I have a Seibel web tools deployment in my network and am trying to add new business components and business services. However, when I click on the business components tab on the left, I do see a plus (addition) sign on the right - above a list of existing business components. But nothing happens when I click on this plus sign.
I even looked up google and Siebel bookshelf,but could not find anything relevant. I came across some useful videos, but they just talk about how to update existing business components.
Please let me know if you have any useful articles on how to do this.
thx - Om
That is the correct way to do it, but there a few things you need to check:
Is the "+" button greyed out?
Are you making the changes in the context of a DEV workspace?
Does the browser console display any errors?
Can you instead make a copy of an existing one and change it? In my experience it is rare to create a BC from scratch.
Related
I read the google help for tracking an addon (https://developers.google.com/gsuite/marketplace/use-analytics) and I am not sure, what to do on the google analytics side of the idea.
I added a stream and entered the url of the application url, which I can find in the sore entry settings of the google cloud plattform.
Then I entered the Stream ID in the configuration of my addon's store entry configuration page, where it asks for google Analytics-ID (I entered the G- ... number).
But I don't see any data in GA.
What did I get wrong in the first place? :)
Maybe I am on the wrong path, so I want to share my goal as well: I try to track three things of my google calendar add-on:
how often the add-on in the Marketplace is viewed
how often the add-on actually was installed
what the user did in the add-on, while using it.
thanks for your input and questions to lead me to the solution :)
Try to use a Universal Analytics Property, the one with ID like UA-XXXXX-Y. When you create a new property activate the advanced options and choose that property type.
I am about to launch a beta version for my react native application, and I want to get information on how much time users stay on my app, and actually use it, how frequently they enter it etc. That would help giving me feedback. Also could be useful to know which pages get used the most. Is there such a thing that exists for that?
You may use analytics in your project. Google Firebase provides analytics. But I use Appcenter Analytics for my app. You can add custom events as well to track which page the user has opened or to find whether the button was clicked by user. Here is a screenshot from Appcenter dashboard.
We're developing a new SharePoint 2013 site and we want our users to be able to easily save files to SharePoint. We have about 100 site collections and each represents a Property that we own and contains all the documents related to that Property. Obviously, the easiest way to ensure a new document is created in the correct location is to first navigate to the document library, then click "New Document". Unfortunately, we anticipate most users will create the document first, then want to choose where to save it. Our users are not so computer savvy and are accustomed to file shares.
I've tried using "Connect To Office" but have had mixed results. Ideally, I would like this link to be to the site collection root so the user can see all the document libraries on the site rather than a single document library.
Any tips on using "Connect To Office"? What permissions or GPOs need to be set up so this works smoothly? We have an SSL site and our users are running Win 7,8 & 10 and also use Office 2010 & 2013.
Is there any way to hide the system/admin folders at the root level of the site collection in Explorer View? The site collections are publishing sites, so there are many additional folders and it's difficult to see which are relevant to the users - plus I'd like to hide them to help with security. There are approximately 25 folders that they should not see.
TIA
I have the exact same scenario.
I have had quite good success mapping the root SP site as a mapped drive. Users can easily browse the SP site libraries as they would folders on the network. It was a bit tricky to get it reliable but now is working very well.
Would also like to know the answer to hiding all the publishing system libraries. I tried setting them to hidden in SP Designer without success.
Mike
We have chosen Alfresco for our project because Alfresco meets most of the functional requirements we need.
Share is a great app, nevertheless it has too much functionality for our scenario, much more than we need in our project. This is the reason of posting this question, we don't know what's the best option: either customize Share creating custom pages, custom dashboard, custom actions and metadata etc. or create a new web application that interacts with the repository.
Roughly, we have these requirements:
Custom header with custom menu, disabling direct access to Repository (users only can collaborate using Sites)
Custom dashboard that contains
On the left, list of Sites
On the center, custom dashlets which shows several content in different ways and formats
One of the dashlet would be a "dynamic" dashlet as I explain in my last question
Custom document details page, with custom actions and custom metadata
I would like to know opinions based on experience, explaining when and why would be a good idea to create a new web app that interacts with the Alfresco repository or when to customize Share according to your needs. I'm highly interested on knowing Share customization limits.
Thanks.
Alfresco Share doesn't really have any limitations, it's already an UI built upon the repository.
I've seen Share modification till the sky and one can't even see it's Share any more.
The things you've described above are just templating and building the rightfully freemarker templates/js to view the piece of information.
If you take a good look at the default templates with their regions and shift around the default regions you'll see that you don't need heavy customizations to achieve a different layout.
The only thing one probably lacks is experience with Share.
I'm supposed to use watershed to allow users to create and post their own videos on a website.
Watershed has it's own viewer for broadcasts and an application for recording broadcasts as well. It's all pretty well set up and easy to embed etc.
If you look at the watershed page (link at bottom of post) it says that you must implement all web service methods for the recording application to work, but it doesn't give any direction on how to implement them.
Am I supposed to do this with javascript? actionscript? how does one go about implementing these "web service methods" I tried to do it with actionscript but I'm not really sure how to put actionscript into my page and what I had typed did not work. Any points in the right direction on what to use or even what some of this stuff means would be greatly appreciated.
https://watershed.ustream.tv/support/advanced_customization/using_web_services
I was able to find this project on github, which is extremely helpful. Put the two files from there on your server. After that go to the watershed site and log in. Under the brands tab, click on properties from the side bar and then advanced settings. Put the link to the soap_service.php on your server and it'll respond to the methods. You can edit the soap_services.php and make the methods do what you want. Hopefully this helps people out who are in the same situation.