Is it possible to make a search to a virtual column that is composed by two columns?
Let's say I have the following MongoDB collection:
db.collection =
[
{ book : 'The Stand', author : 'Stephen King'},
{ book : 'The Dead Zone', author : 'Stephen King'},
{ book : 'Hamlet', author : 'William Shakespeare'},
{ book : 'The Tragedy of Othello', author : 'William Shakespeare'},
{ book : 'Danse Macabre', author : 'Stephen King'},
]
And I want to make a search that should be made considering both book and author columns at the same time. In particular, I will have a query string with several items separated by spaces, and I would want to return the documents whose joint book+author column contains all the query items regardless of their order.
Example:
Query: "King The"
{ book : 'The Stand', author : 'Stephen King'},
{ book : 'The Dead Zone', author : 'Stephen King'}
Query: "Tragedy Shakespeare"
{ book : 'The Tragedy of Othello', author : 'William Shakespeare'}
Query: "The"
{ book : 'The Stand', author : 'Stephen King'},
{ book : 'The Dead Zone', author : 'Stephen King'},
{ book : 'The Tragedy of Othello', author : 'William Shakespeare'},
Is this kind of search possible in MongoDB? Is there any $regex expression to make it feasible?
Thank you!
Here is an aggregation I think might help...
db.collection.aggregate([
{ $project: { book: 1, author: 1, "book_words": { $split: [ "$book", " " ] }, "author_words": { $split: [ "$author", " " ] } } },
{ $project: { book:1, author: 1, "search_words": { $concatArrays: [ "$book_words", "$author_words" ] } } },
{ $match: { "search_words": { $all: [ "The", "King" ] } } },
{ $project: { "search_words": 0} }
]).pretty()
Explanation:
This aggregation has 4 stages...
$project
$project
$match
$project
The first $project will split the string value in field "book" into an array of words called "book_words", and also split the string value in the field "author" into an array of words called "author_words"
The second $project will concatenate the two new arrays together into a single array called "search_words"
The $match stage filters out records that do not match the search criteria
the final $project stage removes the temporary array field called "search_words"
Resulting documents for this aggregation look like...
{
"_id" : ObjectId("60d6139a9148371ae7d2b343"),
"book" : "The Stand",
"author" : "Stephen King"
}
{
"_id" : ObjectId("60d6139a9148371ae7d2b344"),
"book" : "The Dead Zone",
"author" : "Stephen King"
}
Case insensitive matching
In order to provide case insensitive matching MongoDB must understand what case insensitive means. English case is different from other languages. So for this reason we must add an index with a collation that defines english as the language and a strength of 2 for the collation - meaning case insensitive for english. Once the index is created, we must refer to the collation as a option in the aggregation.
Create Index
db.collection.createIndex( { book: 1, author: 1 }, { collation: { locale: 'en', strength: 2 } } )
This is a compound index on both fields - 'book' and 'author'. Notice collation options for this index...
Aggregation using collation
Now that the index exists with a specific collation, Mongo now can calculate the case insensitive options...
db.collection.aggregate([
{ $project: { book: 1, author: 1, "book_words": { $split: [ "$book", " " ] }, "author_words": { $split: [ "$author", " " ] } } },
{ $project: { book:1, author: 1, "search_words": { $concatArrays: [ "$book_words", "$author_words" ] } } },
{ $match: { "search_words": { $all: [ "the", "king" ] } } },
{ $project: { "search_words": 0} }
],
{ collation: { locale: "en", strength: 2 } }).pretty()
Notice the collation option is applied to the aggregation. Also, the aggregation $match stage is now using all lowercase text.
Here is the output...
{
"_id" : ObjectId("60d6139a9148371ae7d2b343"),
"book" : "The Stand",
"author" : "Stephen King"
}
{
"_id" : ObjectId("60d6139a9148371ae7d2b344"),
"book" : "The Dead Zone",
"author" : "Stephen King"
}
Beware
use of regular expressions with collation options will probably not work as expected, at least from an index strategy point of view. In my example I am not using any regular expressions ($regex), and as such it works as expected. But again, this is for exact matches, not partial matches (a.k.a. range queries) such as "Starts with 'ki*'"
MongoDB Atlas Search
If using MongoDB Atlas the use of Atlas Search solves this problem directly, with the exception of common words such as 'the' are omitted.
Related
I have a Mongo collection that contains data on saved searches in a Vue/Laravel app, and it contains records like the following:
{
"_id" : ObjectId("6202f3357a02e8740039f343"),
"q" : null,
"name" : "FCA last 3 years",
"frequency" : "Daily",
"scope" : "FederalContractAwardModel",
"filters" : {
"condition" : "AND",
"rules" : [
{
"id" : "awardDate",
"operator" : "between_relative_backward",
"value" : [
"now-3.5y/d",
"now/d"
]
},
{
"id" : "subtypes.extentCompeted",
"operator" : "in",
"value" : [
"Full and Open Competition"
]
}
]
},
The problem is the value in the item in the rules array that has the decimal.
"value" : [
"now-3.5y/d",
"now/d"
]
in particular the decimal. Because of a UI error, the user was allowed to enter a decimal value, and so this needs to be fixed to remove the decimal like so.
"value" : [
"now-3y/d",
"now/d"
]
My problem is writing a Mongo query to identify these records (I'm a Mongo noob). What I need is to identify records in this collection that have an item in the filters.rules array with an item in the 'value` array that contains a decimal.
Piece of cake, right?
Here's as far as I've gotten.
myCollection.find({"filters.rules": })
but I'm not sure where to go from here.
UPDATE: After running the regex provided by #R2D2, I found that it also brings up records with a valid date string , e.g.
"rules" : [
{
"id" : "dueDate",
"operator" : "between",
"value" : [
"2018-09-10T19:04:00.000Z",
null
]
},
so what I need to do is filter out cases where the period has a double 0 on either side (i.e. 00.00). If I read the regex correctly, this part
[^\.]
is excluding characters, so I would want something like
[^00\.00]
but running this query
db.collection.find( {
"filters.rules.value": { $regex: /\.[^00\.00]*/ }
} )
still returns the same records, even though it works as expected in a regex tester. What am I missing?
To find all documents containing at least one value string with (.) , try:
db.collection.find( {
"filters.rules.value": { $regex: /\.[^\.]*/ }
} )
Or you can filter only the fields that need fix via aggregation as follow:
[direct: mongos]> db.tes.aggregate([ {$unwind:"$filters.rules"}, {$unwind:"$filters.rules.value"}, {$match:{ "filters.rules.value": {$regex: /\.[^\.]*/ } }} ,{$project:{_id:1,oldValue:"$filters.rules.value"}} ])
[
{ _id: ObjectId("6202f3357a02e8740039f343"), oldValue: 'now-3.5y/d' }
]
[direct: mongos]>
Later to update those values:
db.collection.update({
"filters.rules.value": "now-3.5y/d"
},
{
$set: {
"filters.rules.$[x].value.$": "now-3,5y/d-CORRECTED"
}
},
{
arrayFilters: [
{
"x.value": "now-3.5y/d"
}
]
})
playground
I have started using AWS Elastic Search Service and I want to search in JSON array object with partial string search along with Multiple word search.
For example I have added the three objects in an array.
[{
"_id" : "1",
"TitleKeywords" : "Game of thrones"
},
{
"_id" : "2",
"TitleKeywords" : "Baywatch"
},
{
"_id" : "3",
"TitleKeywords" : "Spider Man"
}]
Now I want to perform search on field name TitleKeywords and I want to search for partial word also search on multiple words.
Like for example, If I want to search 'Spi' character then it should results me into below JSON object.
{
"_id" : "3",
"TitleKeywords" : "Spider Man"
}
I have searched query syntax for this and found below query :
query: {
query_string: {
default_field: "TitleKeywords",
query: "*Spi*"
}
}
Also, for search keyword 'Spider M' (which is a multiple word search) it should result me into below JSON object :
{
"_id" : "3",
"TitleKeywords" : "Spider Man"
}
Now, if I want to search on multiple words then I can use below query :
query: {
match: {
"TitleKeywords": {
"query": "Spider M",
"operator": "and"
}
}
}
I want my result to be the mixture of both query which results into partial string search on multiple words.
Can anyone please help me on this ?
Thanks
I think you should consider using combination of multi-fields with NGram Tokenizer.
So you are adding ngram field to your "TitleKeywords" and querying this way:
query: {
match: {
"TitleKeywords.ngram": {
"query" : "Spider M",
"operator": "and"
}
}
}
But NGram-ing from 1 char can be ineffective so I'm not sure if this suits your needs.
db.restaurant_info.find({name:/pi/i})
Above mongodb query is returning the data from DB in the below format
{
"_id" : ObjectId("579cf26204aba69a41da82ad"),
"name" : "pizza hut",
"type" : "restaurant"
}
/* 2 */
{
"_id" : ObjectId("579cf26204aba69a41da82af"),
"name" : "Kai pi",
"type" : "restaurant"
}
/* 3 */
{
"_id" : ObjectId("579cf26404aba69a41da82c7"),
"name" : "pizza and pasta",
"type" : "restaurant"
}
/* 4 */
{
"_id" : ObjectId("579cf26504aba69a41da82d0"),
"name" : "Crispi chicken",
"type" : "restaurant"
}
/* 5 */
{
"_id" : ObjectId("579cf26504aba69a41da82d1"),
"name" : "Pita house",
"type" : "restaurant"
}
However, this query will be used for auto-population so if I use pi in the search text field, then all the recodrs start with pi should come before other records, e.g sequence I am expecting:
Pizza hut
Pizza and pasta
Pita house
Kai pi
Crispi chicken
if I modify the query with db.restaurant_info.find({name:/^pi/i}),
then it returns
Pizza hut
Pizza and pasta
Pita house
without
Kai pi
Crispi Chicken
Please guide me which query should I use to get the sequence I am expecting.
I don't know how you would do this with find(), but you could do it with aggregate().
First you'd use your regex for the $match, then you could use $project with $substring and $eq to project a field indicating whether you have a prefix match. You could then use that field to sort your results. Here is an example. I also used $toLower so that your sorting would be case insensitive.
{
$match: {
name:/pi/i
}
},
{
$project: {
name:true,
regex_match: {
$eq: [
"pi",
{ $substr: [ {$toLower: "$name"}, 0, 2 ] }
]
}
}
},
{
$sort: {regex_match:-1}
}
I want to create a small MongoDB Search Query where I want to sort the result set based exact match followed by no. of matches.
For eg. if I have following labels
Physics
11th-Physics
JEE-IIT-Physics
Physics-Physics
Then, if I search for "Physics" it should sort as
Physics
Physics-Physics
11th-Physics
JEE-IIT-Physics
Looking for the sort of "scoring" you are talking about here is an excercise in "imperfect solutions". In this case, the "best fit" here starts with "text search", and "imperfect" is the term to consider first when working with the text search capabilties of MongoDB.
MongoDB is "not" a dedicated "text search" product, nor is it ( like most databases ) trying to be one. Full capabilites of "text search" is reserved for dedicated products that do that as there area of expertise. So maybe not the best fit, but "text search" is given as an option for those who can live with the limitations and don't want to implement another engine. Or Yet! At least.
With that said, let's look at what you can do with the data sample as given. First set up some data in a collection:
db.junk.insert([
{ "data": "Physics" },
{ "data": "11th-Physics" },
{ "data": "JEE-IIT-Physics" },
{ "data": "Physics-Physics" },
{ "data": "Something Unrelated" }
])
Then of course to "enable" the text search capabilties, then you need to index at least one of the fields in the document with the "text" index type:
db.junk.createIndex({ "data": "text" })
Now that is "ready to go", let's have a look at a first basic query:
db.junk.find(
{ "$text": { "$search": "\"Physics\"" } },
{ "score": { "$meta": "textScore" } }
).sort({ "score": { "$meta": "textScore" } })
That is going to give results like this:
{
"_id" : ObjectId("55af83b964876554be823f33"),
"data" : "Physics-Physics",
"score" : 1.5
}
{
"_id" : ObjectId("55af83b964876554be823f30"),
"data" : "Physics",
"score" : 1
}
{
"_id" : ObjectId("55af83b964876554be823f31"),
"data" : "11th-Physics",
"score" : 0.75
}
{
"_id" : ObjectId("55af83b964876554be823f32"),
"data" : "JEE-IIT-Physics",
"score" : 0.6666666666666666
}
So that is "close" to your desired result, but of course there is no "exact match" component. In addition, the logic here used by the text search capabilities with the $text operator means that "Physics-Physics" is the preferred match here.
This is because then engine does not recognize "non words" such as the "hyphen" in between. To it, the word "Physics" appears several times in the indexed content for the document, therefore it has a higher score.
Now the rest of your logic here depends on the application of "exact match" and what you mean by that. If you are looking for "Physics" in the string and "not" surrounded by "hyphens" or other characters then the following does not suit. But you can just match a field "value" that is "exactly" just "Physics":
db.junk.aggregate([
{ "$match": {
"$text": { "$search": "Physics" }
}},
{ "$project": {
"data": 1,
"score": {
"$add": [
{ "$meta": "textScore" },
{ "$cond": [
{ "$eq": [ "$data", "Physics" ] },
10,
0
]}
]
}
}},
{ "$sort": { "score": -1 } }
])
And that will give you a result that both looks at the "textScore" produced by the engine and then applies some math with a logical test. In this case where the "data" is exactly equal to "Physics" then we "weight" the score by an additional factor using $add:
{
"_id": ObjectId("55af83b964876554be823f30"),
"data" : "Physics",
"score" : 11
}
{
"_id" : ObjectId("55af83b964876554be823f33"),
"data" : "Physics-Physics",
"score" : 1.5
}
{
"_id" : ObjectId("55af83b964876554be823f31"),
"data" : "11th-Physics",
"score" : 0.75
}
{
"_id" : ObjectId("55af83b964876554be823f32"),
"data" : "JEE-IIT-Physics",
"score" : 0.6666666666666666
}
That is what the aggregation framework can do for you, by allowing manipulation of the returned data with additional conditions. The end result is passed to the $sort stage ( notice it is reversed in descending order ) to allow that new value to be to sorting key.
But the aggregation framework can really only deal with "exact matches" like this on strings. There is no facility at present to deal with regular expression matches or index positions in strings that return a meaningful value for projection. Not even a logical match. And the $regex operation is only used to "filter" in queries, so not of use here.
So if you were looking for something in a "phrase" thats was a bit more invovled than a "string equals" exact match, then the other option is using mapReduce.
This is another "imperfect" approach as the limitations of the mapReduce command mean that the "textScore" from such a query by the engine is "completely gone". While the actual documents will be selected correctly, the inherrent "ranking data" is not available to the engine. This is a by-product of how MongoDB "projects" the "score" into the document in the first place, and "projection" is not a feature available to mapReduce.
But you can "play with" the strings using JavaScript, as in my "imperfect" sample:
db.junk.mapReduce(
function() {
var _id = this._id,
score = 0;
delete this._id;
score += this.data.indexOf(search);
score += this.data.lastIndexOf(search);
emit({ "score": score, "id": _id }, this);
},
function() {},
{
"out": { "inline": 1 },
"query": { "$text": { "$search": "Physics" } },
"scope": { "search": "Physics" }
}
)
Which gives results like this:
{
"_id" : {
"score" : 0,
"id" : ObjectId("55af83b964876554be823f30")
},
"value" : {
"data" : "Physics"
}
},
{
"_id" : {
"score" : 8,
"id" : ObjectId("55af83b964876554be823f33")
},
"value" : {
"data" : "Physics-Physics"
}
},
{
"_id" : {
"score" : 10,
"id" : ObjectId("55af83b964876554be823f31")
},
"value" : {
"data" : "11th-Physics"
}
},
{
"_id" : {
"score" : 16,
"id" : ObjectId("55af83b964876554be823f32")
},
"value" : {
"data" : "JEE-IIT-Physics"
}
}
My own "silly little algorithm" here is basically taking both the "first" and "last" index position of the matched string here and adding them together to produce a score. It's likely not what you really want, but the point is that if you can code your logic in JavaScript, then you can throw it at the engine to produce the desired "ranking".
The only real "trick" here to remember is that the "score" must be the "preceeding" part of the grouping "key" here, and that if including the orginal document _id value then that composite key part must be renamed, otherwise the _id will take precedence of order.
This is just part of mapReduce where as an "optimization" all output "key" values are sorted in "ascending order" before being processed by the reducer. Which of course does nothing here since we are not "aggregating", but just using the JavaScript runner and document reshaping of mapReduce in general.
So the overall note is, those are the available options. None of them perfect, but you might be able to live with them or even just "accept" the default engine result.
If you want more then look at external "dedicated" text search products, which would be better suited.
Side Note: The $text searches here are preferred over $regex because they can use an index. A "non-anchored" regular expression ( without the caret ^ ) cannot use an index optimally with MongoDB. Therefore the $text searches are generally going to be a better base for finding "words" within a phrase.
One more way is using the $indexOfCp aggregation operator to get the index of matched string and then apply sort on the indexed field
Data insertion
db.junk.insert([
{ "data": "Physics" },
{ "data": "11th-Physics" },
{ "data": "JEE-IIT-Physics" },
{ "data": "Physics-Physics" },
{ "data": "Something Unrelated" }
])
Query
const data = "Physics";
db.junk.aggregate([
{ "$match": { "data": { "$regex": data, "$options": "i" }}},
{ "$addFields": { "score": { "$indexOfCP": [{ "$toLower": "$data" }, { "$toLower": data }]}}},
{ "$sort": { "score": 1 }}
])
Here you can test the output
[
{
"_id": ObjectId("5a934e000102030405000000"),
"data": "Physics",
"score": 0
},
{
"_id": ObjectId("5a934e000102030405000003"),
"data": "Physics-Physics",
"score": 0
},
{
"_id": ObjectId("5a934e000102030405000001"),
"data": "11th-Physics",
"score": 5
},
{
"_id": ObjectId("5a934e000102030405000002"),
"data": "JEE-IIT-Physics",
"score": 8
}
]
I can't figure out how to sort query results based on the "best" match.
Here's a simple example, I have a "zone" collection containing a list of city/zipcode couples.
If I search several words through the regex using the "and" keyword like that :
"db.zones.find({$or : [ {ville: /ROQUE/}, {ville: /ANTHERON/}] })"
Results won't be ordered by "best match".
What other solutions do I have for that ?
You could try to use http://docs.mongodb.org/manual/reference/operator/query/text/#match-any-of-the-search-terms
db.zones.ensureIndex( { 'ville' : 'text' } ,{ score: {$meta:'textScore'}})
db.zones.find(
{ $text: { $search: "ROQUE ANTHERON"}},
{ score: { $meta: "textScore" } }
).sort( { score: { $meta: "textScore" } } )
Result:
{
"_id" : ObjectId("547c2473371ea419f07b954c"),
"ville" : "ANTHERON",
"score" : 1.1
}
{
"_id" : ObjectId("547c246f371ea419f07b954b"),
"ville" : "ROQUE",
"score" : 1
}
From documentation
If the search string is a space-delimited string, $text operator
performs a logical OR search on each term and returns documents that
contains any of the terms.
You have to use mongodb 2.6
I ended up using ElasticSearch search engine do this query :
#zones = Zone.es.search(
body: {
query: {
bool: {
should: [
{match: {city: search}},
{match: {zipcode: search.to_i}}
]
}
},
size: limit
})
Where search is a search param sent by view.
ElasticSearch with Selectize plugin