XML parsers failed to an xml file with &qt; [duplicate] - c++

Currently, I'm working on a feature that involves parsing XML that we receive from another product. I decided to run some tests against some actual customer data, and it looks like the other product is allowing input from users that should be considered invalid. Anyways, I still have to try and figure out a way to parse it. We're using javax.xml.parsers.DocumentBuilder and I'm getting an error on input that looks like the following.
<xml>
...
<description>Example:Description:<THIS-IS-PART-OF-DESCRIPTION></description>
...
</xml>
As you can tell, the description has what appears to be an invalid tag inside of it (<THIS-IS-PART-OF-DESCRIPTION>). Now, this description tag is known to be a leaf tag and shouldn't have any nested tags inside of it. Regardless, this is still an issue and yields an exception on DocumentBuilder.parse(...)
I know this is invalid XML, but it's predictably invalid. Any ideas on a way to parse such input?

That "XML" is worse than invalid – it's not well-formed; see Well Formed vs Valid XML.
An informal assessment of the predictability of the transgressions does not help. That textual data is not XML. No conformant XML tools or libraries can help you process it.
Options, most desirable first:
Have the provider fix the problem on their end. Demand well-formed XML. (Technically the phrase well-formed XML is redundant but may be useful for emphasis.)
Use a tolerant markup parser to cleanup the problem ahead of parsing as XML:
Standalone: xmlstarlet has robust recovering and repair capabilities credit: RomanPerekhrest
xmlstarlet fo -o -R -H -D bad.xml 2>/dev/null
Standalone and C/C++: HTML Tidy works with XML too. Taggle is a port of TagSoup to C++.
Python: Beautiful Soup is Python-based. See notes in the Differences between parsers section. See also answers to this question for more
suggestions for dealing with not-well-formed markup in Python,
including especially lxml's recover=True option.
See also this answer for how to use codecs.EncodedFile() to cleanup illegal characters.
Java: TagSoup and JSoup focus on HTML. FilterInputStream can be used for preprocessing cleanup.
.NET:
XmlReaderSettings.CheckCharacters can
be disabled to get past illegal XML character problems.
#jdweng notes that XmlReaderSettings.ConformanceLevel can be set to
ConformanceLevel.Fragment so that XmlReader can read XML Well-Formed Parsed Entities lacking a root element.
#jdweng also reports that XmlReader.ReadToFollowing() can sometimes
be used to work-around XML syntactical issues, but note
rule-breaking warning in #3 below.
Microsoft.Language.Xml.XMLParser is said to be “error-tolerant”.
Go: Set Decoder.Strict to false as shown in this example by #chuckx.
PHP: See DOMDocument::$recover and libxml_use_internal_errors(true). See nice example here.
Ruby: Nokogiri supports “Gentle Well-Formedness”.
R: See htmlTreeParse() for fault-tolerant markup parsing in R.
Perl: See XML::Liberal, a "super liberal XML parser that parses broken XML."
Process the data as text manually using a text editor or
programmatically using character/string functions. Doing this
programmatically can range from tricky to impossible as
what appears to be
predictable often is not -- rule breaking is rarely bound by rules.
For invalid character errors, use regex to remove/replace invalid characters:
PHP: preg_replace('/[^\x{0009}\x{000a}\x{000d}\x{0020}-\x{D7FF}\x{E000}-\x{FFFD}]+/u', ' ', $s);
Ruby: string.tr("^\u{0009}\u{000a}\u{000d}\u{0020}-\u{D7FF}\u{E000‌​}-\u{FFFD}", ' ')
JavaScript: inputStr.replace(/[^\x09\x0A\x0D\x20-\xFF\x85\xA0-\uD7FF\uE000-\uFDCF\uFDE0-\uFFFD]/gm, '')
For ampersands, use regex to replace matches with &: credit: blhsin, demo
&(?!(?:#\d+|#x[0-9a-f]+|\w+);)
Note that the above regular expressions won't take comments or CDATA
sections into account.

A standard XML parser will NEVER accept invalid XML, by design.
Your only option is to pre-process the input to remove the "predictably invalid" content, or wrap it in CDATA, prior to parsing it.

The accepted answer is good advice, and contains very useful links.
I'd like to add that this, and many other cases of not-wellformed and/or DTD-invalid XML can be repaired using SGML, the ISO-standardized superset of HTML and XML. In your case, what works is to declare the bogus THIS-IS-PART-OF-DESCRIPTION element as SGML empty element and then use eg. the osx program (part of the OpenSP/OpenJade SGML package) to convert it to XML. For example, if you supply the following to osx
<!DOCTYPE xml [
<!ELEMENT xml - - ANY>
<!ELEMENT description - - ANY>
<!ELEMENT THIS-IS-PART-OF-DESCRIPTION - - EMPTY>
]>
<xml>
<description>blah blah
<THIS-IS-PART-OF-DESCRIPTION>
</description>
</xml>
it will output well-formed XML for further processing with the XML tools of your choice.
Note, however, that your example snippet has another problem in that element names starting with the letters xml or XML or Xml etc. are reserved in XML, and won't be accepted by conforming XML parsers.

IMO these cases should be solved by using JSoup.
Below is a not-really answer for this specific case, but found this on the web (thanks to inuyasha82 on Coderwall). This code bit did inspire me for another similar problem while dealing with malformed XMLs, so I share it here.
Please do not edit what is below, as it is as it on the original website.
The XML format, requires to be valid a unique root element declared in the document.
So for example a valid xml is:
<root>
<element>...</element>
<element>...</element>
</root>
But if you have a document like:
<element>...</element>
<element>...</element>
<element>...</element>
<element>...</element>
This will be considered a malformed XML, so many xml parsers just throw an Exception complaining about no root element. Etc.
In this example there is a solution on how to solve that problem and succesfully parse the malformed xml above.
Basically what we will do is to add programmatically a root element.
So first of all you have to open the resource that contains your "malformed" xml (i. e. a file):
File file = new File(pathtofile);
Then open a FileInputStream:
FileInputStream fis = new FileInputStream(file);
If we try to parse this stream with any XML library at that point we will raise the malformed document Exception.
Now we create a list of InputStream objects with three lements:
A ByteIputStream element that contains the string: <root>
Our FileInputStream
A ByteInputStream with the string: </root>
So the code is:
List<InputStream> streams =
Arrays.asList(
new ByteArrayInputStream("<root>".getBytes()),
fis,
new ByteArrayInputStream("</root>".getBytes()));
Now using a SequenceInputStream, we create a container for the List created above:
InputStream cntr =
new SequenceInputStream(Collections.enumeration(str));
Now we can use any XML Parser library, on the cntr, and it will be parsed without any problem. (Checked with Stax library);

Related

How to get ampersand "&" in output of Transform xml activity of TIBCO

Could anyone please help in getting the ampersand "&" output of Transform xml activity of TIBCO .
My requirement is the xmlstring from Transform xml activity is mapped to Parse xml (which will give the final output ) .Ex; Maitree&Sons. What should be passed in xslt so that when the output from Transform xml goes to Parse xml it will give the final result as "&".
I tried using CDATA and disable-escaping-output also in xslt but in parse xml it fails.
Please help.
Generally XSLT won't allow you to produce invalid output. The correct representation in XML is Maitree&Sons and this is what it produces. If it produced Maitree&Sons, this would be invalid XML and would be thrown out by an XML parser trying to read the document.
Having said that, it's possible using disable-output-escaping to produce an unescaped ampersand if your XSLT processor supports this option. If it's not working for you we need to know exactly what you did and how it failed.
(General rule: on SO, always tell us exactly what you did and exactly how it failed. Saying in general terms that you tried lots of things and none of them worked doesn't get us any nearer to a solution.)
LATER
I'm reading the question again. You want to produce output from the transformer that will go into an XML parser, such that the output of the parser is Maitree&Sons. Well, in that case the lexical XML must be Maitree&Sons, which it will be if you generate the string Maitree&Sons in XSLT. But XSLT is XML, so if you want to write this as a literal string in your stylesheet, it will be written Maitree&Sons.
I guess we need a much clearer picture of what you are doing and where it is going wrong.

Replacing strings in xml file using batch script

I'm new to batch script. I want to replace a strings in a particular file.
In below script I'm getting error.
#echo off
$standalone = Get-Content 'C:\wildfly\standalone\configuration\standalone.xml'
$standalone -replace '<wsdl-host>${jboss.bind.address:127.0.0.1}</wsdl-host>','<wsdl-host>${jboss.bind.address:0.0.0.0}</wsdl-host>' |
Set-Content 'C:\wildfly\standalone\configuration\standalone.xml'
The proper way to edit XML is to process it as an XML document, not as a string. That's because the XML file is not guaranteed to maintain specific formatting. Any edits should be context-aware and string replace isn't. Consider the three eqvivalent XML fragments:
<wsdl-host>${jboss.bind.address:127.0.0.1}</wsdl-host>
<wsdl-host>${jboss.bind.address:127.0.0.1}</wsdl-host >
<wsdl-host >${jboss.bind.address:127.0.0.1}</wsdl-host >
Note that whitespacing in element names is different and it's legal to add some. What's more, in practice, a lot of implementations simply discard line breaks in element values, so the two following are likely to provide same results to a config parser:
<wsdl-host>${jboss.bind.address:127.0.0.1}</wsdl-host>
<wsdl-host>${jboss.bind.address:127.0.0.1}
</wsdl-host>
It really doesn't make much sense to process XML as string, does it?
Fortunately, Powershell has built-in support for XML files. A simple approach is like so,
# Mock XML config
[xml]$x = #'
<root>
<wsdl-host>${jboss.bind.address:127.0.0.1}</wsdl-host>
</root>
'#
# Let's change the wsdl-host element's contents
$x.root.'wsdl-host' = '${jboss.bind.address:0.0.0.0}'
# Save the modified document to console to see the change
$x.save([console]::out)
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ibm850"?>
<root>
<wsdl-host>${jboss.bind.address:0.0.0.0}</wsdl-host>
</root>
If you can't use Powershell and are stuck with batch scripts, you really need to use a 3rd party XML manipulation program.

How to write an XML parser using only standard libraries?

I'm working on my program where I would import an XML file and scan for parser state (also Element, line number, content).
Right now, I have all the elements and line numbers stored in vectors of string and integer.
My question is, how can I scan for an attribute which at the end I would be able to indicate the root, children, and direct children? I have tried using <map> but still no clue.
Here are some examples:
Output will be
It would be easy if I used additional libraries but I would like to use the standard C/C++ library only.
If you want an XML parser, use an XML parser. Simple as that. If you don't want to use an existing one, but only use the tools that C++ gives you, you'd write your own XML parser. Doing that would be insane.
And if people tell you to e.g. use regular expressions on XML: XML is not a regular language, and you'll need a lexer that understands XML, which is an XML parser. To see what happens when you try to RegEx-analyze things like HTML, see this answer.

Best way to remove XML declaration from BSTR

I'm wondering if someone can help me trying to remove the XML declaration from a string containing an XML doc. Any help would be appreciated. We're using MSXML 4.0, but I was having difficulties using that and ended up just doing a substring. I'm not very familiar with the ATL and other Microsoft SDKs. It works, but a little part of me died inside and I would prefer to have this done in a less fragile manner.
Edit: Currently I am doing a sub-string on the first occurrence of a newline character. I was trying to tokenize or sub-string on the "?>" of the XML declaration, but I'm having issues on getting the character matching (using wcstok and substring). I tried "\?>", "\?>" and "?>". The ideal solution would be to load the document into XMLDocument object and just get the text of the message body.
Look up the XML specification, particularly the grammar for the prolog:
[22] prolog ::= XMLDecl? Misc* (doctypedecl Misc*)?
[23] XMLDecl ::= '<?xml' VersionInfo EncodingDecl? SDDecl? S? '?>'
So, your handspun code should be able to parse VersionInfo, EncodingDecl and SDDecl along with the XML declaration tag start and end tokens. For more info on these individual items see the specification.
However, my suggestion would be to use the right tool for the right job: Use a XML toolkit/parser. (The difference between a parser and a toolkit is mainly that the toolkit will support advanced operations such as DTD validation, Namespace handling, XPath etc.).
MSXML4 is pretty old. MSXML6 is the latest. However, MSXML6 is pretty useless for anything but small XML files. So, choose a parser depending on your input file size (if performance is important). There are freely available libraries like Xerces, RapidXML, pugixml etc. which have much better performance.
Also, can you specify what difficulties you have faced with MSXML4?

XSLT and XQuery on invalid html input, pieces of URI look like entities

I'm using Saxon 9 to analyze invalid html sources. Specifically the html has href values like the following:
some text
I'm getting errors:
"Error reported by XML parser: The reference to entity "g_varID" must end with
the ';' delimiter."
The xml parser is reading the "&g_varID" string and complaining that there should be a ";" to delimit the entity. But, of course, this is not intended as an HTML entity -- it's just a piece of a URI.
How can I tell the parser to ignore it? Note: I'm using non-schema-aware Saxon, not Saxon-SA.
If your HTML is not XML, then how do you expect any XML processor to process it?
Make sure you have a correct xhtml DOCTYPE. According to the xhtml1-strict.dtd that I'm looking at, the href attribute is declared CDATA, not PCDATA, which means literal & is perfectly ok and should not be parsed as an entity.
As mentioned above, this is not valid XML, it is HTML. This particular problem, though, is one that HTML tidy cleans up by default: http://www.w3.org/People/Raggett/tidy/. Use it with the following command-line arguments to convert HTML into XHTML:
tidy -asxhtml foo.html > foo.xhtml
And then you should be able to run it through your XSLT.