The way to delete a feature group using the SageMaker Python SDK is as follows:
my_feature_group.delete()
But this only deletes the feature group you are currently working on. How can one delete feature groups from prior sessions? I tried deleting them out of the S3 bucket directly, but they still appear in the Feature Store UI.
It would be great if feature groups could be deleted through the UI. But if not, is there a way to delete a feature group using it's full name; the one that was created using:
my-feature-group-" + strftime("%d-%H-%M-%S", gmtime())
You can create a FeatureGroup object and call delete or via cli or SageMakerFeatureStoreRuntime client
source: aws
You can loop over list_feature_groups as follows:
def extract_feature_groups(feature_groups):
list_feature_groups = []
list_feature_groups.extend([x['FeatureGroupName'] for x in feature_groups['FeatureGroupSummaries']])
next_token = '' if not ('NextToken' in feature_groups.keys()) else feature_groups['NextToken']
while not (next_token==''):
page_feature_groups = boto_client.list_feature_groups(NextToken=next_token)
list_feature_groups.extend([x['FeatureGroupName'] for x in page_feature_groups['FeatureGroupSummaries']])
next_token = '' if not ('NextToken' in page_feature_groups.keys()) else page_feature_groups['NextToken']
return list_feature_groups
region_name = <your_region_name>
boto_client = boto3.client('sagemaker', region_name=region_name)
boto_session = boto3.session.Session(region_name=region_name)
fs_sagemaker_session = sagemaker.Session(boto_session=boto_session)
feature_groups = boto_client.list_feature_groups()
list_features_groups = extract_feature_groups(feature_groups)
for fg in list_features_groups:
<make sure to include appropriate name filter and/or confirmation requests>
feature_group = FeatureGroup(name = feature, sagemaker_session = fs_sagemaker_session)
feature_group.delete()
Feature groups take time to complete deletion; you might want to add a function for checking deletion has concluded successfully.
Related
I am writing a lambda function that has an array of words that I want to put into a slotType, basically updating it every time. Here is how it goes. Initially, the slotType has values ['car', 'bus']. Next time I run the lambda function the values get updated to ['car', 'bus', 'train', 'flight'] which is basically after appending a new array into the old one.
I want to know how I publish the bot every time the Lambda function gets invoked so the next time I hit the lex bot from the front-end, it uses the latest slotType in the intent and newly published bot alias. Yep, also the alias!
I know for a fact that the put_slot_type() is working because the slot is getting updated in the bot.
Here is the function which basically takes in new labels as parameters.
def lex_extend_slots(new_labels):
print('entering lex model...')
lex = boto3.client('lex-models')
slot_name = 'keysDb'
intent_name = 'searchKeys'
bot_name = 'photosBot'
res = lex.get_slot_type(
name = slot_name,
version = '$LATEST'
)
current_labels = res['enumerationValues']
latest_checksum = res['checksum']
arr = [x['value'] for x in current_labels]
labels = arr + new_labels
print('arry: ', arr)
print('new_labels', new_labels)
print('labels in lex: ', labels)
labels = list(set(labels))
enumerationList = [{'value': label, 'synonyms': []} for label in labels]
print('getting ready to push enum..: ', enumerationList)
res_slot = lex.put_slot_type(
name = slot_name,
description = 'updated slots...',
enumerationValues = enumerationList,
valueSelectionStrategy = 'TOP_RESOLUTION',
)
res_build_intent = lex.create_intent_version(
name = intent_name
)
res_build_bot = lex.create_bot_version(
name = bot_name,
checksum = latest_checksum
)
return current_labels
It looks like you're using Version 1 of the Lex Models API on Boto3.
You can use the put_bot method in the lex-models client to effectively create or update your Lex bot.
The put_bot method expects the full list of intents to be used for building the bot.
It is worth mentioning that you will first need to use put_intent to update your intents to ensure they use the latest version of your updated slotType.
Here's the documentation for put_intent.
The appropriate methods for creating and updating aliases are contained in the same link that I've shared above.
Trying to add workflow step to pause the workflow for approval for second signer.
Please note I was able to add the pause when creating envelopes with recipients added.
But was not able to add the workflow step when trying to create envelope from templates. The templates are created in docusign with only roles added.
Later when creating the envelope through API we added TemplateRoles to add signers against each role.
In this case when we tried to add workflow step to pause the workflow it didn’t pause and sent invitation for the second signer. Can you please help us on this and correct us if we are doing any thing wrong.
Please find the snip of the code below:
var workflowStep = new WorkflowStep()
{
Action ="pause_before",
TriggerOnItem = "routing_order",
ItemId = "2"
};
var workflowsteps = new List<WorkflowStep>();
workflowsteps.Add(workflowStep);
TemplateRole signer = new TemplateRole();
signer.Email = "test#example.com";
signer.Name = "Test";
signer.RoleName = "QA";
signer.RoutingOrder = "1";
TemplateRole signer1 = new TemplateRole();
signer1.Email = "test123#example.com";
signer1.Name = "Test123";
signer1.RoleName = "RS";
signer1.RoutingOrder = "2";
var tempRoles = new List<TemplateRole>();
tempRoles.Add(signer);
tempRoles.Add(signer1);
EnvelopesApi envelopesApi = new EnvelopesApi(apiclient);
EnvelopeDefinition envDef = new EnvelopeDefinition();
envDef.TemplateId = templateId;
envDef.Status = "Sent";
envDef.TemplateRoles = tempRoles;
envDef.Workflow = new Workflow { WorkflowSteps = workflowsteps };
EnvelopeSummary envelopeSummary = envelopesApi.CreateEnvelope(accountId, envDef);
I hesitate to add this because I haven't tested it but I'll mention it in case it unblocks you and see if I can verify later...
I believe if you create the envelope/template with status = paused rather than sent, you should be able to update the template with ARR.
The problem is that when you get to the 'pause' in the above code, it's already 'too late'.
I am trying to delete an s3 bucket with versions and delete markers.
I cannot delete them from the console and I am stuck on this for a while.
I have also tried running a few python scripts but still nothing changes.
In the Amazon S3 management console, you will see: Versions: Hide / Show
Clicking Show will display all versions of an object, including the Delete Marker. You can then select versions and delete markers and delete them.
The following Python code should do what you want:
bucket = "my_s3_bucket_1234aefa"
file_to_delete = "file_i_want_to_delete.png"
results = []
response = s3_client.list_object_versions(
Bucket=bucket,
Prefix=file_to_delete,
)
for k in ['Versions', 'DeleteMarkers']:
if k in response:
k_response = response[k]
to_delete = [r['VersionId'] for r in k_response if r['Key'] == file_to_delete]
results.extend(to_delete)
for version in results:
s3_client.delete_object(Bucket=bucket, Key=file_to_delete, VersionId=version)
I've been trying to update our API call to the CIM interface for Authorize.net to hide the Billing Address fields on the hosted profile page.
The documentation states that when call the token creation function, passing in a setting "hostedProfileBillingAddressOptions" with a value of "showNone" will hide the billing address part of the form, however when I pass in this setting I am still getting the billing address showing.
I've verified that I'm passing the setting correctly (added the same way as the "hostedProfileIFrameCommunicatorUrl" and "hostedProfilePageBorderVisible" settings) and if I pass an invalid value for the "hostedProfileBillingAddressOptions" option, the Token creation function will return an error
Is there something else that this option is dependent on, such as an account setting or another settings parameter?
For reference, I'm testing this in the Sandbox system and I'm using the dotNet SDK, my test code for calling the API function is as follows
Public Shared Function CreateHostFormToken(apiId As String, apiKey As String, branchId As Int64, nUser As Contact, iframeComURL As String) As String
Dim nCustProfile = GetCustomerProfile(apiId, apiKey, branchId, nUser)
Dim nHost = New AuthorizeNet.Api.Contracts.V1.getHostedProfilePageRequest()
nHost.customerProfileId = nCustProfile
' Set Auth
Dim nAuth = New Api.Contracts.V1.merchantAuthenticationType()
nAuth.ItemElementName = Api.Contracts.V1.ItemChoiceType.transactionKey
nAuth.name = apiId
nAuth.Item = apiKey
nHost.merchantAuthentication = nAuth
' Set Params
Dim settingList As New List(Of Api.Contracts.V1.settingType)
Dim nParam As New Api.Contracts.V1.settingType With {.settingName = "hostedProfileIFrameCommunicatorUrl",
.settingValue = iframeComURL}
settingList.Add(nParam)
nParam = New Api.Contracts.V1.settingType With {.settingName = "hostedProfilePageBorderVisible",
.settingValue = "false"}
settingList.Add(nParam)
nParam = New Api.Contracts.V1.settingType With {.settingName = "hostedProfileBillingAddressOptions",
.settingValue = "showNone"}
settingList.Add(nParam)
nHost.hostedProfileSettings = settingList.ToArray
Dim nX = New AuthorizeNet.Api.Controllers.getHostedProfilePageController(nHost)
Dim nRes = nX.ExecuteWithApiResponse(GetEnvironment())
Return nRes.token
End Function
I've looked through the SDK code as well, and I don't see anything there that would be preventing the setting from being passed through.
Has anyone come across this issue, or successfully set the card entry form to hide the billing address?
There turned out to be two parts to the solution to this problem:
In order to use the "hostedProfileBillingAddressOptions" option, you need to use a newer version of the capture page than I was using. I was using "https://secure2.authorize.net/profile/", while the new version is "https://secure2.authorize.net/customer/". Added bonus, the new URL provides a much nicer and modern looking form.
However, once this was working, I then had the problem that on entering the card, a validation message told me that "address and Zip code are required", despite not being visible. I did also make sure that I had the option "hostedProfileBillingAddressRequired" set to false (which is it's default value anyway)
The response from Authorize.net support is that in order to capture card without an address, the option "hostedProfileValidationMode" must be set to "testMode".
This is not mentioned in the documentation (at least as far as I could see), so may not be something that other people are aware of since it is a little counter-intuitive to use 'testMode' on a live environment.
It's not ideal since validating the card for a customer account will send a transaction email to the merchant, but it seems there is not another way around this just now.
In summary, to allow the customer to add a credit card to their profile without having to provide an address, you need to specify the following options:
Form URL for capture - https://secure2.authorize.net/customer/
getHostedProfilePageRequest -
hostedProfileIFrameCommunicatorUrl: *your URL*
hostedProfilePageBorderVisible: false //assuming you are using an iFrame
hostedProfileValidationMode: testMode
hostedProfileBillingAddressOptions: showNone
I am using the Google Admin SDK to create, update and delete mailing lists (aka groups).
Everything works fine so far and I can create a new group and add members to it. But: Every adding of a member takes about 1s so I was thinking of a batch request to add several users to a group at once.
In the Google Admin interface it is easy to add several users at once but I didn't find any way to implement this via the API.
Is there a way to do so or do I have to loop through every user?
This works but takes a lot of time if I have to do it for every single user:
$service = new Google_Service_Directory($this->getGoogleClient());
$user = new Google_Service_Directory_Member();
$user->setEmail('test#test.com');
$user->setRole('MEMBER');
$user->setType('USER');
$service->members->insert($group_id, $user);
finally I found a solution on my own: The Admin SDK comes with a Batch class :)
To get batch requests working these steps are necessary:
When initiating the Google Client add the following line to the code
$client->setUseBatch(true);
then you can initiate the batch object
$batch = new Google_Http_Batch($client);
a little modification on the code posted above brings me to this code
foreach($arr_users as $user)
{
$userdata = new Google_Service_Directory_Member();
$userdata->setEmail($user);
$userdata->setRole('MEMBER');
$userdata->setType('USER');
$batch->add($service->members->insert($temp_list_name, $userdata));
}
finally you have to execute the request which is done by this line:
$client->execute($batch);
that's all and it works perfectly
While using the method of Christian Lange I was getting this error -
Argument 1 passed to Google\Client::execute() must implement interface Psr\Http\Message\RequestInterface, instance of Google\Http\Batch given,
So I used this instead
$client->setUseBatch(true);
$service = new Google_Service_Directory($client);
$batch = $service->createBatch();
foreach ($emails as $email)
{
$user = new Google_Service_Directory_Member(array('email' => $email,
'kind' => 'member',
'role' => 'MEMBER',
'type' => 'USER'));
$list = $service->members->insert($key, $user);
$batch->add($list);
}
$resultsBatch = $batch->execute();