Easiest way to limit AWS Lambda invocations per hour - amazon-web-services

I have an API Gateway invoking an AWS Lambda which sends Text messages.
In case of an accident or an attack, I would like to limit the max invocations per hour to mitigate the cost of an infinite loop for example.
What is the easiest way to do that ? I can't see such options in AWS Lambda, SQS or event Cloudwatch Alarm

API Gateway supports rate limiting. You can set limits for individual API stages or methods and you can enable usage plans to restrict client request submissions to within specified request rates and quotas.
In addition, per the API Gateway FAQ:
API Gateway automatically protects your backend systems from distributed denial-of-service (DDoS) attacks, whether attacked with counterfeit requests (Layer 7) or SYN floods (Layer 3).
And, finally, be aware of Protecting API Endpoints guidance.

Related

How to set quota for CORS preflight requests with AWS API Gateway

I'm building a serverless application with AWS Lambda and API Gateway. In order to prevent DDOS attacks doing a large number of requests costing me lots of money, I've set up a usage plan with a request quota (e.g. 10K requests/month). This requires an API key to be passed as header by callers.
This seemingly works well, but I also need to enable CORS for this service. For that I need to allow for an unauthorized OPTIONS request ("CORS preflight" request) as browsers don't support sending any special header there. But then I can't seem to find a way for enforcing a quota and I'm back to square one: an uncontrolled number of those requests could cost an unforeseeable amount of money. Is there any way to exclude this possibility?
To enforce a quota on OPTIONS requests, create a web ACL in AWS WAF & associate it to a stage of your API in API Gateway. Add a rate-based rule in the web ACL that blocks all OPTIONS requests beyond the rate limit you specify. Rules in web ACLs can be configured specifically for this, as shown below:
For a screenshot-guided tutorial of this entire process, see my blog post.
You are not paying for any unauthorized calls to API-Gateway.
AWS is picking up this charge.
You are paying after the request is authorized and only if it does not exceed your usage plan.
So if somebody is doing a DDOS on your API without authentication it is free of charge.
If somebody is doing a DDOS with a valid api key you will only pay until your usage plan is exceeded.
Find more information here.
Requests are not charged for authorization and authentication
failures.
Calls to methods that require API keys are not charged when API keys
are missing or invalid.
API Gateway-throttled requests are not charged when the request rate
or burst rate exceeds the preconfigured limits.
Usage plan-throttled requests are not charged when rate limits or
quota exceed the preconfigured limits.
So make sure to have authentication enabled on your API and a usage plan in place for all the authenticated requests.

Is it possible to remove API Gateway from the equation to serve Lambda over public internet?

Currently, my application resides in lambda which I serve using HTTP API (API Gateway V2). This setup exists in multiple regions. Meaning, API Gateway invokes lambda in the same region which accesses DynamoDB Global Table in the same region. I use Route 53 to serve nearest API Gateway to user.
The problem I faced: API Gateway doesn't support redirection from http to https. I can achieve this with CloudFront. But, it'll increase cost as well as latency.
Can I remove API Gateway from the equation and use Lambda#Edge to access DynamoDB Table near the user? Can CloudFront be used to replace API Gateway?
Yes you can. The docs write:
Functions triggered by origin request and response events as well as functions triggered by viewer request and response events can make network calls to resources on the internet, and to AWS services such as Amazon S3 buckets, DynamoDB tables, or Amazon EC2 instances.
However, there are many limitations to what lambda#edge can do, as compared to a regular lambda. Examples are:
only python and nodejs,
difficulty in debugging, as lambda logs will be in region when it runs, not in one central region,
timeout limits on calls to DynamoDb (5 or 30 seconds) depending if its origin or viewer function,
no lambda layers
max memory of 128 MB for viewer side functions
deployment package size can be max 1 MB for viewer side functions
Thus if you can work with these and other limitations of lambda#edge, then you can use it to work with DynamoDb.

How do we address/what are good practices for "serverless" resource abuse?

If I create a public endpoint using AWS API Gateway, the entire world could access it. This would be a problem because the end point would trigger an AWS Lambda function. If we assume that I can't query a data source to determine the frequency that the incoming IP address queried the resource in the past, what would be the best practice for protecting this end point from abuse? Do I have any other security options?
I realize I could use a reCaptcha but this would still invoke the AWS Lambda function and would incur costs if done a million times over a short window of time.
A very simple way of protecting your API gateway
Use AWS Cloudfront with TTL 0 and pass custom headers from AWS Cloudfront to API gateway
Use AWS WAF with AWS Cloudfront
AWS API Gateway also handles some basic level of DDOS attacks.
Kindly also view these blogs for securing AWS API Gateway
https://aws.amazon.com/blogs/compute/protecting-your-api-using-amazon-api-gateway-and-aws-waf-part-i/
https://aws.amazon.com/blogs/compute/protecting-your-api-using-amazon-api-gateway-and-aws-waf-part-2/
You are probably looking for throttling limit configuration or usage plan definition:
To prevent your API from being overwhelmed by too many requests,
Amazon API Gateway throttles requests to your API using the token
bucket algorithm, where a token counts for a request. Specifically,
API Gateway sets a limit on a steady-state rate and a burst of request
submissions against all APIs in your account. In the token bucket
algorithm, the burst is the maximum bucket size.
When request submissions exceed the steady-state request rate and
burst limits, API Gateway fails the limit-exceeding requests and
returns 429 Too Many Requests error responses to the client. Upon
catching such exceptions, the client can resubmit the failed requests
in a rate-limiting fashion, while complying with the API Gateway
throttling limits.
As an API developer, you can set the limits for individual API stages
or methods to improve overall performance across all APIs in your
account. Alternatively, you can enable usage plans to restrict client
request submissions to within specified request rates and quotas. This
restricts the overall request submissions so that they don't go
significantly past the account-level throttling limits.
References:
https://docs.aws.amazon.com/apigateway/latest/developerguide/api-gateway-request-throttling.html
https://docs.aws.amazon.com/apigateway/latest/developerguide/api-gateway-create-usage-plans-with-console.html#api-gateway-usage-plan-create

Prevent AWS Lambda flooding

I'm considering about moving my service from a VPS to AWS Lambda + DynamoDB to use it as a FaaS, because it's basically 2 API GET calls that fetch info from the database and serve it, and the normal use of those API calls are really rare (about 50 times a week)
But it makes me wonder... As I can't setup a limit on how many calls I want to serve each month, some attacker could theoretically flood my service by calling it a couple thousands times a day and make my AWS bill extremely expensive. Setting up a limit per month wouldn't be a nice idea either, because the attacker could flood the first day and I won't have more requests to serve. The ideal thing would be to set up a limit on request rate per client.
Anyone knows how could I protect it? I've seen that AWS also offers a Firewall, but that's for CloudFront. Isn't there any way to make it work with Lambda directly?
You can put AWS CloudFront in front API Gateway and Lambda so that, the traffic will be served to outside through CloudFront.
In addition by configuring AWS WAF with rate base blocking, it is possible to block high frequencies of access by attackers.
However when configuring AWS CloudFront in front of API Gateway and Lambda, you also need to restrict direct access to API Gateway (Since API Gateway will be publicly accessible by default). This can be achieved in following ways.
Enable API Keys for API Gateway and use the API Key in AWS CloudFront Headers in the Origin.
Use a Token Header and Verify it using a Custom Authorizer Lambda function.
Two options spring to mind:
place API Gateway in front of Lambda so that API requests
have to be authenticated. API Gateway also has built-in throttles and other useful features.
invoke the Lambda directly, which will require the client
invoking the Lambda to have the relevant IAM credentials.

AWS API Gateway Policy Per Header

I would like to have a policy on an API Gateway that would throttle requests based on a header value. For example, header value "AAA" would be allowed up to 10 requests per day, "BBB", 20 requests. Is this possible? How can I achieve this? Note: I am trying to avoid writing a lambda function for this purpose, because then I would need to keep state, etc.
API Gateway has Usage Plans, which support what you are attempting to do.
Each usage plan can have a throttling limit, which restricts requests per second and burst rate. Usage plans can also have quotas, which would allow you to add limits on requests per day.
API Gateway allows you to add API Keys to a usage plan. API Keys are sent HTTP header (x-api-key).
You can find more details in the Usage Plans for API Gateway launch blog and API Gateway Usage Plan docs.