I am trying to recreate a layout similar to the Reminders app. Looking at it makes me think it was built with SwiftUI. I also believe Apple mentioned so in one of the WWDC videos (can't remember which one).
This above screenshot seems to be a List, with a LazyVGrid as the first View inside the List. Tapping on each of the items in the LazyVGrid, such as Today, Scheduled, All and Flagged, navigates to the relevant screen, which means they are all NavigationLinks. Also note that the LazyVGrid has 2 columns.
And then there is another section "My Lists" which has rows which look like regular list rows in a List with style .insetGrouped. Also, every item in this Section is a NavigationItem, and thus comes with the disclosure indicator on the right as usual. Recreating this is trivial, so it has been left out from the MRE.
I am having trouble recreating the first section, which has that LazyVGrid. I faced 3 problems (as mentioned in the image), of which I have been able to solve the first one only. The other two problems remain. I want to know if this MRE can be fixed, or is my entire approach incorrect.
I am including a minimum reproducible example below.
import SwiftUI
#main
struct TestApp: App {
var body: some Scene {
WindowGroup {
RemindersView()
}
}
}
struct RemindersView: View {
private var columns: [GridItem] = [GridItem(.adaptive(minimum: 150))]
private var smartLists: [SmartList] = SmartList.sampleLists
var body: some View {
NavigationView {
List {
Section(header: Text("Using LazyVGrid")) {
grid
}
Section(header: Text("Using HStack")) {
hstack
}
}
.navigationTitle("Store")
}
.preferredColorScheme(.dark)
}
private var grid: some View {
LazyVGrid(columns: columns, spacing: 8) {
ForEach(smartLists) { smartList in
// This use of **ZStack with an EmptyView with opacity 0** is a hack being used to avoid the disclosure indicator on each item in the grid
ZStack(alignment: .leading) {
NavigationLink( destination: SmartListView(list: smartList)) {
EmptyView()
}
.opacity(0)
SmartListView(list: smartList)
}
}
}
.listRowInsets(EdgeInsets())
.listRowBackground(Color.clear)
}
private var hstack: some View {
ScrollView(.horizontal) {
HStack {
ForEach(smartLists) { smartList in
NavigationLink(destination: SmartListView(list: smartList)) {
SmartListView(list: smartList)
}
.buttonStyle(.plain)
}
}
}
.listRowInsets(EdgeInsets())
.listRowBackground(Color.clear)
}
}
struct RemindersView_Previews: PreviewProvider {
static var previews: some View {
RemindersView()
}
}
struct SmartList: Identifiable {
var id: UUID = UUID()
var title: String
var count: Int
var icon: String
var iconColor: Color
static var sampleLists: [SmartList] {
let today = SmartList(title: "Today", count: 5, icon: "20.circle.fill", iconColor: .blue)
let scheduled = SmartList(title: "Scheduled", count: 12, icon: "calendar.circle.fill", iconColor: .red)
let all = SmartList(title: "All", count: 77, icon: "tray.circle.fill", iconColor: .gray)
let flagged = SmartList(title: "Flagged", count: 5, icon: "flag.circle.fill", iconColor: .orange)
return [today, scheduled, all, flagged]
}
}
struct SmartListView: View {
var list: SmartList
var body: some View {
VStack(alignment: .leading, spacing: 8) {
HStack(alignment: .center) {
Image(systemName: list.icon)
.renderingMode(.original)
.font(.title)
.foregroundColor(list.iconColor)
Spacer()
Text("\(list.count)")
.font(.system(.title, design: .rounded))
.fontWeight(.bold)
.padding(.horizontal, 8)
}
Text(list.title)
.font(.system(.headline, design: .rounded))
.foregroundColor(.secondary)
}
.padding(8)
.background(
RoundedRectangle(cornerRadius: 12)
.foregroundColor(.gray.opacity(0.25))
)
.padding(2)
.frame(minWidth: 150)
}
}
EDIT 1: Adding video demo of what editing the dynamic Grid looks like and how the Grid has dynamic grid items (via the Edit button at the top right): https://imgur.com/a/TV0kifY
Related
My SwiftUI TVOS app has two sets of NavigationLink. When both sets are present (not commented out), only one set is accessible to tap on. If I comment out one or the other set, the remaining NavigationLink is accessible to tap on and functions properly.
How can both sets of NavigationLink be accessible (can be interacted with)?
I've tried encapsulating my view in NavigationView and NavigationStack, neither behaved differently.
The view, as shown below, only the NavigationLinks in the ScrollView are accessible to interact with. The "Edit" NavigationLink cannot be selected to tap on. If I comment out the ScrollView NavigationLinks, then the "Edit" NavigationLink becomes accessible and functions correctly.
I've also tried replacing LazyVGrid with VStack to no effect.
import SwiftUI
struct TestSources: Hashable {
let id = UUID()
let name: String
}
struct SourcesView: View {
private var Sources = [TestSources(name: "Computer 1"), TestSources(name: "Computer 2")]
var columns: [GridItem] {
Array(repeating: .init(.adaptive(minimum: 200)), count: 2)
}
var body: some View {
NavigationStack {
VStack(alignment: .center) {
// Header
HStack(alignment: .center){
Label("Sources", systemImage: "externaldrive.connected.to.line.below")
.font(.headline)
.frame(maxWidth: .greatestFiniteMagnitude, alignment: .leading)
.padding(.all)
NavigationLink(destination: TestEditView()) {
Text("Edit")
}
}
Divider()
ScrollView(.vertical, showsIndicators: false) {
LazyVGrid(columns: columns, spacing: 10) {
ForEach(Sources.indices, id: \.self) { index in
NavigationLink(Sources[index].name ,value: Sources[index])
}.navigationDestination(for: TestSources.self) { source in
TestShareView(source: source)
}
.accentColor(Color.black)
.padding(Edge.Set.vertical, 20)
}
.padding(.horizontal)
}
}.frame(
minWidth: 0,
maxWidth: .infinity,
minHeight: 0,
maxHeight: .infinity,
alignment: .topLeading
)
}
}
}
struct TestEditView: View {
var body: some View {
Text("Edit")
}
}
struct TestShareView: View {
let source : TestSources
var body: some View {
Text(source.name)
}
}
I don't see any problem with the navigation links in this code.
I pasted the code into a new project and tweaked it a little to make it compile. As you can see, it just works.
My guess is that it might fail because something outside of this code. Maybe, it is within another NavigationStack or some structure that could increse it's navigation complexity?
Or as Yrb suggests, this force unwrapping could be failing because of null values?
I have two views, ViewAssignment and TaskDetailView. My ViewAssignment page fetches data from an environment object, and creates a list using the data.
Upon each item of the list being clicked on, the TaskDetailView pops in as a navigation link, however, I am having trouble making the information in the TaskDetailView unique to that particular iteration (the item in the list)
I believe the trouble comes from my TaskDetailView.swift
import SwiftUI
struct TaskDetailView: View {
#EnvironmentObject var assignment: Assignments
#State var taskNotes = ""
var body: some View {
VStack(spacing: 10) {
Image("english-essay")
.resizable()
.scaledToFit()
.frame(width: 250, height: 160)
.cornerRadius(20)
Text(self.assignment.data.first?.taskName ?? "Untitled Task")
.font(.title2)
.fontWeight(.semibold)
.lineLimit(2)
.multilineTextAlignment(.center)
HStack(spacing: 20) {
Label(self.assignment.data.first?.weighting ?? "0", systemImage: "percent")
.font(.subheadline)
.foregroundColor(.secondary)
Text(self.assignment.data.first?.dueDate ?? "No Date")
.font(.subheadline)
.foregroundColor(.secondary)
}
TextField("Write any notes here", text: $taskNotes)
.font(.body)
.padding()
Spacer()
}
}
}
struct TaskDetailView_Previews: PreviewProvider {
static var previews: some View {
TaskDetailView() // I assume there is some information I have to pass through here
}
}
For details, this is my other view:
import SwiftUI
struct ViewAssignment: View {
// Observed to update the UI
#EnvironmentObject var assignment: Assignments
var body: some View {
ZStack {
NavigationView {
List(self.assignment.data) { task in
NavigationLink (
destination: TaskDetailView(),
label: {
Image(systemName: "doc.append.fill")
.scaleEffect(2.5)
.padding()
VStack(alignment: .leading, spacing: 3) {
Text(task.taskName)
.fontWeight(.semibold)
.lineLimit(2)
Text(task.dueDate + " - " + task.subject)
.font(.subheadline)
.foregroundColor(.secondary)
}
})
}
.navigationTitle("My Tasks")
.listStyle(InsetGroupedListStyle())
}
}
}
}
struct ViewAssignment_Previews: PreviewProvider {
static var previews: some View {
ViewAssignment()
}
}
I would also like to know if, upon making the screen unique for each item in the list, would I be able to have the contents of the text field saved upon reloading the app, Perhaps through #AppStorage?
Thank you for the assistance.
If I understand correctly what you are trying to do:
a TaskDetailView displays the detail of a ... Task.
So you should have a Task structure like this:
struct Task {
let name: String
let subject: String
...
}
You have to create one (or more) instance of Task to test your TaskDetailView:
extension Task {
var test: Task {
Task(name: "Test", subject: "Test Subject")
}
}
Now in the preview of your TaskDetailView you can try to display your example :
struct TaskDetailView_Previews: PreviewProvider {
static var previews: some View {
TaskDetailView(task: Task.test) // here
}
}
For the moment nothing is happening. Because your TaskDetailView doesn't have a task parameter.
struct TaskDetailView: View {
var task: Task
var body: some View {
...
}
Now its body can use the different parameters of this Task.
Text(task.name)
.font(.title2)
.fontWeight(.semibold)
.lineLimit(2)
.multilineTextAlignment(.center)
Now in your List:
List(self.assignment.data) { task in
NavigationLink (
destination: TaskDetailView(task: task), // <- here !!!
label: {
Image(systemName: "doc.append.fill")
.scaleEffect(2.5)
.padding()
VStack(alignment: .leading, spacing: 3) {
Text(task.name)
.fontWeight(.semibold)
.lineLimit(2)
}
})
}
I just shared this Bug with Apple. I want to share with you.
Application Follow
1 - After the user logs on to the onBoardingView page, they are directed to ContentView with fullScreenCover.
2 - ContentView page contains objects in TabView that are repeated with ForEach. Clicking on these objects will take you to the DetailView page.
3 - However, Navigation repeats itself several times after clicking the object.
My English is bad. Sorry for this.
Video is here
Project file is here
struct OnboardView: View {
#State var isLogin: Bool = false
var body: some View {
Button(action: {self.isLogin = true}) {
Text("Login")
}
.fullScreenCover(isPresented: self.$isLogin) {
ContentView()
}
}
}
struct ContentView: View {
#State var selected: String = ""
var items: [String] = ["1","2","3","4","5","6","7","8","9","10"]
var body: some View {
NavigationView {
TabView(selection: $selected) {
ForEach(items, id: \.self) { item in
NavigationLink(
destination: DetailView(),
label: {
Text(item)
.foregroundColor(.white)
.padding()
.background(Color.orange)
.cornerRadius(10)
})
}
}
.tabViewStyle(PageTabViewStyle(indexDisplayMode: .never))
.indexViewStyle(PageIndexViewStyle(backgroundDisplayMode: .always))
}
}
}
When working with ForEach in SwiftUI, you have to be extra careful on the ids.
Try changing items to items.indices instead:
ForEach(items.indices, id: \.self) { item in
NavigationLink(
destination: Text("Detail View"),
label: {
Text(items[item])
.foregroundColor(.white)
.padding()
.background(Color.orange)
.cornerRadius(10)
}
)
}
There are a lot of solutions for trying to align multiple images and text in SwiftUI using a HStacks inside of a VStack. Is there any way to do it for multiple Labels? When added in a list, multiple labels automatically align vertically neatly. Is there a simple way to do this for when they are embedded inside of a VStack?
struct ContentView: View {
var body: some View {
// List{
VStack(alignment: .leading){
Label("People", systemImage: "person.3")
Label("Star", systemImage: "star")
Label("This is a plane", systemImage: "airplane")
}
}
}
So, you want this:
We're going to implement a container view called EqualIconWidthDomain so that we can draw the image shown above with this code:
struct ContentView: View {
var body: some View {
EqualIconWidthDomain {
VStack(alignment: .leading) {
Label("People", systemImage: "person.3")
Label("Star", systemImage: "star")
Label("This is a plane", systemImage: "airplane")
}
}
}
}
You can find all the code in this gist.
To solve this problem, we need to measure each icon's width, and apply a frame to each icon, using the maximum of the widths.
SwiftUI provides a system called “preferences” by which a view can pass a value up to its ancestors, and the ancestors can aggregate those values. To use it, we create a type conforming to PreferenceKey, like this:
fileprivate struct IconWidthKey: PreferenceKey {
static var defaultValue: CGFloat? { nil }
static func reduce(value: inout CGFloat?, nextValue: () -> CGFloat?) {
switch (value, nextValue()) {
case (nil, let next): value = next
case (_, nil): break
case (.some(let current), .some(let next)): value = max(current, next)
}
}
}
To pass the maximum width back down to the labels, we'll use the “environment” system. For that, we need an EnvironmentKey. In this case, we can use IconWidthKey again. We also need to add a computed property to EnvironmentValues that uses the key type:
extension IconWidthKey: EnvironmentKey { }
extension EnvironmentValues {
fileprivate var iconWidth: CGFloat? {
get { self[IconWidthKey.self] }
set { self[IconWidthKey.self] = newValue }
}
}
Now we need a way to measure an icon's width, store it in the preference, and apply the environment's width to the icon. We'll create a ViewModifier to do those steps:
fileprivate struct IconWidthModifier: ViewModifier {
#Environment(\.iconWidth) var width
func body(content: Content) -> some View {
content
.background(GeometryReader { proxy in
Color.clear
.preference(key: IconWidthKey.self, value: proxy.size.width)
})
.frame(width: width)
}
}
To apply the modifier to the icon of each label, we need a LabelStyle:
struct EqualIconWidthLabelStyle: LabelStyle {
func makeBody(configuration: Configuration) -> some View {
HStack {
configuration.icon.modifier(IconWidthModifier())
configuration.title
}
}
}
Finally, we can write the EqualIconWidthDomain container. It needs to receive the preference value from SwiftUI and put it into the environment of its descendants. It also needs to apply the EqualIconWidthLabelStyle to its descendants.
struct EqualIconWidthDomain<Content: View>: View {
let content: Content
#State var iconWidth: CGFloat? = nil
init(#ViewBuilder _ content: () -> Content) {
self.content = content()
}
var body: some View {
content
.environment(\.iconWidth, iconWidth)
.onPreferenceChange(IconWidthKey.self) { self.iconWidth = $0 }
.labelStyle(EqualIconWidthLabelStyle())
}
}
Note that EqualIconWidthDomain doesn't just have to be a VStack of Labels, and the icons don't have to be SF Symbols images. For example, we can show this:
Notice that one of the label “icons” is an emoji in a Text. All four icons are laid out with the same width (across both columns). Here's the code:
struct FancyView: View {
var body: some View {
EqualIconWidthDomain {
VStack {
Text("Le Menu")
.font(.caption)
Divider()
HStack {
VStack(alignment: .leading) {
Label(
title: { Text("Strawberry") },
icon: { Text("🍓") })
Label("Money", systemImage: "banknote")
}
VStack(alignment: .leading) {
Label("People", systemImage: "person.3")
Label("Star", systemImage: "star")
}
}
}
}
}
}
This has been driving me crazy myself for a while. One of those things where I kept approaching it the same incorrect way - by seeing it as some sort of alignment configuration that was inside the black box that is List.
However it appears that it is much simpler. Within the List, Apple is simply applying a ListStyle - seemingly one that is not public.
I created something that does a pretty decent job like this:
public struct ListLabelStyle: LabelStyle {
#ScaledMetric var padding: CGFloat = 6
public func makeBody(configuration: Configuration) -> some View {
HStack {
Image(systemName: "rectangle")
.hidden()
.padding(padding)
.overlay(
configuration.icon
.foregroundColor(.accentColor)
)
configuration.title
}
}
}
This uses a hidden rectangle SFSymbol to set the base size of the icon. This is not the widest possible icon, however visually it seems to work well. In the sample below, you can see that Apple's own ListStyle assumes that the label icon will not be something significantly larger than the SFSymbol with the font being used.
While the sample here is not pixel perfect with Apple's own List, it's close and with some tweaking, you should be able to achieve what you are after.
By the way, this works with dynamic type as well.
Here is the complete code I used to generate this sample.
public struct ListLabelStyle: LabelStyle {
#ScaledMetric var padding: CGFloat = 6
public func makeBody(configuration: Configuration) -> some View {
HStack {
Image(systemName: "rectangle")
.hidden()
.padding(padding)
.overlay(
configuration.icon
.foregroundColor(.accentColor)
)
configuration.title
}
}
}
struct ContentView: View {
#ScaledMetric var rowHeightPadding: CGFloat = 6
var body: some View {
VStack {
Text("Lazy VStack Plain").font(.title2)
LazyVStack(alignment: .leading) {
ListItem.all
}
Text("Lazy VStack with LabelStyle").font(.title2)
LazyVStack(alignment: .leading, spacing: 0) {
vStackContent
}
.labelStyle(ListLabelStyle())
Text("Built in List").font(.title2)
List {
ListItem.all
labelWithHugeIcon
labelWithCircle
}
.listStyle(PlainListStyle())
}
}
// MARK: List Content
#ViewBuilder
var vStackContent: some View {
ForEach(ListItem.allCases, id: \.rawValue) { item in
vStackRow {
item.label
}
}
vStackRow { labelWithHugeIcon }
vStackRow { labelWithCircle }
}
func vStackRow<Content>(#ViewBuilder _ content: () -> Content) -> some View where Content : View {
VStack(alignment: .leading, spacing: 0) {
content()
.padding(.vertical, rowHeightPadding)
Divider()
}
.padding(.leading)
}
// MARK: List Content
var labelWithHugeIcon: some View {
Label {
Text("This is HUGE")
} icon: {
HStack {
Image(systemName: "person.3")
Image(systemName: "arrow.forward")
}
}
}
var labelWithCircle: some View {
Label {
Text("Circle")
} icon: {
Circle()
}
}
enum ListItem: String, CaseIterable {
case airplane
case people = "person.3"
case rectangle
case chevron = "chevron.compact.right"
var label: some View {
Label(self.rawValue, systemImage: self.rawValue)
}
static var all: some View {
ForEach(Self.allCases, id: \.rawValue) { item in
item.label
}
}
}
}
struct ContentView_Previews: PreviewProvider {
static var previews: some View {
ContentView()
// .environment(\.sizeCategory, .extraExtraLarge)
}
}
Combining a few of these answers into another simple option (Very similar to some of the other options but thought it was distinct enough that some may find it useful). This has the simplicity of just setting a frame on the icon, and the swiftUI-ness of using LabelStyle but still adapts to dynamic type!
struct StandardizedIconWidthLabelStyle: LabelStyle {
#ScaledMetric private var size: CGFloat = 25
func makeBody(configuration: Configuration) -> some View {
Label {
configuration.title
} icon: {
configuration.icon
.frame(width: size, height: size)
}
}
}
The problem is that the system icons have different standard widths. It's probably easiest to use an HStack as you mentioned. However, if you use the full Label completion, you'll see that the Title is actually just a Text and the icon is just an Image... and you can then add custom modifiers, such as a specific frame for the image width. Personally, I'd rather just use an HStack anyway.
var body: some View {
VStack(alignment: .leading){
Label(
title: {
Text("People")
},
icon: {
Image(systemName: "person.3")
.frame(width: 30)
})
Label(
title: {
Text("Star")
},
icon: {
Image(systemName: "star")
.frame(width: 30)
})
Label(
title: {
Text("This is a plane")
},
icon: {
Image(systemName: "airplane")
.frame(width: 30)
})
}
}
I can't use multiple NavigationLinks in the same row of a List.
It looks like the navigation stack is totally messed up, because you tap once and it goes to multiple views and back erratically...
in TestList, I've tried adding the separate NavigationLinks in Sections, and I've tried moving the NavigationLinks two different places in the view hierarchy...
I've tried adding two NavigationViews for each row of the list, but
then the navigationTitleBar don't go away when I need it to..
struct ContentView: View {
var body: some View {
NavigationView {
TestList()
}
}
}
struct TestList: View {
var body: some View {
List {
ListCellView()
}
}
}
struct ListCellView: View {
var body: some View {
VStack {
Spacer()
NavigationLink(destination: TestDestination1()) {
Text("Test Destination 1")
.frame(width: 140, height: 50)
.background(RoundedRectangle(cornerRadius: 7.0).strokeBorder(Color.green, lineWidth: 3.0))
}
Spacer()
NavigationLink(destination: TestDestination2()) {
Text("Test Destination 2")
.frame(width:140, height: 50)
.background(RoundedRectangle(cornerRadius: 7.0).strokeBorder(Color.purple, lineWidth: 3.0))
Spacer()
}
}
}
}
struct TestDestination1: View {
var body: some View {
Text("Test Destination 1")
}
}
struct TestDestination2: View {
var body: some View {
Text("Test Destination 2")
}
}
I expect that when you tap a NavigationLink, it will navigate to the destination view.
What happens is when two NavigationLinks are in the same row of a List and you tap in it, it will:
1. go to one of the views
2. After tapping 'back', it will take you back to the view AND THEN take you to the other destination view.
https://youtu.be/NCTnqjzJ4VE
As the others mentioned, why 2 NavigationLinks in 1 cell. The issue is with multiple buttons and gesture in general for the Cell. I guess it is expected 1 Button/NavigationLink max per cell. As you noticed, on your video, you tap on a NavigationLink but your full Cell got the gesture (highlighted), which in return impact the other Buttons/NavigationLinks.
Anyhow, you can have it working, the 2 NavigationLinks in 1 cell, with a hack. Below I have created SGNavigationLink, which I use for my own app which solve your issue. It simply replace NavigationLink and based on TapGesture, so you will lose the highlight.
NB: I slightly modified your ListCellView, as the Spacer within my SGNavigationLink was creating an internal crash.
struct ListCellView: View {
var body: some View {
VStack {
HStack{
SGNavigationLink(destination: TestDestination1()) {
Text("Test Destination 1")
.frame(width: 140, height: 50)
.background(RoundedRectangle(cornerRadius: 7.0).strokeBorder(Color.green, lineWidth: 3.0))
}
Spacer()
}
HStack{
SGNavigationLink(destination: TestDestination2()) {
Text("Test Destination 2")
.frame(width:140, height: 50)
.background(RoundedRectangle(cornerRadius: 7.0).strokeBorder(Color.purple, lineWidth: 3.0))
}
Spacer()
}
}
}
}
struct SGNavigationLink<Content, Destination>: View where Destination: View, Content: View {
let destination:Destination?
let content: () -> Content
#State private var isLinkActive:Bool = false
init(destination: Destination, title: String = "", #ViewBuilder content: #escaping () -> Content) {
self.content = content
self.destination = destination
}
var body: some View {
return ZStack (alignment: .leading){
if self.isLinkActive{
NavigationLink(destination: destination, isActive: $isLinkActive){Color.clear}.frame(height:0)
}
content()
}
.onTapGesture {
self.pushHiddenNavLink()
}
}
func pushHiddenNavLink(){
self.isLinkActive = true
}
}
I am not sure about why do you need multiple Navigationlinks (duplicate code). You can use a data source that will hold the required properties of the list [title, color, id etc] and based on the id, call the desired View. Reuse the same code. Here is an example.
struct TestList: View {
var body: some View {
List { // <- Use Data source
ForEach(0..<2) { index in
ListCellView(index: index)
}
}
}
}
struct ListCellView: View {
var index: Int
var body: some View {
return NavigationLink(destination: ViewFactory.create(index)) {
Text("Test Destination 1")
.frame(width: 140, height: 50)
.background(RoundedRectangle(cornerRadius: 7.0).strokeBorder(Color.green, lineWidth: 3.0))
}
}
}
class ViewFactory {
static func create(_ index: Int) -> AnyView {
switch index {
case 0:
return AnyView(TestDestination1())
case 1:
return AnyView(TestDestination2())
default:
return AnyView(EmptyView())
}
}
}
struct TestDestination1: View {
var body: some View {
Text("Test Destination 1")
}
}
struct TestDestination2: View {
var body: some View {
Text("Test Destination 2")
}
}