I am doing some matrix manipulation, and I would like that my variables are always present in alphabetical order (which they are, as far as I can tell), there are no spaces, and that any constants are printed last.
How can I ensure these last two requirements? No spaces is trivial to do in my final formatting step, so I'm not too concerned about it, but the constant-ordering would be a little harder.
An example:
import sympy
from sympy import symbols, Matrix, Rational, pprint
from sympy import init_printing
init_printing()
mm = Matrix([[-1,0,0], [-1,1,0], [0,0,-1]])
tt = Matrix([Rational(6,12), Rational(0,12), Rational(6,12)])
x, y, z = symbols('x y z')
r = Matrix([x, y, z])
rp = mm * r + tt
pprint(rp)
# Currently:
# ⎡1/2 - x⎤
# ⎢ ⎥
# ⎢-x + y ⎥
# ⎢ ⎥
# ⎣1/2 - z⎦
# Wanted:
# ⎡-x+1/2⎤
# ⎢ ⎥
# ⎢ -x+y ⎥
# ⎢ ⎥
# ⎣-z+1/2⎦
The final aim will be to output the matrix values to file as strings, such as:
'-x+1/2,-x+y,-z+1/2'
You can use:
init_printing(order="grevlex")
from sympy import *
from sympy.abc import x
integrate(ln(x-4))
Outputs:
𝑥log(𝑥−4)−𝑥−4log(𝑥−4)
Is there a way I can convert this to (x-4)*ln(x-4) - (x-4) or (x-4)*ln(x-4) + 4 -x
You can do it with a manual substitution using transform:
In [2]: I = Integral(ln(x - 4), x)
In [3]: I
Out[3]:
⌠
⎮ log(x - 4) dx
⌡
In [4]: I.transform(x - 4, y)
Out[4]:
⌠
⎮ log(y) dy
⌡
In [5]: I.transform(x - 4, y).doit()
Out[5]: y⋅log(y) - y
In [6]: I.transform(x - 4, y).doit().subs(y, x - 4)
Out[6]: -x + (x - 4)⋅log(x - 4) + 4
Alternatively you can just use collect:
In [7]: integrate(ln(x - 4))
Out[7]: x⋅log(x - 4) - x - 4⋅log(x - 4)
In [8]: integrate(ln(x - 4)).collect(log(x - 4))
Out[8]: -x + (x - 4)⋅log(x - 4)
This case misses the 4 but that's expected because antiderivatives are only uniquely defined up to an additive constant.
I'm attempting to show the decomposition of an affine matrix with sympy as
shown in the following stackexchange post:
https://math.stackexchange.com/questions/612006/decomposing-an-affine-transformation
I've setup two matrices A_params and A_matrix, where the former represents
the raw matrix values and the latter is the matrix constructed from its
underlying parameters.
import sympy
import itertools as it
import ubelt as ub
domain = {'real': True}
theta = sympy.symbols('theta', **domain)
sx, sy = sympy.symbols('sx, sy', nonzero=True, **domain)
m = sympy.symbols('m', **domain)
S = sympy.Matrix([ # scale
[sx, 0],
[ 0, sy]])
H = sympy.Matrix([ # shear
[1, m],
[0, 1]])
R = sympy.Matrix([ # rotation
[sympy.cos(theta), -sympy.sin(theta)],
[sympy.sin(theta), sympy.cos(theta)]])
A_params = sympy.simplify((R # H # S))
a11, a12, a21, a22 = sympy.symbols(
'a11, a12, a21, a22', real=True)
A_matrix = sympy.Matrix([[a11, a12], [a21, a22]])
print(ub.hzcat(['A_matrix = ', sympy.pretty(A_matrix)]))
print(ub.hzcat(['A_params = ', sympy.pretty(A_params)]))
A_matrix = ⎡a₁₁ a₁₂⎤
⎢ ⎥
⎣a₂₁ a₂₂⎦
A_params = ⎡sx⋅cos(θ) sy⋅(m⋅cos(θ) - sin(θ))⎤
⎢ ⎥
⎣sx⋅sin(θ) sy⋅(m⋅sin(θ) + cos(θ))⎦
From what I understand I should simply be able to set these two matrices to be
equal and then solve for the parameters of interest. However, I'm getting
unexpected results.
First, if I just try to solve for "sx", I get no result.
## Option 1: Matrix equality
mat_equation = sympy.Eq(A_matrix, A_params)
soln_sx = sympy.solve(mat_equation, sx)
print('soln_sx = {!r}'.format(soln_sx))
## Option 2: List of equations
lhs_iter = it.chain.from_iterable(A_matrix.tolist())
rhs_iter = it.chain.from_iterable(A_params.tolist())
equations = [sympy.Eq(lhs, rhs) for lhs, rhs in zip(lhs_iter, rhs_iter)]
soln_sx = sympy.solve(equations, sx)
print('soln_sx = {!r}'.format(soln_sx))
soln_sx = []
soln_sx = []
But if I try to solve for all variables simultaniously, I get a result
but it does not agree with what I would expect
solve_for = (sx, theta, sy, m)
solutions = sympy.solve(mat_equation, *solve_for)
for sol, symbol in zip(solutions[0], solve_for):
sol = sympy.simplify(sol)
print('sol({!r}) = {!r}'.format(symbol, sol))
# sympy.pretty_print(sol)
sol(sx) = -(a11**2 + a11*sqrt(a11**2 + a21**2) + a21**2)/(a11 + sqrt(a11**2 + a21**2))
sol(theta) = -2*atan((a11 + sqrt(a11**2 + a21**2))/a21)
sol(sy) = (-8*a11**6*a22 + 8*a11**5*a12*a21 - 8*a11**5*a22*sqrt(a11**2 + a21**2) + 8*a11**4*a12*a21*sqrt(a11**2 + a21**2) - 12*a11**4*a21**2*a22 + 12*a11**3*a12*a21**3 - 8*a11**3*a21**2*a22*sqrt(a11**2 + a21**2) + 8*a11**2*a12*a21**3*sqrt(a11**2 + a21**2) - 4*a11**2*a21**4*a22 + 4*a11*a12*a21**5 - a11*a21**4*a22*sqrt(a11**2 + a21**2) + a12*a21**5*sqrt(a11**2 + a21**2))/(8*a11**6 + 8*a11**5*sqrt(a11**2 + a21**2) + 16*a11**4*a21**2 + 12*a11**3*a21**2*sqrt(a11**2 + a21**2) + 9*a11**2*a21**4 + 4*a11*a21**4*sqrt(a11**2 + a21**2) + a21**6)
sol(m) = (a11*a12 + a21*a22)/(a11*a22 - a12*a21)
After having a hard time getting the above to work, I wanted to see
if I could at least verify the solution from stackexchange. So I coded that up
symbolically:
# This is the guided solution by Stéphane Laurent
recon_sx = sympy.sqrt(a11 * a11 + a21 * a21)
recon_theta = sympy.atan2(a21, a11)
recon_sin_t = sympy.sin(recon_theta)
recon_cos_t = sympy.cos(recon_theta)
recon_msy = a12 * recon_sin_t + a22 * recon_cos_t
condition2 = sympy.simplify(sympy.Eq(recon_sin_t, 0))
condition1 = sympy.simplify(sympy.Not(condition2))
sy_cond1 = (recon_msy * recon_cos_t - a12) / recon_sin_t
sy_cond2 = (a22 - recon_msy * recon_sin_t) / recon_cos_t
recon_sy = sympy.Piecewise((sy_cond1, condition1), (sy_cond2, condition2))
recon_m = recon_msy / recon_sy
recon_S = sympy.Matrix([ # scale
[recon_sx, 0],
[ 0, recon_sy]])
recon_H = sympy.Matrix([ # shear
[1, recon_m],
[0, 1]])
recon_R = sympy.Matrix([ # rotation
[sympy.cos(recon_theta), -sympy.sin(recon_theta)],
[sympy.sin(recon_theta), sympy.cos(recon_theta)]])
# Recombine the components
A_recon = sympy.simplify((recon_R # recon_H # recon_S))
print(ub.hzcat(['A_recon = ', sympy.pretty(A_recon)]))
That results in something quite like what I would expect, but it doesn't
seem to simplify all the way down to the point where it can be programmatically
validated.
A_recon = ⎡ ⎧ a₂₁ ⎤
⎢ ⎪ a₁₂ for ──────────────── ≠ 0 ⎥
⎢ ⎪ _____________ ⎥
⎢ ⎪ ╱ 2 2 ⎥
⎢a₁₁ ⎨ ╲╱ a₁₁ + a₂₁ ⎥
⎢ ⎪ ⎥
⎢ ⎪a₁₁⋅a₂₂ + a₁₂⋅a₂₁ - a₂₁⋅a₂₂ ⎥
⎢ ⎪─────────────────────────── otherwise ⎥
⎢ ⎩ a₁₁ ⎥
⎢ ⎥
⎢ ⎧-a₁₁⋅a₁₂ + a₁₁⋅a₂₂ + a₁₂⋅a₂₁ a₂₁ ⎥
⎢ ⎪──────────────────────────── for ──────────────── ≠ 0⎥
⎢ ⎪ a₂₁ _____________ ⎥
⎢a₂₁ ⎨ ╱ 2 2 ⎥
⎢ ⎪ ╲╱ a₁₁ + a₂₁ ⎥
⎢ ⎪ ⎥
⎣ ⎩ a₂₂ otherwise ⎦
My thought is that the conditional is messing is up, so I tried just
using two cases:
recon_sy2 = sy_cond1
recon_m2 = recon_msy / recon_sy2
recon_S2 = sympy.Matrix([ # scale
[recon_sx, 0],
[ 0, recon_sy2]])
recon_H2 = sympy.Matrix([ # shear
[1, recon_m2],
[0, 1]])
recon_sy3 = sy_cond2
recon_m3 = recon_msy / recon_sy3
recon_S3 = sympy.Matrix([ # scale
[recon_sx, 0],
[ 0, recon_sy3]])
recon_H3 = sympy.Matrix([ # shear
[1, recon_m3],
[0, 1]])
# Recombine the components
A_recon2 = sympy.simplify((recon_R # recon_H2 # recon_S2))
A_recon3 = sympy.simplify((recon_R # recon_H3 # recon_S3))
print('')
print(ub.hzcat(['A_recon2 = ', sympy.pretty(A_recon2)]))
print('')
print(ub.hzcat(['A_recon3 = ', sympy.pretty(A_recon3)]))
A_recon2 = ⎡a₁₁ a₁₂ ⎤
⎢ ⎥
⎢ -a₁₁⋅a₁₂ + a₁₁⋅a₂₂ + a₁₂⋅a₂₁⎥
⎢a₂₁ ────────────────────────────⎥
⎣ a₂₁ ⎦
A_recon3 = ⎡ a₁₁⋅a₂₂ + a₁₂⋅a₂₁ - a₂₁⋅a₂₂⎤
⎢a₁₁ ───────────────────────────⎥
⎢ a₁₁ ⎥
⎢ ⎥
⎣a₂₁ a₂₂ ⎦
But that doesn't seem to allow any further simplification.
I'm not quite seeing how a22/a12 pops out of the top/bottom equations
respectively, but they should if this decomposition is correct, but these
results are making me worried that it is not.
So my questions are two fold:
Can any sympy gurus help me get the basic solution for the decomposition working?
Is the decomposition in the reference SE post wrong? Or am I not including a
constraint that would allow simplification? If so how would I do that in sympy?
Update
I was able to get a bit further by using sympy.radsimp on the equations from sympy.solve when all variables are solved for jointly (still not sure why it wont solve for sx by itself).
solve_for = (sx, theta, sy, m)
solutions = sympy.solve(mat_equation, *solve_for, dict=True)
# minimal=True, quick=True, cubics=False, quartics=False, quintics=False, check=False)
for sol in solutions:
for sym, symsol0 in sol.items():
symsol = sympy.radsimp(symsol0)
symsol = sympy.trigsimp(symsol)
symsol = sympy.simplify(symsol)
symsol = sympy.radsimp(symsol)
print('\n=====')
print('sym = {!r}'.format(sym))
print('symsol = {!r}'.format(symsol))
print('--')
sympy.pretty_print(symsol, wrap_line=False)
print('--')
print('=====\n')
=====
sym = sx
symsol = -sqrt(a11**2 + a21**2)
--
_____________
╱ 2 2
-╲╱ a₁₁ + a₂₁
--
=====
=====
sym = theta
symsol = 2*atan((a11 + sqrt(a11**2 + a21**2))/a21)
--
⎛ _____________⎞
⎜ ╱ 2 2 ⎟
⎜a₁₁ + ╲╱ a₁₁ + a₂₁ ⎟
2⋅atan⎜──────────────────────⎟
⎝ a₂₁ ⎠
--
=====
=====
sym = m
symsol = (a11*a12 + a21*a22)/(a11*a22 - a12*a21)
--
a₁₁⋅a₁₂ + a₂₁⋅a₂₂
─────────────────
a₁₁⋅a₂₂ - a₁₂⋅a₂₁
--
=====
=====
sym = sy
symsol = (-a11*a22*sqrt(a11**2 + a21**2) + a12*a21*sqrt(a11**2 + a21**2))/(a11**2 + a21**2)
--
_____________ _____________
╱ 2 2 ╱ 2 2
- a₁₁⋅a₂₂⋅╲╱ a₁₁ + a₂₁ + a₁₂⋅a₂₁⋅╲╱ a₁₁ + a₂₁
─────────────────────────────────────────────────────
2 2
a₁₁ + a₂₁
--
=====
But the solution for sx is closer to what I want (althought it's a negative root, which I suppose is technically correct, but I was under the impression sympy only handled principle roots).
Main questions are still open though. (although I'm more confident the original SE post is correct).
And it looks like it is saying that "m" has the determinant in the denominator, which is interesting. (and the numerator is the dot-product of the rows).
Update2
I'm starting to think that there is some error in sympy or in the Se post. I started doing numerical checks, and it's giving errors that I don't think are reconcilable (i.e. same after rotation).
Numerical checking code is
params = [sx, theta, sy, m]
params_rand = {p: np.random.rand() for p in params}
A_params_rand = A_params.subs(params_rand)
matrix_rand = {lhs: rhs for lhs, rhs in zip(elements, ub.flatten(A_params_rand.tolist()))}
A_matrix_rand = A_matrix.subs(matrix_rand)
A_solved_rand = A_solved_recon.subs(matrix_rand)
A_recon_rand = A_recon.subs(matrix_rand)
mat1 = np.array(A_matrix_rand.tolist()).astype(float)
mat2 = np.array(A_params_rand.tolist()).astype(float)
mat3 = np.array(A_recon_rand.tolist()).astype(float)
assert np.all(np.isclose(mat1, mat2))
print(mat2 - mat3)
mat4 = np.array(A_solved_rand.tolist()).astype(float)
Random values seem to always produce some error at a22 in the matrix, so I think the sympy reconstruction of the matrix from the manually inputed decomposition is wrong, or the decomposition itself is wrong. Any help would be very valuable.
After discussion with a colleague, it turns out I made a simple error in the code. I swapped sin and cos terms. Fixing this results in the correct reconstruction of the matrix when using #Stéphane Laurent's decomposition:
import sympy
import ubelt as ub
domain = {'real': True}
theta = sympy.symbols('theta', **domain)
sx, sy = sympy.symbols('sx, sy', **domain)
m = sympy.symbols('m', **domain)
params = [sx, theta, sy, m]
S = sympy.Matrix([ # scale
[sx, 0],
[ 0, sy]])
H = sympy.Matrix([ # shear
[1, m],
[0, 1]])
R = sympy.Matrix(( # rotation
[sympy.cos(theta), -sympy.sin(theta)],
[sympy.sin(theta), sympy.cos(theta)]))
A_params = sympy.simplify((R # H # S))
a11, a12, a21, a22 = sympy.symbols(
'a11, a12, a21, a22', real=True)
A_matrix = sympy.Matrix(((a11, a12), (a21, a22)))
print(ub.hzcat(['A_matrix = ', sympy.pretty(A_matrix)]))
print(ub.hzcat(['A_params = ', sympy.pretty(A_params)]))
# This is the guided solution by Stéphane Laurent
recon_sx = sympy.sqrt(a11 * a11 + a21 * a21)
recon_theta = sympy.atan2(a21, a11)
recon_sin_t = sympy.sin(recon_theta)
recon_cos_t = sympy.cos(recon_theta)
recon_msy = a12 * recon_cos_t + a22 * recon_sin_t
# condition2 = sympy.simplify(sympy.Eq(recon_sin_t, 0))
# condition1 = sympy.simplify(sympy.Not(condition2))
condition1 = sympy.Gt(recon_sin_t ** 2, recon_cos_t ** 2)
condition2 = sympy.Le(recon_sin_t ** 2, recon_cos_t ** 2)
sy_cond1 = (recon_msy * recon_cos_t - a12) / recon_sin_t
sy_cond2 = (a22 - recon_msy * recon_sin_t) / recon_cos_t
recon_sy = sympy.Piecewise((sy_cond1, condition1), (sy_cond2, condition2))
recon_m = sympy.simplify(recon_msy / recon_sy)
# Substitute the decomposition into the "A_params" to reconstruct "A_matrix"
recon_symbols = {
sx: recon_sx,
theta: recon_theta,
m: recon_m,
sy: recon_sy
}
for sym, symval in recon_symbols.items():
# symval = sympy.radsimp(symval)
symval = sympy.trigsimp(symval)
symval = sympy.simplify(symval)
if not isinstance(symval, sympy.Piecewise):
symval = sympy.radsimp(symval)
print('\n=====')
print('sym = {!r}'.format(sym))
print('symval = {!r}'.format(symval))
print('--')
sympy.pretty_print(symval)
print('=====\n')
A_recon = A_params.subs(recon_symbols)
A_recon = sympy.simplify(A_recon)
print(ub.hzcat(['A_recon = ', sympy.pretty(A_recon)]))
Output of reconstruction with Laurent's explicitly defined decomposition:
A_matrix = ⎡a₁₁ a₁₂⎤
⎢ ⎥
⎣a₂₁ a₂₂⎦
A_params = ⎡sx⋅cos(θ) sy⋅(m⋅cos(θ) - sin(θ))⎤
⎢ ⎥
⎣sx⋅sin(θ) sy⋅(m⋅sin(θ) + cos(θ))⎦
=====
sym = sx
symval = sqrt(a11**2 + a21**2)
--
_____________
╱ 2 2
╲╱ a₁₁ + a₂₁
=====
=====
sym = theta
symval = atan2(a21, a11)
--
atan2(a₂₁, a₁₁)
=====
=====
sym = m
symval = (a11*a12 + a21*a22)/(a11*a22 - a12*a21)
--
a₁₁⋅a₁₂ + a₂₁⋅a₂₂
─────────────────
a₁₁⋅a₂₂ - a₁₂⋅a₂₁
=====
=====
sym = sy
symval = (a11*a22*sqrt(a11**2 + a21**2) - a12*a21*sqrt(a11**2 + a21**2))/(a11**2 + a21**2)
--
_____________ _____________
╱ 2 2 ╱ 2 2
a₁₁⋅a₂₂⋅╲╱ a₁₁ + a₂₁ - a₁₂⋅a₂₁⋅╲╱ a₁₁ + a₂₁
───────────────────────────────────────────────────
2 2
a₁₁ + a₂₁
=====
A_recon = ⎡a₁₁ a₁₂⎤
⎢ ⎥
⎣a₂₁ a₂₂⎦
I was also able to get the solver to produce a solution that reconstructed "A_matrix" correctly, although I had to jump through some hoops, and the decomposition takes a different (somewhat strange) form. But it does produce the right answer:
mat_equation = sympy.Eq(A_matrix, A_params)
solve_for = (sx, theta, sy, m)
solutions = sympy.solve(mat_equation, *solve_for, dict=True)
solved = {}
# minimal=True, quick=True, cubics=False, quartics=False, quintics=False, check=False)
for sol in solutions:
for sym, symsol0 in sol.items():
symsol = sympy.radsimp(symsol0)
symsol = sympy.trigsimp(symsol)
symsol = sympy.simplify(symsol)
symsol = sympy.radsimp(symsol)
print('\n=====')
print('sym = {!r}'.format(sym))
print('symsol = {!r}'.format(symsol))
print('--')
sympy.pretty_print(symsol, wrap_line=False)
solved[sym] = symsol
print('--')
print('=====\n')
A_matrix[0, :].dot(A_matrix[1, :]) / A_matrix.det()
A_solved_recon = sympy.simplify(A_params.subs(solved))
print(ub.hzcat(['A_solved_recon = ', sympy.pretty(A_solved_recon)]))
Although I haven't worked out all of the details, it does seem that this sympy-computed decomposition is correct:
=====
sym = sx
symsol = -sqrt(a11**2 + a21**2)
--
_____________
╱ 2 2
-╲╱ a₁₁ + a₂₁
--
=====
=====
sym = theta
symsol = -2*atan((a11 + sqrt(a11**2 + a21**2))/a21)
--
⎛ _____________⎞
⎜ ╱ 2 2 ⎟
⎜a₁₁ + ╲╱ a₁₁ + a₂₁ ⎟
-2⋅atan⎜──────────────────────⎟
⎝ a₂₁ ⎠
--
=====
=====
sym = m
symsol = (a11*a12 + a21*a22)/(a11*a22 - a12*a21)
--
a₁₁⋅a₁₂ + a₂₁⋅a₂₂
─────────────────
a₁₁⋅a₂₂ - a₁₂⋅a₂₁
--
=====
=====
sym = sy
symsol = (-a11*a22*sqrt(a11**2 + a21**2) + a12*a21*sqrt(a11**2 + a21**2))/(a11**2 + a21**2)
--
_____________ _____________
╱ 2 2 ╱ 2 2
- a₁₁⋅a₂₂⋅╲╱ a₁₁ + a₂₁ + a₁₂⋅a₂₁⋅╲╱ a₁₁ + a₂₁
─────────────────────────────────────────────────────
2 2
a₁₁ + a₂₁
--
=====
A_solved_recon = ⎡a₁₁ a₁₂⎤
⎢ ⎥
⎣a₂₁ a₂₂⎦
I have an expression which is the sum of some trig functions:
import sympy as sy
from sympy import cos,sin,pi
theta = sy.symbols('theta')
expr = 5*cos(theta) + sin(theta*2)+3*cos(3*theta)
I'd like to add a "phase shift" by pi/4 to each trig function:
sin(2*theta + pi/4) + 5*cos(theta + pi/4) + 3*cos(3*theta + pi/4)
How can this be achieved? Is there a way to walk the expression tree and do an insertion of pi/4?
There are many ways to do this. Here is one that uses pattern matching:
In [5]: expr
Out[5]: sin(2⋅θ) + 5⋅cos(θ) + 3⋅cos(3⋅θ)
In [6]: w = Wild('w')
In [7]: expr.replace(sin(w), sin(w+pi/4))
Out[7]:
⎛ π⎞
sin⎜2⋅θ + ─⎟ + 5⋅cos(θ) + 3⋅cos(3⋅θ)
⎝ 4⎠
In [8]: expr.replace(sin(w), sin(w+pi/4)).replace(cos(w), cos(w + pi/4))
Out[8]:
⎛ π⎞ ⎛ π⎞ ⎛ π⎞
sin⎜2⋅θ + ─⎟ + 5⋅cos⎜θ + ─⎟ + 3⋅cos⎜3⋅θ + ─⎟
⎝ 4⎠ ⎝ 4⎠ ⎝ 4⎠
Is there any way to get sympy to perform this integral?
x=var('x')
L=var('L')
Q.positive(1/L)
integrate(besseli(1,x) * exp(-x**2/(4*L)-L),(x,0,inf))
Sympy just returns the integral:
Integral(exp(-L - x**2/(4*L))*besseli(1, x), (x, 0, +inf))
Mathematica does it:
Integrate[BesselI[1, x] Exp[-(x^2/(4 L)) - L], {x, 0, Infinity}]
Result:
ConditionalExpression[1 - E^-L, Re[1/L] > 0]
EDIT: using the answer provided below, a better way to perform this integral is:
L=var('L',real=True,positive=True)
x=var('x',real=True,positive=True)
integrate(besseli(1,x) * exp(-x**2/(4*L)-L),(x,0,oo))
The problem is that you are using inf, which I guess is Float('inf'). You want oo, the symbolic infinity. SymPy should probably be smarter about converting Float('inf') to oo.
In [1]: x=var('x')
In [2]: L=var('L')
In [3]: Q.positive(1/L)
Out[3]: Q.positive(1/L)
In [5]: integrate(besseli(1,x) * exp(-x**2/(4*L)-L),(x,0,oo))
Out[5]:
⎧ ⎛ L ⎞ -L │ ⎛ 1 ⎞│ π
⎪ ⎝ℯ - 1⎠⋅ℯ for │periodic_argument⎜─────────────, ∞⎟│ < ─
⎪ │ ⎝polar_lift(L) ⎠│ 2
⎪
⎪∞
⎪⌠
⎨⎮ 2
⎪⎮ x
⎪⎮ -L - ───
⎪⎮ 4⋅L
⎪⎮ ℯ ⋅besseli(1, x) dx otherwise
⎪⌡
⎩0
The original expression now works in SymPy because inf is automatically recast to oo:
>>> inf=float('inf')
>>> x=var('x')
>>> L=var('L')
>>> Q.positive(1/L)
Q.positive(1/L)
>>> integrate(besseli(1,x) * exp(-x**2/(4*L)-L),(x,0,inf))
Piecewise(
((exp(L) - 1)*exp(-L), Abs(arg(L)) < pi/2),
(Integral(exp(-L - x**2/(4*L))*besseli(1, x), (x, 0, oo)), True))