Closed. This question needs to be more focused. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Update the question so it focuses on one problem only by editing this post.
Closed 2 years ago.
Improve this question
Can clang-tidy break the code (when you apply the -fix option)?
For example, it can reorder headers and cause some wrong order of included symbols.
But maybe you have more examples where it can break?
Related
Closed. This question needs details or clarity. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Add details and clarify the problem by editing this post.
Closed 5 days ago.
Improve this question
I have a question in CUDA programming.
Is there a way to obtain a module by accepting the contents of a *.cu file as a string rather than loading a *.cu file and compiling with cubin? I'd like to utilize nvrtc if possible.
I wrote most of the code using nvrtc, and I'm looking for a way to not create external files like cubin.
Closed. This question needs details or clarity. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Add details and clarify the problem by editing this post.
Closed 2 years ago.
Improve this question
Can you please help me with how to check CPP files in a project for functions exceeding 'n' number of lines using Clang-Tidy?
You can use the readability-function-size check and set the LineThreshold parameter to your n value.
Closed. This question needs details or clarity. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Add details and clarify the problem by editing this post.
Closed 3 years ago.
Improve this question
if(cout<<"h"){}
this gives me an output
h
Any idea why, I have tried many variations of it and it still works.
That's because the if statement needs to evaluate the condition you give into it, plus, streams are implicitly convertible to bool.
Closed. This question is opinion-based. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Update the question so it can be answered with facts and citations by editing this post.
Closed 5 years ago.
Improve this question
Some libraries, such as LLVM, use a "superproject" pattern, where consumers of the library, such as libcxx, should live inside of the libraries' folder-structure. In the case of LLVM, this is llvm/projects.
This seems quite limiting, as it makes it harder use the library when there are other folder-structure constraints.
Why was this descision made, and what are some reasons to use such a layout?
Closed. This question needs to be more focused. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Update the question so it focuses on one problem only by editing this post.
Closed 5 years ago.
Improve this question
How can I edit my program to have a look like QtDemo ?
I am using Qt 4.7.
Thanks
A Qt installation often includes the demo code. Start with the source code from QtDemo, strip out the demo part and then add your code.