I love WebStorm's "Move Module Members" feature, where I can move a function from one file into its own new file and all the imports and references are handled.
However, it creates the new file with the moved member as a named export. Is there any way to use this feature and have it create a default export? (export default MovedMember)
Obviously it can be changed after the fact, but it's a small pain to fix all the imports in other files.
Right now it's not possible to modify the behavior of the Move refactoring. Please vote for this feature request: WEB-44423
Related
We are using vTiger CRM with its Extension Pack from VTExpers, Inc.
We used the Custom Module Builder Extension to Custom Modules Several times, now we want to Uinstall the extension.
My Question is:
What will happen to the Custom Created Modules, which have been created through this Extension, will they disappear as well, or they will remain Active in the CRM?
I want to keep the Custom Modules and remove (uninstall) the Extension it self.
They remain in your crm but your custom modules will not work after uninstalling Custom Module Builder
Simply modify YourCustomModuleName_Module_Model class and remove isActive method from class. you can find this class in the following path:
modules/YourCustomModuleName/models/Module.php
yes, created modules will be there
The modules will be there, beware as VT Experts uses ION Cube to encrypt most of their extensions so you have no idea what the code is doing.
I am trying to remove a model from Realm. I appears there's a straightforward way to do it in Java with
realm.getSchema().remove(className)
It doesn't appear there is an option in Swift 3 other than to remove the model from the App and then migrate the data, or delete the entire Realm file.
To clarify, when I open the Realm Browser I have three models
Dog 2
Person 4
Test 0
and I want to remove just the Test model via code. There doesn't appear to be any way to remove it via the Browser either.
Perhaps I overlooked something in the docs?
No, you haven't overlooked anything in the docs.
It is not possible to modify the schema of a Realm file in the Objective-C/Swift SDKs without triggering a migration. In which case, you can use Migration.deleteData(forType:) to delete the object schema from the Realm.
Additionally, if you want to explicitly ensure that Test isn't added to your Realm file in the first place, you can explicitly define that in your Realm configuration.
I am trying to create global functions in Lucee. I have followed the directions here and have it "Kind of" working. Inside of Application.cfc I placed the following code:
public void function onRequest() {
URL.IsInternalUser = function() { return (SESSION.user.ID ?: 0); };
}
This seems to work fine in some cases but if we need to access this function in a subdirectory that contains an Application.cfc that does not have the function re-defined it will error out saying the function doesn't exist.
The ultimate goal I am trying to achive is to have a cfc file that contains several user defined functions and then have them accessible throughout the entire application without redefining things over and over again.
Is there a better way to accomplish what we want? I ask this because on the page I referenced earlier in the comments section there is a quote:
I concur. Wouldn't surprise me to see it somewhere else in the future.
What I like about Railo's method is that it is completely sandboxed.
Host A's tags & functions libraries never cross/conflict with Host B's
libraries unless they're put into the global server folders. It's the
same way for the virtual file system too and pretty much everything
else (datasources, etc).
It specifically mentions Railo having a way to create UDF but I can not find any documentaion on this anywhere. Since we are using Lucee which is a fork of Railo I figure it must have what Railo has for creating UDF. Hoping someone that reads this can help me out and point me in the right direction.
Railo/Lucee support custom functions. You can declare them in /WEB-INF/{railo|lucee}/library/function/ of the site. Save the function in a .cfm file and name the file the same as the function. The server needs a restart after creating new functions. Here is Railo's blog post about it.
Adobe ColdFusion doesn't support this AFAIK. So you have to store your functions in the SERVER scope here.
I'm trying to make my own full adder and some other devices as a sub-circuit in "Proteus" and use them several times in a bigger circuit.
The problem is when you copy a sub-circuit you need to rename all of its inner parts, otherwise, the parts with a same name in two sub-circuits would be considered as one, therefore you'd get some errors.
So I'd like to know if there is a way to define a full adder of my own and use it like "74LS183" which is a primitive device, and by primitive I mean it has been defined in the library.
From answer posted here
It's in the Proteus Help file:
SCHEMATIC CAPTURE HELP (F1) -> MULTI-SHEET DESIGNS -> Hierarchical Designs
See the section "Module Components":
Any ordinary component can be made into a module by setting the Attach Hierarchy Module checkbox on the Edit Component dialogue form.
The component's value is taken to be the name for the associated circuit,
and the component's reference serves as the instance name.
after this you can use your new implementation of that component with your new name. for making it available at library see "External Modules" section of proteus help.
The problem with copying is solved in "Proteus 8".not completely but sort of.
I mean you can copy a subcircuit without a need to change it's inner parts, but you must change the subcircuit name and I mean the bigger name above the subcircuit not the little one below it.
so there is no need to define a primitive.
I have just started to create Haxe externs (strictly typed class definitions)
based on the yuidoc output from the ember source.
Now I need help to understand how to implement the kind of mixing architecture special to Ember.
For example the Ember.Object extends the Ember.CoreObject - however I wasn't able to locate any constructor inside the latter - is there any direct call to new Something() in Ember at all?
Then Ember.Object uses Ember.Observable which in turn imports cacheFor from the ember-metal / lib / computed.js module - is this relation reflected inside the data.json output of yuidoc or will I need to parse the sources directly in order to collect all methods into my class definitions?
is there any direct call to new Something() in Ember at all?
For the most part, no. You're supposed to call Class.create() not new Class().
is this relation reflected inside the data.json output of yuidoc or will I need to parse the sources directly in order to collect all methods into my class definitions?
The data.json file should contain most of the documentation written. The problem you'll experience is that not everything is documented (mostly private API).
Where can I find the Container Class API docs?
In the source code.