It appears that bodymovin will crash with render failed randomly during our export.
Is there a way to debug this?
It appears that we're able to debug the extension using:
chrome://inspect/#devices
And configuring the port addresses with the following
There I can verify that the reason it is failing is due to a broken else statement as it states it inside of the console.
Bodymovin uses Esprima.js in order to parse the expressions, and if there is a syntax error, it may crash.
Related
I've developed a program by a customer who's experiencing when he do a certain operation. This isn't happening always on the same place and on the same data and, moreover, it is not happening nor in my local developing machine nor in my test Virtual Machine (which is free of all developing equipment).
Given these conditions, I've decided to compile with MAP (enabled in Configuring Properties-> Linker->Debugger with option /MAP) to see which function is causing crash.
If I've correctly understood, when the program crash I've to check down the offset error and then, search in my MAP under the column RVA+BASE:
Address Publics by Value Rva+Base Lib:Object
0001:00037af0 ?PersonalizzaPlancia#CDlgGestioneDatiProgetto#MosaicoDialogs##IAEXXZ 00438af0 f DlgGestioneDatiProgetto.obj
0001:00038000 ?SalvaTemporanei#CDlgGestioneDatiProgetto#MosaicoDialogs##IAEXXZ 00439000 f DlgGestioneDatiProgetto.obj
Actually, my crash happens at offset: 00038C90 So I should think that it's somewhere in the method:
MosaicoDialogs::CDlgGestioneDatiProgetto::PersonalizzaPlancia
but this is not absolutely possible, so assuming that the computer can't be wrong, I'm the one who's doing it bad.
Can someone explain me how to read MAP in correct way?
don't bother - instead, build the project with symbols enabled and strip them into a pdb file.
Modify the program a little, to write a minidump when it crashes using a unhandled exception handler
Give the newly compiled program to the customer, and when it crashes call MiniDumpWriteDump.
Ask the customer to send this .dmp file to you, and you then simply load it up in Visual Studio (or WinDbg) and it will match up the symbols to the program, and will also match up the code. You should be able to see the exact line of code and some of the variables involved. (if using VS, when you load the .dmp file, top right corner will be an option to "start debugging" click that as it will 'start debugging' at the point of the crash)
Try it first locally - put a div by zero error somewhere in your program and see if you can debug the dump after its been run. Note that you must keep the exact same symbol file for each build of your program - they match exactly. You cannot expect a symbol file for one build to match another build, even if nothing changed.
There are tutorials for this kind of thing, such as this one from CodeProject that looks like it describes what you need.
Reading of MAP files to find out crash location is explained nicely in this code project article.
http://www.codeproject.com/Articles/3472/Finding-crash-information-using-the-MAP-file
Hope helps.
For postmortem debugging, there's an alternative that would not required the use of a map file. Rather, it would require you to create a simple registry script to enable some WER (Windows Error Reporting) flags to trap the crash dump file. First, build your application with debug symbols. Then, follow the instructions for Collecting User-Mode Dumps. Basically, you create a sub key under the "LocalDumps" key. This sub key must be the name of your application, for example, "myapplication.exe". Then, create the "DumpCount", "DumpType", and "DumpFolder" keys/values. Have the user run the registry script. This will enable trapping the dump locally. Then, have the user force the crash to collect the dump file. The user can then send the dump file to you to debug using the symbols you created earlier. Lastly, you'll need to create a registry script that removes the keys/values you added to the registry.
I have one big problem with using STL, C++ and Visual Studio. When i use some std or stl functions (in debug compilation) a have some errors some like this "Incorrect format specifier".
but my code are too large for "hand searching" for this error. Maybe one know how to get some help with finding error, some like __FILE__ & __LINE__ for assert? Because code of program too large.
Or try & catch my last hope?...
with respect Alex
Since you have the source code for the STL, what I would do is set a breakpoint at the point where the "Incorrect format specifier" string is located. Do a grep (eg find in files) for that string, set a breakpoint at each one, run your program and hope for death. :)
You talk about try/catch, so I assume it's throwing an exception. If you run your app within the debugger, doesn't it break your program at the point where the uncaught exception is thrown?
EDIT: If you could alternately compile on Linux/g++ it would leave behind a core with a backtrace in that case.
Maybe you could do status msgs on the console so that you get an idea where the error happens. You can search in this part more detailed with the same technique. Do this as often as you need.
After that you can debug you program and set breakpoints in the 'problem area' and step through it.
EDIT: If you are able to compile the program on linux, you can simply install and run valgrind memcheck. It should print out all errors with line number.
The attached screenshot makes it clear that you hit a runtime assertion, and even offers the option to go directly to the dbugger. This will take you to the faulty callstack.
This message is the default mode of _CrtDbgReport. With _CrtSetReportHook2, you can run your own code before the error is printed. You might create a minidump, for instance.
I am debugging an Iphone program with the simulator in xCode and I have one last issue to resolve but I need help resolving it for the following reason: when it happens the program goes into debugging mode but no errors appear (no BAD ACCESS appears) and it does not show where the code fails. Putting some variables as global helps me to see their values to start pin pointing where the bug is but before I go into this fully I would like to know what techniques/tools you guys use to debug these situations.
If it helps Im debugging the following: I merged some code into the SpeakHere demo. The code was added in the C++ modules of the program (AQRecorder.h and .mm). I seem to have pinpointed the problem code in a function I wrote.
My favourite is always to add debugging code and log it to a file. This allows me so report any and all information I need to resolve the issue if the debugger is not working properly.
I normally control the debugging code by use of a flag which I can manipulate at run time or by the command line.
If the error is (and it probably is) a memory management issue, printing log entries is really not going to help.
I would reccomend learning how to use Instruments, and use its tools to track down the memory leak when it occurs rather than waiting until the application crashes later on.
If my C++ app crashes on Windows I want to send useful debugging information to our server.
On Linux I would use the GNU backtrace() function - is there an equivalent for Windows?
Is there a way to extract useful debugging information after a program has crashed? Or only from within the process?
(Advice along the lines of "test you app so it doesn't crash" is not helpful! - all non-trivial programs will have bugs)
The function Stackwalk64 can be used to snap a stack trace on Windows.
If you intend to use this function, you should be sure to compile your code with FPO disabled - without symbols, StackWalk64 won't be able to properly walk FPO'd frames.
You can get some code running in process at the time of the crash via a top-level __try/__except block by calling SetUnhandledExceptionFilter. This is a bit unreliable since it requires you to have code running inside a crashed process.
Alternatively, you can just the built-in Windows Error Reporting to collect crash data. This is more reliable, since it doesn't require you to add code running inside the compromised, crashed process. The only cost is to get a code-signing certificate, since you must submit a signed binary to the service. https://sysdev.microsoft.com/en-US/Hardware/signup/ has more details.
You can use the Windows API call MiniDumpWriteDump if you wish to roll your own code. Both Windows XP and Vist automate this process and you can sign up at https://winqual.microsoft.com to gain access to the error reports.
Also check out http://kb.mozillazine.org/Breakpad and http://www.codeproject.com/KB/debug/crash_report.aspx for other solutions.
This website provides quite a detailed overview of stack retrieval on Win32 after a C++ exception:
http://www.eptacom.net/pubblicazioni/pub_eng/except.html
Of course, this will only work from within the process, so if the process gets terminated or crashes to the point where it terminates before that code is run, it won't work.
Generate a minidump file. You can then load it up in windbg or Visual Studio and inspect the entire stack where the crash occurred.
Here's a good place to start reading.
Its quite simple to dump the current stackframe addresses into a log file. All you have to do is get such a function called on program faults (i.e. a interrupt handler in Windows) or asserts. This can be done at released versions as well. The log file then can be matched with a map file resulting in a call stack with function names.
I published a article about this some years ago.
See http://www.ddj.com/architect/185300443
Let me describe how I handle crashes in my C++/WTL application.
First, in the main function, I call _set_se_translator, and pass in a function that will throw a C++ exception instead of using structured windows exceptions. This function gets an error code, for which you can get a Windows error message via FormatMessage, and a PEXCEPTION_POINTERS argument, which you can use to write a minidump (code here). You can also check the exception code for certain "meltdown" errors that you should just bail from, like EXCEPTION_NONCONTINUABLE_EXCEPTION or EXCEPTION_STACK_OVERFLOW :) (If it's recoverable, I prompt the user to email me this minidump file.)
The minidump file itself can be opened in Visual Studio like a normal project, and providing you've created a .pdb file for your executable, you can run the project and it'll jump to the exact location of the crash, together with the call stack and registers, which can be examined from the debugger.
If you want to grab a callstack (plus other good info) for a runtime crash, on a release build even on site, then you need to set up Dr Watson (run DrWtsn32.exe). If you check the 'generate crash dumps' option, when an app crashes, it'll write a mini dump file to the path specified (called user.dmp).
You can take this, combine it with the symbols you created when you built your server (set this in your compiler/linker to generate pdb files - keep these safe at home, you use them to match the dump so they can work out the source where the crash occurred)
Get yourself windbg, open it and use the menu option to 'load crash dump'. Once it's loaded everything you can type '~#kp' to get a callstack for every thread (or click the button at the top for the current thread).
There's good articles to know how to do this all over the web, This one is my favourite, and you'll want to read this to get an understanding of how to helpyourself manage the symbols really easily.
You will have to set up a dump generation framework in your application, here is how you may do it.
You may then upload the dump file to the server for further analysis using dump analyzers like windbg.
You may want to use adplus to capture the crash callstack.
You can download and install Debugging tools for Windows.
Usage of adplus is mentioned here:
Adplus usage
This creates the complete crash or hang dump. Once you have the dump, Windbg comes to the rescue. Map the correct pdbs and symbols and you are all set to analyze the dump. To start with use the command "!analyze -v"
Here's the scenario. I'm debugging my own app (C/C++) which is using some library developed by another team in the company. An assertion fails when my code generates some edge case. Its a pain because the assertion is not formulated correctly so the library function is working OK but I get all these interruptions where I just have to continue (lots as its in a loop) so I can get to the stuff I'm actually interested in. I have to use the debug version of the library when debugging for other reasons. The other team wont fix this till next release (hey, it works on our machine).
Can I tell the debugger to ignore the breakpoints asserted by this section of code (i.e. can it auto-continue for me).
If the code is triggering breakpoints on its own (by __debugbreak or int 3), you cannot use conditional breakpoints, as the breakpoints are not know to Visual Studio at all. However, you may be able to disable any such breakpoints you are not interested in by modifying the code from the debugger. Probably not what you want, because you need to repeat this in each debugging session, however still may be better than nothing. For more information read How to disable a programmatical breakpoint / assert?.
There's no good way to automatically ignore ASSERT() failures in a debug library. If that's the one you have to use, you're just going to have to convince the other team that this needs fixed now, or if you have the source for this library, you could fix or remove the assertions yourself just to get your work done in the meantime.
You can add an exception handler around the call(s) to the library, catch the EXCEPTION_BREAKPOINT exception and do nothing.
Example 2 in the following link seems to be what you want to do:
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms681409(VS.85).aspx
You can use conditional breakpoints. Some links:
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/308469
http://dotnettipoftheday.org/tips/conditional_breakpoint.aspx