I have the following regex ^(2[0-3]|1?[0-9])?(\:[0-5]?[0-9])?$
8:45 matches, however 08:45 does not.
How can this be re-written to also allow 08:45?
I would also like like to check for either the . or : if possible instead of just the .
As well as "1", also allow "0" at the start of the hours before "20:00":
^(2[0-3]|[01]?[0-9])?(:[0-5]?[0-9])?$
Note that you don't need to escape colons - they have no speacial regex meaning.
Also, since everything is optional, this regex matches a blank string.
If you want to match something, add (?!$) after ^. ^(?!$) is a negative look ahead anchored to start that requires that end of input does not follow the start of input (ie, the input is not zero length).
Please try this regEx.
[0]?\d[:\.]\d\d
which can capture 8:45 08:45 8.45 and 08.45
or click this to see the result.
https://regex101.com/r/tLEqhH/1
Related
I want to select some string combination (with dots(.)) from a very long string (sql). The full string could be a single line or multiple line with new line separator, and this combination could be in start (at first line) or a next line (new line) or at both place.
I need help in writing a regex for it.
Examples:
String s = I am testing something like test.test.test in sentence.
Expected output: test.test.test
Example2 (real usecase):
UPDATE test.table
SET access = 01
WHERE access IN (
SELECT name FROM project.dataset.tablename WHERE name = 'test' GROUP BY 1 )
Expected output: test.table and project.dataset.tablename
, can I also add some prefix or suffix words or space which should be present where ever this logic gets checked. In above case if its update regex should pick test.table, but if the statement is like select test.table regex should not pick it up this combinations and same applies for suffix.
Example3: This is to illustrate the above theory.
INS INTO test.table
SEL 'abcscsc', wu_id.Item_Nbr ,1
FROM test.table as_t
WHERE as_t.old <> 0 AND as_t.date = 11
AND (as_t.numb IN ('11') )
Expected Output: test.table, test.table (Key words are INTO and FROM)
Things Not Needed in selection:as_t.numb, as_t.old, as_t.date
If I get the regex I can use in program to extract this word.
Note: Before and after string words to the combination could be anything like update, select { or(, so we have to find the occurrence of words which are joined together with .(dot) and all the number of such occurrence.
I tried something like this:
(?<=.)(.?)(?=.)(.?) -: This only selected the word between two .dot and not all.
.(?<=.)(.?)(?=.)(.?). - This everything before and after.
To solve your initial problem, we can just use some negation. Here's the pattern I came up with:
[^\s]+\.[^\s]+
[^ ... ] Means to make a character class including everything except for what's between the brackets. In this case, I put \s in there, which matches any whitespace. So [^\s] matches anything that isn't whitespace.
+ Is a quantifier. It means to find as many of the preceding construct as you can without breaking the match. This would happily match everything that's not whitespace, but I follow it with a \., which matches a literal .. The \ is necessary because . means to match any character in regex, so we need to escape it so it only has its literal meaning. This means there has to be a . in this group of non-whitespace characters.
I end the pattern with another [^\s]+, which matches everything after the . until the next whitespace.
Now, to solve your secondary problem, you want to make this match only work if it is preceded by a given keyword. Luckily, regex has a construct almost specifically for this case. It's called a lookbehind. The syntax is (?<= ... ) where the ... is the pattern you want to look for. Using your example, this will only match after the keywords INTO and FROM:
(?<=(?:INTO|FROM)\s)[^\s]+\.[^\s]+
Here (?:INTO|FROM) means to match either the text INTO or the text FROM. I then specify that it should be followed by a whitespace character with \s. One possible problem here is that it will only match if the keywords are written in all upper case. You can change this behavior by specifying the case insensitive flag i to your regex parser. If your regex parser doesn't have a way to specify flags, you can usually still specify it inline by putting (?i) in front of the pattern, like so:
(?i)(?<=(?:INTO|FROM)\s)[^\s]+\.[^\s]+
If you are new to regex, I highly recommend using the www.regex101.com website to generate regex and learn how it works. Don't forget to check out the code generator part for getting the regex code based on the programming language you are using, that's a cool feature.
For your question, you need a regex that understands any word character \w that matches between 0 and unlimited times, followed by a dot, followed by another series of word character that repeats between 0 and unlimited times.
So here is my solution to your question:
Your regex in JavaScript:
const regex = /([\w][.][\w])+/gm;
in Java:
final String regex = "([\w][.][\w])+";
in Python:
regex = r"([\w][.][\w])+"
in PHP:
$re = '/([\w][.][\w])+/m';
Note that: this solution is written for your use case (to be used for SQL strings), because now if you have something like '.word' or 'word..word', it will still catch it which I assume you don't have a string like that.
See this screenshot for more details
I am trying to write a regex that matches only strings like this:
89-72
10-123
109-12
122-311(a)
22-311(a)(1)(d)(4)
These strings are embedded in sentences and sometimes there are 2 potential matches in the sentence like this:
In section 10-123 which references section 122-311(a) there is a phone number 456-234-2222
I do not want to match the phone. Here is my current working regex
\d{2,3}\-\d{2,3}(\([a-zA-Z0-9]\))*
see DEMO
I've been looking on Stack and have not found anything yet. Any help would be appreciated. Will be using this in a google sheet and potentially postgres.
Based on regex, suggested by #Wiktor Stribiżew:
=REGEXEXTRACT(A1,REPT("\b(\d{2,3}-\d{2,3}\b(?:\([A-Za-z0-9]\))*)(?:[^-]|$)(?:.*)",LEN(REGEXREPLACE(REGEXREPLACE(A1,"\b(\d{2,3}-\d{2,3}\b(?:\([A-Za-z0-9]\))*)(?:[^-]|$)", char (9)),"[^"&char(9)&"]",""))))
The formula will return all matches.
String:
A
In 22-311(a)(1)(d)(4) section 10-123 which ... 122-311(a) ... number 456-234-2222
Output:
B C D
22-311(a)(1)(d)(4) 10-123 122-311(a)
Solution
To extract all matches from a string, use this pattern:
=REGEXEXTRACT(A1,
REPT(basic_regex & "(?:.*)",
LEN(REGEXREPLACE(REGEXREPLACE(A1,basic_regex, char (9)),"[^"&char(9)&"]",""))))
The tail of a function:
LEN(REGEXREPLACE(REGEXREPLACE(A1,basic_regex, char (9)),"[^"&char(9)&"]","")))
is just for finding number 3 -- how many entries of a pattern in a string.
To not match the phone number you have to indicate that the match must neither be preceded nor followed by \d or -. Google spreadsheet uses RE2 which does not support look around assertion (see the list of supported feature) so as far as I can tell, the only solution is to add a character before and after the match, or the string boundary:
(?:^|[^-\d])\d{2,3}\-\d{2,3}(\([a-zA-Z0-9]\))*(?:$|[^-\d])
(?:^|[^-\d]) means either the start of a line (^) or a character that is not - or \d (you might want to change that, and forbid all letters as well). $ is the end of a line. ^ and $ only do what you want with the /m flag though
As you can see here this finds the correct strings, but with additional spaces around some of the matches.
Lets say I have a string something-123.
I need to get last 5 (or less) characters of it but only up to - if there is one in the string, so the result would be like thing, but if string has no - in it, like something123 then the result would be ng123, and if string is like 123 then the result would be 123.
I know how to mach last 5 characters:
/.{5}$/
I know how to mach everything up to first -:
/[^-]*/
But I can not figure out how to combine them, and to make things worse I need to get the match without extracting it from specific groups and similar advanced regex stuff because I want to use it in SQL Anywhere, please help.
Tank you all for the help, but looks like a complete regex solution is going to be too complicated for my problem, so I did it very simple: SELECT right(regexp_substr('something-123', '[^-]*'), 4).
One option is to group the result:
(.{4})-
Now you have captured the result but without the -.
Or using lookarounds you can:
.{4}(?=-)
which matches any 4 characters that appears before "-".
You can use:
.{5}(?=(?:-[^-]*)?$)
See the regex demo
We match 5 symbols other than a newline only before the last - in the string or at the very end of the string ((?=(?:-[^-]*)?$)). You only need to collect the matches, no need checking groups/submatches.
UPDATE
To match any 1 to 5 characters other than a hyphen before the first hyphen (if present in the string), you can use
([^-]{1,5})(?:(?:-[^-]*)*)?$
See demo. We rely on a lookahead here, that checks if there are -+non-hyphen sequences are after the expected substring.
An faster alternative:
^[^-]*?([^-]{1,5})(?:-|$)
This regex will search for any characters other than - up to 1 to 5 such characters.
Note that here, the value we need is in Group 1.
How about:
(.{5})(?:-[^-]+)?$
The result is in group 1
Try this regex:
(.{1,5})(?:-.*|$)
Group 1 has the result you need
demo
I want to remove all numbers from a paragraph except from some words.
My attempt is using a negative look-ahead:
gsub('(?!ami.12.0|allo.12)[[:digit:]]+','',
c('0.12','1245','ami.12.0 00','allo.12 1'),perl=TRUE)
But this doesn't work. I get this:
"." "" "ami.. " "allo."
Or my expected output is:
"." "" 'ami.12.0','allo.12'
You can't really use a negative lookahead here, since it will still replace when the cursor is at some point after ami.
What you can do is put back some matches:
(ami.12.0|allo.12)|[[:digit:]]+
gsub('(ami.12.0|allo.12)|[[:digit:]]+',"\\1",
c('0.12','1245','ami.12.0 00','allo.12 1'),perl=TRUE)
I kept the . since I'm not 100% sure what you have, but keep in mind that . is a wildcard and will match any character (except newlines) unless you escape it.
Your regex is actually finding every digit sequence that is not the start of "ami.12.0" or "allo.12". So for example, in your third string, it gets to the 12 in ami.12.0 and looks ahead to see if that 12 is the start of either of the two ignored strings. It is not, so it continues with replacing it. It would be best to generalize this, but in your specific case, you can probably achieve this by instead doing a negative lookbehind for any prefixes of the words (that can be followed by digit sequences) that you want to skip. So, you would use something like this:
gsub('(?<!ami\\.|ami\\.12\\.|allo\\.)[[:digit:]]+','',
c('0.12','1245','ami.12.0 00','allo.12 1'),perl=TRUE)
I need to regex-match numbers in a certain pattern which works already, but only if there is not (+ right in front of it.
Example Strings I want to have a valid match within: 12, 12.5, 200/300, 200/300/400%, 1/2/3/4/5/6/7
Example Strings I want to have no valid match within: (+10% juice), (+4)
I can already get all the valid matches with (\d+[/%.]?)+, but I need help to exclude the example Strings I want to have no valid match in (which means, only match if there is NOT the String (+ right in front of the mentioned pattern).
Can someone help me out? I have already experimented with the ! (like ?!(\(\+)(\d+[/%.]?)+) but for some reason I can't it to work the way I need it.
(You can use http://gskinner.com/RegExr/ to test regex live)
EDIT: I did maybe use wrong words. I don't want to check if the searchstring does start with (+ but I want to make sure that there is no (+ right in front of my String.
Try regexr with the following inputs:
Match: (\d+[/%.]?)+
Check the checkbox for global (to search for more than one match within the text)
Text:
this should find a match: 200/300/400
this shouldnt find any match at all: (+100%)
this should find a match: 40/50/60%
this should find a match: 175
Currently it will find a match in all 4 lines. I want a regex that does no longer find a match in line 2.
The regex construct you are wanting is "Negative Lookbehind" - See http://www.regular-expressions.info/lookaround.html. A negative lookbehind is defined like (?<!DONTMATCHME) where DONTMATCHME is the expression you don't want to find just before the next bit of the expression. Crutially, the lookbehind bit is not considered part of the match itself
Your expression should be:
(?<![+\d/\.])(\d+[/%.]?)+
Edit - changed negative lookbehind to any character that is not a + or another digit!
Edit #2 - moved the lookbehind outside the main capture brackets. Expanded the range of not acceptable characters before the match to include / & .