl annotate --overwrite serviceaccount aws-load-balancer-controller eks.amazonaws.com/role-arn='arn:aws:iam::212222224610:role/eksctl-ch-test-addon-iamserviceaccou-Role1-17A92GGXZRY6O' -n kube-system
In my case, I was able to attach the oidc role with route53 permissions policy and that resolved the error.
https://medium.com/swlh/amazon-eks-setup-external-dns-with-oidc-provider-and-kube2iam-f2487c77b2a1
and then with the external-dns service account used that instead of the cluster role.
annotations:
# # Substitute your account ID and IAM service role name below.
eks.amazonaws.com/role-arn: arn:aws:iam::<account>:role/external-dns-service-account-oidc-role
For me the issue was that the trust relationship was (correctly) setup using one partition whereas the ServiceAccount was annotated with a different partition, like so:
...
"Principal": {
"Federated": "arn:aws-us-gov:iam::${AWS_ACCOUNT_ID}:oidc-provider/${OIDC_PROVIDER}"
},
...
kind: ServiceAccount
metadata:
annotations:
eks.amazonaws.com/role-arn: arn:aws:iam::{{ .Values.aws.account }}:role/{{ .Values.aws.roleName }}
Notice arn:aws:iam vs arn:aws-us-gov:iam