I tried to capture the second match from given text i.e,
hash=e1467eb30743fb0a180ed141a26c58f7&token=a62ef9cf-2b4e-4a99-9335-267b6224b991:IO:OPCA:117804471:OPI:false:en:opsdr:117804471&providerId=paytm
In the above text, I want to capture the second number with the length of 9 (117804471).
I tried following, but it didn't work; so please help me resolving in this.
https://regex101.com/r/vBJceR/1
You can use
^(?:.*?\K\b[0-9]{9}\b){2}
See the regex demo.
Details:
^ - start of string
(?: - start of a non-capturing group:
.*? - any zero or more chars other than line break chars (as few as possible) followed with
\K - match reset operator discarding text matched so far
\b[0-9]{9}\b - a 9-digit number as a whole word
){2} - two occurrences of the pattern sequence defined above.
Related
I have this kind of text:
other text opt1 opt2 opt3 I_want_only_this_text because_of_this
And am using this regex:
(?<=opt1|opt2|opt3).*?(?=because_of_this)
Which returns me:
opt2 opt3 I_want_only_this_text
However, I want to match only "I_want_only_this_text".
What is the best way to achieve this?
I don't know in what order the opt's will appear and they are only examples. Actual words will be different and there will be more of them.
Test screenshot
Actual data:
regex
(?<=※|を|備考|町|品は|。).*(?=のお届けとなります|でお届けします|にてお届け致します|にてお届けいたします)
text
こだわり豚には通常の豚よりビタミンB1が2倍以上あります。私たちの育てた愛情たっぷりのこだわり豚をぜひ召し上がってください。商品説明名称えびの産こだわり豚切落し産地宮崎県えびの市内容量500g×8パック合計4kg賞味期限90日保存方法-15℃以下で保存すること提供者株式会社さつま屋産業備考・本お礼品は冷凍でのお届けとなります
what I want to get:
冷凍で
You can use
(?<=※|を|備考|町|品は|。)(?:(?!※|を|備考|町|品は|。).)*?(?=のお届けとなります|でお届けします|にてお届け致します|にてお届けいたします)
See the regex demo. The scheme is the same as in (?<=opt1|opt2|opt3)(?:(?!opt1|opt2|opt3).)*?(?=because_of_this) (see demo).
The tempered greedy token solution allows you to match multiple occurrences of the same pattern in a longer string.
Details
(?<=※|を|備考|町|品は|。) - a positive lookbehind that matches a location that is immediately preceded with one of the alternatives listed in the lookbehind
(?:(?!※|を|備考|町|品は|。).)*? - any char other than a line break char, zero or more but as few as possible occurrences, that is not a starting point of any of the alternative patterns in the negative lookahead
(?=のお届けとなります|でお届けします|にてお届け致します|にてお届けいたします) - a positive lookahead that requires one of the alternative patterns to appear immediately to the right of the current location.
You could add a negative lookahead (?!\s*opt\d) to assert that there is no opt and a digit to the right. You can use a character class to list the digits 1, 2 and 3 instead of using the alternation with |.
(?<=\bopt[123]\s(?!\s*opt\d)).*?(?=\s*\bbecause_of_this\b)
Regex demo
It might be a bit more efficient to use a match with a capture group:
\bopt[123]\s(?!\s*opt\d)(.*?)\s*\bbecause_of_this\b
Regex demo
What about:
.*\bopt[123]\b\s*(.*?)\s*because_of_this\b
See the online demo.
.* - A greedy match of any character other than newline upto the last occurence of:
\bopt[123]\b - A word boundary followed by literally "opt" with a trailing number 1, 2 or 3 and another word boundary.
\s* - 0+ whitespace characters.
(.*?) - A 1st capture group with a lazy match of 0+ characters upto:
\s* - 0+ whitespace characters.
because_of_this\b - Literally "because_of_this" followed by a word-boundary.
If you need to have this written out in alternations:
.*\b(?:opt1|opt2|opt3)\b\s*(.*?)\s*because_of_this\b
See that demo.
I've stumbled upon a regex question.
How to validate a subtract equation like this?
A string subtract another string equals to whatever remains(all the terms are just plain strings, not sets. So ab and ba are different strings).
Pass
abc-b=ac
abcde-cd=abe
ab-a=b
abcde-a=bcde
abcde-cde=ab
Fail
abc-a=c
abcde-bd=ace
abc-cd=ab
abcde-a=cde
abc-abc=
abc-=abc
Here's what I tried and you may play around with it
https://regex101.com/r/lTWUCY/1/
Disclaimer: I see that some of the comments were deleted. So let me start by saying that, though short (in terms of code-golf), the following answer is not the most efficient in terms of steps involved. Though, looking at the nature of the question and its "puzzle" aspect, it will probably do fine. For a more efficient answer, I'd like to redirect you to this answer.
Here is my attempt:
^(.*)(.+)(.*)-\2=(?=.)\1\3$
See the online demo
^ - Start line anchor.
(.*) - A 1st capture group with 0+ non-newline characters right upto;
(.+) - A 2nd capture group with 1+ non-newline characters right upto;
(.*) - A 3rd capture group with 0+ non-newline characters right upto;
-\2= - An hyphen followed by a backreference to our 2nd capture group and a literal "=".
(?=.) - A positive lookahead to assert position is followed by at least a single character other than newline.
\1\3 - A backreference to what was captured in both the 1st and 3rd capture group.
$ - End line anchor.
EDIT:
I guess a bit more restrictive could be:
^([a-z]*)([a-z]+)((?1))-\2=(?=.)\1\3$
You may use this more efficient regex with a lookahead at the start with a capture group that matches text on the right hand side of - i.e. substring between - and = and captures it in group #1. Then in the main body of regex we just check presence of capture group #1 and capture text before and after \1 in 2 separate groups.
^(?=[^-]+-([^=]+)=.)([^-]*?)\1([^-]*)-[^=]+=\2\3$
RegEx Demo
RegEx Demo:
^: Start
(?=[^-]+-([^=]+)=.): Lookahead to make sure we have expression structure of pqr-pq=r and also more importantly capture substring between - and = in capture group #1. . after = is there for a reason to disallow any empty string after =.
([^-]*?): Match 0 or more non-- characters in capture group #2
\1: Back-reference to group #1 to make sure we match same value as in capture group #1
([^-]*): Match 0 or more non-- characters in capture group #3
-: Match a -
[^=]+: Match 0 or more non-= characters
=: Match a =
\2\3: Back-reference to group #2 and #3 which is difference of substraction
$: End
I have the following template :
1251 Left Random Text I want to fill
It can go through multiple lines
As you can see
9841 Right Again we see a lot of random text with 3115 numbers
And this also goes
To multiple lines
0121 Right
5151 Right This one is just one line
I was wrong
9731 Left This one is just a line
5123 NA Instruction 5151 was wrong
4113 Right Instr 9841 was correct
We checked
I want to have 3 groups:
1251
Left
Random Text I want to fill
It can go through multiple lines
As you can see
I'm using
(\d+)\s(\w+)\s(.*)
but it stops at the current line only (so I get only Random Text I want to fill in group 3, although I want including As you can see)
If I'm using Single line flag I get only 1 match for each group, group 3 almost being all
Here is live : https://regex101.com/r/W3x0mH/4
You could use a repeating group matching all the lines while asserting that the next line does not start wit 1+ digits followed by Left or Right:
(\d+)\s(\w+)\s(.*(?:\r?\n(?!\d).*)*)
Explanation
(\d+)\s(\w+)\s Match the first 2 groups
(Third capturing group
.* Match 0+ times any char except a newline
(?: Non capturing group
\r?\n(?!\d).* Match newline, assert what is on the right is not a digit
)* Close non capturing group and repeat 0+ times
) Close capturing group
Regex demo
You may use this regex with a lookahead:
^(\d+)\s(\w+)\s(.*?)(?=\n\d|\z)
with DOTALL and MULTILINE modifiers.
Updated Regex Demo
RegEx Details:
^: Line start
(\d+): Match and capture 1+ digits in group #1
\s: match a whitespace
(\w+): Match and capture 1+ word characters in group #2
\s: match a whitespace
(.*?): Match 0 or more of any character (non-greedy) provided next lookahead assertion is satiSfied
(?=\n\d|\z): Lookahead assertion to assert that we have a newline followed by a digit or there is end of input
Faster Regex:
If you are using this regex on a long string then you should also keep overall performance in mind as a regex with DOTALL modifier will tend to get slow on a large size text. For that I suggest using this regex that doesn't need DOTALL modifier:
^(\d+)\s(\w+)\s(.*(?:\n.*)*?)(?=\n\d|\z)
RegEx Demo 2
On regex101 demo this regex takes just 181 steps as compared to first one that takes 1300 steps.
For the third group, repeat any character while using negative lookahead for ^\d, which would indicate the start of a new match:
(\d+)\s(\w+)\s((?:(?!^\d)[\s\S])*)
https://regex101.com/r/W3x0mH/5
You may try with this regex:
^(\d+)\s+(\w+)\s+(.*?)(?=^\d|\z)
^(\d+)\s+ , ^\d+ Line begins with numbers followed by one or more whitespace character \s+
(\w+)\s+ where \w+ one or more characters (left,right,na or something else) followed by one or more whitespace \w+
(.*?) matches everything until it finds a line beginning with number or \z end of string.
I think it fits your requirement....
Regex101
I have the below string
abc-12d-ef-oy-5678-xyz--**--20190120075439322am--**--ghi-66d-ef-oy-8877-sdf--**--sfdfdsgfg--**--20190120075765487am
It is kind of multi character delimited string, delimited by '--**--' I am trying to extract the first and second words which has the -oy- tag in it. This is a column in a table. I am using the regex_extract method but i am not able extract the string which contains a string and ends with a string.
Here is one pattern that i tried .*(.*oy.*)--
If the -oy- can not be at the start or at the end, you could use this pattern to match the 2 hyphen delimited strings with -oy-:
[a-z0-9]+(?:-[a-z0-9]+)*-oy(?:-[a-z0-9]+)+
Regex details
[a-z0-9]+ Match 1+ times a-z0-9
(?: Non capturing group
-[a-z0-9]+ Match - and 1+ times a-z0-9
)* Close group and repeat 0+ times
-oy Match literally
(?:-[a-z0-9]+)+ Repeat 1+ times a group which will match - and 1+ times a-z0-9
You can extend the character class [A-Za-z0-9] to allow what you want to match like uppercase chars.
Regex demo | Java demo
If the matches should be between delimiters, you could use a positive lookbehind and positive lookahead and an alternation:
(?<=^|--\\*\\*--)[a-z0-9]+(?:-[a-z0-9]+)*-oy(?:-[a-z0-9]+)+(?=--\\*\\*--|$)
See a Java demo
You can use this regex which will match string containing -oy- and capture them in group1 and group2.
^.*?(\w+(?:-\w+)*-oy-\w+(?:-\w+)*).*?(\w+(?:-\w+)*-oy-\w+(?:-\w+)*)
This regex basically matches two strings delimiter separated containing -oy- using this (\w+(?:-\w+)*-oy-\w+(?:-\w+)*) to capture the text.
Demo
Are you able to select values from capture groups?
(?:--\*\*--|^)(.*?-oy-.*?)(?:--\*\*--|$)
?: - Non-capture group, matches the delimiter, begin of line, or end of line but does not create a capture group
*? - Lazy match so you only grab the contents of the field
https://regex101.com/r/aUAvcx/1
--- Second stab at this follows ---
This is convoluted. Hopefully you can use Lookahead and Lookbehind. The last problem I had was the final record was being "Greedy" and sucking up the field before it too. So I had to add an exclusion in the capture group for your delimiter.
See if this works for you.
(?<=--\*\*--|^)((?:(?:(?!--\*\*--).)*)-oy-(?:(?:(?!--\*\*--).)*))(?=--\*\*--|$)
https://regex101.com/r/aUAvcx/3
Basically the (?: are so we are not getting too many capture groups to work with.
There are three parts to this:
The lookbehind - Make sure the field is framed by the delimiter (or start of line)
The capture group - Grab the contents of the field, making sure a delimiter isn't sucked up into it
The lookahead - Make sure the field is framed by the delimiter (or end of line)
As far as the capture group goes, I check the left and right side of the -oy- to make sure the delimiter isn't there.
There is a text like this (many lines)
1. sdfsdf werwe werwemax45 rwrwerwr
2. 34348878 max max44444445666 sdf
3. 4353424 23423eedf max55 dfdg dfgdf
4. max45
5. 4324234234sdfsdf maxx34534
Using regular expressions I need to find all lines and include a word max<digits> (containing digits instead of literally <digits>) into a matching group.
So I've tried this regular expression:
^.*?\b(max\d+)\b.*?$
But it finds only lines containing max... and ignores others.
Then I’ve tried
^.*?\b(max\d+)?\b.*?$
It finds all lines but without matching group containing max....
The issue can be "debugged" with a slightly modified pattern, ^(.*?)\b(max\d+)?\b(.*?)$, with the rest of the pattern wrapped into separate capturing groups. You can see that the lines are all matched by the Group 3 pattern, the last .*?. It happens because the first .*? is skipped (since it is a lazy pattern), then (max\d=)? matches an empty string at the start of the line (none begins with max + digits - but if any line starts with that pattern, you would get it captured), and the last .*? captures the whole line.
You can fix it by wrapping the first part into a non-capturing optional group capturing the max\d+ into an obligatory capturing group
^(?:.*?\b(max\d+)\b)?.*?$
Or even without ?$ at the end since .* will match greedily up to the end of the line:
^(?:.*?\b(max\d+)\b)?.*
See the regex demo
Details
^ - start of string (with m option, start of a line)
(?:.*?\b(max\d+)\b)? - an optional non-capturing group:
.*? - any 0+ chars, other than line break chars as few as possible
\b - a word boundary
(max\d+) - Group 1 (obligatory, will be tried once): max and 1+ digits
\b - a word boundary
.* - rest of the line