I'm working on a standalone countdown App for Apple Watch. When the timer is over, the watch rings or vibrate.
There are three different situations where this can happen:
The app screen is active on the user's wrist: that's the easiest part; when the timer is over, the app runs a sound/haptic feedback, no need for anything running in the background. No problem with that.
The app is in the background: Using notifications seems to be the obvious choice, and it already works very well.
The app is in the foreground, but the screen turns off either because it reached the maximum wake duration (15 or 70 seconds) or because the user rotated his wrist back in rest position, which automatically turns the apple watch's screen off.
This third and last situation is where I'm confused. Neither the first nor the second situation works here: when the app is active, but the screen turns off, the app stops running, but the notifications are still not triggered since the app is technically not in the background.
Are there any straightforward ways around this problem?
Use Extended Runtime Sessions to create smart alarms
like this:
func notifyUser(hapticType type: WKHapticType,
repeatHandler: ((UnsafeMutablePointer<WKHapticType>) -> Time
Interval)? = nil)
Apple Documentation
For schedulable sessions such as smart alarms, call this method during the session to alert the user. When you call the method, the system plays repeating haptic feedback. If the app isn’t active, the system also displays a system alarm alert on the watch.
The haptic feedback repeats at the interval specified by the repeatHandler, and continues to repeat until the application or system alert invalidates the session.
If the app isn’t active, the user can tap the Stop button to invalidate the session or tap the Open button to activate the app.
If the app is active, the app must invalidate the session by calling its invalidate method.
Only call this method on a schedulable session that’s running: you must schedule the session using the startAtDate: method, and the session’s state must equal WKExtendedRuntimeSessionStateRunning. During a smart alarm session, your app must call this method before the session expires.
Also you should check out the life cycle of watchOS app
In order to prevent application's data from losing caused by "End Task" from Task Manager, I am trying to save data at the function handler of WM_CLOSE event.
The app saves data successfully in case I closed my app via Alt+F4 or "close" button. But when I killed it via the Task Manager, the saving data process couldn't be done properly. It seems that the saving progress was terminated in middle.
I tried to debug it via VS2015 IDE, the debugger intercepted a break point in the WM_CLOSE handler successfully but it could not go further, hitting F10 to step over caused my app closes immediately.
Is there any way to delay the termination progress until my application saves data completely?
I found two links below but they didn't help.
How to handle "End Task" from Windows Task Manager on a background process?
How does task manager kill my program?
The task manager might decide that your application isn't responding, and terminate it. You can do nothing against it.
If you want to ensure that your data is always saved, you should save constantly (with some heuristics, like at least once every minute, preferrably after no change happened in a few seconds) in the background. It's more complex but has the advantage of working even when you won't receive WM_CLOSE at all, for example in the case of power loss.
I have scheduled a C# console application in Task Scheduler of Windows 2012 R2. Application will run when executed it manually or Right click on scheduled task and click on Run, but it is failed when triggered by Task Scheduler with below error.
The operator or administrator has refused the request(0x800710E0)
I have followed below steps also after Google search
Selected "Run whether user logged in or not"
Unchecked "Start the task only if the computer is on AC power"
In my case, the error message "The operator or administrator has refused the request" meant that a previous instance of the task has still been running and the task was configured to not start a new instance if it's already running (the default configuration), so the Task Scheduler refused to start a new instance when the task was triggered.
You can find that option in a select box on the task's Settings tab, under the caption "If the task is already running, then the following rule applies". The default value is "Do not start a new instance".
But that error message is pretty confusing. From the other answers, you may see that it may mean many completely distinct errors. As is usual in Microsoft's products.
Tip
It's helpful to check the History tab of a task. That's where I have found out what's actually going on. There was an event "Launch request ignored, instance already running".
In my case, I had to redo the permissions on the task. Somehow it had lost the domain portion of the username. Instead of `DOMAIN\joeuser' it was just 'joeuser'. After a reset, it worked correctly as it had for the previous year.
In my case as per having a job setup with Task Scheduler as written about in the "Prevent a Task Scheduler Task from Executing on Setting Updates", I had a job setup to run every "X" minutes for a period of indefinitely.
Upon seeing the dreaded "The operator or administrator has refused the request" for the Last Run Result, I looked over the History tab and see detail indicating that is "missed its schedule".
The Solution
From the Settings tab of the job properties, I simply checked the option "Run task as soon as possible after a scheduled start is missed", and problem resolved; although, I did have to type in the credential again as well.
Note: This started occurring once a server was moved from a redundant backup server once hardware repair was completed back to the original hardware. The OS was Server 2012 R2 and the OS was moved to other hardware while repair was done on the production server but I didn't notice this there—maybe an oversight there though—not sure.
I know that #Sushmit-Patil found a solution, but I wanted to add a solution to my similar problem:
It turns out a prior process never exited (it was hanging around in memory because of a defect I had in my code). By default, Windows Task Scheduler won't run the process again if it's already running.
In addition to fixing the defect, in Task Scheduler, under the Settings tab, I set If the task is already running, then the following rule applies: to Run a new instance in parallel
1
Error occurred due to folder permission, I was creating CSV from my application, which was required folder permission to be granted. After giving Full Control to the folder error got resolved.
For me, the solution was to check Run with highest privileges in the properties.
In my case my task launches a PowerShell script--and it produced the "The operator or administrator has refused the request (0x800710E0)" error message as seen in the Task Scheduler's task-entry grid. My user name was correct, but when I dropped to a command prompt and simulated the task by running the PowerShell against my .ps1 file, I saw an Avast prompt that flagged my script as suspicious and wasn't allowing it to run. I created an Avast exception and now the task runs without any issue.
After turning on history I also had the error "Missed task start rejected: Task Scheduler did not launch task as it missed its schedule." but I didn't want the task to start when I woke up the computer, I wanted to figure out why the computer didn't wake up.
This answer helped me out -- by default Windows was waking for "Important Wake Timers Only" (system updates, but not my scheduled task).
In the setting Power Options > Edit Plan Settings > Change advanced power settings > Sleep > Allow wake timer change the option to "Enabled" and then your computer will wake up to run the task.
You can also do this from "settings". Probably earlier instance was already running and launching a new instance failed.
In my case, the error message "The operator or administrator has refused the request" appeared because the computer was in stand-by at the scheduled time (and the options "Wake the computer to run this task" and "Run task as soon as possible after a scheduled start was missed" were unchecked).
I had previously chosen "Enable All Tasks History" and a more useful error message appeared in the History tab: "Missed task start rejected: Task Scheduler did not launch task as it missed its schedule. Consider using the configuration option to start the task when available, if schedule is missed."
I have found what I believe to be a bizarre bug in Windows Server 2016 scheduler and maybe other Windows Server versions that produces the OP's error (and a workaround):
Here are the conditions:
You're using the "Monthly" option trigger in your task (I currently have all months selected and just a couple days chosen, e.g. 1st and 15th)
You have the "Synchronize across time zones" selected.
This was originally an issue I found back in November 2020 when my tasks were running twice all of a sudden after the DST time change (and this was a widely reported bug, but not an obvious solution). I never would have known, except that users started receiving duplicate emails from one of my tasks. In the history you would simply see the task running twice at what appeared to be exactly the same time. It worked fine before the time change. I forget all the troubleshooting I did then, but my end theory was that it was somehow confusing the time after the time change. The work around was to set the option "Synchronize across time zones" and all seemed well...
Fast forward to March when the DST time just changed back again and now I get every time the tasks with the Monthly option runs:
The operator or administrator has refused the request
The History tab on the task is also blank. If you change options and save, the History tab starts logging again and then sometimes stops if the task errors again. Weird.
One work around is to simply turn off the "Synchronize across time zones" option (tested). However, I don't recommend that option as I assume you'll have the duplicate running task issue again when the DST time changes again in November.
The one time I got an error to show in the History tab it stated:
Task Scheduler did not launch task "\EmailCampaign" as it missed its
schedule. Consider using the configuration option to start the task
when available, if schedule is missed.
Therefore, I went and set that option to start the task if the schedule is missed and all seems well. I figured I'd see the original error and then subsequently the task running, but no error any more either. It all just works.
I know this solution was reported above, but that's because most people's computers were asleep or something to that effect. My issue is on a production internet facing server that doesn't go to sleep, hibernate or anything related and only happens with specific conditions related to the Monthly trigger option. All my others tens of scheduled tasks work flawless.
I wrote a Powershell script to do a task. I was getting this error and landed here (as well as other lower ranked search results). The task would run manually and the first time it was triggered, but not on repeat even though I had it set up to end the task if it took longer than a minute.
My problem was caused by not providing an exit code in my powershell script. Task scheduler simply did not know the task had finished and would consider it still running. I could have simply allowed the next instance of the task to be started if the previous was not finished, but using the exit code is the 'right way'.
So I simply added a new line on the end of my PS1 --
exit
This topic is old but I had the same problem on windows server 2016.
My task executes a BAT script that zip a folder and upload on an external backup.
The task never ended because there was a "pause" at the end of my script. And my task was configured with "Dot not start a new instance" settings.
I solved my problem by removing the "pause". I don't know if it will be useful..
I'm running on windows 8.
Occasionally, when I resume from sleep, my service gets a stop request through the SCM (call to SvcCtrlHandler with SERVICE_CONTROL_STOP). I wasn't able to trace the source of this request. Can it possibly be sent by the OS itself, in some scenario?
My two main suspicions right now:
If the resume event (SERVICE_CONTROL_POWEREVENT of type PBT_APMRESUMEAUTOMATIC) is taking too long, the OS might stop the service (system logs contain logs referring to this specific service: A timeout was reached (30000 milliseconds) while waiting for the [...] The service did not respond to the start or control request in a timely fashion)
The OS stops the service because it has been flagged as a problematic service (system logs contain logs referring to this specific service: service did not shut down properly after receiving a preshutdown control
I write a local service application using C++ and I can't find the correct way of registering for a pre-shut-down notification (for OS later than Windows XP). I believe that SERVICE_CONTROL_PRESHUTDOWN notification has been added since Vista, but when you call SetServiceStatus do we need to specify:
dwServiceStatus.dwControlsAccepted = SERVICE_ACCEPT_PRESHUTDOWN;
or
dwServiceStatus.dwControlsAccepted = SERVICE_ACCEPT_SHUTDOWN | SERVICE_ACCEPT_PRESHUTDOWN;
You cannot accept both a shutdown and a preshutdown if your service is correctly coded. The documentation explicitly states this.
From http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/desktop/ms683241(v=vs.85).aspx:
Referring to SERVICE_CONTROL_PRESHUTDOWN:
A service that handles this notification blocks system shutdown until the service stops or the preshutdown time-out interval specified through SERVICE_PRESHUTDOWN_INFO expires.
In the same page, the section about SERVICE_CONTROL_SHUTDOWN adds:
Note that services that register for SERVICE_CONTROL_PRESHUTDOWN notifications cannot receive this notification because they have already stopped.
So, the correct way is to set the dwControlsAccepted to include either SERVICE_ACCEPT_SHUTDOWN or SERVICE_ACCEPT_PRESHUTDOWN, depending on your needs, but not to both at the same time.
But do note that you probably want to accept more controls. You should always allow at least SERVICE_CONTROL_INTERROGATE, and almost certainly allow SERVICE_CONTROL_STOP, since without the latter the service cannot be stopped (e.g. in order to uninstall the software) and the process will have to be forcibly terminated (i.e. killed).
As noted by the commenters above, you will need to choose from either SERVICE_ACCEPT_SHUTDOWN or SERVICE_ACCEPT_PRESHUTDOWN (Vista or later). If you are using SERVICE_ACCEPT_PRESHUTDOWN, you will need to register your service with the SCM using RegisterServiceCtrlHandlerEx instead of RegisterServiceCtrlHandler else you will not be receiving the pre-shutdown notifications. The handler prototype also changes from Handler to HandlerEx.
Another point to note is that handling pure shutdown events is limited to 5 seconds in Windows Server 2012 (and presumably Windows 8), 12 seconds in Windows 7 and Windows Server 2008, 20 seconds in Windows XP before your service is killed while stopping. This is the reason why you may need the pre-shutdown notification. You may want to change this at \\HKLM\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\WaitToKillServiceTimeout.
In the comment from alexpi there is a key piece of information. I found that the service handling PRESHUTDOWN needs to update the service status with a new checkpoint number (repeatedly) before WaitToKillServiceTimeout has elapsed. My server was configured to 5000 ms and my service only updated every 12000 ms, and the server went into the SHUTDOWN phase, which caused my attempt to stop another service to return the error that the shutdown was in progress.
These two notifications seem to be different as I get it from the documentation. If what you need is really to enable your service to recieve preshutdown notification, you should go with: dwServiceStatus.dwControlsAccepted = SERVICE_ACCEPT_PRESHUTDOWN; But if you also want to enable your service to receive shutdown notifications, you should go with your second option.