Visual Studio C++ static lib function exposing problem - c++

Question

I have created example of using static libraries. The goal is this functionality:
DllTestFunctDll.dll links static_lib.lib (contains fnStaticLibrary())
example.exe links DllTestFunctDll.dll (contains dllTestFunct())
main() calls directly fnStaticLibrary() and dllTestFunct().
dllTestFunct() calls directly fnStaticLibrary().
I don't understand one thing, this works only if fnStaticLibrary() is inside same project as main() and dllTestFunct().
If I create another solution that
DllTestFunctDll.dll links also static_lib.lib (contains fnStaticLibTest())
main() newly also calls directly fnStaticLibTest().
dllTestFunct() newly also calls directly fnStaticLibTest().
dllTestFunct() is able to call fnStaticLibTest() and main() is unable to call fnStaticLibTest() due to linker. But I am able to call fnStaticLibTest() inside dllTestFunct().
I used dumpbin to see what functions are exported:
dumpbin /EXPORTS "C:\\path\\DllTestFunctDll.dll"
Output:
ordinal hint RVA name
1 0 00001000 ?dllTestFunct##YAXXZ = ?dllTestFunct##YAXXZ (void __cdecl DllTestFunct(void))
2 1 00001070 ?fnStaticLibrary##YAXXZ = ?fnStaticLibrary##YAXXZ (void __cdecl fnStaticLibrary(void))
You can see that fnStaticLibTest() is missing inside the output.
In both static lib projects I export function by "__declspec(dllexport) ".
I assume that the problem is inside the Visual Studio. Do you know how to solve it?
Thank you in advance for your answers.
CODE (VS17 solution) LINK: https://github.com/Ales5475/StaticLibProblemExample

Answer 1

An object module is added from a .lib, if it is required. If the dll does not call (or reference) any item in a compilation unit (c/cpp file), it won't be added to the dll
This behavior is important for libraries, as it ensures that when linking against the C/C++ runtimes, then you don't import the whole of the libraries. Just those which are required.
In your case you have a DLL which doesn't require the test function, and a .EXE which expects the DLL to have it. There is no visible requirement for the test function when the DLL is being built.

Answer 2

A DLL has explicit exports. Either
__declspec(dllexport)
or a .DEF file with exports. In this case, it appears that the static lib doesn't know if it is in a DLL or the EXE, so isn't decorated with declspec(dllexport) the best solution is for the .def file for the DLL to explicitly export the function.
The code in StaticLibTest.h
__declspec(dllexport) void fnStaticLibTest();
is inconsistent with the code in StaticLibTest.cpp
void fnStaticLibTest(){
This will not cause the function to be exported. In general include a file which declares a function / structure to ensure it is consistent.
The correct form is
void __declspec(dllexport) fnStaticLibTest(){
and
void __declspec(dllexport) fnStaticLibTest();
Otherwise you are adding the attribute to the void.

Answer 3

Here is the snippet I did use #pragma comment successfully.
DLL:
__declspec(dllexport) void DllTestFunct();
...
#pragma comment(linker, "/export:fnStaticLibTest")
void DllTestFunct() {
fnStaticLibrary();
fnStaticLibTest();
printf("Hello world (Dynamic library)!\n");
}
DLL's dependency:
Header Folder:
XXX\StaticLibTest\StaticLibTest;
XXX\MainProgram\StaticLibrary;
DLL Folder:
XXX\StaticLibTest\x64\Debug;
XXX\MainProgram\x64\Debug;
DLL input:
StaticLibTest.lib;
StaticLibrary.lib
Static Lib:
extern "C" void fnStaticLibTest();
...
extern "C" void fnStaticLibTest() {
printf("Hello World! (Static library from another project)\n");
}