If a List is placed along with other views within a VStack which defines one page within a TabView with PageTabViewStyle, interacting (tap, long pressing) with the other views causes all (visible) rows of the List to get highlighted.
The following View demonstrates this behaviour: tapping or long pressing the Button or the purple area (Color View) will cause the rows in the List to get highlighted (Xcode 12.1 & iOS 14.1).
struct ContentView: View {
var body: some View {
TabView {
VStack {
List {
Text("Row 0")
Text("Row 1")
Text("Row 2")
}
.listStyle(InsetGroupedListStyle())
Spacer()
Button(action: { print("tapped")}, label: { Text("Button") } )
.padding(.vertical, 80)
Spacer()
Color.purple
}
Text("Second Page")
}
.tabViewStyle(PageTabViewStyle())
}
}
I assume this is a bug and have already submitted feedback, but was wondering if there is a workaround while it's not fixed.
wondering if there is a workaround while it's not fixed.
After some investigation & testing the only workaround I see is to use scroll view instead
TabView {
VStack {
ScrollView { // << here
Text("Row 0")
Text("Row 1")
Text("Row 2")
}
Note: of course it might require some manual formatting & layout inside scroll view, but there is no such bug.
I have a list with some items.
Below the list I'd like to have to button to load more items.
(As loading all items requires some user actions like entering a TAN, this should not be done automatically when the user scrolls to the end of the list, but only if he likes to.)
What I'd like to have is a view like this:
However, if I place the List and the Button in a VStack, the Button get always displayed at the bottom of the screen, not only when I scroll to the end of the List:
struct ContentView: View {
private let items = Range(0...15).map { "Item " + String($0) }
var body: some View {
VStack {
List(items, id: \.self) { item in
Text(item)
}
HStack {
Spacer()
Button("Load more") { print("Load more items") }
Spacer()
}
}
}
}
If I add the Button to the List, the Button obviously gets displayed as a List item with a white background and without any space to the list:
struct ContentView: View {
private let items = Range(0...15).map { "Item " + String($0) }
var body: some View {
List {
ForEach(items, id: \.self) { item in
Text(item)
}
HStack {
Spacer()
Button("Load more") { print("Load more items") }
Spacer()
}
}.listStyle(GroupedListStyle())
}
}
Is there any way to add a view that becomes visible when the user scrolls to the end of the List but that is not part of the List? (Or at least looks like being below the List and not part of it?)
You should use second variant, but a bit tuned, like below (colors/spaces modify per your needs
var body: some View {
List {
ForEach(items, id: \.self) { item in
Text(item)
}
HStack {
Button("Load more") { print("Load more items") }
}
.listRowInsets(EdgeInsets())
.frame(maxWidth: .infinity, minHeight: 60)
.background(Color(UIColor.systemGroupedBackground))
}.listStyle(GroupedListStyle())
}
I'm not sure if anything changed in Beta 3, however, when trying to add the NavigationBarTitle modifier to NavigationView, it does not show the text for the title? Any ideas?
NavigationView {
List(0 ..< 20) { item in
NavigationLink(destination: Text("1")) {
Text("Navigate 1")
}
}
}.navigationBarTitle(Text("Update")).navigationBarHidden(false)
}
The list shows but no title for the list in the NavigationView
You're setting .navigationBarTitle and .navigationBarHidden on NavigationView when they should be modifiers on List instead:
NavigationView {
List(0..<20) { item in
NavigationLink(destination: Text("1")) {
Text("Navigate 1")
}
}
.navigationBarTitle("Update")
.navigationBarHidden(false)
}
You can also just remove .navigationBarHidden(false) (unless you're setting it to true in a previous view or something).
Your code works fine and the navigationBarTitle is not outdated. It must be placed above (inside the Navigation View). Yes, it is sometimes confusing, it is necessary to remember this.
To the place where you currently have it .navigationBarTitle(Text ("Update")).navigationBarHidden(false) you need to set the modifier .navigationViewStyle(StackNavigationViewStyle ()), which means that you should always show the first screen regardless of the screen size.
var body: some View {
NavigationView {
List(0 ..< 20) { item in
NavigationLink(destination: Text("1")) {
Text("Navigate 1")
}
}
.navigationBarTitle(Text("Update"), displayMode: .automatic).navigationBarHidden(false)
}
// that means only show one view at a time no matter what device I'm working
.navigationViewStyle(StackNavigationViewStyle())
}
When making a List with a row that pushes to a new view, SwiftUI adds a disclosure indicator ">" automatically? How do I remove it if I don't want it?
NavigationView {
List {
NavigationButton(destination: DetailView()) {
ListItem()
}
}
.navigationBarTitle(Text("Some title"))
}
On a UITableViewCell you set Accessory to None but how do I do that in SwiftUI?
Setting the NavigationLink width and hiding it did the trick for me
List {
ForEach(pages) { page in
HStack(spacing: 0) {
Text("Something")
NavigationLink(destination: Text("Somewhere")) {
EmptyView()
}
.frame(width: 0)
.opacity(0)
}
}
}
Swift 5, Xcode 11. ZStack works perfect.
var body: some View {
NavigationView {
List {
ForEach(viewModel.currenciesViewModel) { cellViewModel in
ZStack {
cellViewModel.makeView()
NavigationLink(destination: ChooseCurrencyListView()) {
EmptyView()
}
.buttonStyle(PlainButtonStyle())
}
}
}
.navigationBarHidden(true)
.navigationBarTitle("", displayMode: .inline)
}
}
The easiest one. The content for each item in the list.
ZStack {
NavigationLink(destination: DetailView()) {
EmptyView()
}.hidden()
RowView()
}
As workaround I can suggest to add .padding modifier like this:
NavigationView {
List {
NavigationButton(destination: DetailView()) {
ListItem()
}
}
.navigationBarTitle(Text("Some title"))
}
.padding(.trailing, -32.0)
So you will get rows without visible disclosure:
You can also put it in the .background modifier:
List {
Text("Go to...")
.background(NavigationLink("", destination: Text("Detail View")))
}
If you already have the background modifier on the Text, you can wrap the Text in a HStack and apply background to the HStack.
What you can do, if you are using list, is setting the navigationlink to hidden and its frame width to zero.
HStack{
Button(action: {self.statusShow = 1}, label: {
Image(systemName: "info.circle")
})
NavigationLink(destination: StimulatorSettingView(),
tag: 1,
selection: self.$statusShow){
EmptyView()
}.hidden().frame(width: 0)
}
This worked for me.
As of beta 6, this works well:
struct SwiftUIView: View {
var body: some View {
NavigationView {
List {
HStack {
Text("My Cell Content")
NavigationLink(destination: Text("destination"), label: {
EmptyView()
})
}
}
}
}
}
You don't have to use NavigationLink to wrap your Label directly. It will work as long as the link is anywhere in your view hierarchy.
Here I've wrapped it in a button, which allows you to trigger an action prior to pushing the view. Since the NavigationLink has an EmptyView for the label the disclosure indicator is not visible. You can also style this with ButtonStyle.
struct NavigationButton<Destination: View, Label: View>: View {
var action: () -> Void = { }
var destination: () -> Destination
var label: () -> Label
#State private var isActive: Bool = false
var body: some View {
Button(action: {
self.action()
self.isActive.toggle()
}) {
self.label()
.background(NavigationLink(destination: self.destination(), isActive: self.$isActive) {
EmptyView()
})
}
}
}
And to use it:
NavigationButton(
action: { print("tapped!") },
destination: { Text("Pushed View") },
label: { Text("Tap me") }
)
NavigationLink is what we should define in a scope enclosed inside a NavigationView.
But when we use NavigationLink it is attached to the enclosing view, so to reuse the same NavigationLink with other views, we use tag which differentiates between different Destinations.
struct SwiftUIView: View {
#State private var viewState: Int? = 0
var body: some View {
NavigationView {
VStack {
NavigationLink(destination: Text("View 1"), tag: 1, selection: $viewState) {
EmptyView()
}
NavigationLink(destination: Text("View 2"), tag: 2, selection: $viewState) {
EmptyView()
}
Text("First View")
.onTapGesture {
self.viewState = 1
}
Text("Second View")
.onTapGesture {
self.viewState = 2
}
}
}
}
}
Here we bind a Hashable property with all the NavigationLinks present in our VStack so that when a particular View is tapped we can notify which Destination should be opened by setting the value of Bindable property.
If we don't notify the correct Destination by setting the value of tag, always the View defined inside the Closure of NavigationLink will be clickable and nothing else.
Using this approach you don't need to wrap all your clickable views inside NavigationView, any action on any view can use any NavigationLink just by setting the tag.
Thanks, hope this helps.
Works well for me!
import SwiftUI
struct LandmarkList: View {
var body: some View {
NavigationView {
List(landmarkData) { landmark in
LandmarkRow(landmark: landmark)
NavigationLink(destination: LandmarkDetail(landmark: landmark)) {
EmptyView()
}
}
.navigationBarTitle(Text("Landmarks"))
}
}
}
struct LandmarkList_Previews: PreviewProvider {
static var previews: some View {
ForEach(["iPhone SE", "iPhone 11 Pro Max"], id: \.self) { deviceName in
LandmarkList()
.previewDevice(PreviewDevice(rawValue: deviceName))
.previewDisplayName(deviceName)
}
}
}
Use .frame(width: 0).opacity(0.0):
NavigationView {
List {
ForEach(options) {
option in
ZStack {
YourView(option: option)
NavigationLink(destination: ProductListView(),
label: {
EmptyView()
}).frame(width: 0).opacity(0.0)
}.listRowInsets(EdgeInsets())
}
}.navigationBarHidden(true)
}
My version of this solution is to make a view modifier. I think it's the cleanest way, as it doesn't use AnyView.
Note that this solution runs the init() for the destination when it draws the element the .navigationLink() is attached to.
Usage
Text("Link")
.navigationLink({
// put your destination here
})
How To
import SwiftUI
extension View {
func navigationLink<Destination: View>(_ destination: #escaping () -> Destination) -> some View {
modifier(NavigationLinkModifier(destination: destination))
}
}
fileprivate struct NavigationLinkModifier<Destination: View>: ViewModifier {
#ViewBuilder var destination: () -> Destination
func body(content: Content) -> some View {
content
.background(
NavigationLink(destination: self.destination) { EmptyView() }.opacity(0)
)
}
}
This helps to push and pass the model to the next navigation view controller.
struct ContentView : View {
#State var model = PostListViewModel()
var body: some View {
NavigationView {
List(model.post) { post in
ListCell(listData: post)
}.navigationBarTitle(Text("My Post"))
}
}
}
struct ListCell: View {
var listData: Post
var body: some View {
return NavigationButton(destination: DetailContentView(post: listData)) {
HStack {
ImageRow(model: listData) // Get image
VStack(alignment: .leading) {
Text(listData.login).font(.headline).lineLimit(nil)
Text(listData.url).font(.subheadline).lineLimit(nil)
}.padding(.leading, 10)
}.padding(.init(top: 5, leading: 0, bottom: 5, trailing: 0))
}
}
}
Here's a reusable "plain" navigation link view (i.e. without the chevron disclosure indicator) that can be a drop-in replacement for NavigationLink:
struct PlainNavigationLink<Label, Destination>: View where Label: View, Destination: View {
#ViewBuilder var destination: () -> Destination
#ViewBuilder var label: () -> Label
var body: some View {
label()
.background(
NavigationLink(destination: destination, label: {})
.opacity(0)
)
}
}
To use it, simply replace NavigationLink with PlainNavigationLink:
NavigationView { // or NavigationStack in iOS 16
List {
ForEach(1...30, id: \.self) { _ in
PlainNavigationLink {
Text("Hello, world!")
} label: {
Text("Hello, world!")
}
}
}
}
We can also extend it with convenience initializers for LocalizedStringKey and String, just like NavigationLink does.
just came here looking for the answer to this question, but none of the proposed solutions worked for me (can't have an empty view, because i want to put something in the list row; i'm already messing with the padding (and increasing trailing padding didn't seem to work) ... i was about to give up, and then something occurred to me: what if you crank up the z-index of the list row itself? seemed somewhat unlikely, but i gave it a try and, i'll be damned, it worked! i was so pleasantly surprised, i felt like sharing ...
e.g.:
// in body of your list row view
HStack(alignment: .top, spacing: 0.0) {
// stuff ...
}
.zIndex(9999999999)
If you need children behaviour for List and NavigationLink, without additional discloser in the same time, I want to promote this tricky solution, main point at HStack
var body: some View {
NavigationView {
List(items, children: \.items) { item in
ZStack {
NavigationLink(destination: DetailsView()) {
EmptyView()
}.hidden()
HStack {
RowView(item: item)
Spacer()
}
}
}
}
}
Once you put your button in a scrollview, the disclosure button will be hidden. Just make sure to disable your scroll indicator.
there is no documentation yet, so you can use ScrollView for now
NavigationView {
ScrollView {
ForEach(0...100){ x in
NavigationButton(destination: Text("ss")) {
HStack {
Text(String(x))
Spacer()
}
.padding()
.background(Color.white)
.shadow(radius:1,y:1)
}
}
.frame(width: UIScreen.main.bounds.width - 32)
.padding()
}
}
Removing List and just using ForEach works fine with navigation link. You just have to create your own list row. This works for me
NavigationView {
ForEach(pages) {
page in
NavigationLink(destination: DetailView()) {
ListItem()
}
}
}