Wagtail and Django-Tenants, does it work together? - django

Does anyone have experience in this topic? Is it fully incompatible or might it be possible to customize certain parts of the app to make it work.

multi-tenancy is not yet fully supported by Wagtail.
Although, as mentioned here in docs, there are some features that are supported.
You may find this blog helpful. Also here is a repository that implements basic features of multi tenancy with django and wagtail and you can play around with it.
Here are some other CMS (build on top of Django) you can try.

I think as long as there are no raw sql queries in wagtail's source code we are good to use django-tenents, the layer that django-tenets is working on is on top of django orm it self.
see wagtail-tenents

Related

Twitter in Django

I have to create web application similar to twitter with a few tweaks using django. I am clueless if I have to use a CMS for this or any other existing django-application. Working from ground up is quite tedious to be honest. Can anyone recommend me which CMS( or anything else) I should attempt trying?
There is a project called trillr1. According to its page:
"Trillr is a Twitter-like microblogging service enhanced with user directory and group discussion features. " that's maybe what you want.
https://contributions.coremedia.com/trillr1
I guess, the closest you can come with an out-of-the-box software to imitate Twitter is Status.net, the software, that powers identi.ca. However, this is a PHP application.
I'm not aware of something similar in the Django world.

Django Admin site and Forms on AppEngine

i'm developing a web site hosted on AppEngine and wanted to use Django for some tasks. I've read these two answers:
Django on Google App Engine
Django and App Engine
But those are pretty old, and my question is a little more specific. I've taken a look at django-nonrel and seems good, but i've not used it and cant affirm anything.
So, the question is. Can I use the Admin site and the forms from Django with this package? If not, do you know any other patch that allow me to use them?
Thank you very much!
If you use django-nonrel, then you can use the Django admin site but it will be limited to the types of queries you can do on app engine. I personally found it easier to code my own simple admin interfaces that to type to make things work in Django Admin.
Regarding forms, regular Django Forms and ModelForms work quite well.
Yes, you can (both Admin and forms).
(definitely) :)
I installed djangoappengine 3 months ago and work on it daily under Eclipse (Windows).
If you have some expericence with Django it should be easy, I faced much more problems with Eclipse integration, but nothing unfeseable (even for a newbie - as I'm still).
You just have to start from here:
http://www.allbuttonspressed.com/projects/djangoappengine#installation
Be careful anyway: there are some limitations due to the Datastore capabilities.
A lot of work has been done to circumvent them (dbindexer, specifics decorators...) and if you're planning to develop an app from scratch you will find your way (keeping " noSQL " in mind) but if you plan to migrate a plain vanilla SQL app, it may cause you some pain...
Last point: instances handling Django and all its libraries may be long to start with App Engine ; an issue to consider:
http://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/issues/detail?id=1695
Hope it helps.
Florent

Running Mezzanine on App Engine

I am looking for a blog solution to run inside a Django project deployed on the Google App Engine. After a bit of review I decided to try out Mezzanine v0.11.3. I've overcome the hurdle of getting it in project using the advice of others deploying on App Engine at this link: http://groups.google.com/group/mezzanine-users/browse_thread/thread/c8b13c41a3168c94.
Mezzanine is now showing up in the Admin, but clicking on Blog posts leads to a multi-table inheritance failure. I believe that this is due to multi-site support functionality in Mezzanine via use of the Django sites framework.
Has anyone overcome this issue? I'm going to try to use django-dbindexer but I'm not confident it will work.
*Update: as far as I can tell, the folks at AllButtonsPressed don't have any magic solutions to work around ManyToManyField issues yet, so I think that option is dead.
If no one knows a work around, do any of you know of a good blog solution I can run inside a Django project on the App Engine?
*Update: found this post Integrating Blogger into a Google App Engine App. Will investigate if this solves the problem.
*Current Status:
I have not been able to solve this problem and I don't think it is currently solvable. Thought I would share what I found through my investigations though; maybe someone out there can carry on and come up with a solution.
Options tried:
Bloog
I looked this over but it is a Python
solution, not a Django solution and I
didn't want to do the work to turn it
into one
Byteflow ( https://bitbucket.org/piranha/byteflow/wiki/Home ) notes:
designed to be standalone, will need a
lot of edits to settings.py,
inclusion of 12 additional apps and
overrides on account settings plus
hand tuning at every upgrade.
AppEngineBlog ( http://code.google.com/p/appengineblogsoftware/ ) notes:
written in appengine specific code,
not maintained, no example sites
available to see how it looks
Coltrane ( http://code.google.com/p/coltrane-blog/source/browse/ ):
simple blog constructed from standard
Django functionality no development
or support, basically need to use
this code as a way to develop your
own blog and go from there
Flother ( https://github.com/flother/flother ):
found via Coltrane comments, probably
embeddable without too much trouble,
requires 8 additional apps,the photos
and places components have
ManyToManyFields that would have to
be re-written or these components
disabled
Blogger API ( http://code.google.com/apis/blogger/ ):
use Blogger at whatever location you
wish to gain fully functional
blogging capabilities, then use
Blogger API to deliver content to any
other site you wish to display it
Flother came close to what I need but there is still a fair bit of uncertainty and effort there. I'm proceeding with the Blogger option as the only viable choice for me at this time.
Well, as far as I can see, there is no way to get Mezzanine running on GAE other than wading into the code and ripping out anything relating to a ManyToManyField (Sites support, Photos and ... something else. Can't remember what).
The only thing I could find out there that has the potential to be added to an existing project, uses only portable Django code (app engine specific) and runs on App Engine is http://www.allbuttonspressed.com/projects/allbuttonspressed . I haven't actually tried to integrate it yet because I'm going to see if the Blogger solution works.
I've been using bloog for two of my blogs without any serious troubles so far - there are few little quirks that make it mildly unpleasant sometimes but nothing that's been a deal breaker.
I use the Blogger solution and it works fine, especially if you're only one person and you run the whole site.
The problem comes when you want to others to help you out. Now every css and design decision needs to be sent to a programmer who hacks away at django templates. A CMS with a real WYSIWYG editor would allow you to ship off that work to marketing/design people and let you focus on the fun stuff.
I came across a decent review of the various blogging engines for Django, however, it's unclear how well they each integrate with GAE.
I have deployed Mezzanine/Cartridge in GAE succesfully but I have not documented it yet in github or something like that. It works using python 2.7 of course and django 1.5. Additionally it works with Google Cloud SQL, and the local file system GAE provides. It additionally works with google gmail facilities. For thumbnailing I am using local GAE functionality.
It requires several additional libraries like boto, but it works well.
See a short demo in midevocional365.appspot.com/

Django App for Academic Journal?

I'm looking a Django app I'm looking for an app that that allows for management and integration of footnotes for articles
just wondering if anyone had seen something around...
It's certainly not a perfect fit, but I wrote a Django app that supports annotations and footnotes on texts, although the app concentrates more on annotations. If you have the time to read source and adapt it to your needs, clone the app from GitHub.

Wrapper google.appengine.ext.db.Model => django.db.models.Model

Given that gae & django persistence layers are quite similar, I'm wondering whether someone has tried creating a wrapper? Say, could be useful for utilizing django.forms.ModelForm.
Are there any fundamental problems with this?
App-engine-helper provides limited support for this, but you're still dealing with thinly-disguised App Engine models. I'm not hugely familiar with Django's model framework, but the basic issue is that Django's model framework is simply too tied to relational databases to easily move to the App Engine backend.
You can use a variant of ModelForms, built right into the App Engine SDK, though - see here for details.
Django norel is better alternative to app-engine-helper. It is a much better abstraction that supports django queries (well many of them -- there is no JOIN support), foregin keys (no ManyToMany relations, though).
Django norel supports admin app (app-engine-patch doesn't).
What, you mean like the Google App Engine Helper or Google App Engine Patch?
The design of Django models implicitly assumes that you're using a relational database. Unfortunately, Datastore does not support all the features of a relational database. For example, there is no equivalent of a join query in Datastore. General transactions aren't supported either. As such, it would be really hard (if not impossible) to adapt Datastore to work as a drop-in replacement for Django models.
At 4:45 of this YouTube video, Guido Von Rossum briefly describes how you need to rethink the way you design your database to fit Datastore's model. The benefit is that you will be able to scale up very well. At 48:30, someone asks why the Datastore API wasn't designed to be more like Django models. Guido explains that the fundamental differences between Datastore and a relational database make this impractical. 13:20 also discusses this.