I'm trying to pass vpc cidr as input parameter like below:
import { Stack, StackProps, Construct, CfnParameter } from '#aws-cdk/core';
import { Vpc, SubnetType } from '#aws-cdk/aws-ec2';
export class VpcStructureCdkStack extends Stack {
constructor(scope: Construct, id: string, props?: StackProps) {
super(scope, id, props);
// VPC CIDR as input parameter
const vpcCidr = new CfnParameter(this, 'vpcCidr', {
type: 'String',
description: 'Please enter the IP range (CIDR notation) for this VPC',
allowedPattern: '((\d{1,3})\.){3}\d{1,3}/\d{1,2}'
})
// The code that defines your stack goes here
new Vpc(this, 'VPC', {
maxAzs: 3,
cidr: vpcCidr.valueAsString,
subnetConfiguration: [
{
name: 'App',
subnetType: SubnetType.PRIVATE,
cidrMask: 24
},
...
But getting the following error:
Error: 'cidr' property must be a concrete CIDR string, got a Token (we need to parse it for automatic subdivision)
Same error when using environment variables.
Is there any way to don't hard code vpc cidr?
From the documentation of CDK Parameters:
A CfnParameter instance exposes its value to your AWS CDK app via a token.
Like all tokens, the parameter's token is resolved at synthesis time, but it resolves to a reference to the parameter defined in the AWS CloudFormation template, which will be resolved at deploy time, rather than to a concrete value.
[...] In general, we recommend against using AWS CloudFormation parameters with the AWS CDK.
Especially the last sentence is crucial.
How do you resolve it now?
Well, as you already stated: use environment variables via your programming language.
I don't know about your approach with environment variables, because you didn't show it.
Let me give you an example.
// file: lib/your_stack.ts
export class VpcStructureCdkStack extends Stack {
constructor(scope: Construct, id: string, props?: StackProps) {
super(scope, id, props);
// reading the value from the env.
// Obviously, you have to set it before or pass it before you call any cdk command
const vpcCidr = process.env.VPC_CIDR;
new Vpc(this, 'VPC', {
maxAzs: 3,
// passing it
cidr: vpcCidr,
subnetConfiguration: [
{
name: 'App',
subnetType: SubnetType.PRIVATE,
cidrMask: 24
},
// ...
]
}
}
}
That's only one way of getting a configurable value into CDK though.
A better and debuggable way is to set all your dynamic/user/domain values in the Context.
The best place to do for your own values is within the cdk.json. If it doesn't exist yet, just create it and don't forget to put it into Git (or your VCS of your choice).
{
// ...
context: {
// ...
"VpcCidr": "10.0.0.0/8",
}
}
If the cdk.json approach also isn't sufficient, you have another option:
Pass it to cdk synth/deploy as an argument via -c/--context vpcCidr=10.0.0.0/8.
However, that's harder to debug, because it's not versioned necessarily.
Within your stack (the best place IMHO to do it), you can call the following method to retrieve the actual value from the context:
const vpcCidr = this.node.tryGetContext("VpcCidr");
and pass it to your VPC constructor.
Either create your own VPC either import the existing one. For the second solution there is fromLookup(), which will find proper VPC (by tags, name or other VPCLookupOptions) together with it's CIDR:
https://docs.aws.amazon.com/cdk/api/latest/typescript/api/aws-ec2/vpc.html#aws_ec2_Vpc_fromLookup
I did similar thing by reading external config file.
import * as cdk from "#aws-cdk/core";
import { Vpc, SubnetType } from "#aws-cdk/aws-ec2";
import fs = require("fs");
export class ExampleStack extends cdk.Stack {
constructor(scope: cdk.Construct, id: string, props?: cdk.StackProps) {
super(scope, id, props);
const configJson = fs.readFileSync(
"config/" + this.account + ".json",
"utf8"
);
let config = JSON.parse(configJson);
const vpc = Vpc.fromLookup(this, "vpc", {
vpcId: config.vpcId
});
}
}
const app = new cdk.App();
new ExampleStack(app, 'ExampleStack', {
env: {
account: process.env.CDK_DEFAULT_ACCOUNT,
region: process.env.CDK_DEFAULT_REGION,
}});
and have a file location at ./config/123123123.json
{
"vpcId" : "123123123"
}
Related
I have an ApplicationStack which created a S3Bucket:
export class ApplicationStack extends Cdk.Stack {
public readonly websiteBucket : S3.Bucket;
constructor(scope: Construct, id: string, props: ApplicationStackProps) {
super(scope, id, props);
// Amazon S3 bucket to host the store website artifact
this.websiteBucket = new S3.Bucket(this, "eCommerceWebsite", {
bucketName: `${props.websiteDomain}-${account}-${region}`,
websiteIndexDocument: "index.html",
websiteErrorDocument: "error.html",
removalPolicy: Cdk.RemovalPolicy.DESTROY,
autoDeleteObjects: true,
accessControl: S3.BucketAccessControl.PRIVATE,
encryption: S3.BucketEncryption.S3_MANAGED,
publicReadAccess: false,
blockPublicAccess: S3.BlockPublicAccess.BLOCK_ALL,
});
// Create a dummy export.
// https://www.endoflineblog.com/cdk-tips-03-how-to-unblock-cross-stack-references
this.exportValue(this.websiteBucket.bucketArn);
...
...
...
}
}
I also defines ApplicationStage which contains above ApplicationStack
export class ApplicationStage extends Cdk.Stage {
public readonly websiteBucket : S3.Bucket;
constructor(scope: Construct, id: string, props: ApplicationStageProps) {
super(scope, id, props);
const applicationStack = new ApplicationStack(this, `eCommerceDatabaseStack-${props.stageName}`, {
stageName: props.stageName,
websiteDomain: props.websiteDomain,
});
this.websiteBucket = applicationStack.websiteBucket;
}
public getWebsiteBucket() {
return this.websiteBucket;
}
}
In my pipeline stack, I want to create application stage for each stage that need deploy the website artifact to its corresponding S3 bucket. This is a cross-account CI/CD pipeline, and I have 3 separate AWS accounts(Alpha, Gamma, Prod) for this website. Whenever I ship code out, the pipeline should deploy the new artifact to Alpha then Gamma then Prod, and the alpha.ecommerce.com, gamma.ecommerce.com, ecommerce.com should be updated in this order. The problem happens when reference the S3Bucket in S3DeployAction below:
export class CodePipelineStack extends CDK.Stack {
constructor(scope: CDK.App, id: string, props: CodePipelineStackProps) {
super(scope, id, props);
...
...
// Here the pipelineStageInfoList contains Gamma and Prod information.
pipelineStageInfoList.forEach((pipelineStage: PipelineStageInfo) => {
const applicationStage = new ApplicationStage(this, pipelineStage.stageName, {
stageName: pipelineStage.stageName,
pipelineName: props.pipelineName,
websiteDomain: props.websiteDomain,
env: {
account: pipelineStage.awsAccount,
region: pipelineStage.awsRegion,
},
});
const stage = pipeline.addStage(applicationStage);
// Here is what went wrong. It is trying to deploy the S3Bucket for that stage.
stage.addAction(
new codepipeline_actions.S3DeployAction({
actionName: "Deploy-Website",
input: outputWebsite,
bucket: applicationStage.getWebsiteBucket(),
})
);
});
}
...
...
...
}
Run cdk synthesize got below error:
/Users/yangliu/Projects/eCommerce/eCommerceWebsitePipelineCdk/node_modules/aws-cdk-lib/core/lib/deps.ts:39
throw new Error(`You cannot add a dependency from '${source.node.path}' (in ${describeStage(sourceStage)}) to '${target.node.path}' (in ${describeStage(targetStage)}): dependency cannot cross stage boundaries`);
^
Error: You cannot add a dependency from 'eCommerceWebsitePipelineCdk-CodePipeline-Stack' (in the App) to 'eCommerceWebsitePipelineCdk-CodePipeline-Stack/ALPHA/eCommerceDatabaseStack-ALPHA' (in Stage 'eCommerceWebsitePipelineCdk-CodePipeline-Stack/ALPHA'): dependency cannot cross stage boundaries
I think this means that I didn't pass the S3Bucket reference in the right way here.
How to fix it?
Update with my solution 2022-09-06
Based on matthew-bonig#'s advice, I am able to get this work.
I have a separate stack to be deployed to each account to create the S3 buckets and its required CloudFront distribution. Then my pipeline stack just focus on tracking my GitHub repository, and update S3 bucket whenever a new commit is pushed.
This usually occurs because your pipeline is running in a different account/region than your stacks created from the pipelineStageInfoList.
If they aren't in the same account/region then then simplest route is to manually set the s3 bucket names by a property on your 'InfoList' and forgo using references like you're trying to use. So you'd have to deploy everything first, then come back with an update afterwards that sets those values.
If they are, then you can try to set the pipeline stacks account/region directly like you are with the other stacks and that might help.
I am using CDK to deploy AWS resources but need to get some values from the parameter store from a different region. I can see this API in CDK's reference page to read a parameter:
ssm.StringParameter.fromStringParameterAttributes
But it doesn't support passing region. How can I make it work across region?
You can find an implementation here:
import { Construct } from 'constructs';
import { AwsCustomResource, AwsCustomResourcePolicy, AwsSdkCall, PhysicalResourceId } from 'aws-cdk-lib/custom-resources';
interface SSMParameterReaderProps {
readonly parameterName: string;
readonly region: string;
}
export class SSMParameterReader extends AwsCustomResource {
constructor(scope: Construct, name: string, props: SSMParameterReaderProps) {
const { parameterName, region } = props;
super(scope, name, {
onUpdate: {
action: 'getParameter',
service: 'SSM',
parameters: {
Name: parameterName,
},
region,
physicalResourceId: PhysicalResourceId.of(name),
},
policy: AwsCustomResourcePolicy.fromSdkCalls({
resources: AwsCustomResourcePolicy.ANY_RESOURCE,
}),
});
}
public getParameterValue(): string {
return this.getResponseFieldReference('Parameter.Value').toString();
}
}
Source: https://github.com/Idea-Pool/aws-static-site/blob/main/lib/ssm-parameter-reader.ts
(Based on CloudFormation Cross-Region Reference)
This article explains what you are looking for
How to read parameter store from a different region in CDK?
Summary:
Create an AWS custom resource that takes in the parameterName and the regionName as props and returns the value.
It is not currently possible to access SSM Parameters in a different region.
You would have to set up some process to replicate the parameter across the needed regions and keep them in sync.
You could also get the value using a custom resource backed by a lambda.
I have a pipeline stack with a stage. This stage contains multiple stacks. One of the stacks creates a Step Function. Now I would like to trigger that step function in the post of the stage (I created InvokeStepFunctionStep as a custom ICodePipelineActionFactory implementation for this).
This is from my pipeline stack code:
// TODO make this dynamic
const stepFunctionArn = "arn:aws:states:<FULL_ARN_OMITTED>";
pipeline.addStage(stage, {
post: [ new InvokeStepFunctionStep('step-function-invoke', {
stateMachine: sfn.StateMachine.fromStateMachineArn(this, 'StepFunctionfromArn',stepFunctionArn),
stateMachineInput: StateMachineInput.literal(stepFunctionsInput)
})]
});
Obviously the hard coded ARN is bad. I tried getting the ARN of the step function as a variable from the stage's stack. However this fails with
dependency cannot cross stage boundaries
I also tried using a CfnOutput for the ARN but when I try to use it via Fn.ImportValue the UpdatePipelineStep fails in CloudFormation with
No export named EdgePackagingStateMachineArn found
What is the recommended way to pass this information dynamically?
You could try using the CfnOutput.importValue property to reference CfnOutput value, which works for me. See below:
Service stack:
export class XxxStack extends Stack {
public readonly s3BucketName: CfnOutput;
constructor(scope: Construct, id: string, props?: StackProps) {
...
this.s3BucketName = new CfnOutput(
this,
's3BucketName',
{
exportName: `${this.stackName}-s3BucketName`,
value: s3Bucket.bucketName,
}
);
}
}
Stage class:
import { CfnOutput, Construct, Stage, StageProps } from '#aws-cdk/core';
export class CdkPipelineStage extends Stage {
public readonly s3BucketName: CfnOutput;
constructor(scope: Construct, id: string, props?: StageProps) {
super(scope, id, props);
const service = new XxxStack(
this,
'xxx',
{
...
}
);
this.s3BucketName = service.s3BucketName;
}
}
Pipeline stack:
import { CdkPipeline, SimpleSynthAction } from '#aws-cdk/pipelines';
const pipeline = new CdkPipeline(this, 'Pipeline', {...})
const preprod = new CdkPipelineStage(this, 'Staging', {
env: { account: PREPROD_ACCOUNT, region: PIPELINE_REGION },
});
// put validations for the stages
const preprodStage = pipeline.addApplicationStage(preprod);
preprodStage.addActions(
new ShellScriptAction({
actionName: 'TestService',
additionalArtifacts: [sourceArtifact],
rolePolicyStatements: [
new PolicyStatement({
effect: Effect.ALLOW,
actions: ['s3:getObject'],
resources: [
`arn:aws:s3:::${preprod.s3BucketName.importValue}/*`,
`arn:aws:s3:::${preprod.s3BucketName.importValue}`,
],
}),
],
useOutputs: {
ENV_S3_BUCKET_NAME: pipeline.stackOutput(
preprod.s3BucketName
),
},
...
}),
);
Note: my CDK version is
$ cdk --version
1.121.0 (build 026cb8f)
And I can confirm that CfnOutput.importValue also works for CDK version 1.139.0, and CDK version 2.8.0
Option 1: easy, not optimal.
Specify a name for your Step Function, and pass it to both the stack that creates it, and your invokation step. Build the ARN from the name.
This option isn't great because specifying physical names for CloudFormation resources has its disadvantages - mainly the inability to introduce any subsequent change that requires resource replacement, which may likely be necessary for a step function.
Option 2: more convoluted, but might be better long-term.
Create an SSM parameter with the step function's ARN from within the stack that creates the step function, then read the SSM parameter in your invokation step.
This will also require specifying a physical name for a resource - the SSM parameter, but you are not likely to require resource replacement for it, so it is less of an issue.
I am writing an AWS CDK application that creates a ECS Fargate stack. It uses an existing VPC and existing ECR repositories. Simply mocking my Interface, and returning mocks of the IVpc and IRepository interfaces gets me past initial problems, but when the CDK goes to use those constructs, I get more errors.
const mockResources = mock<IExistingResources>(
{
getVpc: (scope: cdk.Construct, vpcId: string) => {
return mock<IVpc>();
},
getElasticContainerRepository: (scope: cdk.Construct, id: string, repositoryName: string) => {
return mock<IRepository>();
}
}
);
I get this error:
TypeError: Cannot destructure property 'subnetIds' of 'baseProps.vpc.selectSubnets(...)' as it is undefined.
This seems like a possible "black hole" where I will need to understand every usage of the mock and account for it. I'm looking for a better way to consistently model my existing resources so that I can test my new code. Any advice would be appreciated.
For anyone that comes across this question, I decided to construct a VPC with known parameters for purposes of my tests. This VPC is returned from the mock fromLookup function.
For example: to build the VPC
function buildVpc(scope: cdk.Construct, vpcId:string): IVpc {
return new Vpc(scope, vpcId, {
cidr: '10.0.0.0/16',
maxAzs: 2,
subnetConfiguration: [{
cidrMask: 26,
name: 'isolatedSubnet',
subnetType: SubnetType.PUBLIC,
}],
natGateways: 0
});
}
And then to use the vpc in the mock of my ExistingResources class,
const mockResources = mock<IExistingResources>(
{
getVpc: (scope: cdk.Construct, vpcId: string) => {
return buildVpc(scope, vpcId);
},
getElasticContainerRepository: (scope: cdk.Construct, id: string, repositoryName: string) => {
return mock<IRepository>();
}
}
);
This allows me to do snapshot testing in a disconnected environment.
When you are running multiple CloudFormation stacks within the same region, you are able to share references across stacks using CloudFormation Outputs
However, outputs cannot be used for cross region references as that documentation highlights.
You can't create cross-stack references across regions. You can use the intrinsic function Fn::ImportValue to import only values that have been exported within the same region.
How do you reference values across regions in CloudFormation?
For an example to follow, I have a Route 53 hosted zone deployed in us-east-1. However, I have a backend in us-west-2 that I want to create a DNS-validated ACM certificate which requires a reference to the hosted zone in order to be able to create the appropriate CNAME for prove ownership.
How would I go about referencing that hosted zone id created in us-east-1 from within us-west-2?
The easiest way I have found of doing this is writing the reference you want to share (i.e. your hosted zone id in this case) to the Systems Manager Parameter Store and then referencing that value in your "child" stack in the separate region using a custom resource.
Fortunately, this is incredibly easy if your templates are created using Cloud Development Kit (CDK).
For the custom resource to read from SSM, you can use something like this:
// ssm-parameter-reader.ts
import { Construct } from '#aws-cdk/core';
import { AwsCustomResource, AwsSdkCall } from '#aws-cdk/custom-resources';
interface SSMParameterReaderProps {
parameterName: string;
region: string;
}
export class SSMParameterReader extends AwsCustomResource {
constructor(scope: Construct, name: string, props: SSMParameterReaderProps) {
const { parameterName, region } = props;
const ssmAwsSdkCall: AwsSdkCall = {
service: 'SSM',
action: 'getParameter',
parameters: {
Name: parameterName
},
region,
physicalResourceId: Date.now().toString() // Update physical id to always fetch the latest version
};
super(scope, name, { onUpdate: ssmAwsSdkCall });
}
public getParameterValue(): string {
return this.getData('Parameter.Value').toString();
}
}
To write the hosted zone id to parameter store, you can simply do this:
// route53.ts (deployed in us-east-1)
import { PublicHostedZone } from '#aws-cdk/aws-route53';
import { StringParameter } from '#aws-cdk/aws-ssm';
export const ROUTE_53_HOSTED_ZONE_ID_SSM_PARAM = 'ROUTE_53_HOSTED_ZONE_ID_SSM_PARAM';
/**
* Other Logic
*/
const hostedZone = new PublicHostedZone(this, 'WebsiteHostedZone', { zoneName: 'example.com' });
new StringParameter(this, 'Route53HostedZoneIdSSMParam', {
parameterName: ROUTE_53_HOSTED_ZONE_ID_SSM_PARAM,
description: 'The Route 53 hosted zone id for this account',
stringValue: hostedZone.hostedZoneId
});
Lastly, you can read that value from the parameter store in that region using the custom resource we just created and use that to create a certificate in us-west-2.
// acm.ts (deployed in us-west-2)
import { DnsValidatedCertificate } from '#aws-cdk/aws-certificatemanager';
import { PublicHostedZone } from '#aws-cdk/aws-route53';
import { ROUTE_53_HOSTED_ZONE_ID_SSM_PARAM } from './route53';
import { SSMParameterReader } from './ssm-parameter-reader';
/**
* Other Logic
*/
const hostedZoneIdReader = new SSMParameterReader(this, 'Route53HostedZoneIdReader', {
parameterName: ROUTE_53_HOSTED_ZONE_ID_SSM_PARAM,
region: 'us-east-1'
});
const hostedZoneId: string = hostedZoneIdReader.getParameterValue();
const hostedZone = PublicHostedZone.fromPublicHostedZoneId(this, 'Route53HostedZone', hostedZoneId);
const certificate = new DnsValidatedCertificate(this, 'ApiGatewayCertificate', { 'pdx.example.com', hostedZone });
The cdk library has been updated, the code avove needs to be changed to the following:
import { Construct } from '#aws-cdk/core';
import { AwsCustomResource, AwsSdkCall } from '#aws-cdk/custom-resources';
import iam = require("#aws-cdk/aws-iam");
interface SSMParameterReaderProps {
parameterName: string;
region: string;
}
export class SSMParameterReader extends AwsCustomResource {
constructor(scope: Construct, name: string, props: SSMParameterReaderProps) {
const { parameterName, region } = props;
const ssmAwsSdkCall: AwsSdkCall = {
service: 'SSM',
action: 'getParameter',
parameters: {
Name: parameterName
},
region,
physicalResourceId: {id:Date.now().toString()} // Update physical id to always fetch the latest version
};
super(scope, name, { onUpdate: ssmAwsSdkCall,policy:{
statements:[new iam.PolicyStatement({
resources : ['*'],
actions : ['ssm:GetParameter'],
effect:iam.Effect.ALLOW,
}
)]
}});
}
public getParameterValue(): string {
return this.getResponseField('Parameter.Value').toString();
}
}
CDK 2.x
There is a new Stack property called crossRegionReferences which you can enable to add cross region references. It's as simple as this:
const stack = new Stack(app, 'Stack', {
crossRegionReferences: true,
});
Under the hood, this does something similar to the above answers by using custom resources and Systems Manager. From the CDK docs:
crossRegionReferences?
Enable this flag to allow native cross region stack references.
Enabling this will create a CloudFormation custom resource in both the producing stack and consuming stack in order to perform the export/import
This feature is currently experimental
More details from the CDK core package README:
You can enable the Stack property crossRegionReferences
in order to access resources in a different stack and region. With this feature flag
enabled it is possible to do something like creating a CloudFront distribution in us-east-2 and
an ACM certificate in us-east-1.
When the AWS CDK determines that the resource is in a different stack and is in a different
region, it will "export" the value by creating a custom resource in the producing stack which
creates SSM Parameters in the consuming region for each exported value. The parameters will be
created with the name '/cdk/exports/${consumingStackName}/${export-name}'.
In order to "import" the exports into the consuming stack a SSM Dynamic reference
is used to reference the SSM parameter which was created.
In order to mimic strong references, a Custom Resource is also created in the consuming
stack which marks the SSM parameters as being "imported". When a parameter has been successfully
imported, the producing stack cannot update the value.
CDK 1.x
If you are on CDK 1.x, continue using the workaround that others have shared.
Update 2023-01-16 with cdkv2 version 2.56.0 in a projen generated projects (hence respecting eslint rules and best practices for formatting etc.) :
import {
aws_iam as iam,
custom_resources as cr,
} from 'aws-cdk-lib';
import { Construct } from 'constructs';
interface SSMParameterReaderProps {
parameterName: string;
region: string;
}
export class SSMParameterReader extends cr.AwsCustomResource {
constructor(scope: Construct, name: string, props: SSMParameterReaderProps) {
const { parameterName, region } = props;
const ssmAwsSdkCall: cr.AwsSdkCall = {
service: 'SSM',
action: 'getParameter',
parameters: {
Name: parameterName,
},
region,
physicalResourceId: { id: Date.now().toString() }, // Update physical id to always fetch the latest version
};
super(scope, name, {
onUpdate: ssmAwsSdkCall,
policy: {
statements: [
new iam.PolicyStatement({
resources: ['*'],
actions: ['ssm:GetParameter'],
effect: iam.Effect.ALLOW,
}),
],
},
});
}
public getParameterValue(): string {
return this.getResponseField('Parameter.Value').toString();
}
};
Could not edit the post above ...