I want to expect some characters only if a prior regex matched. If not, no characters (empty string) is expected.
For instance, if after the first four characters appears a string out of the group (A10, B32, C56, D65) (kind of enumeration) then a "_" followed by a 3-digit number like 123 is expected. If no element of the mentioned group appears, no other string is expected.
My first attempt was this but the ELSE branch does not work:
^XXX_(?<DT>A12|B43|D14)(?(DT)(_\d{1,3})|)\.ZZZ$
XXX_A12_123.ZZZ --> match
XXX_A11.ZZZ --> match
XXX_A12_abc.ZZZ --> no match
XXX_A23_123.ZZZ --> no match
These are examples of filenames. If the filename contains a string of the mentioned group like A12 or C56, then I expect that this element if followed by an underscore followed by 1 to 3 digits. If the filename does not contain a string of that group (no character or a character sequence different from the strings in the group) then I don't want to see the underscore followed by 1 to 3 digits.
For instance, I could extend the regex to
^XXX_(?<DT>A12|B43|D14)_\d{5}(?(DT)(_\d{1,3})|)_someMoreChars\.ZZZ$
...and then I want these filenames to be valid:
XXX_A12_12345_123_wellDone.ZZZ
XXX_Q21_00000_wellDone.ZZZ
XXX_Q21_00000_456_wellDone.ZZZ
...but this is invalid:
XXX_A12_12345_wellDone.ZZZ
How can I make the ELSE branch of the conditional statement work?
In the end I intend to have two groups like
Group A: (A11, B32, D76, R33)
Group B: (A23, C56, H78, T99)
If an element of group A occurs in the filename then I expect to find _\d{1,3} in the filename.
If an element of group B occurs ion the filename then the _\d{1,3} shall be optional (it may or may not occur in the filename).
I ended up in this regex:
^XXX_(?:(?A12|B43|D14))?(?(DT)(_\d{5}_\d{1,3})|(?!(?&DT))(?!.*_\d{3}(?!\d))).*\.ZZZ$
^XXX_(?:(?<DT>A12|B43|D14))?_\d{5}(?(DT)(_\d{1,3})|(?!(?&DT))(?!.*_\d{3}(?!\d))).+\.ZZZ$
Since I have to use this regex in the OpenApi #Pattern annotation I have the problem that I get the error:
Conditionals are not supported in this regex dialect.
As #The fourth bird suggested alternation seems to do the trick:
XXX_((((A12|B43|D14)_\d{5}_\d{1,3}))|((?:(A10|B10|C20)((?:_\d{5}_\d{3})|(?:_\d{3}))))).*\.ZZZ$
The else branch is the part after the |, but if you also want to match the 2nd example, the if clause would not work as you have already matched one of A12|B43|D14
The named capture group is not optional, so the if clause will always be true.
What you can do instead is use an alternation to match either the numeration part followed by an underscore and 3 digits, or match an uppercase char and 2 digits.
^XXX_(?:(?<DT>A12|B43|D14)_\d{1,3}|[A-Z]\d{2})\.ZZZ$
Regex demo
If you want to make use of the if/else clause, you can make the named capture group optional, and then check if group 1 exists.
^XXX_(?<DT>A12|B43|D14)?(?(DT)_\d{1,3}|[A-Z]\d{2})\.ZZZ$
Regex demo
For the updated question:
^XXX_(?<DT>A12|B43|D14)?(?(DT)(?:_\d{5})?_\d{3}(?!\d)|(?!A12|B43|D14|[A-Z]\d{2}_\d{3}(?!\d))).*\.ZZZ$
The pattern matches:
^ Start of string
XXX_ Match literally
(?<DT>A12|B43|D14)?
(?(DT) If we have group DT
(?:_\d{5})? Optionally match _ and 5 digits
_\d{3}(?!\d) Match _ and 3 digits
| Or
(?! Negative lookahead, assert not to the right
A12|B43|D14| Match one of the alternatives, or
[A-Z]\d{2}_\d{3}(?!\d) Match 1 char A-Z, 2 digits _ 3 digits not followed by a digit
) Close lookahead
) Close if clause
.* Match the rest of the line
\.ZZZ Match . and ZZZ
$ End of string
Regex demo
Related
there are 4 strings as shown below
ABC_FIXED_20220720_VALUEABC.csv
ABC_FIXED_20220720_VALUEABCQUERY_answer.csv
ABC_FIXED_20220720_VALUEDEF.csv
ABC_FIXED_20220720_VALUEDEFQUERY_answer.csv
Two strings are considered as matched based on a matching substring value (VALUEABC, VALUEDEF in the above shown strings). Thus I am looking to match first 2 (having VALUEABC) and then next 2 (having VALUEDEF). The matched strings are identified based on the same value returned for one regex group.
What I tried so far
ABC.*[0-9]{8}_(.*[^QUERY_answer])(?:QUERY_answer)?.csv
This returns regex group-1 (from (.*[^QUERY_answer])) value "VALUEABC" for first 2 strings and "VALUEDEF" for next 2 strings and thus desired matching achieved.
But the problem with above regex is that as soon as the value ends with any of the characters of "QUERY_answer", the regex doesn't match any value for the grouping. For instance, the below 2 strings doesn't match at all as the VALUESTU ends with "U" here :
ABC_FIXED_20220720_VALUESTU.csv
ABC_FIXED_20220720_VALUESTUQUERY_answer.csv
I tried to use Negative Lookahead:
ABC.*[0-9]{8}_(.*(?!QUERY_answer))(?:QUERY_answer)?.csv
but in this case the grouping-1 value is returned as "VALUESTU" for first string and "VALUESTUQUERY_answer" for second string, thus effectively making the 2 strings unmatched.
Any way to achieve the desired matching?
With your shown samples please try following regex.
^ABC_[^_]*_[0-9]+_(.*?)(?:QUERY_answer)?\.csv$
OR to match exact 8 digits try:
^ABC_[^_]*_[0-9]{8}_(.*?)(?:QUERY_answer)?\.csv$
Here is the online demo for above regex.
Explanation: Adding detailed explanation for above regex.
^ABC_[^_]*_ ##Matching from starting of value ABC followed by _ till next occurrence of _.
[0-9]+_ ##Matching continuous occurrences of digits followed by _ here.
(.*?) ##Creating one and only capturing group using lazy match which is opposite of greedy match.
(?:QUERY_answer)? ##In a non-capturing group matching QUERY_answer and keeping it optional.
\.csv$ ##Matching dot literal csv at the end of the value.
You need
ABC.*[0-9]{8}_(.*?)(?:QUERY_answer)?\.csv
See the regex demo.
Note
.*[^QUERY_answer] matches any zero or more chars other than line break chars as many as possible, and then any one char other than Q, U, E, etc., i.e. any char in the negated character class. This is replaced with .*?, to match any zero or more chars other than line break chars as few as possible.
(?:QUERY_answer)? - the group is made non-capturing to reduce grouping complexity.
\.csv - the . is escaped to match a literal dot.
I have patterns like
FQC19515_TCELL001_20190319_165944.pdf
FQC19515_TBNK001_20190319_165944.pdf
I can match word TCELL and TBNK with this RegEX
^(\D+)-(\d+)-(\d+)([A-Z1-9]+)?.*
But if I have patterns like
FLW194640_T20NK022_20190323_131348.pdf
FLW194228_C1920_SOME_DEBRIS_REMOVED.pdf
the above regex returns
T2 and C192 instead of T20NK and C1920 respectively
Is there a general regex that matches Nzeros out side of these word boundaries?
Let's consider all 4 examples of your input:
FQC19515_TCELL001_20190319_165944.pdf
FQC19515_TBNK001_20190319_165944.pdf
FLW194640_T20NK022_20190323_131348.pdf
FLW194228_C1920_SOME_DEBRIS_REMOVED.pdf
The first group, between start of line and the first "_" (e.g. FQC19515 in row 1)
consists of:
a non-empty sequence of letters,
a non-empty sequence of digits.
So the regex matching it, including the start of line anchor and a capturing group is:
^([A-Z]+\d+)
You used \D instead of [A-Z] but I think that [A-Z] is
more specific, as it matches only letters an not e.g. "_".
The next source char is _, so the regex can also include _.
A now the more diificult part: The second group to be captured has
actually 2 variants:
a sequence of letters and a sequence of digits (after that there is
a "_"),
a sequence of letters, a sequence of digits and another sequence of
letters (after that there are digits that you want to omit).
So the most intuitive way is to define 2 alternatives, each with
a respective positive lookahead:
alternative 1: [A-Z]+\d+(?=_),
alternative 2: [A-Z]+\d+[A-Z]+(?=\d).
But there is a bit shorter way. Notice that both alternatives start
from [A-Z]+\d+.
So we can put this fragment at the first place and only the rest
include as a non-capturing group ((?:...)), with 2 alternatives.
All the above should be surrounded with a capturing group:
([A-Z]+\d+(?:(?=_)|[A-Z]+(?=\d)))
So the whole regex can be:
^([A-Z]+\d+)_([A-Z]+\d+(?:(?=_)|[A-Z]+(?=\d)))
with m option ("^" matches also the start of each line).
For a working example see https://regex101.com/r/GDdt10/1
Your regex: ^(\D+)-(\d+) is wrong as after a sequence of non-digits
(\D+) you specified a minus which doesn't occur in your source.
Also the second minus does not correspond to your input.
Edit
To match all your strings, I modified slightly the previous regex.
The changes are limited to the matching group No 2 (after _):
Alternative No 1: [A-Z]{2,}+(?=\d) - two or more letters, after them
there is a digit, to be omitted. It will match TCELL and TBNK.
Alternative No 2: [A-Z]+\d+(?:(?=_)|[A-Z]+(?=\d)) - the previous
content of this group. It will match two remaining cases.
So the whole regex is:
^([A-Z]+\d+)_([A-Z]{2,}+(?=\d)|[A-Z]+\d+(?:(?=_)|[A-Z]+(?=\d)))
For a working example see https://regex101.com/r/GDdt10/2
As far as I understand, you could use:
^[A-Z]+\d+_\K[A-Z0-9]{5}
Explanation:
^ # beginning of line
[A-Z]+ # 1 or more capitals
\d+_ # 1 or more digit and 1 underscore
\K # forget all we have seen until this position
[A-Z0-9]{5} # 5 capitals or digits
Demo
For example, this is the regular expression
([a]{2,3})
This is the string
aaaa // 1 match "(aaa)a" but I want "(aa)(aa)"
aaaaa // 2 match "(aaa)(aa)"
aaaaaa // 2 match "(aaa)(aaa)"
However, if I change the regular expression
([a]{2,3}?)
Then the results are
aaaa // 2 match "(aa)(aa)"
aaaaa // 2 match "(aa)(aa)a" but I want "(aaa)(aa)"
aaaaaa // 3 match "(aa)(aa)(aa)" but I want "(aaa)(aaa)"
My question is that is it possible to use as few groups as possible to match as long string as possible?
How about something like this:
(a{3}(?!a(?:[^a]|$))|a{2})
This looks for either the character a three times (not followed by a single a and a different character) or the character a two times.
Breakdown:
( # Start of the capturing group.
a{3} # Matches the character 'a' exactly three times.
(?! # Start of a negative Lookahead.
a # Matches the character 'a' literally.
(?: # Start of the non-capturing group.
[^a] # Matches any character except for 'a'.
| # Alternation (OR).
$ # Asserts position at the end of the line/string.
) # End of the non-capturing group.
) # End of the negative Lookahead.
| # Alternation (OR).
a{2} # Matches the character 'a' exactly two times.
) # End of the capturing group.
Here's a demo.
Note that if you don't need the capturing group, you can actually use the whole match instead by converting the capturing group into a non-capturing one:
(?:a{3}(?!a(?:[^a]|$))|a{2})
Which would look like this.
Try this Regex:
^(?:(a{3})*|(a{2,3})*)$
Click for Demo
Explanation:
^ - asserts the start of the line
(?:(a{3})*|(a{2,3})*) - a non-capturing group containing 2 sub-sequences separated by OR operator
(a{3})* - The first subsequence tries to match 3 occurrences of a. The * at the end allows this subsequence to match 0 or 3 or 6 or 9.... occurrences of a before the end of the line
| - OR
(a{2,3})* - matches 2 to 3 occurrences of a, as many as possible. The * at the end would repeat it 0+ times before the end of the line
-$ - asserts the end of the line
Try this short regex:
a{2,3}(?!a([^a]|$))
Demo
How it's made:
I started with this simple regex: a{2}a?. It looks for 2 consecutive a's that may be followed by another a. If the 2 a's are followed by another a, it matches all three a's.
This worked for most cases:
However, it failed in cases like:
So now, I knew I had to modify my regex in such a way that it would match the third a only if the third a is not followed by a([^a]|$). So now, my regex looked like a{2}a?(?!a([^a]|$)), and it worked for all cases. Then I just simplified it to a{2,3}(?!a([^a]|$)).
That's it.
EDIT
If you want the capturing behavior, then add parenthesis around the regex, like:
(a{2,3}(?!a([^a]|$)))
I have a command-line program that its first argument ( = argv[ 1 ] ) is a regex pattern.
./program 's/one-or-more/anything/gi/digit-digit'
So I need a regex to check if the entered input from user is correct or not. This regex can be solve easily but since I use c++ library and std::regex_match and this function by default puts begin and end assertion (^ and $) at the given string, so the nan-greedy quantifier is ignored.
Let me clarify the subject. If I want to match /anything/ then I can use /.*?/ but std::regex_match considers this pattern as ^/.*?/$ and therefore if the user enters: /anything/anything/anyhting/ the std::regex_match still returns true whereas the input-pattern is not correct. The std::regex_match only returns true or false and the expected pattern form the user can only be a text according to the pattern. Since the pattern is various, here, I can not provide you all possibilities, but I give you some example.
Should be match
/.//
s/.//
/.//g
/.//i
/././gi
/one-or-more/anything/
/one-or-more/anything/g/3
/one-or-more/anything/i
/one-or-more/anything/gi/99
s/one-or-more/anything/g/4
s/one-or-more/anything/i
s/one-or-more/anything/gi/54
and anything look like this pattern
Rules:
delimiters are /|##
s letter at the beginning and g, i and 2 digits at the end are optional
std::regex_match function returns true if the entire target character sequence can be match, otherwise return false
between first and second delimiter can be one-or-more +
between second and third delimiter can be zero-or-more *
between third and fourth can be g or i
At least 3 delimiter should be match /.// not less so /./ should not be match
ECMAScript 262 is allowed for the pattern
NOTE
May you would need to see may question about std::regex_match:
std::regex_match and lazy quantifier with strange
behavior
I no need any C++ code, I just need a pattern.
Do not try d?([/|##]).+?\1.*?\1[gi]?[gi]?\1?d?\d?\d?. It fails.
My attempt so far: ^(?!s?([/|##]).+?\1.*?\1.*?\1)s?([/|##]).+?\2.*?\2[gi]?[gi]?\d?\d?$
If you are willing to try, you should put ^ and $ around your pattern
If you need more details please comment me, and I will update the question.
Thanks.
You could use this regular expression:
^s?([/|##])((?!\1).)+\1((?!\1).)*\1((gi?|ig)(\1\d\d?)?|i)?$
See regex101.com
Note how this also rejects these cases:
///anything/
/./anything/gg
/./anything/ii
/./anything/i/12
How it works:
Some explanation of the parts that are different:
((?!\1).): this will match any character that is not the delimiter. This way you are sure you can keep track of the exact number of delimiters used. You can this way also prevent that the first character after the first delimiter, is again that delimiter, which should not be allowed.
(gi?|ig): matches any of the valid modifier combinations, except a sole i, which is treated separately. So this also excludes gg and ii as valid character sequences.
(\1\d\d?)?: optionally allows for an extra delimiter (after a g modifier -- see previous) to be added with one or two digits following it.
( |i)?: for the case there is no g modifier present, but just the i or none: then no digits are allowed to follow.
This is a tricky one, but I took the challenge - here is what I have ended up with:
^s?([\/|##])(?:(?!\1).)+\1(?:(?!\1).)*\1(?:i|(?:gi?|ig)(\1\d{1,2})?)?$
Pattern breakdown:
^ matches start of string
s? matches an optional 's' character
([\/|##]) matches the delimeter characters and captures as group 1
(?:(?!\1).)+ matches anything other than the delimiter character one or more times (uses negative lookahead to make sure that the character isn't the delimiter matched in group 1)
\1 matches the delimiter character captured in group 1
(?:(?!\1).)* matches anything other than the delimiter character zero or more times
\1 matches the delimiter character captured in group 1
(?: starts a new group
i matches the i character
| or
(?:gi?|ig) matches either g, gi, or ig
(\1\d{1,2})? followed by an optional extra delimiter and 0-9 once or twice
)? closes group and makes it optional
$ matches end of string
I have used non capturing groups throughout - these are groups that start ?:
I need to find all emails aren't info#example.com to config openwebmail with regex
With result:
abbb#example.com -- true
76312783dd#example.com -- true
8734289347#test.it -- true
info#example.com -- false
This would be my answer:
^(?!info#example\.com$)((\w+|\.)+#\w+(\.\w+)+)$
This will match everything in your examples except info#example.com, and a few more that would be useful, such as test.example#mail.co.uk, as shown in the example here:
Click here for the example on Regex101
Edit
You could also change the regex to:
^(?!info#example\.com$)((\w+\.?)+#\w+(\.\w+)+)$
To disallow the emails: info..example#mail.com, but as you are simply searching through emails, it is very unlikely that you will come across an email with the format info..example#mail.com
Breakdown
^ Start of string
(?!) Negative lookahead
info#example\.com$ Literal match of info.example.com, and it being until the end of the string.
(\w+|\.)+ Capture group with letters and numbers 1 or more times, or a dot, 1 or more times Will match example..test#mail.com
(\w\.?)+ Capture group with letters 1 or more times, with a following optional dot, 1 or more times. Will not match example..test#mail.com
#\w+ Matches # literally, and any letters or numbers after.
(.\w+)+ Matches a dot and any letters coming after it 1 or more times. Dot not optional because an email like: example#test.com. is invalid.
$ End of string
Use this great trick!:
^info#example\.com$|^(\w+#\w+\.\w+)$
Demo: https://regex101.com/r/zJ5nY5/1
Explanation:
a|b|(c|d) and take the group 1 value. This is one of the most popular regex trick ever. This way, if you take group 1 value, a and b will be automatically ignored and you only approve c and d.
\w is any character that we normally find inside a word.