The purpose of this code is to insert an x in between repeating letters. For example, if I were to input "CoolBoolFallmoose", the output would be "CoxolBoxolFalxlmoxose".
The code is also supposed to make an even number of pairs of letters, so if there is an odd amount of characters, an x is added to the end of the string. An example for this would be if we had "ball", it would become "balxlx" to make even pairs: "ba" "lx" "lx".
This is the code I have so far:
#include <iostream>
#include <iomanip>
#include <string>
using namespace std;
int main(){
string cipher, plain, paired = "";
cout << "input plaintext(no spaces, lowercase):\n";
cin >> plain;
for (int i=0;i<plain.length();i++){
if (plain[i]==plain[i+1]){
plain.insert(i,'x');
}
paired[i]=paired[i];
cout<<paired[i];
}
if (paired.length() % 2!= 0){
paired=+'x';
}
cout<<paired<<endl;
return 0;
}
The output I get is just the same as my input, no "x" added in any place.
The issue I am having is, every time I try to use the append() or insert() function for strings, I get an error from my compiler, which is xCode. Is there another way to solve this code?
EDIT: The error says:
No matching member function to call for insert
It also comes up for append().
I don't really know what you wanted to do with this part:
paired[i]=paired[i];
cout<<paired[i];
but otherwise the logic is good. Here is my take on it, x is a counter:
#include <iostream>
#include <string>
using namespace std;
int main(){
string m,n;
int x = 0;
cout << "Input: " << endl;
getline(cin, m);
for(int i = 0;i < m.length();i++){
x++;
n = n + m[i];
if(m[i] == m[i+1]){
n = n + 'x';
x++;
}
}
if((x % 2) != 0){
n = n + 'x';
}
cout << n;
return 0;
}
If you look at the available overloads of std::string::insert(), you will see that your statement plain.insert(i,'x'); does not match any of them, hence the compiler error. The overloads that takes a single char require either:
an index and a count (you are omitting the count)
an iterator and an optional count
There is, however, a couple of overloads that take just an index and a value, but they require a const char* or a std::string, not a single char.
Also, paired[i]=paired[i]; is a no-op. Except in your case, since paired has a size() of 0 since you never append anything to paired, so actually any access to paired[...] is undefined behavior.
Try this instead:
#include <iostream>
#include <string>
using namespace std;
int main(){
string plain, paired;
cout << "input plaintext(no spaces, lowercase):\n";
cin >> plain;
paired = plain;
for (string::size_type i = 1; i < paired.size(); ++i){
if (paired[i] == paired[i-1]){
paired.insert(i, 1, 'x');
// or: paired.insert(paired.begin()+i, 'x');
// or: paired.insert(i, "x");
// or: paired.insert(i, string{'x'});
// or: paired.insert(paired.begin()+i, {'x'});
++i; // skip the x just inserted
}
}
if (paired.size() % 2 != 0){
paired += 'x';
}
cout << paired << endl;
return 0;
}
Demo
A couple of points
First, Although the string.insert function says it takes an int as its first argument it really wants an iterator in this case.
Second, you are inserting elements into your "plain" string which increases its length and you have plain.length within your loop so you create an infinite loop.
Third, insert inserts BEFORE the index so you need to add 1 to I.
The code below will work for your loop:
Int len = plain.length();
Int count = 0;
for (int i = 0; i < len + count; i++)
{
If (plain[i] == plain[i + 1])
{
plain.insert(plain.begin() + (i +1), 'X');
++count;
}
}
cout << plain;
And as, mentioned below, if you want to handle spaces you can use getline(cin, plain) instead of cin.
Write a void function called string_list_sort() that reads in any number of strings (duplicates are allowed) from cin, stores them in a vector, and then sorts them. Don’t use the standard C++ sort function here — use the version of quicksort that you created.
My problem is I tried to use strcmp() but I got a lot of errors, so I tried this method, but I have a problem with char val = v[end]. I am not sure how to compare two std::string values.
I changed char to string and it works. Now my problem is for example v = {" apple", "car", "fox", " soap", "foz"}; the result I get is apple, soap, car, fox, foz which is not in alphabetical order
#include <iostream>
#include <string>
#include <cstdio>
#include <cstring>
#include <vector>
#include "error.h"
using namespace std;
void string_list_sort(vector<string> v){
string line;
while (getline(cin, line)){
if (line.empty()){
break;
}
v.push_back(line);
}
}
int partition(vector<string>&v, int begin, int end)
{
char val = v[end];
char temp;
int j = end;
int i = begin - 1;
while (true)
{
while (v[++i] < val)
while (v[--j] > val)
{
if (j == begin)
break;
}
if (i >= j)
break;
temp = v[i];
v[i] = v[j];
v[j] = temp;
}
temp = v[i];
v[i] = v[end];
v[end] = temp;
return i;
}
void quicksort(vector<string>& v, int begin, int end)
{
if (begin < end)
{
int p = partition(v, begin, end);
quicksort(v, begin, p - 1);
quicksort(v, p + 1, end);
}
}
void quick_sort(vector<string>& v)
{
quicksort(v, 0, v.size() - 1);
}
int main()
{
vector<string> v;
v =
{ " this is a test string,.,!"};
string word;
while (cin >> word)
{
v.push_back(word);
}
quick_sort(v);
for (int i = 0; i < v.size(); i++)
{
cout << v[i] << " ";
}
}
OP almost has a sorting function. Two mistakes in particular stand out:
char val = v[end];
char temp;
v is a vector<string> so v[end] will return a string.
string val = v[end];
string temp;
Takes care of that and makes the program compile and successfully sort. There is no need to go inside the strings to compare character by character. string does that work for you.
The second problem: Quicksort's partition function is supposed to look like (Looting from wikipedia here)
algorithm partition(A, lo, hi) is
pivot := A[lo]
i := lo – 1
j := hi + 1
loop forever
do
i := i + 1
while A[i] < pivot
do
j := j – 1
while A[j] > pivot
if i >= j then
return j
swap A[i] with A[j]
and OP's partition function has picked up a bunch of extra baggage that needs to be removed to get an optimal mark from their instructor. Take a look at the above pseudo implementation and compare it with yours. You may see the mistakes right way, but if not, stand on the shoulders of giants and translate it into C++ (hints: := is plain old = in C++, and you'll need to add some ;s and braces). Debug the result as required. I won't translate it because that would almost totally defeat the point of the assignment.
Side notes (gathering a few important comments):
When writing a test driver don't take in user input until you know the algorithm works. Start with preloaded input that is easy to visualize like
int main()
{
vector<string> v{"C","B","A"};
quick_sort(v);
for (size_t i = 0; i < v.size(); i++)
{
cout << v[i] << " ";
}
}
When the output is "A B C ", change the input to something more complicated, but still easy to visualize
vector<string> v{"A","C","Q","B","A"};
And when that works go nuts and feed it something nasty. I like the Major General's Song from the Pirates of Penzance.
You can compare strings using std::string::compare() or relational operators.
It looks like you've tried using relational operators here, but as #user4581301 pointed out, in partition() on the first line, you have
char val = v[end];
However, v[end] is of type 'string', not 'char'. If you declare val and temp as string instead of char, you can sort them with the relational operators you have, and I think you'll be fine.
compare() documentation: fttp://www.cplusplus.com/reference/string/string/compare/
Relational operators: http://www.cplusplus.com/reference/string/string/operators/
I have a string contains numbers but also contains spaces between them, i need to convert the string to int and store them in an int array .
Th following function produces a run time error
void fun(string m)
{
string temp;
int j = 0;
int h = 0;
int d;
int arr[10];
for (int i = 0; i < m.length(); i++)
{
while (m[i] != ' ')
temp[j++] = m[i];
d = atoi(temp.c_str());
arr[h++] = d;
}
for (int i = 0; i < sizeof(arr); i++)
{
cout << arr[i];
}
}
I would suggest using a stringstream for this vs. rolling your own implementation.
#include <sstream>
#include <iterator>
#include <iostream>
int main()
{
std::stringstream ss("1 2 3 4 5 6 7");
auto head = std::istream_iterator<int>(ss);
auto tail = std::istream_iterator<int>();
while(head!=tail)
{
std::cout << *head << "\n";
++head;
}
return 0;
}
if you're receiving the string in a method you can easily adapt the function above to create an empty stringstream and then pass it the string.
#include <sstream>
#include <iterator>
#include <iostream>
int main()
{
std::string astring = "1 2 3 4 5 6";
std::stringstream ss;
ss << astring;
auto head = std::istream_iterator<int>(ss);
auto tail = std::istream_iterator<int>();
while(head!=tail)
{
std::cout << *head << "\n";
++head;
}
return 0;
}
You are making several mistakes in your code.
You have not initialized temp to contain anything, but you are trying to index into its characters. Instead of temp[j++] = m[i], you need to use temp += m[i]; or temp.push_back(m[i]); or temp.append(&m[i], 1);. Or consider using an std::ostringstream to gather the characters, and then call its str() method to extract the final std::string value.
you are not incrementing i in your while loop. As soon as the for loop reaches a non-whitespace character, your while loop will end up running endlessly, continuously (and unsuccessfully) trying to append the same character to temp.
you are not doing any bounds checking to make sure your for loop does not exceed arr's max capacity of 10 numbers.
you are misusing sizeof(). sizeof(arr) returns the number of bytes that arr occupies in memory (10 * sizeof(int), which is 20 or 40 bytes, depending on your compiler's implementation of int). It is not the number of elements in the array (10). So you will exceed the bounds of the array trying to display 20/40 numbers instead of 10 numbers.
Your code is more complicated than it needs to be. You can use a std::istringstream for parsing and let it ignore whitespace for you. Use std::vector or other dynamically-sized container to receive the parsed numbers.
#include <sstream>
#include <vector>
void fun(string m)
{
std::istreamstream iss(m);
std::vector<int> vec;
int num;
vec.reserve(10); // optional
while (iss >> num) {
vec.push_back(num);
}
for (int i = 0; i < vec.size(); ++i) {
std::cout << vec[i];
}
/*
alternatively:
for (std::vector<int>::iterator iter = vec.begin(); iter != vec.end(); ++iter) {
std::cout << *iter;
}
*/
/*
alternatively (C++11 and later):
for (auto i: vec) {
std::cout << i;
}
*/
/*
alternatively (C++11 and later):
std::for_each(vec.begin(), vec.end(), [](int &n){ std::cout << n; });
*/
}
You cannot do for (int i = 0; i < sizeof(arr); i++)
The sizeof() operator gives you the size of something in bytes, which for an array of 10 ints probably amounts to 40. You need to use something like this:
#define COUNTOF(x) ((x)/sizeof((x)[0]))
for (int i = 0; i < COUNTOF(arr); i++)
The problem is in your while loop, J is 0 the first iteration through the While loop and gets incremented the first time it's called while also trying to assign it to the next letter.
Despite this issue I'd suggest using a string stream for this problem like others have said.
Here's a good reference.
void permute(string elems, int mid, int end)
{
static int count;
if (mid == end) {
cout << ++count << " : " << elems << endl;
return ;
}
else {
for (int i = mid; i <= end; i++) {
swap(elems, mid, i);
permute(elems, mid + 1, end);
swap(elems, mid, i);
}
}
}
The above function shows the permutations of str(with str[0..mid-1] as a steady prefix, and str[mid..end] as a permutable suffix). So we can use permute(str, 0, str.size() - 1) to show all the permutations of one string.
But the function uses a recursive algorithm; maybe its performance could be improved?
Are there any better methods to permute a string?
Here is a non-recursive algorithm in C++ from the Wikipedia entry for unordered generation of permutations. For the string s of length n, for any k from 0 to n! - 1 inclusive, the following modifies s to provide a unique permutation (that is, different from those generated for any other k value on that range). To generate all permutations, run it for all n! k values on the original value of s.
#include <algorithm>
void permutation(int k, string &s)
{
for(int j = 1; j < s.size(); ++j)
{
std::swap(s[k % (j + 1)], s[j]);
k = k / (j + 1);
}
}
Here swap(s, i, j) swaps position i and j of the string s.
Why dont you try std::next_permutation() or std::prev_permutation()
?
Links:
std::next_permutation()
std::prev_permutation()
A simple example:
#include<string>
#include<iostream>
#include<algorithm>
int main()
{
std::string s="123";
do
{
std::cout<<s<<std::endl;
}while(std::next_permutation(s.begin(),s.end()));
}
Output:
123
132
213
231
312
321
I'd like to second Permaquid's answer. The algorithm he cites works in a fundamentally different way from the various permutation enumeration algorithms that have been offered. It doesn't generate all of the permutations of n objects, it generates a distinct specific permutation, given an integer between 0 and n!-1. If you need only a specific permutation, it's much faster than enumerating them all and then selecting one.
Even if you do need all permutations, it provides options that a single permutation enumeration algorithm does not. I once wrote a brute-force cryptarithm cracker, that tried every possible assignment of letters to digits. For base-10 problems, it was adequate, since there are only 10! permutations to try. But for base-11 problems took a couple of minutes and base-12 problems took nearly an hour.
I replaced the permutation enumeration algorithm that I had been using with a simple i=0--to--N-1 for-loop, using the algorithm Permaquid cited. The result was only slightly slower. But then I split the integer range in quarters, and ran four for-loops simultaneously, each in a separate thread. On my quad-core processor, the resulting program ran nearly four times as fast.
Just as finding an individual permutation using the permutation enumeration algorithms is difficult, generating delineated subsets of the set of all permutations is also difficult. The algorithm that Permaquid cited makes both of these very easy
In particular, you want std::next_permutation.
void permute(string elems, int mid, int end)
{
int count = 0;
while(next_permutation(elems.begin()+mid, elems.end()))
cout << << ++count << " : " << elems << endl;
}
... or something like that...
Any algorithm for generating permutations is going to run in polynomial time, because the number of permutations for characters within an n-length string is (n!). That said, there are some pretty simple in-place algorithms for generating permutations. Check out the Johnson-Trotter algorithm.
The Knuth random shuffle algorithm is worth looking into.
// In-place shuffle of char array
void shuffle(char array[], int n)
{
for ( ; n > 1; n--)
{
// Pick a random element to move to the end
int k = rand() % n; // 0 <= k <= n-1
// Simple swap of variables
char tmp = array[k];
array[k] = array[n-1];
array[n-1] = tmp;
}
}
Any algorithm that makes use of or generates all permutations will take O(N!*N) time, O(N!) at the least to generate all permutations and O(N) to use the result, and that's really slow. Note that printing the string is also O(N) afaik.
In a second you can realistically only handle strings up to a maximum of 10 or 11 characters, no matter what method you use. Since 11!*11 = 439084800 iterations (doing this many in a second on most machines is pushing it) and 12!*12 = 5748019200 iterations. So even the fastest implementation would take about 30 to 60 seconds on 12 characters.
Factorial just grows too fast for you to hope to gain anything by writing a faster implementation, you'd at most gain one character. So I'd suggest Prasoon's recommendation. It's easy to code and it's quite fast. Though sticking with your code is completely fine as well.
I'd just recommend that you take care that you don't inadvertantly have extra characters in your string such as the null character. Since that will make your code a factor of N slower.
I've written a permutation algorithm recently. It uses a vector of type T (template) instead of a string, and it's not super-fast because it uses recursion and there's a lot of copying. But perhaps you can draw some inspiration for the code. You can find the code here.
The only way to significantly improve performance is to find a way to avoid iterating through all the permutations in the first place!
Permuting is an unavoidably slow operation (O(n!), or worse, depending on what you do with each permutation), unfortunately nothing you can do will change this fact.
Also, note that any modern compiler will flatten out your recursion when optimisations are enabled, so the (small) performance gains from hand-optimising are reduced even further.
Do you want to run through all the permutations, or count the number of permutations?
For the former, use std::next_permutation as suggested by others. Each permutation takes O(N) time (but less amortized time) and no memory except its callframe, vs O(N) time and O(N) memory for your recursive function. The whole process is O(N!) and you can't do better than this, as others said, because you can't get more than O(X) results from a program in less than O(X) time! Without a quantum computer, anyway.
For the latter, you just need to know how many unique elements are in the string.
big_int count_permutations( string s ) {
big_int divisor = 1;
sort( s.begin(), s.end() );
for ( string::iterator pen = s.begin(); pen != s.end(); ) {
size_t cnt = 0;
char value = * pen;
while ( pen != s.end() && * pen == value ) ++ cnt, ++ pen;
divisor *= big_int::factorial( cnt );
}
return big_int::factorial( s.size() ) / divisor;
}
Speed is bounded by the operation of finding duplicate elements, which for chars can be done in O(N) time with a lookup table.
I don't think this is better, but it does work and does not use recursion:
#include <iostream>
#include <stdexcept>
#include <tr1/cstdint>
::std::uint64_t fact(unsigned int v)
{
::std::uint64_t output = 1;
for (unsigned int i = 2; i <= v; ++i) {
output *= i;
}
return output;
}
void permute(const ::std::string &s)
{
using ::std::cout;
using ::std::uint64_t;
typedef ::std::string::size_type size_t;
static unsigned int max_size = 20; // 21! > 2^64
const size_t strsize = s.size();
if (strsize > max_size) {
throw ::std::overflow_error("This function can only permute strings of size 20 or less.");
} else if (strsize < 1) {
return;
} else if (strsize == 1) {
cout << "0 : " << s << '\n';
} else {
const uint64_t num_perms = fact(s.size());
// Go through each permutation one-by-one
for (uint64_t perm = 0; perm < num_perms; ++perm) {
// The indexes of the original characters in the new permutation
size_t idxs[max_size];
// The indexes of the original characters in the new permutation in
// terms of the list remaining after the first n characters are pulled
// out.
size_t residuals[max_size];
// We use div to pull our permutation number apart into a set of
// indexes. This holds what's left of the permutation number.
uint64_t permleft = perm;
// For a given permutation figure out which character from the original
// goes in each slot in the new permutation. We start assuming that
// any character could go in any slot, then narrow it down to the
// remaining characters with each step.
for (unsigned int i = strsize; i > 0; permleft /= i, --i) {
uint64_t taken_char = permleft % i;
residuals[strsize - i] = taken_char;
// Translate indexes in terms of the list of remaining characters
// into indexes in terms of the original string.
for (unsigned int o = (strsize - i); o > 0; --o) {
if (taken_char >= residuals[o - 1]) {
++taken_char;
}
}
idxs[strsize - i] = taken_char;
}
cout << perm << " : ";
for (unsigned int i = 0; i < strsize; ++i) {
cout << s[idxs[i]];
}
cout << '\n';
}
}
}
The fun thing about this is that the only state it uses from permutation to permutation is the number of the permutation, the total number of permutations, and the original string. That means it can be easily encapsulated in an iterator or something like that without having to carefully preserve the exact correct state. It can even be a random access iterator.
Of course ::std::next_permutation stores the state in the relationships between elements, but that means it can't work on unordered things, and I would really wonder what it does if you have two equal things in the sequence. You can solve that by permuting indexes of course, but that adds slightly more complication.
Mine will work with any random access iterator range provided it's short enough. And if it isn't, you'll never get through all the permutations anyway.
The basic idea of this algorithm is that every permutation of N items can be enumerated. The total number is N! or fact(N). And any given permutation can be thought of as a mapping of source indices from the original sequence into a set of destination indices in the new sequence. Once you have an enumeration of all permutations the only thing left to do is map each permutation number into an actual permutation.
The first element in the permuted list can be any of the N elements from the original list. The second element can be any of the N - 1 remaining elements, and so on. The algorithm uses the % operator to pull apart the permutation number into a set of selections of this nature. First it modulo's the permutation number by N to get a number from [0,N). It discards the remainder by dividing by N, then it modulo's it by the size of the list - 1 to get a number from [0,N-1) and so on. That is what the for (i = loop is doing.
The second step is translating each number into an index into the original list. The first number is easy because it's just a straight index. The second number is an index into a list that contains every element but the one removed at the first index, and so on. That is what the for (o = loop is doing.
residuals is a list of indices into the successively smaller lists. idxs is a list of indices into the original list. There is a one-one mapping between values in residuals and idxs. They each represent the same value in different 'coordinate spaces'.
The answer pointed to by the answer you picked has the same basic idea, but has a much more elegant way of accomplishing the mapping than my rather literal and brute force method. That way will be slightly faster than my method, but they are both about the same speed and they both have the same advantage of random access into permutation space which makes a whole number of things easier, including (as the answer you picked pointed out) parallel algorithms.
Actually you can do it using Knuth shuffling algo!
// find all the permutations of a string
// using Knuth radnom shuffling algorithm!
#include <iostream>
#include <string>
template <typename T, class Func>
void permutation(T array, std::size_t N, Func func)
{
func(array);
for (std::size_t n = N-1; n > 0; --n)
{
for (std::size_t k = 0; k <= n; ++k)
{
if (array[k] == array[n]) continue;
using std::swap;
swap(array[k], array[n]);
func(array);
}
}
}
int main()
{
while (std::cin.good())
{
std::string str;
std::cin >> str;
permutation(str, str.length(), [](std::string const &s){
std::cout << s << std::endl; });
}
}
This post: http://cplusplus.co.il/2009/11/14/enumerating-permutations/ deals with permuting just about anything, not only strings. The post itself and the comments below are pretty informative and I wouldn't want to copy&paste..
If you are interested in permutation generation I did a research paper on it a while back : http://www.oriontransfer.co.nz/research/permutation-generation
It comes complete with source code, and there are 5 or so different methods implemented.
Even I found it difficult to understand that recursive version of the first time and it took me some time to search for a berre way.Better method to find (that I can think of) is to use the algorithm proposed by Narayana Pandita. The basic idea is:
First sort the given string in no-decreasing order and then find the index of the first element from the end that is less than its next character lexicigraphically. Call this element index the 'firstIndex'.
Now find the smallest character which is greater thn the element at the 'firstIndex'. Call this element index the 'ceilIndex'.
Now swap the elements at 'firstIndex' and 'ceilIndex'.
Reverse the part of the string starting from index 'firstIndex+1' to the end of the string.
(Instead of point 4) You can also sort the part of the string from index 'firstIndex+1' to the end of the string.
Point 4 and 5 do the same thing but the time complexity in case of point 4 is O(n*n!) and that in case of point 5 is O(n^2*n!).
The above algorithm can even be applied to the case when we have duplicate characters in the string. :
The code for displaying all the permutation of a string :
#include <iostream>
using namespace std;
void swap(char *a, char *b)
{
char tmp = *a;
*a = *b;
*b = tmp;
}
int partition(char arr[], int start, int end)
{
int x = arr[end];
int i = start - 1;
for(int j = start; j <= end-1; j++)
{
if(arr[j] <= x)
{
i = i + 1;
swap(&arr[i], &arr[j]);
}
}
swap(&arr[i+1], &arr[end]);
return i+1;
}
void quickSort(char arr[], int start, int end)
{
if(start<end)
{
int q = partition(arr, start, end);
quickSort(arr, start, q-1);
quickSort(arr, q+1, end);
}
}
int findCeilIndex(char *str, int firstIndex, int n)
{
int ceilIndex;
ceilIndex = firstIndex+1;
for (int i = ceilIndex+1; i < n; i++)
{
if(str[i] >= str[firstIndex] && str[i] <= str[ceilIndex])
ceilIndex = i;
}
return ceilIndex;
}
void reverse(char *str, int start, int end)
{
while(start<=end)
{
char tmp = str[start];
str[start] = str[end];
str[end] = tmp;
start++;
end--;
}
}
void permutate(char *str, int n)
{
quickSort(str, 0, n-1);
cout << str << endl;
bool done = false;
while(!done)
{
int firstIndex;
for(firstIndex = n-2; firstIndex >=0; firstIndex--)
{
if(str[firstIndex] < str[firstIndex+1])
break;
}
if(firstIndex<0)
done = true;
if(!done)
{
int ceilIndex;
ceilIndex = findCeilIndex(str, firstIndex, n);
swap(&str[firstIndex], &str[ceilIndex]);
reverse(str, firstIndex+1, n-1);
cout << str << endl;
}
}
}
int main()
{
char str[] = "mmd";
permutate(str, 3);
return 0;
}
Here's one I just rustled up!!
void permute(const char* str, int level=0, bool print=true) {
if (print) std::cout << str << std::endl;
char temp[30];
for (int i = level; i<strlen(str); i++) {
strcpy(temp, str);
temp[level] = str[i];
temp[i] = str[level];
permute(temp, level+1, level!=i);
}
}
int main() {
permute("1234");
return 0;
}
This is not the best logic, but then, i am a beginner. I'll be quite happy and obliged if anyone gives me suggestions on this code
#include<iostream.h>
#include<conio.h>
#include<string.h>
int c=1,j=1;
int fact(int p,int l)
{
int f=1;
for(j=1;j<=l;j++)
{
f=f*j;
if(f==p)
return 1;
}
return 0;
}
void rev(char *a,int q)
{
int l=strlen(a);
int m=l-q;
char t;
for(int x=m,y=0;x<q/2+m;x++,y++)
{
t=a[x];
a[x]=a[l-y-1];
a[l-y-1]=t;
}
c++;
cout<<a<<" ";
}
int perm(char *a,int f,int cd)
{
if(c!=f)
{
int l=strlen(a);
rev(a,2);
cd++;
if(c==f)return 0;
if(cd*2==6)
{
for(int i=1;i<=c;i++)
{
if(fact(c/i,l)==1)
{
rev(a,j+1);
rev(a,2);
break;
}
}
cd=1;
}
rev(a,3);
perm(a,f,cd);
}
return 0;
}
void main()
{
clrscr();
char *a;
cout<<"\n\tEnter a Word";
cin>>a;
int f=1;
for(int o=1;o<=strlen(a);o++)
f=f*o;
perm(a,f,0);
getch();
}
**// Prints all permutation of a string**
#include<bits/stdc++.h>
using namespace std;
void printPermutations(string input, string output){
if(input.length() == 0){
cout<<output <<endl;
return;
}
for(int i=0; i<=output.length(); i++){
printPermutations(input.substr(1), output.substr(0,i) + input[0] + output.substr(i));
}
}
int main(){
string s = "ABC";
printPermutations(s, "");
return 0;
}
Here yet another recursive function for string permutations:
void permute(string prefix, string suffix, vector<string> &res) {
if (suffix.size() < 1) {
res.push_back(prefix);
return;
}
for (size_t i = 0; i < suffix.size(); i++) {
permute(prefix + suffix[i], suffix.substr(0,i) + suffix.substr(i + 1), res);
}
}
int main(){
string str = "123";
vector<string> res;
permute("", str, res);
}
The function collects all permutations in vector res.
The idea can be generalized for different type of containers using templates and iterators:
template <typename Cont1_t, typename Cont2_t>
void permute(typename Cont1_t prefix,
typename Cont1_t::iterator beg, typename Cont1_t::iterator end,
Cont2_t &result)
{
if (beg == end) {
result.insert(result.end(), prefix);
return;
}
for (auto it = beg; it != end; ++it) {
prefix.insert(prefix.end(), *it);
Cont1_t tmp;
for (auto i = beg; i != end; ++i)
if (i != it)
tmp.insert(tmp.end(), *i);
permute(prefix, tmp.begin(), tmp.end(), result);
prefix.erase(std::prev(prefix.end()));
}
}
int main()
{
string str = "123";
vector<string> rStr;
permute<string, vector<string>>("", str.begin(), str.end(), rStr);
vector<int>vint = { 1,2,3 };
vector<vector<int>> rInt;
permute<vector<int>, vector<vector<int>>>({}, vint.begin(), vint.end(), rInt);
list<long> ll = { 1,2,3 };
vector<list<long>> vlist;
permute<list<long>, vector<list<long>>>({}, ll.begin(), ll.end(), vlist);
}
This may be an interesting programming exercise, but in production code you should use a non recusrive version of permutation , like next_permutation.
//***************anagrams**************//
//************************************** this code works only when there are no
repeatations in the original string*************//
#include<iostream>
using namespace std;
int counter=0;
void print(char empty[],int size)
{
for(int i=0;i<size;i++)
{
cout<<empty[i];
}
cout<<endl;
}
void makecombination(char original[],char empty[],char comb[],int k,int& nc,int size)
{
nc=0;
int flag=0;
for(int i=0;i<size;i++)
{
flag=0; // {
for(int j=0;j<k;j++)
{
if(empty[j]==original[i]) // remove this code fragment
{ // to print permutations with repeatation
flag=1;
break;
}
}
if(flag==0) // }
{
comb[nc++]=original[i];
}
}
//cout<<"checks ";
// print(comb,nc);
}
void recurse(char original[],char empty[],int k,int size)
{
char *comb=new char[size];
int nc;
if(k==size)
{
counter++;
print(empty,size);
//cout<<counter<<endl;
}
else
{
makecombination(original,empty,comb,k,nc,size);
k=k+1;
for(int i=0;i<nc;i++)
{
empty[k-1]=comb[i];
cout<<"k = "<<k<<" nc = "<<nc<<" empty[k-1] = "<<empty[k-1]<<endl;//checks the value of k , nc, empty[k-1] for proper understanding
recurse(original,empty,k,size);
}
}
}
int main()
{
const int size=3;
int k=0;
char original[]="ABC";
char empty[size];
for(int f=0;f<size;f++)
empty[f]='*';
recurse(original,empty,k,size);
cout<<endl<<counter<<endl;
return 0;
}