models.py:
class Address(models.Model):
text = models.TextField(max_length=2060, null=True, blank=True, default=None, unique=True)
class Tag(models.Model):
text = models.CharField(max_length=255, null=True, blank=True, default=None, unique=True)
class AddressTagJoin(models.Model):
address = models.ForeignKey(Address, on_delete=models.CASCADE, null=True, blank=True, related_name='address_tag_join')
tag = models.ForeignKey(Tag, on_delete=models.CASCADE, null=True, blank=True, related_name='address_tag_join')
In above, Address and Tag objects are only used as AddressTagJoin's foreignkey target.
What I want to do is two kind of queryset..
When I got address "https://www.google.com", I want to get Tag queryset ordered by most used for Address (text = "www.google.com")
Tag.objects.order_by(count_of_AddressTagJoin_and_It's_address_foreignkey_is_for_"www.google.com")
In reverse, I got tag "google", I want to get Address queryset ordered by most how many used for Tag (text="google")
Address.objects.order_by(count_of_AddressTagJoin_and_It's_tag_foreignkey_is_for_"google")
How can I do that?
from what I understood, you require:
"For the address "google.com" most used tags in order"
By taking an example I'll reach to the query.
There is this table AddressTagJoin:
address__text | tag__id
"google.com" | 1
"google.com" | 2
"google.com" | 1
"yahoo.com" | 2
"google.com" | 3
"google.com" | 3
"google.com" | 3
If we filter AddressTagJoin based on address "google.com" and then group this based on tag__id to get the tag counts(for the address most used tags), ordering it we get:
tag__id | tag_count
3 | 3
1 | 2
2 | 1
The desired result which you want is:
tags --> 3, 1, 2
Query for this will be:
from django.db.models import Count
tags_list = list(
AddressTagJoin.objects.filter(address__text__icontains="www.google.com")
.values('tag__id')
.annotate(tag_count=Count('tag__id'))
.order_by('-tag_count')
.values_list('tag__id', flag=True)
)
tags = Tag.objects.filter(id__in=tags_list)
Note
Please check the query there might be little adjustments required. This will give you an idea for the second query, both are almost same.
Also, If you want to optimize this query you can use select_related in the tag_list query. You can refer to the docs here
PS: I haven't implemented the models to check the query because of time constraints.
Related
The output could look like this, for example:
id
secondary_id
fk
1
1
1
2
2
1
3
3
1
4
1
2
5
2
2
For context:
(see models below)
I have a commission structure which will have brackets depending on how much a user is earning in a month.
Ideally, I need to know in my Commission Bracket model, the bracket index for a given structure.
Here are my models.
class CommissionStructure(APIBaseModel):
advisor = models.ManyToManyField(AdviserDetail)
name = models.CharField(max_length=20, blank=True, null=True, default='default')
company = models.ForeignKey(Company, on_delete=models.CASCADE)
start_dt = models.DateTimeField(auto_now_add=True)
end_dt = models.DateTimeField(default=timezone.datetime.max)
objects = CommissionStructureManager()
class CommissionBracket(APIBaseModel):
<secondary_id ???>
commission_structure = models.ForeignKey(CommissionStructure, on_delete=models.CASCADE, related_name="brackets")
lower_bound = models.DecimalField(decimal_places=2, default=0.00, max_digits=20, null=True, blank=True)
upper_bound = models.DecimalField(decimal_places=2, default=0.00, max_digits=20, null=True, blank=True)
Please note, I may not have to store it on my model if I can add an annotation to an aggregate set, but my preference is to follow DRY.
Thank you
My suggestion would be to execute custom SQL directly. You can add the secondary id as an integer field in CommissionBracket. Then, you can implement this:
from django.db import connection
def sample_view(request):
...
with connection.cursor() as cursor:
cursor.execute('''
INSERT INTO appname_commissionbracket (
secondary_id,
commission_structure_id
)
SELECT CASE
WHEN MAX(secondary_id)
THEN MAX(secondary_id) + 1
ELSE 1
END AS new_secid, %s
FROM appname_commissionbracket
WHERE commission_structure_id = %s''',
[1, 1] # Sample foreign key value
)
return render(...)
Here we're using INSERT INTO SELECT since we're basing the new record's secondary_id from the same table. We're also adding a CASE so that we can have a fallback value if no record with commission_structure_id value as 1 is returned.
In case you need to populate other columns during create, you can simply include them like so:
INSERT INTO (secondary_id, commission_structure_id, lower_bound, upper_bound)
SELECT CASE ... END AS new_secid, <fk_value>, <lower_bound_value>, <upper_bound_value>
I've found a way to annotate the queryset, but for interest, my original question still remains: how do I add another field partitioned by the foreign key?
brackets = CommissionBracket.objects.select_related("commission_structure")\
.prefetch_related(
'commission_structure__advisor',
'commission_structure__start_dt__gte',
'commission_structure__end_dt__lte',
'commission_structure__company',
'bracket_values'
).filter(
commission_structure__advisor=advisor,
commission_structure__start_dt__lte=date,
commission_structure__end_dt__gte=date,
commission_structure__company=advisor.user.company,
).annotate(index=Window(
expression=Count('id'),
partition_by="commission_structure",
order_by=F("lower_bound").asc()))
Consider a simple User and Content models setup. I would like to get the distribution of content per user, including 0 for users without content:
per_user | count
----------+-------
0 | 89
1 | 15
2 | 14
For the sake of this question the barebone models are:
class User(models.Model):
id = models.UUIDField(primary_key=True, default=uuid.uuid4, editable=False)
class Content(models.Model):
user = models.ForeignKey(User, on_delete=models.PROTECT)
One way to do this in pure SQL is:
SELECT
per_user,
count(per_user) count
FROM (
SELECT COUNT(c.id) per_user
FROM app_user u
LEFT JOIN app_content c ON (c.user_id = u.id)
GROUP BY u.id
) AS sub
GROUP BY
per_user
ORDER BY
per_user DESC;
I can do this to get the per_user count:
User.objects.annotate(per_user=Count("content")).values("per_user")
Unfortunately I cannot stick another .annotate(c=Count("per_user")) at the end of this:
FieldError: Cannot compute Count('per_user'): 'per_user' is an aggregate
How i can return all relationships on recursive table on django
Structure(model):
class Category(models.Model):
name = models.CharField(max_length=100)
details = models.CharField(max_length=100)
state = models.IntegerField(default=1,choices=estado_choices,)
parent = models.ForeignKey('self', blank=True, null=True, related_name='category', db_index=False)
I would like return like this on template:
_______________________________________________
# |Category |name |description|
________________________________________________
1 | Principal |Example |example 3 |
2 | Subprincipal |subprincipal |example 3 |
3 | Subprincipal 2 |subprincipal 2| example3
i dont know how return this relationship.. please someone idea..!!
Rather that implementing a hierarchical category model of your own. Build on what others have done! There is a library called django-mptt that works very well for this. The documentation will tell you all you need to know about getting a recursive results from your categories.
In a few weeks I want to start building a "datawarehouse" based on django. The database should be filled with data which can be connected to a location. For example population which is connected to country or city, or the anual rainfall or temperature. The parameters are not yet defined and will change over time but they will in general have a quantity, timeperiod (for example anual) and unit (so in the example: population of country X in year Y).
My idea was to have a selfreferencing table in the database named locations in which there would be continents, countries, regions and cities. An example:
ID | parent_id | name
1 | null | Europe
2 | 1 | France
3 | 2 | Paris
I would than have a table which would connect data to a location like such:
ID | location_id | parameter_id | from_date | to_date | quantity
1 | 3 | 1 | 01-01-2000 | 31-01-2001 | 3000000
parameters:
ID | name | unit
1 | population | people
Technically I also want to couple locations to coordinates or polygons such that I can show them on a map.
Is something like this possible in (Geo)Django? I feel that GeoDjango couples a model class to a specific subject such as in this case population. However, I do not know my subjects yet..
Or should I design the database structure different altogether?
Lastly: I want to use a pgSQL with postgis database for this because it is opensource and seems most appropriate. However if I program the website locally I have SQLite, is there a way I can run a pgSQL with Postgis locally on my windows computer (which is rather slow) for development? Can I then easily push it using for example GitLab to a production location (for example amazone AWS)?
Tips and help on this subject is very much appreciated.
For hierarchical data with Django, use Django MPTT:
class Region(MPTTModel):
parent = TreeForeignKey('self', null=True, blank=True, related_name='children', db_index=True)
name = models.CharField(max_length=50, unique=True)
geom = models.MultiPolygonField(null=True, blank=True)
class Parameter(models.Model):
name = models.CharField(max_length=50, unique=True)
class RegionParameter(models.Model):
region = TreeForeignKey(Region, null=True, blank=True, related_name='children', db_index=True...)
param = models.ForeignKey(Parameter...)
from_date = models.DateField()
to_date = models.DateField()
value = models.IntegerField()
You can add the geographic data only on the leafs or to all levels in the hierarchy.
I'm using django 1.10 and have the following two models
class Post(models.Model):
title = models.CharField(max_length=500)
text = models.TextField()
class UserPost(models.Model):
user = models.ForeignKey(User, on_delete=models.CASCADE)
post = models.ForeignKey(Post, on_delete=models.CASCADE)
approved = models.BooleanField(default=False)
How do I get a list of all the posts including the 'approved' property for the logged in user if exists? So instead of multiple queries, it would be one left join query, pseudo-code:
select * from posts as p
left join user_posts as up
on up.post_id = p.post_id
and up.user_id = 2
Output
post_id | title | text | user_id | approved
1 | 'abc' | 'abc' | 2 | true
2 | 'xyz' | 'xyz' | null | null
3 | 'foo' | 'bar' | 2 | true
I created the models this way because the 'approved' property belongs to the user. Every user can approve/reject a post. The same post could be approved and rejected by other users. Should the models be setup differently?
Thanks
Update:
I'm trying to create a webpage to display all available posts and highlight the ones that the current user approved. I could just list all posts and then for each post check if the 'UserPost' table has a value, if yes get the approved property else ignore. But that means if I have 100 posts I'm making 100 + 1 calls to the db. Is it possible to do 1 call using ORM? If this is not possible, should the models be setup differently?
Then I think you need something like this:
Post.objects.all().annotate(
approved=models.Case(
models.When(userpost_set__user_id=2,
then=models.F('userpost__approved')),
default=models.Value(False),
output_field=models.BooleanField()
)
)