I am working on my outlook plugin using C++ MAPI.
On one particular button click I want to open New Mail window for which I am following below approach. But to my surprise, IMAPIFormMgr::ResolveMessageClass() function fails. That too randomly. At times it works fine and at other times it fails. Couldn't figure out what could be the cause for the same.
Any pointer, idea?
My code flow is something like below
Note: It's not full code, just little bit of overview.
I have printed all the variables and poiters in my log fine and non of them is NULL or garbage or like.
Still it fails at ResolveMessageClass() function only. That too strangely it fails randomly. many a time it works like champ and suddenly it shows some error in ResolveMessageClass()
Code
CComPtr<IMessage> mapiMessage;
hRes = spOutboxFolder->CreateMessage(&IID_IMessage, 0, &mapiMessage);
CComPtr<IMAPIFormInfo> pFormInfo;
std::wstring szMessageClass(L"IPM.Note");
hRes = pFormMgr->ResolveMessageClass(
wstringTostring(szMessageClass).c_str(), // Message class is ALWAYS ANSI --> Never Unicode
0,
spOutboxFolder.get(),
&pFormInfo);
CComPtr<IPersistMessage> pPersistMessage;
hRes = pFormMgr->CreateForm(NULL, 0L, pFormInfo, IID_IPersistMessage, (LPVOID*)&pPersistMessage);
ULONG_PTR ul = 0;
hRes = spSession->PrepareForm(NULL, mapiMessage, &ul);
hRes = spSession->ShowForm(
NULL, //(ULONG)parent->GetSafeHwnd(),
msgStore,
spInboxFolder.get(),
NULL,
ul,
NULL,
MAPI_POST_MESSAGE,
pPropsMsg[MSG_STATUS].Value.l,
pPropsMsg[MSG_FLAGS].Value.l,
pPropsMsg[MSG_ACCESS].Value.l,
pPropsMsg[MSG_CLASS].Value.lpszA);
Thanks in advance
If your code is in an Outlook addin, why not use OOM to create and display message? In this particular case, using MAPI does not buy you anything.
Use the Outlook object model instead of Extended MAPI. Creating a COM add-in involves two major steps:
Implement the IDTExtensibility2 interface in a class module of a dynamic link library (DLL).
Register the COM add-in.
The key to understanding COM add-in development is the IDTExensibility2 interface. This interface is used by all Office applications to communicate with a COM add-in. This ensures a common initialization mechanism and an ability to pass in the application's object model so that the COM add-in can communicate with the Office application. Listing 23-1 shows the IDTExtensibility2 interface.
public interface IDTExtensibility2
{
void OnAddInsUpdate(ref System.Array custom);
void OnBeginShutdown(ref System.Array custom);
void OnConnection(object Application,
Extensibility.ext_ConnectMode ConnectMode,
object AddInInst, ref System.Array custom);
void OnDisconnection(Extensibility.ext_DisconnectMode RemoveMode,
ref System.Array custom);
void OnStartupComplete(ref System.Array custom);
}
As you can see the OnConnection method gets an instance of the host application instance. So, that is where you could start from developing your add-in.
Read more about the OOM in the Outlook object model overview section of MSDN.
Related
I am currently trying to piece together a shader-based music visualizer. The plan is to read data from the current MMDevice, which I'm trying to follow the documentation for, but I must be doing something wrong because I had to jump through all sorts of hoops to get even just the MMDeviceEnumerator to compile.
In order for the uuids of MMDeviceEnumerator and IMMDeviceEnumerator to be defined, I had to set #define WINAPI_FAMILY WINAPI_FAMILY_GAMES. This was also required for EDataFlow and ERole enumerations to be defined. My first question is if I've missed some configuration somewhere, or if this is the intended method of enabling these things.
Currently, I have the following code in an AudioStream class:
class AudioStream {
public:
AudioStream() {
//SUCCEEDING(CoInitializeEx(nullptr, COINIT_MULTITHREADED));
SUCCEEDING(CoCreateInstance(
__uuidof(IMMDeviceEnumerator),
NULL,
CLSCTX_ALL,
__uuidof(MMDeviceEnumerator),
(void**)&this->mmDeviceEnumerator));
SUCCEEDING(this->mmDeviceEnumerator->GetDefaultAudioEndpoint(
eRender,
eConsole,
&this->mmDevice));
}
private:
IAudioClient* audioClient = NULL;
IAudioCaptureClient* captureClient = NULL;
IMMDeviceEnumerator* mmDeviceEnumerator = NULL;
IMMDevice* mmDevice = NULL;
};
If you're familiar with what the DirectX 12 project template looks like, this object is being instantiated in the Sample3DSceneRenderer constructor. The main issue I'm having right now is the following two errors which are immediately raised during startup:
onecore\com\combase\dcomrem\resolver.cxx(2299)\combase.dll!75AA0DFF: (caller: 75B1CF2C) ReturnHr(1) tid(42a8) 80040154 Class not registered
onecore\com\combase\dcomrem\resolver.cxx(2507)\combase.dll!75B1CF4D: (caller: 75AA29E4) ReturnHr(2) tid(42a8) 80040154 Class not registered
This causes the entire app to hang, and the project template visualization to never appear (the succeeding macro exits). Does anyone have any idea why this is failing? It must have to be something with the CoCreateInstance call :(
You are writing a Universal Windows Platform (UWP) app because that's what the "built-in" DirectX 12 App project template creates in Visual Studio. UWPs do not have access to all the same APIs and IMMDevice is not part of the UWP API surface area.
The fact that you defined WINAPI_FAMILY_GAMES means you hacked the API Family Partition macros which will define the API in a UWP context, but it doesn't mean that API actually works from the AppContainer process that all UWPs run in.
You really have two options:
(1) If you want to write a UWP, then you will need to enumerate audio devices via the proper Windows Runtime APIs which are in the Windows::Devices::Enumeration namespace.
Assuming you are using C++/CX language extensions (instead of the more modern C++/WinRT projections), then this code works:
auto operation = DeviceInformation::FindAllAsync(DeviceClass::AudioRender);
while (operation->Status == Windows::Foundation::AsyncStatus::Started)
{
Sleep(100);
}
if (operation->Status != Windows::Foundation::AsyncStatus::Completed)
{
throw std::runtime_error("FindAllAsync");
}
DeviceInformationCollection^ devices = operation->GetResults();
for (unsigned i = 0; i < devices->Size; ++i)
{
using Windows::Devices::Enumeration::DeviceInformation;
DeviceInformation^ d = devices->GetAt(i);
// d->Id->Data();
// d->Name->Data();
}
Also, if you want to get access to the audio capture device from a UWP, you must add a capability to your manifest to request it via <DeviceCapability Name="microphone"/>. See Microsoft Docs.
You should take the time to read the Microsoft Docs on UWPs so you have a better idea of what's supported and what's not.
(2) If you want to write a Win32 desktop app, use the directx-vs-templates instead which include DirectX 12 starting templates for Win32 desktop apps (plus alternative DirectX templates for UWP if that's your thing).
Whichever appmodel you use, you may want to take a look at DirectX Tool Kit for Audio.
BTW, WINAPI_FAMILY_GAMES is used by the Microsoft GDK for Xbox which is for writing titles for Xbox One and Xbox Series X|S. It uses Win32 APIs and doesn't use Windows Runtime APIs, so it has the IMMDevice interface in it's API surface. See Microsoft Docs.
I have a com dll that gets used in a c++ project. I have not registered the dll but its in the same solution. My application continuously breaks and I found that it breaks here
hr = CoCreateInstance(rclsid, pOuter, dwClsContext, __uuidof(IUnknown), reinterpret_cast<void**>(&pIUnknown));
because I don't have a com class with that guid (rclsid). I did more digging and I found that it gets the guid from a .tlh file in a temp directory but the guid differs from my code.
.tlh file
struct __declspec(uuid("b10a18c8-7109-3f48-94d9-e48b526fc928"))
DocMapEntry;
// [ default ] interface _DocMapEntry
// interface _Object
// interface IDocMapEntry
c# code (com visable dll)
[ComVisible(true)]
[Guid("E98676B9-1965-4248-A9B6-74EC5EE5385A")]
[InterfaceType(ComInterfaceType.InterfaceIsDual)]
public interface IDocMapEntry
{
int Offset { get; set; }
int PageOffset { get; set; }
int PageNumber { get; set; }
}
I tried changing the value to the correct value but it continuously gets changed and visual studio asks me to reload.
When I look at the class using com explorer I get a different clsid, and when I try to unregister it, it completes successfully but the item is still there and the file location is mscoree.
my c++ application uses the guid in the .tlh file but doesn't find the file.
public class DocMapEntry : IDocMapEntry
{
...
}
My questions are.
Do I need to register my com dll for this to work?
how can I set the guid for the class?
Why would it create a temp .tlh file with the wrong guid? (optional)
why can't I change this file? (optional)
Thank you.
public interface IDocMapEntry
COM strongly distinguishes between a CLSID and a IID. The IID, the interface identifier, identifies an interface implemented by a COM object. We can see that one, you specified it with the [Guid] attribute. You'd pass it as the 4th argument of CoCreateInstance(), the one where you now pass the IID of IUnknown.
What you need is the CLSID, the class identifier. We can't see it in your snippet, it is the one for whatever class implements your IDocMapEntry. With some odds that it is named DocMapEntry. And additional odds that you didn't give it a [Guid] so the CLR will auto-generate one for you. Note that it will change when you modify the class, one possible reason for CoCreateObject() to fail.
Forgetting to register the .NET assembly with Regasm.exe /codebase is another reason, you stated as much in your question. This is required or COM will not be able to find the DLL and fails the call with error code 0x80040154, "Class not registered". Having it in the same solution is not sufficient, COM search rules are not anything like those used by .NET.
Also note that you are exposing the internals of the class, avoid that by applying the [ClassInterface(ClassInterfaceType.None)] attribute on the class.
No you do not have to register the COM DLL but you do need to register an object responsible for creating the COM objects. Use do this in your application by calling CoRegisterClassObject after the COM subsystem has been initialized (by calling CoInitialize or CoInitializeEx).
IClassFactory *factory = new ObjectFactory();
// Register the factory responsible for creating our COM objects
DWORD classToken;
HRESULT hr = CoRegisterClassObject(
Object_CLSIID,
factory,
CLSCTX_LOCAL_SERVER,
REGCLS_MULTIPLEUSE,
&classToken);
// Now we can create the objects
Object *obj = nullptr;
hr = CoCreateInstance(
Object_CLSIID,
nullptr,
CLSCTX_LOCAL_SERVER,
Object_IID,
reinterpret_cast<void**>(&obj));
Not sure why it's creating a temporary .tlh but I suspect it's something in your build settings - possibly in the build steps.
Is your COM object in a C# dll ? If yes, did you run regasm previously in your system, which could have registered the COM dll.
Guid("E98676B9-1965-4248-A9B6-74EC5EE5385A"): This is your interface GUID, not your component guid.
You should have a GUID declared for COM object in the implementation class, which should be b10a18c8-7109-3f48-94d9-e48b526fc928.
Why would it create a temp .tlh file with the wrong guid?
Are you sure you have not imported the COM dll using #import keyword.
I have a C++ dll which is a plug-in to ADOBE Acrobat. It needs to talk often ( to and fro) and with a fair amount of complicated data-structures to a WPF process.
Any thoughts of what might be the best way to go . Need something that is a little long term and maintainable, in other words would love some ideas around something that lets both process make what looks like methods calls and some infrastructure piece does the marshaling and dispatch . I've tried Windows messages but ran into some conflict issues on ADOBE, also not really interested in anything that causes the dll to get adobe to load the CLR. Only other things that come to my mind are named pipes or http.
Thanks in Advance
Named pipes could do but you won't get a feeling of just calling functions. Named pipe are quite low-level IPC. Other IPC options are:
Windows RPC, you definitely get a feeling of just calling functions.
What about hosting a COM object in WPF application and calling it from the Adobe plugin?
I would go with COM:
Implement an interface in WPF app
generate a typelib (e.g by using regasm)
import the typelib into C++ dll
communicate
if you need bidirectional communication, C++ dll can also implement a COM interface which is then accessed from WPF application.
This is what I have used to connect legacy C++ app with new .NET service, and it works great. The biggest issue is to find people who know COM, but fortunately this doesn't require a deep understanding of COM.
your hint with COM is very intersting. I tried to implement this concept.
I have created an interface in my WPF CallDllFromWpf3Interface project:
using System.Runtime.InteropServices;
namespace CallDllFromWpf3Interface
{
[Guid("F6E0E2E8-CCC6-487B-8BF1-261265061E6A")]
public interface SetValueInterface
{
void SetValue(int value);
}
}
Then I have generated the typelib with the regasm tool:
regasm CallDllFromWpf3Interface.exe /tlb
With the "oleview" tool I can see the typelib and the interface.
The next step was to create a c++ dll project called "CallSetValueInterface".
In my CallSetValueInterface.cpp file I wrote this lines:
#import "D:\Thomas\Programming\WPF\Basics\CallDllFromWpf\CallDllFromWpf3Interface\CallDllFromWpf3Interface\bin\Debug\CallDllFromWpf3Interface.tlb"
void
CallSetValueInterface::startAcq(void)
{
CoInitializeEx(NULL, COINIT_APARTMENTTHREADED);
CallDllFromWpf3Interface::SetValueInterfacePtr Svip("f6e0e2e8-ccc6-487b-8bf1-261265061e6a");
Svip->SetValue(55);
Svip = NULL;
CoUninitialize();
}
After a successful build of the dll project I copied "CallSetValueInterface.dll" to the "CallDllFromWpf3Interface" project.
Finally I changed my WPF code to:
#region SetValueInterface Members
public void SetValue(int value)
{
MyValue = value;
}
#endregion
[DllImport("CallSetValueInterface.dll", EntryPoint = "startAcq", ExactSpelling = true, SetLastError = true)]
public static extern void StartAcqFromDll();
private void Button_Click(object sender, RoutedEventArgs e)
{
StartAcqFromDll();
}
And when the debugger came to StartAcqFromDll() there occurred an error dialog "An unhandled exception of type 'System.Runtime.InteropServices.SEHException' occurred in CallDllFromWpf3Interface.exe".
Does anybody know whats going wrong?
Regards,
ThomasL.
I'm working on a project involving the Microsoft Unified Communications Client API; uccapi.dll. I'm also using Codegear C++Builder 2010, not Visual Studio. After registering the dll with regsvr32 and importing it as type library into C++Builder 2010, uccapi_tlb- and uccapi_ocx-files were generated. When having imported these into my new project I'm trying to follow the msdn guideline for creating a Office Communicator Client able of signing into the Office Communication server.
In this regard I have two questions:
What is the correct way of accessing the com-interfaces made available through the ocx?
I've so far found several ways of creating access points, such as.
TCOMIUccPlatform plat;
plat = CoUccPlatform::Create();
and
IUccPlatformPtr im;
im = CreateComObject(CLSID_UccPlatform);
and
IUccPlatform* pIUccPlatform;
hr = CoCreateInstance(CLSID_UccPlatform,
NULL,
CLSCTX_INPROC_SERVER,
__uuidof(IUccPlatform),
(void**)&pIUccPlatform);
and
IUccPlatformPtr pIPlat;
pIPlat.CreateInstance(__uuidof(IUccPlatform));
The three first seem to work well. The latter will give me an Assertion failed: intf!=0 error with 0×40000015 exception. Using any of the three top ones I can access methods and initialize the platform interface.
However when trying any of the same tactics to access any other interface, such as IUccContext, IUccUriManager or IUccUri, all of which have a clsid defined in the _tlb.h file, I either get a "class not registered" error in the first two cases, or a hresult failure in the third case. Which brings me to my next question.
Using ole-viewer all interfaces are registered as they should. Why wouldn't all co-creatable classes in the dll be registered when registering the dll? And what could be the reasons why don't they act similarly?
Edit1 from UCCAPILib_tlb.h:
//
// COCLASS DEFAULT INTERFACE CREATOR
// CoClass : UccPlatform
// Interface: TCOMIUccPlatform
//
typedef TCoClassCreatorT<TCOMIUccPlatform, IUccPlatform, &CLSID_UccPlatform, &IID_IUccPlatform> CoUccPlatform;
//
// COCLASS DEFAULT INTERFACE CREATOR
// CoClass : UccUriManager
// Interface: TCOMIUccUriManager
//
typedef TCoClassCreatorT<TCOMIUccUriManager, IUccUriManager, &CLSID_UccUriManager, &IID_IUccUriManager> CoUccUriManager;
This issue is already being discussed in detail in the Embarcadero forums.
guys! Very important question:
Please, look at my project (300Kb). I can`t use MFC/ATL, pure C++ only.
I have COM library (niapi.dll), but no sources/headers available, dll only.
There is class for connecting to server (NiApi::SrvrSession), class has login event handler (NiApi::SrvrSession::OnLogin).
I used
#import "NiApi.dll"
to generate wrappers/information,
then
ISrvrSessionPtr session(L"NiApi.SrvrSession");
to create object, then trying
session->put_OnLogin();
to assign events, but there is no one put_On or such member.
niapi.tlh have _ISrvrSessionEvents struct inside, but it have no relations with SrvrSession.
I need to use events from NiApi::SrvrSession for handling connection status.
Please help or my boss kill me! (sorry for broken english, I read better than speak;)
COM events are handled via connection points. You need to write your own COM object that implements whichever event interface you are interested in. Then you need to connect it to the COM object that fires the events. First you QI the COM object for its IConnectionPointContainer, then find the corresponding connection point of the GUID of the event interface. The you call its Advise method to connect it to your event sink.
class CSrvrSessionEvents: public _ISrvrSessionEvents
{
public:
HRESULT OnLogin(long LoginResult)
{
// do something
return S_OK;
}
// implement rest of _ISrvrSessionEvents
};
ISrvrSession* pSrvrSession = ...; // get ISrvrSession from somewhere
_ISrvrSessionEvents* pSrvrSessionEvents = new CSrvrSessionEvents();
IConnectionPointContainer* pCPC = NULL;
pSrvrSession->QueryInterface(IID_IConnectionPointContainer, &pCPC);
IConnectionPoint* pCP = NULL;
pCPC->FindConnectionPoint(__uuidof(_ISrvrSessionEvents), &pCP);
DWORD dwCookie = 0;
pCP->Advise(pSrvrSessionEvents, &dwCookie);
pSrvrSession->Connect(); // I assume this fires some events
pCP->Unadvise(dwCookie);
What is really necessary, is to carefully read
codeproject_TEventHandler.
All explained here.
The put_ prefix is the default prefix for the raw interface (customizable via the raw_property_prefixes attribute). Since you are not using the raw interface, use session->OnLogin=... instead.
For event handling see ADO Events Model Example (VC++)