The target for me is a custom paragraph type that I made which allows you to embed a webform in it. I need to update the submit callback for only those forms which are added in this paragraph type.
I have used the hook to alter the form, but I can't seem to find the reference to the parent paragraph type in that hook to put the condition.
Alternatively, when I am preprocessing the paragraph, I have access to the content and in turn the webform entity, but I can't update the form settings from that function?
Edit: The ultimate goal is for me to handle the ajax submit by default method but in my custom callback function so that I want to override the response with an additional command.
I am able to do it currently, but this approach alters all the forms.
Any help would be appreciated. I have not added the code blocks here since the implementation is pretty generic, but if somebody wants to take a look at the code, let me know.
The $form_id is always in the form webform_submission_<webform_id>_<field_machine_name>_<delta>_add_form (see my example below)
So you can check if $form_id start with webform_submission_<webform_id>_<field_machine_name> like this:
function <your_module>_form_alter(&$form, $form_state, $form_id) {
if (strpos($form_id, 'webform_submission_<webform_id>_<field_machine_name>') === 0) {
// Your logic
}
}
Related
I am using APEX 20.2.0.00.20. apex.region(region_static_id).widget() method should return a jQuery object according to the documentation. I am trying to figure out how to know what the object's properties and methods are, especially when they are not mentioned in the documentation. I tried running apex.region(calendar_region_static_id).widget() to return the object and inspect what properties and methods it has but I got S.fn.init [div#CAL_calendar.fc.ui-widget.fc-ltr, prevObject: S.fn.init(1)] 0: div#CAL_calendar.fc.ui-widget.fc-ltr length: 1 prevObject: S.fn.init [document] __proto__: Object(0)
I did not get the object. I do not know what s.fn.init or the rest of the returned code is?!
I see code like apex.region("calendar_static_id").widget().fullCalendar("getView"), so I assumed I should have gotten the jQuery object which has the "fullCalendar" method and more when I ran apex.region(calendar_region_static_id).widget(), but I have not.
Is this not the right way to inspect a jQuery object's properties and methods?
APEX integrates the FullCalendar widget, but it doesn't duplicate its documentation. Have a look here for a list of the FullCalendar methods and options.
In general, most (interactive) APEX regions are implemented as jQuery UI widgets. That means you can use them like this:
$('selector').widgetName('methodName'); //invokes said method
$('selector').widgetName('methodName', 'param1'); //invokes said method with a parameter
$('selector').widgetName('option', 'optionName'); //gets a specific option
$('selector').widgetName('option', 'optionName', 'newVal'); //sets a specific option
What's more, you can inspect all available options by running:
$('selector').widgetName('option');
And even have a look at the internal object, see all methods, public and otherwise, via:
$('selector').widgetName('instance');
Moreover, via its region interface, APEX offers an even easier way to reach those methods and options, even without having to know a region's widgetName:
// this
$('widgetSelector', 'staticId').widgetName('methodName');
// is equivalent to
apex.region('staticId').widget().widgetName('methodName');
// is quivalent to
apex.region('staticId').call('methodName');
The last way is the shortest and doesn't require knowing the real widget's id or widget name.
All of this helps when dealing with regular APEX widgets, such as the Interactive Grid.
apex.region('emp').call('instance'); //inspects all methods
apex.region('emp').call('option'); //inspects all options
This however does not work on the FullCalendar region, for reasons that are beyond me. It should help you navigate all other APEX regions, but for the FullCalendar you'll have to resort to their API docs.
Hope this helps a bit.
I have $dinetype variable obtained from the user.
But I would like to give response based on what value has been set in $dinetype variable. In addition to giving responses, I also need to set relevant context. How do I do this in DialogFlow?
if($Dinetype=='dineout')
ask ('which restaurant would you like to go to?')
set_context ('awaiting-restaurant')
if($Dinetype=='takeaway')
ask ('When would you like to take away?')
set_context ('awaiting-takeaway-time')
Is it programmable at all? Or is it possible to achieve something equivalent to the above in the UI?
Edit: A much easier way has been added to handle this issue directly in Dialogflow
(Updated Solution) Follow-up Intents:
After creating an intent, you can add follow-up intents now.
Intents -> Create Intent >
[Response=Prompt For Conditional Response]
Intents -> Add Follow-up Intent -> Custom/Yes/No
Then set the training praise to a matching entity you want to conditionally respond to
OLD HACKY SOLUTION:
Late reply, but maybe someone will find this useful.
If the conditional response only needs to reference a single parameter
value, then I figured out what you can do is utilize the Entity's
"Reference Value" as the response you want to give for a particular
set of Synonyms.
So you'd have an entity that looked like this:
Then, setup your intent like this, with a response of $Dinetype:
Then the end result will look like this:
And you can make whatever follow-up intent you need from there.
Down-side is Dinetype won't be as reusable. But I still think it
beats writing a fulfillment webhook every time you need a simple
conditional response.
You can't do this in the Response section directly. The Response section is meant for fairly simple responses that don't require significant logic to process. Although you can use parameters in the response, you can't give a different response based on the value of the parameter. So you can set a response to something like
I think $Dinetype is great food.
but not
{{#if $Dinetype == "Thai"}}I think Thai food is too hot{{/if}}
or anything like that
However, you can add code that sends conditional responses and contexts by implementing a Fulfillment webhook. Although you can't do this for each Intent as part of the Intent editor screen, the Fulfillment screen includes a built-in code editor.
I found a solution to my similar problem using composite entities, which may or may not be overkill for your agent. The value assigned to a parameter associated with the (composite) entity will contain a JSON structure, if a synonym in that entity was matched.
Using the "Dot" notation, you can assign the matched sub-entity's property (similar to the reference value of a normal entity) to another parameter in the Actions and Parameters section. You can have one parameter for each sub-entity and hence, you can evaluate these parameters in your response section to select each response variants:
$Parameter_A ResponseA
$Parameter_B ResonseB
....
etc.
Clunky but works. Just have to be careful to reference the property exactly as it is defined in the composite entity.
The title of the questions pretty much describes what I need to do. It is basically the same as this question, which never received an answer:
Rails 4: get list of permitted attributes (strong parameters) from a controller
Similar to the example provided in that question, it would be the equivalent to something like this, if it existed:
account_update_permitted_params = AccountController.permitted_params(:update)
You basically can't do that due to the nature of strong parameters.
What you define in some_resource_attributes is meant to filter parameters hash of the request. If you look at the method definition, you will see params.require(:some_resource).permit.. - it operates on the params object, which is only present during a request.
So having such method seems to be of very little use.
If you really want to programatically access your whitelisted attributes in the some_resource_attributes, you can go with:
class ResourceController < ApplicationController
LIST = %i(foo bar baz)
private
def resource_attributes
params.require(:resource).permit(*LIST)
end
end
ResourceController::LIST
#=> [:foo, :bar, :baz]
But I dot see a point in this since you can just open controller's code and check it.
I'm just starting out with ColdFusion OOP and I am wanting to make a DIV which shows different links to users depending on what page they are on and what login rights (role) they have. Basically a 'context' menu.
Should I put this toolbar/navigation DIV in a .cfm or .cfc file?
To reiterate; The cfm or cfc file needs to know what page the user is on and will also check what role they have. Depending on these two pieces of information it will display a set of links to the user. The role information comes from the database and stored in a SESSION variable, and to find out what page they are on I guess it could use #GetFileFromPath(GetBaseTemplatePath())#.
My first thought was to have a normal .cfm file, put all the presentation and logic in that file (the HTML and lots of <cfif> statements) to ensure the correct information is displayed in the DIV, and then use <cfinclude> to display it on the page. Then I started thinking maybe I should make a Custom Tag and ask the calling page to pass in the user's credentials and the #GetFileFromPath(GetBaseTemplatePath())# as arguments and then have that Custom Tag return all the presentational data.
Finally I guess a CFC could do the above as well, but I'd be breaking the 'rule' of having presentational and logic data in a CFC.
Any suggestions on the best practice to achieve what I'm trying to do? It will eventually serve thousands of customers so I need to make sure my solution is easy to scale.
Anything that outputs HTML to the screen should be in a .cfm file.
That being said, depending on your need, you could have methods in a CFC that generate HTML, but the method simply returns the HTML as a string.
In programming, there are very few absolutes, but here is one: You should NEVER directly output anything inside of a function or method by using output="true". Instead, whatever content is generated, it should be returned from the method.
If you will have a need to use this display element more than once, a custom tag might be the best way to go rather than an include.
I see security as being a combination of what menu items I can see and what pages can be ran.
The main security function is inside of the main session object
On the menus
I call a function called
if (session.objState.checkSecurity(Section, Item) == 1)
then ...
For page security
function setupRequest() {
...
if (session.objState.checkSecurity(getSection(), getItem()) == 0) {
location("#request.self#?message=LoginExpired", "no");
return;
}
...
}
The particulars of what checkSecurity can do varies from application to application, but it is tied into how FW/1 works. The following security variations exist:
session.objState.checkSecurity(getSection())
session.objState.checkSecurity(getSection(), getItem())
session.objState.checkSecurity(getSection(), getItem(), Identifier)
None of the presentation files know anything about security.
Rules by which I live:) :
No CF business logic in CFM files. Just use some service which will serve template and provide needed data.
navService = com.foobar.services.Navigation(form, url);
and later output #navService.GetNavConent()#
No direct output from CFC files, functions should always return content. For example, make one function which makes one link based on some logic, second which wraps that and returns to cfm template.
Also one more hint, avoid using application and session scopes in your services.
This makes refactoring, testing and debugging too difficult.
For session you can make session.currentUser , CurrentUser.cfc which provides all things you need. e.g. session.currentUser.isAuthorized("backend/administration") and if true, show link to backend/administration.
Same for application, if you need locale, applicaiton wide setting or some singleton, make application.applicationSettings, ApplicationSettings.cfc and use that to retrieve all info you need in cfc's.
These rules will make your application to be easier to test and debug, and really easy to migrate tomorrow on some javascript based UI like Angular or backbone.js since all th edata you need is already in CFC and theoretically you just need to put remote in CFC or make some remote facade in the middle and you're done.
I been trying to compare some values in handlebars if statement {{#if value == 'otherValue'}}, obviously unsuccessfully because handlebars do not like this and expecting a string, boolean, or function name. Well that would be ok, but then I tried to pass parameter in the function like you can do with {{action}} helper, and well that didn't workout either, got this in console
Error: assertion failed: You must pass exactly one argument to the if helper
So then I decided to do this in a View, even so ember js guides points that accessing template values in-scope is unusual and they provide only poor paragraph with no examples.
http://emberjs.com/guides/understanding-ember/the-view-layer/#toc_accessing-template-variables-from-views
So when I tried to do this, I got a problem of accessing those variables, I tried this way this.get('controller.templateVariables') and via full path to View, but value was either undefined or .get() wasn't exists as a method.
So at this moment I decided to save variable in the DOM data property, but turns out this {{#view App.TabsView data-title="{{tab}}"}} is going to literately give me a string {{tab}} when I try to access it from View with this.get('data-title').
The only way left to me was to insert additional element inside view and store variable there, and afterwards access it with jQuery class selector. but element is not yet exist in the DOM at the time of isVisible function gets executed, so I have no access to values at that time. That explains why this.get('element') was returning null.
Similar examples on ember js mostly ends up with something like if (someLogic) {}, but how I can do any logic when there is no variables available to me.
Question
To simplify my question - is there a way how I can do such a thing in ember js? Simple as
// have objects stored in controller
var obj = [{title:'Tab1'}, {title:'Tab2'}, {title:'Tab3'}];
// loop via them in the DOM
obj.forEach(function(tab) {
// do this kind of comparison
if( tab.title == currentTab() ) {
// do something here
}
});
If that is not possible, then what would be the other way to achieve similar functionality?
You can write a handlerbar helper to do this
{{activeTab tab}}
Handlebars.registerHelper('activeTab', function(tab) {
})
See a question about the same issue
Active Tab
Or look at existing helpers to write your own
Bind Helper
Template Helper
I think the best way for me to demonstrate this is with a heavily commented JSFiddle that I've put together for you: http://jsfiddle.net/PbLnm/
Please ask any questions below if you're not sure about anything.
The main part which determines when to add the active class is in the computed property:
// Determine if the object we have for this view is the same as the activeTab's object. If it is the same, then this view is the current active tab.
active: function() {
return Boolean(this.get('parentView.activeTab') == this.get('tab'));
}.property('parentView.activeTab')