I'm currently stuck on how to do the following:
I want to track workouts and see the progress being made with the exercises.
Each workout has a name, body weight, date, and exercises.
I want to select the exercises when adding the workouts(exercises are already pre-created with a name and some tags), however, each workout is different, meaning the reps, sets, and weight for the exercise is different every time.
I'm not sure how to make a model for this.
I've added an image of a simple design I made to show what I'm after
Hope someone can help me, I'm pretty sure it's a simple solution however, my brain is stuck atm.
Image Of Design
First an foremost, I'd recommend reading through the Django models docs to get an idea of what models represent and how they work.
To address your question, I think you've correctly identified all of the information you need to create your models, so let's go through them step by step.
Architecture
It's helpful to take a step back and think about the entities in your app. Identify what they are, what attributes they posses and which of these attributes are atomic i.e. cannot be their own entity.
Workout - You mentioned that you want to track workouts with each one having name, body weight, date, and exercises. All of these attributes except for exercises seem to be atomic as they can be represented with fundamental datatypes (strings, floats, datetimes etc.). Moreover, one workout can have many exercises indicating that we need to abstract it into its own entity.
Exercise - You identified that exercises are pre-set and need to have a name and tags. A name is something we can represent with a string, however one exercise can have multiple tags, meaning it's not atomic (has a one-to-many relationship). This means we need to extract it into its own entity.
Tag - From what you said, a tag simply has one attribute which is a name that can be represented by a string. One tag can belong to many exercises.
You may be wondering where we are storing the reps, sets and weight data for each exercise in each workout. This is actually going to require an extra entity that stores the many-to-many relationship between Exercise and Workout. Let's call this Workout-Exercise.
With this information we could draw a Entity Relationship Diagram as such:
This gives us what we need to start creating Django models.
Models
Let's start with the Exercise and Tag entities. We can simply translate these directly into Django models:
from django.db import models
class Tag(models.Model):
name = models.CharField(max_length=200)
class Exercise(models.Model):
name = models.CharField(max_length=200)
tags = models.ManyToManyField(Tag)
Here we've created the two models and specified a many-to-many relationship between Exercise and Tag. This means that an Exercise object can have many Tag objects e.g. you can call exercise.tags.all() to get all of the tags for a given Exercise object.
The tricky part comes when we are creating the Workout-Exercise entity. When we use ManyToManyField in Django, it normally automatically creates a mapping model/table that we don't see. However, in the case where we want to store extra information about these relations (as we do in our use-case) we have to use a through model.
On this model we have to define the two foreign keys for the models we are linking along with the data types for the extra field data we want to store. In this case the foreign keys are Workout and Exercise, and the extra data are reps, sets and weight. The model definitions could therefore look like:
class WorkoutExercise(models.Model):
workout = models.ForeignKey(
'Workout',
on_delete=models.CASCADE,
)
exercise = models.ForeignKey(
Exercise,
on_delete=models.CASCADE,
)
reps = models.IntegerField()
sets = models.IntegerField()
weight = models.DecimalField(max_digits=5, decimal_places=2)
class Workout(models.Model):
name = models.CharField(max_length=200)
body_weight = models.DecimalField(max_digits=5, decimal_places=2)
date = models.DateTimeField(auto_now_add=True)
exercises = models.ManyToManyField(
Exercise,
through=WorkoutExercise
)
If you're confused about any of the model data type choices I've recommended, please take a look at Django model docs.
With this set-up you should be able to access and insert all of the data you need. If you need more information on how to access any of the many-to-many relationship data, please look at the Django many-to-many docs.
Sources
https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/3.2/topics/db/models/
https://www.1keydata.com/database-normalization/first-normal-form-1nf.php
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/One-to-many_(data_model)
https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/3.2/topics/db/examples/many_to_many
Related
Models:
class Author(Base):
name = models.CharField(max_length=100, unique=True)
class Book(Base):
name = models.CharField(max_length=100, unique=True)
class AuthorBookAssn(Base):
author = models.ForeignKey(Author, on_delete=models.PROTECT)
book = models.ForeignKey(Book, on_delete=models.CASCADE)
I have an api to create a book, and along with the book data we would also get a list of author ids.
Now for each book we need to create one/more records (depending on the author ids provided) in the AuthorBookAssn table.
What is the best way to do this and can the create be done in bulk.
Currently the approach is to get the author objects for each of the ids in the list and then call
AuthorBookAssn.objects.create(book=book_instance,author=author_instance)
You've created a many-to-many relationship so your current method is the only possible way based on your current structure. If you were to use Django's in-built m2m field then you would essentially do the same except you would do something like author.books.add(book), but again, you would have to do this separately to your book/author creation. An alternative would be to use a many-to-one relation (i.e. ForeignKey field) which would allow you to connect the two when an object is created. Many-to-One might not be how you want to structure things if books can have multiple authors and vice-versa.
(supplementary to OsVoid's answer)
There might be some degree of optimization by working with the object ids (primary key values) rather than fetching the entire objects. Premature optimization is a bad idea, and you'd have to benchmark this idea to see if any improvement is measurable (assuming you have any need to optimize at all).
Given book_pk and author_pk you can use the "magic" _id suffix:
AuthorBookAssn.objects.create(book_id=book_pk,author_id=author_pk)
And instead of fetching whole objects, you might fetch just their pk values using a .values_list('pk') in a queryset. (with flat=True if only the one value is being requested). Since this is just a number, it also might be possible to attach it to some other objects that you really do need to obtain, using annotation.
Also, you can cause your own model to be used for the association in a Django ManyToMany relation, using "through". This is valuable if you want to store extra information about the association, such as when it was created, who by, for what purpose, etc.
What I want is to retrieve all the fields belonging to a Model of a foreign key.
My models for example:
class BaseProduct(models.Model):
name = models.CharField(max_length=256)
variant = models.CharField(max_length=256, default='N/A')
type = models.ForeignKey(ProductType)
class ProductType(models.Model):
name = models.CharField(max_length=256,blank=False,null=False)
sofa = models.ForeignKey(SofaProduct, blank=True, null=True)
toaster = models.ForeignKey(ToasterProduct, blank=True, null=True)
These are just examples, there can be any number of ProductType models each with any number of fields.
In my template I can display all the fields of the BaseProduct by using the BaseProduct ID. What I want is to display all the fields of the FK.
For example if type = sofa in BaseProduct, I need to retrieve and display all sofa fields as well as BaseProduct fields.
(disclaimer: I have a tendency to give really long answers. You'll have to forgive me for that)
First rule of schema design - It should reflect your real world business logic (not the actual business action mind you, just the implications of the relationships). For example, if I have a class Person I can create a class Pet with a foreginKey to Person which translates to - every person can have multiple pets.
If we apply that logic to your schema we see that ProductType is a class that has a foreignKey to both Sofas and Toasters, which means each Toaster can have multiple Sofas and vice versa. Last time I checked, I never heard of a Sofa that had a Toaster.
In other words - you need to think what you're actually trying to achieve here. I'm guessing BaseProduct is a basic class that has common fields, and Sofa and Toaster are different types of products. Since they are different, they have their own special fields, and shouldn't be related, so it makes sense to have them as separate models. So why do you even need ProductType? To define the name Toaster? You're already defining an entire model! Why do you need to keep its name on a different table (and not, say, some custom method that always returns "I am a toaster, hear me roar")?
My best guess is that you want to be able to define new types of products on the go. However, if you intend to keep them separated on the model level, then you'll have to create a model for each new product. And if you want to be able to simple define a new model with ProductType, then you either need to have one Product class to manage them all, or you want a complicated dynamic system that can create new models on the fly.
Let's break those options down:
Create a generic product and a type class, like you did there:
class ProductType(models.Model):
name = models.CharField(max_length=256,blank=False,null=False)
class Product(models.Model):
name = models.CharField(max_length=256)
variant = models.CharField(max_length=256, default='N/A')
type = models.ForeignKey(ProductType)
Now each product can only be of one type, and you can always create new types on the go. This of course means all Product objects will share the same fields, and is very limiting. You won't have the same flexibility for each type like you would before (no sofa-only fields), but on the other hand it will be easier to create dynamic types of objects - you just define a new ProductType and bam you have a whole new group of products.
Create a basic abstract Product model, and define a new sub-model for each new type of product. You'll have a lot more flexibility for each one, but defining new types will always require defining a new model and setting up a table for it. With this scheme you don't need the ProductType object at all because the different models define the different types (there's no need for duplicity).
You can create some kind of admin page for the process, but it's not going
to be very easy to setup, and you might find yourself eventually with too many tables
(which can be especially problematic if you need to sometimes query
on all products - you'll have to join a lot of different tables,
which is not very efficient).
Use a non-relational database with some dynamic-models know how and disco*
*ok, it's actually more complicated than that, but the explanation on how to combine them is way too long, even for my answer. If it seems over your head, forget about it. If you have some idea about how non-relation databases work, you can probably figure it out yourself
Your question is somewhat unclear.
I think you want Django modal forms to display all fields of an modal.
def ListForm(Forms.form):
model = MyModel
fields='__all__' #Sets display all
fk_name ="Model_to_use" #Is needed when your model has more then one fk
Django model form
You can use _set for accessing related objects. For example, if you have two models like these:
class MyModel(models.Model):
name = models.CharField(max_length=200)
somedata = models.CharField(max_length=200)
class AnotherModel(models.Model):
name = models.CharField(max_length=256,blank=False,null=False)
referral = models.ForeignKey(MyModel)
type = models.CharField(max_length=256,blank=False,null=False)
you can access the name field of AnotherModel with
>>> m = MyModel.objects.get(id=1)
>>> m.AnotherModel_set.all()[0].name
See: https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/dev/topics/db/queries/#related-objects
On a side note, you should probably rethink your models structure, as yuvi pointed out.
I haven't taken any database course. Please excuse me...
From Django Book tutorial, we have a book application which has three classes initially (Book, Publisher and Author).
class Book(models.Model):
title = models.CharField(max_length=100)
# categories = models.ManyToManyField(Category)
authors = models.ManyToManyField(Author)
publisher = models.ForeignKey(Publisher)
publication = models.DateField()
We can match a book to many authors while we can match only a book to a Publisher.
A book can have several categories so it seems natural to write what I've commented out above.
class Category(models.Model):
name = models.CharField(max_length=40)
Second attempt:
I remember reading this somewhere (vaugly): create BookCategories which takes Category as ForeignKey.
Book --> --> BookCategories --> Categroy
(Notation: double arrows = ManyToMany and single arrow = ForeginKey)
Which one is better? If none, how do I approach this? Where is my logic flaw? If the second attempt is better, what is the reason?
Thank you very much.
I believe the approaches you have described are more or less identical. A many-to-many field always requires an interstitial or 'through' table to store the links between the two object types.
In the first approach you've described, Django will create the through table automatically when you run syncdb. In the second approach you've just defined that table manually (although as you've specified it you would have a redundant table). The second approach is useful in some circumstances, because it means you can not only define a link, but also store information about that link. In this case, you might have a field that stores the time when a book was first added to a category, or the user that added it.
For more information, check out the Django docs on many-to-many through tables.
How do I travel through multiple foreign keys in Django? I've tried everything I can think of from the django docs, but I'm obviously missed something (extreme newbie). I have models for scientists, experiments, and theories.
If I want to look at a particular Theory (let's call it 'relativity') and get a list of all of the emails of scientists working on it (kept in the normal django user model), how do I do this?
class Experiment(models.Model)
experimenter = models.ForeignKey(Scientist)
theory = models.ForeignKey(Theory)
class Theory(models.Model)
name = models.CharField(max_length=100)
class Scientist(models.Model)
user = models.ForeignKey(User, unique=True)
institution = models.CharField(max_length=20, null=True, blank=True)
These are simplified versions of my models that I rewrote, so there are probably some errors in it, but the relationships are correct.
I've tried every kind of combinations of select_related(), get(), filter() but can't figure it out. Thanks in advance for your help!
User.objects.filter(scientist__experiment__theory__name=u'relativity')
Take a look at the Django documentation section about Lookups that span relationships. The net takeaway is:
To span a relationship, just use the field name of related fields across models, separated by double underscores, until you get to the field you want.
Ignacio's answer shows an example of using the double underscores on field names to span a relationship.
The other relevant portion of Django's documentation would be the Related objects section. Relationships in Django are asymmetrical in the way they are accessed. Forward/normal relationships are accessed as attributes of the models. Backward relationships are accessed:
Django also creates API accessors for the "other" side of the relationship -- the link from the related model to the model that defines the relationship. For example, a Blog object b has access to a list of all related Entry objects via the entry_set attribute: b.entry_set.all().
I'd like to make a user profile app in Django (I know there are some that exist, thanks) and I'm wondering how you would structure the models to allow for an arbitrary combination fields in each sub-section.
As an example, the section 'education' may have a sub-section called 'Programming Experience', and the section 'personal info' may have a sub-section called 'favourites'.
Thinking in terms of a typical side bar navigation setup each section would be a header, and each sub-section would be a link to a form where the information can be manipulated.
Education
- Schooling
- Programming Experience
Personal Info
- Location
- Favourites
- Look a-likes
What I'd like to do is be able to add items to the sub-sections on an Arbitrary basis. Whatever the feel of the site calls for.
Maybe one site would benefit from photos of the school a user attended, while another might only need a description.
I'd like to use the admin interface to add these field types to the sub-section. So adding an item would present the choice of what type of information it is (image, video, text, etc) and what sub-section it's to be applied to.
I'd like to know how you would accomplish this; and more importantly, by jumping through as few hoops as possible.
Thanks.
Edit:
To hopefully clarify the question I'll provide a sample models.py file. This is just a quick moch-up to demonstrate the problem more accurately. I have two solutions in mind, and I think solution two will work better than solution one; but I'd also like to here what the SO community thinks and if they have any other solutions of their own.
**models.py**
class Section(models.Model):
"""
The root of categorization. Acts much like a header
"""
name = models.CharField(max_length=30)
description = models.CharField(max_length=255)
class SubSection(models.Model):
"""
The contents of each section. Contains many items of varying types as needed
by the site developer.
"""
name = models.CharField(max_length=30)
description = models.CharField(max_length=255)
section = models.ForeignKey(Section)
class Item(models.Model):
"""
I would like this to store the information here and have a foreign key to the
'SubSection' table. The problem is that there are a lot of different information
types that can be stored and I'd need a row for each type. Thus for each
entry most of the columns will be blank.
I'm thinking that it may be better to use this table as a pointer to another
table that actually contains the information. This will result in a lot of
tables but will eliminate waste.
"""
name = models.CharField(max_length=30)
description = models.CharField(max_length=255)
sub_section = models.ForeignKey(SubSection)
### Solution One
# Storing the info here results in a lot of wasted space and may not be all
# that flexible
image = models.ImageField()
text = models.CharField(max_length=255)
numeric = models.IntegerField()
time = models.TimeField()
# etc ...
### Solution Two
# Storing the field info results in more tables but allows for a better match
# of information and field type.
field_type = models.CharField(max_length=255)
field_properties = models.CommaSeparatedIntegerField(max_length=None)
### Solution Two Tables
# Solution two would require a table for each field type supported here, which
# is quite a few different types.
class ImageStorage(models.Model):
item = models.ForeignKey(Item)
information = models.ImageField()
class IntegerStorage(models.Model):
item = models.ForeignKey(Item)
information = models.IntegerField()
### etc ...
Just keep in mind it's targeted at user profiles. So a weight loss site may want the users current weight in the profile (numeric information) while a travel site may want a list of places visited (text information, could even use the IPAddressField I suppose). I just have no idea what will pop up so I'm trying to make it as generic as possible.
If I'm understanding you properly, the simplest way to do this would likely be a many-to-one relationship. I'm not sure if you wanted these on a per-user or per-site basis so I'll assume you want to customize it per-site (switching that is easy).
Create a table that looks something like this:
class Section(models.Model):
section = models.CharField()
sub-section = model.CharField()
site = models.ForeignKey(Site)
For multiple subsections that belong to the same section, simply give them the same primary section name so that you can query the DB for the accompanying subsections using that name.
Another way would be to use two tables to accomplish the same thing, but given the application I think this might be more appropriate.