I have a function 'one' that creates a string of length i,
fillWithEmpty :: Int -> String
fillWithEmpty i =
if i == 0 then "." else "." ++ fillWithEmpty(i - 1)
I then want the system to remember the length i so that it can replace a character in the string with 'S' at a position in the string of length i, given a value of a position needed to be replaced, e
replaceWithS :: String -> Int -> String
replaceWithS i e=
if i == e then "S" else "." ++ replaceWithS(i - 1)
Any help would be appreciated. Thanks
You can use explicit recursion to enumerate over the list. Each time you make a call where you decrement the index, and if the index is 0 you use an S instead of the value of the given string, so:
replaceWithS :: String -> Int -> String
replaceWithS "" _ = ""
replaceWithS (_:xs) 0 = … : …
replaceWithS (x:xs) i = … : replaceWithS … …
Here x is thus the head of the string (its first character), and xs is a list with the remaining characters. You here still need to fill in the … parts.
Related
I'm trying to make a function that will check how many characters are matching in a word
The characters are non-repeating A-Z. The position of the letters doesn't matter
INPUT target = "ABCDE" , attempt = "CDXYZ",
OUTPUT match = 2 letters (C & D)
I've managed to write a function that compares one character in a word, but I've no clue
how to make it compare every character.
import Data.List
--check if a char appears in a [char]
checkForCharInAWord :: [Char] -> Char -> Bool
checkForCharInAWord wrd lt = elem lt wrd
compareChars :: [Char] -> [Char] -> Int
compareChars = ?????
I would also like to know how to count the matching characters in case of words with repeating characters, the position of the letter doesn't matter. I.e:
INPUT target = "AAAB", attempt = "ABBB" OUTPUT match = 2 letters (A &
B)
INPUT target = "AAAB", attempt = "AABB" OUTPUT match = 3 letters (A,
A & B)
and finally how to count the matching characters in a word, but where position is also taken into consideration
INPUT target = "NICE", attempt = "NEAR" OUTPUT match = 1 letters (N)
-- correct letter and a correct position
INPUT target = "BBBB", attempt = "BABA" OUTPUT match = 2 letters (B,
B) -- correct letter and a correct position
In each case I need just a simple int output with a similarity rating between 0 and (max number of letters in a target word.
The method should be flexible enough to allow words of different length (however target and attempt word will always be of equal length).
Thanks!
Below function seems to work for point 3. It takes two formal parameters (w1 and w2) representing the two words you want to compare, creates a list of 2-tuples of the corresponding letters using the built-in zip function (where xs = zip w1 w2 ). Then it goes through this list of 2-tuples and for each tuple compares the two elements using a list comprehension with guard. If they match, it adds a 1 to the list, otherwise it does nothing. Finaly, it sums all elements of this list (sum [1 | x<-xs, fst x == snd x]).
match :: [Char] -> [Char] -> Int
match w1 w2 = sum [1 | x<-xs, fst x == snd x]
where xs = zip w1 w2
I need to process a string using foldr where '#' means deleting the previous character. For example:
>backspace "abc#d##c"
"ac"
>backspace "#####"
""
It needs to be done using foldr through one pass of the list, without using reverse and/or (++).
Here what I have got so far:
backspace :: String -> String
backspace xs = foldr func [] xs where
func c cs | c /= '#' = c:cs
| otherwise = cs
But it just filter the '#' from the string. I thought about deleting the last element of current answer every time c == '#' and got something like that
backspace :: String -> String
backspace xs = foldr func [] xs where
func c cs | c /= '#' = c:cs
| cs /= [] = init cs
| otherwise = cs
but it is not working properly,
ghci> backspace "abc#d##c"
"abc"
You can use (Int, String) as state for your foldr where the first Int is the number of backspaces, and the String is the current string constructed.
This thus means that you can work with:
backspace :: String -> String
backspace = snd . foldr func (0, [])
where func '#' (n, cs) = (n+1, cs)
func c (n, cs)
| n > 0 = … -- (1)
| otherwise = … -- (2)
In case we have a character that is not a #, but n > 0 it means we need to remove that character, and thus ignore c and decrement n. In case n == 0 we can add c to the String.
I leave filling in the … parts as an exercise.
My goal is to take a char list like:
['a'; 'a'; 'a'; 'a'; 'a'; 'b'; 'b'; 'b'; 'a'; 'd'; 'd'; 'd'; 'd']
Count the number of repeated characters and transform it into a (int * char) list like this:
[(5, 'a'); (3, 'b'); (1, 'a'); (4, 'd')]
I am completely lost and also am very very new to OCaml. Here is the code I have rn:
let to_run_length (lst : char list) : (int * char) list =
match lst with
| [] -> []
| h :: t ->
let count = int 0 in
while t <> [] do
if h = t then
count := count + 1;
done;
I am struggling on how to check the list like you would an array in C or Python. I am not allowed to use fold functions or map or anything like that.
Edit: Updated code, yielding an exception on List.nth:
let rec to_run_length (lst : char list) : (int * char) list =
let n = ref 0 in
match lst with
| [] -> []
| h :: t ->
if h = List.nth t 0 then n := !n + 1 ;
(!n, h) :: to_run_length t ;;
Edit: Added nested match resulting in a function that doesn't work... but no errors!
let rec to_run_length (lst : char list) : (int * char) list =
match lst with
| [] -> []
| h :: t ->
match to_run_length t with
| [] -> []
| (n, c) :: tail ->
if h <> c then to_run_length t
else (n + 1, c) :: tail ;;
Final Edit: Finally got the code running perfect!
let rec to_run_length (lst : char list) : (int * char) list =
match lst with
| [] -> []
| h :: t ->
match to_run_length t with
| (n, c) :: tail when h = c -> (n + 1, h) :: tail
| tail -> (1, h) :: tail ;;
One way to answer your question is to point out that a list in OCaml isn't like an array in C or Python. There is no (constant-time) way to index an OCaml list like you can an array.
If you want to code in an imperative style, you can treat an OCaml list like a list in C, i.e., a linked structure that can be traversed in one direction from beginning to end.
To make this work you would indeed have a while statement that continues only as long as the list is non-empty. At each step you examine the head of the list and update your output accordingly. Then replace the list with the tail of the list.
For this you would want to use references for holding the input and output. (As a side comment, where you have int 0 you almost certainly wanted ref 0. I.e., you want to use a reference. There is no predefined OCaml function or operator named int.)
However, the usual reason to study OCaml is to learn functional style. In that case you should be thinking of a recursive function that will compute the value you want.
For that you need a base case and a way to reduce a non-base case to a smaller case that can be solved recursively. A pretty good base case is an empty list. The desired output for this input is (presumably) also an empty list.
Now assume (by recursion hypothesis) you have a function that works, and you are given a non-empty list. You can call your function on the tail of the list, and it (by hypothesis) gives you a run-length encoded version of the tail. What do you need to do to this result to add one more character to the front? That's what you would have to figure out.
Update
Your code is getting closer, as you say.
You need to ask yourself how to add a new character to the beginning of the encoded value. In your code you have this, for example:
. . .
match to_run_length t with
| [] -> []
. . .
This says to return an empty encoding if the tail is empty. But that doesn't make sense. You know for a fact that there's a character in the input (namely, h). You should be returning some kind of result that includes h.
In general if the returned list starts with h, you want to add 1 to the count of the first group. Otherwise you want to add a new group to the front of the returned list.
Im trying to run an interpreter I made in ocaml and when i to push in a negative value i.e. let e1 = run [PushI -2; PushI 2; LessThan] []. I am getting a syntax error for my parse_int function. I'm trying to write the part of the function that allows for the input of a negative number
type stackVal =
I of int
type command = PushI of int
let rec run (commands : command list) (stack: stackVal list) : stackVal list =
match (commands , stack) with
| (PushI i :: rest, _ ) -> run rest (I i :: stack)
let to_string (s : stackVal) : string =
match s with
| I i -> string_of_int i
let parse_command (s:string) : command =
match take_while is_alpha (String.trim s) with
| ("PushI" , p) -> let Some i = parse_int (String.trim p) in PushI i
let parse_int (s : string) : int option =
match int_of_string s with
| String.get n 0 = '-' -> Some -String.sub n 1 len
| n -> Some n
| exception _ -> None
There is a problem with the pattern-matching of your parse_int function.
match int_of_string s with
| String.get n 0 = '-' -> Some -String.sub n 1 len
| n -> Some n
| exception _ -> None
The first clause here is invalid as "String.get n 0 = '-'" is not an integer constructor. You could write 1 which matches only the integer 1 or _ whitch matches any integer or n which matches any integer and binds it to the name n for the rest of the clause. You can have a look at the manual for more informations.
If you wanted to check if the first char of the string is - pattern matching is not the right tool to do it, simply use an if then else.
However, note that int_of_string works just fine on negative integers, so there is no need to do that part by yourself.
Unrelated, but i noticed that you call the parse_int in the parse_command function. In that case you should define parse_int before parse_command.
I have a character list [#"h", #"i", #" ", #"h", #"i"] which I want to get the first word from this (the first character sequence before each space).
I've written a function which gives me this warning:
stdIn:13.1-13.42 Warning: type vars not generalized because of value
restriction are instantiated to dummy types (X1,X2,...)
Here is my code:
fun next [] = ([], [])
| next (hd::tl) = if(not(ord(hd) >= 97 andalso ord(hd) <= 122)) then ([], (hd::tl))
else
let
fun getword [] = [] | getword (hd::tl) = if(ord(hd) >= 97 andalso ord(hd) <= 122) then [hd]#getword tl else [];
in
next (getword (hd::tl))
end;
EDIT:
Expected input and output
next [#"h", #"i", #" ", #"h", #"i"] => ([#"h", #"i"], [#" ", #"h", #"i"])
Can anybody help me with this solution? Thanks!
This functionality already exists within the standard library:
val nexts = String.tokens Char.isSpace
val nexts_test = nexts "hi hi hi" = ["hi", "hi", "hi"]
But if you were to build such a function anyway, it seems that you return ([], []) sometimes and a single list at other times. Normally in a recursive function, you can build the result by doing e.g. c :: recursive_f cs, but this is assuming your function returns a single list. If, instead, it returns a tuple, you suddenly have to unpack this tuple using e.g. pattern matching in a let-expression:
let val (x, y) = recursive_f cs
in (c :: x, y + ...) end
Or you could use an extra argument inside a helper function (since the extra argument would change the type of the function) to store the word you're extracting, instead. A consequence of doing that is that you end up with the word in reverse and have to reverse it back when you're done recursing.
fun isLegal c = ord c >= 97 andalso ord c <= 122 (* Only lowercase ASCII letters *)
(* But why not use one of the following:
fun isLegal c = Char.isAlpha c
fun isLegal c = not (Char.isSpace c) *)
fun next input =
let fun extract (c::cs) word =
if isLegal c
then extract cs (c::word)
else (rev word, c::cs)
| extract [] word = (rev word, [])
in extract input [] end
val next_test_1 =
let val (w, r) = next (explode "hello world")
in (implode w, implode r) = ("hello", " world")
end
val next_test_2 = next [] = ([], [])