Breakpoint on Delete class pointer - c++

Question

I'm working on a class project and this piece of code won't let me delete an instance of a class without throwing a breakpoint error.
The class is Node, I'm trying to build a singly linked list for data structures and algorithms. I'll include the whole program, it isn't long, but the code in question that's causing the problem is in deleteMin(), the delete u.
#include <iostream>
using namespace std;
// we create a Node class.
class Node { // inside this class we hold two pieces of information.
int x; // the integer x, which is our data.
Node* next; // and the address of the next node.
public:
Node(int x0) : x(x0), next(NULL) { } // Here I've set up a constructor that sets x equal to the argument
// and defaults the next address to NULL.
bool add(int newValue); // Here follows our three required functions.
int deleteMin();
int size();
void printSSL(); // I also added a printSSL() function so that we can test and see what's going on.
};
//Originally I wanted to put these inside of the Node class, but then you'd end up with a unique head and tail for every Node.
//So instead I've left them outside. If you wanted to create multiple SSList's then you'd want to create an object out of these as well.
Node* head; // The first value in the our SLList.
Node* tail; // The last value in our SLList.
int n; // The number of elements in the list.
// I should mention here that head and tail are set equal to the first value in the SLList in the Main() function below.
// Here follows the actual implementation.
// I chose to try and simplify things by focusing on the add() function.
// If the add function organizes the information, and puts it into the SLList in order,
//then deleteMin() only has to pull the first value.
bool Node::add(int newValue) { // add() is a member function of Node and it takes in the newValue were adding to the list.
Node* u = new Node(newValue); // First thing we do is create a new Node using the argument value x. We pass this into a pointer, u.
if (newValue <= head->x) { // Next, we check to see if the new value is less than the head.
u->next = head; // if it is, then our job is done and we just make this new, smaller value, the new head.
head = u; // we do this by making the initial head equal to the next address in the new Node u.
n++; // Once we have the address saved, we make u into the new head and increment n.
return true; // There's no iteration in this case, so this if statement would be O(1).
}//O(1)
else { // If the new value is greater than the head, then we have to store it further back in the SLList.
Node* y = head; // This was the hardest part of the whole thing... I solved it by creating two Node pointers,
Node* z = head; // Both Node pointers are set equal to head, but this is mostly just to ensure that they aren't empty.
while ((newValue > y->x) && (y != tail)) { // Then I set a while loop that looks at whether the new value is less than the value in the head.
z = y; // The while loop continues, moving through the list of values, setting y equal to the next value,
y = y->next; // and using z to keep track of the former value.
} // The loop exits when we either a) hit the end of the SLList, y == tail, or when the new value is
if (y == tail) { // smaller than the next value, newValue < y->x. When the loop exits we have to deal with these two
y->next = u; // scenarios separately. If we reached the end of our list, then adding the new value is as simple as
tail = u; // setting y->next equal to u, then we make u into the new tail.
} // if we didn't reach the end of the list, then we have to set u inbetween z and y. This was really
else { // the only reason I needed z. I needed to be able to update the address of the previous Node, and
z->next = u; // I also needed to have the address of the next Node, this way I could slip u inbetween the two.
u->next = y; // Worst case scenario, this function runs through the entire SLList and then adds the value at the end.
} // I could have shaved off some time by asking if(newValue > tail->x) then run the z->next=u; and u->next=y; after
n++; // after that, but that throws an error becauset ail is a NULL pointer, which is bull#*#!
return true; // because I'm not dealing the tail->next, all I care about is tail->x which isn't NULL.
}//O(n) // But because this is an SSList and not a DLList I have no way of going to the n-2 element.
}//O(max(1, n)) // When that's done, we just increment n and leave the function.
// Considering that the worst case scenario, when x > tail->x, takes us through the whole SLList.
// I'm going to say that this add function is O(n).
int Node::deleteMin() { // The deleteMin() function starts by checking whether or not the
int x = head->x;
Node* u = head;
head = head->next;
delete u; // I have to figure out what the hells going on right here, why can't I delete this?
return x;
}
int Node::size() {
cout << n + 1 << endl;
return n + 1;
}
void Node::printSSL() {
Node* u = head;
cout << "Head:";
for (int i = 0; i <= n; i++) {
cout << i << ":(" << u->x << ", " << u->next << ") ";
u = u->next;
}
cout << " Tail" << endl;
}
int main()
{
Node one(1);
head = &one;
tail = &one;
one.printSSL();
one.deleteMin();
}

Answer 1

You declared an object of the type Node
Node one(1);
You may not apply the operator delete to a pointer to the object because the object was not allocated dynamically. It has automatic storage duration.
Pay attention to that it is a bad idea when functions depend on global variables. For example you will be unable to define two lists in your program.
What you need is to define a class named something like List the following way
class List
{
private:
Node *head = nullptr, *tail = nullptr;
public:
// special member functions and some other member functions;
void clear();
~List() { clear(); }
};
and to allocate nodes dynamically that will be inserted in the list.
The destructor and the function clear will delete all the allocated nodes in the list.
class Node also should be defined as a nested class of the class List.
For example the function clear can be defined the following way
#include <functional>
//...
void List::clear()
{
while ( head )
{
delete std::exchange( head, head->next );
}
tail = nullptr;
}

Answer 2

#include <iostream>
using namespace std;
class SLList { // SLList is the object that holds the entire list.
public: // The Node class lives inside the SLList class.
struct Node {
int data;
Node* next;
Node(int x0) : data(x0), next(NULL) {}
Node() : data(NULL), next(NULL) {}
};
Node* head;
Node* tail;
int n;
SLList() : n(0) {
Node* initial = new Node();
head = initial;
tail = initial;
cout << "You've created a new SSList" << endl;
}
bool add(int newValue);
int deleteMin();
int size();
void printSSL();
};
bool SLList::add(int newValue) { //
if (n == 0) {
head->data = newValue;
n++;
return true;
}
else {
Node* u = new Node(newValue);
if (newValue <= head->data) { //
u->next = head; //
head = u; //
n++; //
return true; //
}//O(1)
else { //
Node* y = head; //
Node* z = head; //
while ((newValue > y->data) && (y != tail)) { //
z = y; //
y = y->next; //
} //
if (y == tail && newValue > y->data) {
y->next = u; //
tail = u; //
} //
else { //
z->next = u; //
u->next = y; //
} //
n++; //
return true;
}
}//O(n) //
}//O(max(1, n)) //
int SLList::deleteMin() {
int x = head->data;
Node* u = head;
head = head->next;
delete u;
n--;
return x;
}//O(1)
int SLList::size() {
cout << n + 1 << endl;
return n + 1;
}//O(1)
void SLList::printSSL() {
Node* u = head;
cout << n << " Nodes|" << "Head:";
for (int i = 0; i < n; i++) {
cout << i << ":(" << u->data << ", " << u->next << ") ";
u = u->next;
}
cout << " Tail" << endl;
}//O(n)
int main() {
SLList* one = new SLList;
one->printSSL();
one->add(30);
one->printSSL();
one->add(20);
one->printSSL();
for (int i = 0; i < 7; i++) {
int x = rand() % 50;
one->add(x);
one->printSSL();
}
for (int i = 0; i < 9; i++) {
one->deleteMin();
one->printSSL();
}
}