Create event handler at runtime without using WndProc win32 c++ - c++

While using C#, it was easy before to create an event handler at runtime like:
Button button1 = new button1();
button1.click += Button_Click(); //Create handler
button1.click -= Button_Click(); //Remove handler
public void Button_Click()
{
//Button clicked
}
But in win32 I am stuck with WndProc callback where I have to handle all events. I want to create a handler for specific message and attach it to specific void.
Currently, I am using WndProc to catch WM_CREATE message and draw controls:
LRESULT CALLBACK WndProc(HWND hWnd, UINT message, WPARAM wParam, LPARAM lParam)
{
switch (message)
{
case WM_CREATE:
Draw(hWnd);
break;
case WM_DESTROY:
PostQuitMessage(0);
break;
default:
return DefWindowProc(hWnd, message, wParam, lParam);
}
return 0;
}
void Draw(HWND hWnd)
{
HWND button4 = CreateWindow(L"button", L"button4", WS_CHILD | WS_VISIBLE , 329, 118, 112, 67, hWnd, (HMENU)1001, hInst, NULL);
HWND button3 = CreateWindow(L"button", L"button3", WS_CHILD | WS_VISIBLE , 212, 118, 112, 67,
...
}
But I want to create or remove event handler instead of using WndProc at runtime something like:
AddHandler WM_CREATE , Draw(hWnd);
DelHandler WM_CREATE , Draw(hWnd);
What I have tried ?
The problem with SetWindowsHookEx is that its handles entire messages like WndProc. I don't want an handler that handles entire window messages and skip some of them. May be this can create performance or memory leak issue's.
Edit: Implemented example from answer:
#include <unordered_map>
using msgHandler = LRESULT(*)(HWND, UINT, WPARAM, LPARAM);
std::unordered_map<UINT, msgHandler> messageHandlers;
LRESULT handleCreate(HWND hWnd, UINT msg, WPARAM wParam, LPARAM lParam)
{
//Draw some buttons to see whether event WM_CREATE called or not
HWND button4 = CreateWindow(L"button", L"button4", WS_CHILD | WS_VISIBLE, 329, 118, 112, 67, hWnd, (HMENU)1001, hInst, NULL);
HWND button3 = CreateWindow(L"button", L"button3", WS_CHILD | WS_VISIBLE, 212, 118, 112, 67, hWnd, (HMENU)1002, hInst, NULL);
HWND button2 = CreateWindow(L"button", L"button2", WS_CHILD | WS_VISIBLE, 329, 46, 112, 67, hWnd, (HMENU)1003, hInst, NULL);
HWND button1 = CreateWindow(L"button", L"button1", WS_CHILD | WS_VISIBLE, 212, 46, 112, 67, hWnd, (HMENU)1004, hInst, NULL);
return 0;
}
LRESULT handleClose(HWND hWnd, UINT msg, WPARAM wParam, LPARAM lParam)
{
//Quit form
PostQuitMessage(0);
return 0;
}
void AddHandler()
{
messageHandlers[WM_CREATE] = handleCreate;
messageHandlers[WM_DESTROY] = handleClose;
}
void DelHandler()
{
messageHandlers.erase(WM_CREATE);
}
LRESULT CALLBACK WndProc(HWND hWnd, UINT msg, WPARAM wParam, LPARAM lParam)
{
auto handler = messageHandlers.find(msg);
if (handler != messageHandlers.end()) return handler->second(hWnd, msg, wParam, lParam);
return DefWindowProc(hWnd, msg, wParam, lParam);
}
BOOL InitInstance(HINSTANCE hInstance, int nCmdShow){
AddHandler();
//DelHandler();
...

The message ID is just an unsigned integer, so there's not really anything special about it. Although the giant switch statement is one common way to handle messages, you can do things quite differently if you choose. To support dynamic insertion/deletion of handlers, one possibility would be to use an std::unordered_map:
// a message handler receives the normal parameters:
using msgHandler = LRESULT(*)(HWND, UINT, WPARAM, LPARAM);
// a map from message numbers to the handler functions:
std::unordered_map<UINT, msgHandler> messageHandlers;
// A couple of message handler functions:
LRESULT handleCreate(HWND hWnd, UINT msg, WPARAM wParam, LPARAM lParam) {
// ...
}
LRESULT handleDraw(HWND hWnd, UINT msg, WPARAM wParam, LPARAM lParam) {
// ...
}
// register them to handle the appropriate messages:
messageHandlers[WM_CREATE] = handleCreate;
messageHandlers[WM_PAINT] = handleDraw;
// and then our (now really tiny) window proc that uses those:
LRESULT CALLBACK WndProc(HWND hWnd, UINT msg, WPARAM wParam, LPARAM lParam)
{
auto handler = messageHandlers.find(msg);
if (handler != messageHandlers.end())
return handler->second(hWnd, msg, wParam, lParam);
return DefWindowProc(hWnd, msg, wParam, lParam);
}
Since we're just storing pointers to functions in an std::unordered_map, adding, finding, or deleting a handler all just use the normal operations for adding, finding, or deleting something in an std::unodered_map (e.g., messageHandlers.erase(WM_CREATE); to erase the WM_CREATE handler from the map).
If you want to get more elaborate with this, you can create specific types for handling different messages, so (for example) one that doesn't receive anything meaningful in its lParam simply won't receive an lParam at all, while another that receives two things "smooshed" together, one in the low word of lParam, and the other in the high word of lParam can receive them broken apart into two separate parameters. But that's a lot more work.
You might also want to look for WindowsX.h, a header Microsoft provides (or at least used to provide) in the SDK that handles mapping a little like I've outlined above (the latter version, where each handler receives parameters that represent the logical data it receives, instead of the WPARAM and LPARAM used to encode that data.

You could process messages dynamically like this:
typedef void (*FHANDLE)();
std::vector<FHANDLE> handles;
void AddHandler(FHANDLE handle)
{
handles.push_back(handle);
}
void DelHandler(FHANDLE handle)
{
auto it = std::find(handles.begin(), handles.end(), handle);
handles.erase(it);
}
LRESULT CALLBACK WndProc(HWND hWnd, UINT message, WPARAM wParam, LPARAM lParam)
{
switch (message)
{
case WM_CREATE:
for (int i = 0; i < handles.size(); i++)
{
handles[i]();
}
break;
...
}
}
And add/del the handle:
void myclick1()
{
MessageBox(0, L"test1", L"message", 0);
}
void myclick2()
{
MessageBox(0, L"test2", L"message", 0);
}
BOOL InitInstance(HINSTANCE hInstance, int nCmdShow)
{
hInst = hInstance; // Store instance handle in our global variable
AddHandler(myclick1);
AddHandler(myclick2);
//DelHandler(myclick2);
HWND hWnd = CreateWindowW(szWindowClass, szTitle, WS_OVERLAPPEDWINDOW,
CW_USEDEFAULT, 0, CW_USEDEFAULT, 0, nullptr, nullptr, hInstance, nullptr);
...
}

Related

The procedure of control subclassed does not work. Why?

I recently tried to subclass a control using the SetWindowSubclass() function. And to my surprise, it worked smoothly at first. I created the control procedure, but it doesn't receive messages like WM_LBUTTONDOWN or WM_KEYDOWN, and I don't understand why! I searched all my time yesterday and I confess that I am losing hope.
Here is my code, simplified (very long in normal times!):
HWND button = CreateWindow("BUTTON", NULL, WS_VISIBLE | WS_CHILD | BS_OWNERDRAW, 100, 200, 250, 50, hwnd, (HMENU)ID_B_JOUER, instance, NULL);
SetWindowSubclass(boutton, ControlProc, ID_B_JOUER, 0);
And here is the control procedure:
LRESULT CALLBACK ControlProc(HWND hwnd, UINT msg, WPARAM wParam, LPARAM lParam, UINT_PTR uIdSubclass, DWORD_PTR dwRefData)
{
switch(msg)
{
case WM_...:
{
MessageBox(hwnd, "Bonjour!", "Message", MB_ICONINFORMATION); // Here it does not work!!! Something be the message.
break;
}
default:
{
DefSubclassProc(hwnd, msg, wParam, lParam);
}
}
return 0;
}
I want to clarify that I am using the GetLastError() function and it returned 0 (no problem). I hope someone has a solution because it's very weird.
You are creating a new BUTTON control and assigning it to a variable named button, but you are subclassing using a different variable named boutton instead.
Assuming that is just a typo, your ControlProc() is returning 0 for every message, it is ignoring the return value of DefSubclassProc(), which may not be 0. You MUST return what DefSubclassProc() returns for unhandled messages.
HWND button = CreateWindow("BUTTON", NULL, WS_VISIBLE | WS_CHILD | BS_OWNERDRAW, 100, 200, 250, 50, hwnd, (HMENU)ID_B_JOUER, instance, NULL);
SetWindowSubclass(button, &ControlProc, ID_B_JOUER, 0);
...
LRESULT CALLBACK ControlProc(HWND hwnd, UINT msg, WPARAM wParam, LPARAM lParam, UINT_PTR uIdSubclass, DWORD_PTR dwRefData)
{
switch (msg)
{
case WM_LBUTTONDOWN:
case WM_KEYDOWN:
{
MessageBox(hwnd, "Bonjour!", "Message", MB_ICONINFORMATION);
break;
}
default:
{
return DefSubclassProc(hwnd, msg, wParam, lParam);
}
}
return 0;
}

WM_COMMAND not received in subclassed WinAPI button

I have a basic wrapper class for my buttons created in C++ with WinAPI. I try to handle messages but it looks like not everything reaches my WndProc
class MyButton {
public:
MyButton(HINSTANCE, HWND);
private:
HWND _hWnd;
static LRESULT CALLBACK _WndProc(HWND, UINT, WPARAM, LPARAM, UINT_PTR, DWORD_PTR);
};
MyButton::MyButton(HINSTANCE hInst, HWND hParent)
{
this->_hWnd = CreateWindow(
TEXT("BUTTON"),
TEXT("CLICK ME"),
WS_TABSTOP | WS_VISIBLE | WS_CHILD | BS_DEFPUSHBUTTON,
10, 10,
100, 25,
hParent,
NULL,
hInst,
this
);
SetWindowSubclass(this->_hWnd, this->_WndProc, 1, (DWORD_PTR)this);
}
LRESULT CALLBACK MyButton::_WndProc(HWND hWnd, UINT uMsg, WPARAM wParam, LPARAM lParam, UINT_PTR uIdSub, DWORD_PTR dwRef)
{
// MessageBox(NULL, L"TEST1", L"TEST1", MB_OK | MB_ICONINFORMATION);
MyButton *pThis = (MyButton*)dwRef;
switch (uMsg)
{
case WM_COMMAND:
MessageBox(NULL, L"TEST2", L"TEST2", MB_OK | MB_ICONINFORMATION);
break;
}
return DefSubclassProc(hWnd, uMsg, wParam, lParam);
}
The function is called ("TEST1" is shown) but when I click the button, I don't see "TEST2". I also tried with WM_CREATE and it doesn't work either. I don't know what messages are passed to _WndProc

Call non-static member from WndProc

Anyone know how to call non-static member from WndProc?
Here is my WndProc prototype:
LRESULT CALLBACK System::Windows::Forms::Control::WndProc(HWND hWnd,
UINT message, WPARAM wParam, LPARAM lParam)
{
switch (message)
{
case WM_CREATE:
this->OnCreate(new EventArgs(hWnd, message, wParam, lParam));
break;
default:
return DefWindowProc(hWnd, message, wParam, lParam);
break;
}
return 0;
}
And defination:
class LIBMANAGED_API Control
{
protected:
HWND hWnd;
static LRESULT CALLBACK WndProc(HWND, UINT, WPARAM, LPARAM);
...
};
This is wrong on so many levels. What do you really want to achieve? Just from this piece of code, there's not enough info.
First, you declare this method using a mixture of C and managed C++. It either
protected virtual void WndProc(Message m) // Managed C++
as you see, NOT static method, LRESULT, HWND and so on, or
LRESULT CALLBACK WindowProc(
_In_ HWND hwnd,
_In_ UINT uMsg,
_In_ WPARAM wParam,
_In_ LPARAM lParam
);
as you can see, no System namespace.
Second, where are your clases defined? I suspect you should override your method, using Managed C++, see MSDN.
You were not that far as you are already processing the WM_CREATE message.
The trick is to pass an object pointer at creation time and store it in the Window itself with SetWindowLongPtr in the WM_CREATE or WM_NCCREATE message. The you can extract it with GetWindowLongPtr and access your object from the window procedure.
Window creation (say MyWnd myWnd is the C++ object that will represent the window):
HWND hWnd = CreateWindow( m_pszClassName, "Name", WS_VISIBLE | WS_OVERLAPPED,
x, y, w, h, NULL, NULL, hInst, &myWnd);
Window procedure:
LRESULT CALLBACK WndProc(HWND hWnd, UINT message, WPARAM wParam, LPARAM lParam)
{
MyWnd *myWnd;
myWnd = (MyWnd *) GetWindowLongPtr(hWnd, GWLP_USERDATA); /* to use it outside WM_CREATE */
switch (message)
{
case WM_CREATE:
CREATESTRUCT * pcs = (CREATESTRUCT*)lParam;
MyWnd* myWnd= (MyWnd*) pcs->lpCreateParams;
SetWindowLongPtr( hwnd, GWLP_USERDATA, (LONG_PTR) myWnd);
myWnd->OnCreate(new EventArgs(hWnd, message, wParam, lParam));
break;
default:
return DefWindowProc(hWnd, message, wParam, lParam);
break;
}
return 0;
}

Changing HWND Window Procedure in runtime

I'm working in an IDE which creates a hwnd and its respective WndProc LRESULT CALLBACK. I need to change the WndProc to a custom one.
I've read that SetWindowLong would do the job, but I can't find any working example. For example:
HWND hwnd; //My window
SetWindowLong(hwnd, GWL_WNDPROC, myNewWndProc);
The third parameter for SetWindowLong is a Long as the name of the function names it. How can I make a reference from my WndProc function to a Long?
My WndProc:
LRESULT CALLBACK WndProcedure(HWND hwnd, UINT uMsg, WPARAM wParam, LPARAM lParam){
msg_dev(toString(uMsg));
switch(uMsg){
case WM_MOUSEMOVE:
SetCursor(LoadCursor(NULL, IDC_HAND));
break;
case WM_LBUTTONDOWN:
msg_dev("Button down!");
break;
default:
DefWindowProc(hwnd, uMsg, wParam, lParam);
}
return 0;
};
You need to use something like this:
WNDPROC prevWndProc;
...
prevWndProc = (WNDPROC) SetWindowLongPtr(hwnd, GWL_WNDPROC, (LONG_PTR)&myNewWndProc);
...
LRESULT CALLBACK myNewWndProc(HWND hwnd, UINT uMsg, WPARAM wParam, LPARAM lParam)
{
msg_dev(toString(uMsg));
switch(uMsg)
{
case WM_MOUSEMOVE:
SetCursor(LoadCursor(NULL, IDC_HAND));
break;
case WM_LBUTTONDOWN:
msg_dev("Button down!");
break;
}
return CallWindowProc(prevWndProc, hwnd, uMsg, wParam, lParam);
}
See this article:
When you subclass a window, it's the original window procedure of the window you subclass you have to call when you want to call the original window procedure
That being said, you should use SetWindowSubclass() instead of SetWindowLongPtr(). Let it handle this for you. See this article for more details:
Safer subclassing
For example:
#define MY_SUBCLASS_ID 1
SetWindowSubclass(hwnd, &mySubClassProc, MY_SUBCLASS_ID, 0);
...
LRESULT CALLBACK mySubClassProc(HWND hWnd, UINT uMsg, WPARAM wParam, LPARAM lParam, UINT_PTR uIdSubclass, DWORD_PTR dwRefData)
{
msg_dev(toString(uMsg));
switch(uMsg)
{
case WM_MOUSEMOVE:
SetCursor(LoadCursor(NULL, IDC_HAND));
break;
case WM_LBUTTONDOWN:
msg_dev("Button down!");
break;
case WM_NCDESTROY:
RemoveWindowSubclass(hWnd, &mySubClassProc, uIdSubclass);
break;
}
return DefSubclassProc(hWnd, uMsg, wParam, lParam);
}
A simple cast does the job.
SetWindowLongPtr(hwnd, GWL_WNDPROC, (LONG_PTR)&myNewWndProc);
Otherwise It would be incompatible types: LRESULT and LONG.
The MSDN documentation for SetWindowLong() states that GWL_WNDPROC
Sets a new address for the window procedure.
This means that your third parameter should be a pointer to a function. Your SetWindowLong() call should therefore look like this:
SetWindowLong(hwnd, GWL_WNDPROC, (LONG_PTR)&myNewWndProc);
Note also the Remarks section that states:
An application must pass any messages not processed by the new window procedure to the previous window procedure by calling CallWindowProc.
You can use setWindowLong to address your problem.
setWindowLong(hwnd,GWL_WNDPROC,(LONG)newWindowProcedure);
However you would be setting the window procedure twice. Once with the IDE default and then to yours. What you need to dobis set the window procedure when the window is being REGISTERED.
#include <windows.h>
void registerWindow();
void createWindow();
void messageLoop();
int main()
{
registerWindow();
createWindow();
messageLoop();
}
LRESULT CALLBACK myWindowProcedure(HWND hwnd,UINT msg,WPARAM wparam,LPARAM lparam)
{
return DefWindowProc(hwnd,msg,wparam,lparam);
}
void registerWindow()
{
/** This is the important part.
* Find this part in your code.
* Set WNDCLASS::lpfnWndProc to what ever
* window procedure you want.
**/
WNDCLASS wc = {};
wc.lpfnWndProc = myWindowProcedure;
wc.hInstance = hInstance;
wc.lpszClassName = "CLASS NAME";
RegisterClass(&wc);
// WARNING: Your app will crash at runtime if the
// windows procedure is "NOT PROPER"
}
void createWindow()
{
auto hwnd = CreateWindowEx(
0, // Optional window styles.
"CLASS NAME", // Window class
"Learn to Program Windows", // Window text
WS_OVERLAPPEDWINDOW, // Window style
// Size and position
CW_USEDEFAULT,
CW_USEDEFAULT,
CW_USEDEFAULT,
CW_USEDEFAULT,
NULL, // Parent window
NULL, // Menu
HINSTANCE(), // Instance handle
NULL // Additional application data
);
ShowWindow(hwnd, nCmdShow
}
void messageLoop()
{
MSG msg;
while( GetMessage(&msg, NULL, 0, 0) )
{
TranslateMessage(&msg);
DispatchMessage(&msg);
}
}
You have to use SetWindowLongPtr (which on 32-bit is a macro but a separate function on 64-bit) to ensure compatibility with both 32- and 64-bit systems.
Syntax would be as follows:
SetWindowLongPtr(hwnd, GWLP_WNDPROC, (LONG_PTR)&myNewWndProc);
Note SetWindowLongPtr is used instead of SetWindowLong, and GWLP_WNDPROC is used as the nIndex constant.

WM_VSCROLL / WM_HSCROLL message from TrackBar is not sent to the subclassed MessageHandler. Why?

I have a crazy issue. I subclassed buttons, richedits, checkboxes,.. and all seems working fine. But after I subclassed a trackbar I’m having some trouble now. The problem is that my subclassed messagehandler don’t receive the WM_VSCROLL / WM_HSCROLL messages. They are still sent to the parent's messagehandler. WM_PAINT message and some others are successfully sent to the subclassed messagehanlder.
Someone knows what I’m doing wrong? …And maybe knows how to solve this problem? I created a clean project with the following needed code:
#include <windows.h>
#include <CommCtrl.h>
#pragma comment(lib,"comctl32.lib")
//Prototyps
HWND CreateMainWindow(HINSTANCE hInstance);
LRESULT CALLBACK MessageHandler(HWND hwnd, UINT msg, WPARAM wparam, LPARAM lparam);
LRESULT CALLBACK SubMessageHandler(HWND hwnd, UINT msg, WPARAM wParam, LPARAM lParam);
WNDPROC oldWndProc;
HWND hWnd = 0;
HWND hTrackBar = 0;
int WINAPI WinMain(HINSTANCE hInstance, HINSTANCE hPrevInstance, LPSTR lpCmdLine, int nCmdShow){
WNDCLASSEXA wndClass = {sizeof(WNDCLASSEX), CS_DBLCLKS | CS_OWNDC | CS_HREDRAW | CS_VREDRAW, MessageHandler, 0,0, hInstance, LoadIcon(NULL, IDI_WINLOGO),
LoadCursor(NULL, IDC_ARROW),(HBRUSH)GetStockObject(WHITE_BRUSH), NULL, "WindowClass", LoadIcon(NULL, IDI_WINLOGO)};
RegisterClassExA(&wndClass);
//Creat MainWindow
hWnd = CreateWindowExA(NULL, "WindowClass", "Test Windows", WS_OVERLAPPEDWINDOW | WS_VISIBLE | WS_CLIPCHILDREN,
100, 100, 400, 300, NULL, NULL, hInstance, NULL);
//Creat Trackbar
INITCOMMONCONTROLSEX initCtrlEx;
initCtrlEx.dwSize = sizeof(INITCOMMONCONTROLSEX);
initCtrlEx.dwICC = ICC_BAR_CLASSES;
if (InitCommonControlsEx(&initCtrlEx)){
hTrackBar = CreateWindowExA(NULL,TRACKBAR_CLASSA, "TrackBar_Test", WS_VISIBLE | WS_CHILD | WS_CLIPSIBLINGS | TBS_AUTOTICKS |
TBS_ENABLESELRANGE | TBS_VERT | TBS_BOTH, 10, 10, 50, 200, hWnd, NULL, hInstance, NULL);
oldWndProc = (WNDPROC)SetWindowLongPtrA(hTrackBar, GWLP_WNDPROC, (LONG_PTR)SubMessageHandler); //Subclassing messagehandler
}
//Message loop
MSG msg;
while (GetMessageA(&msg, NULL, 0, 0)) {
TranslateMessage(&msg);
DispatchMessageA(&msg);
}
return 0;
}
LRESULT CALLBACK SubMessageHandler(HWND hwnd, UINT msg, WPARAM wParam, LPARAM lParam){
switch (msg){
case WM_VSCROLL: //callback is subclassed but WM_VSCROLL is not send. why?
MessageBoxA(hWnd, "WM_VSCROLL sent (to SubMessageHandler)", "Test", MB_OK);
break;
}
if (oldWndProc != 0)
return CallWindowProcA(oldWndProc, hwnd, msg, wParam, lParam);
else
return DefWindowProcA(hwnd, msg, wParam, lParam);
}
LRESULT CALLBACK MessageHandler(HWND hwnd, UINT msg, WPARAM wParam, LPARAM lParam){
switch (msg){
case WM_VSCROLL: //Why the hell is the Trackbar WM_VSCROLL still sent here to the parent callback!?!?
MessageBoxA(hWnd, "WM_VSCROLL sent (to Parent)", "Test", MB_OK);
break;
case WM_DESTROY:
PostQuitMessage(0);
return 0;
break;
}
return DefWindowProcA(hwnd, msg, wParam, lParam);
}
From the MSDN documentation on Trackbar controls:
A trackbar notifies its parent window of user actions by sending the
parent a WM_HSCROLL or WM_VSCROLL message.
The Trackbar's contract is to notify the parent window with WM_HSCROLL/WM_VSCROLL. The Trackbar control generates and sends those messages; it does not receive them.
Also note that the Default Trackbar Message Processing section does not list WM_HSCROLL/WM_VSCROLL (but does list WM_LBUTTONDOWN, WM_MOUSEMOVE, WM_LBUTTONUP, WM_KEYDOWN, WM_KEYUP, which are the raw messages it would need to handle to handle interaction).
As for what to do about it, it probably depends on exactly what you want to do. You could try subclassing and intercepting all of the user input messages, but that seems like a lot of work and is potentially brittle. My recommendation would be to have the parent window explicitly reflect WM_HSCROLL/WM_VSCROLL back to your custom Trackbar control.