I am using an EC2 instance to setup Jenkins. In the EC2 instance, I bootstrap the following script to download the Jenkins CLI in my EC2 instance.
sudo wget http://127.0.0.1:8080/jenkins/jnlpJars/jenkins-cli.jar
But when this command executes I receive the following error
http://127.0.0.1:8080/jenkins/jnlpJars/jenkins-cli.jar Connecting to 127.0.0.1:8080... connected.
HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 503 Service Unavailable
ERROR 503: Service Unavailable.
I googled and found that it might be due to Jenkins is bootstrapping so for that I added following code in the script to wait for the Jenkins to start.
function jenkinsCreationWait () {
echo "Jenkins Creation Wait"
while ! test -f "/var/lib/jenkins/secrets/initialAdminPassword"; do
sleep 5
echo "Jenkins is booting, please wait..."
done
echo "End"
}
I placed this code before executing the
sudo wget http://127.0.0.1:8080/jenkins/jnlpJars/jenkins-cli.jar
After receiving the error during bootstrap, I SSH into EC2 instance and the tried executing the above command I received 500
http://127.0.0.1:8080/jenkins/jnlpJars/jenkins-cli.jar
Connecting to 127.0.0.1:8080... connected.
HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 500 Server Error
ERROR 500: Server Error.
Although this was working fine some hours ago.
I assume you're using user data. Here is a shell script to wait until you get a 200 code
while [[ "$(curl --insecure -s -o /dev/null -w "%{http_code}" http://localhost:8080/jnlpJars/jenkins-cli.jar)" != "200" ]]; do sleep 15; done
wget http://127.0.0.1:8080/jenkins/jnlpJars/jenkins-cli.jar
reference wait for http 200
Having this Dockerfile:
FROM fedora:30
ENV LANG C.UTF-8
RUN dnf upgrade -y \
&& dnf install -y \
openssh-clients \
openvpn \
slirp4netns \
&& dnf clean all
CMD ["openvpn", "--config", "/vpn/ovpn.config", "--auth-user-pass", "/vpn/ovpn.auth"]
Building the image with:
podman build -t peque/vpn .
If I try to run it with (note $(pwd), where the VPN configuration and credentials are stored):
podman run -v $(pwd):/vpn:Z --cap-add=NET_ADMIN --device=/dev/net/tun -it peque/vpn
I get the following error:
ERROR: Cannot open TUN/TAP dev /dev/net/tun: Permission denied (errno=13)
Any ideas on how could I fix this? I would not mind changing the base image if that could help (i.e.: to Alpine or anything else as long as it allows me to use openvpn for the connection).
System information
Using Podman 1.4.4 (rootless) and Fedora 30 distribution with kernel 5.1.19.
/dev/net/tun permissions
Running the container with:
podman run -v $(pwd):/vpn:Z --cap-add=NET_ADMIN --device=/dev/net/tun -it peque/vpn
Then, from the container, I can:
# ls -l /dev/ | grep net
drwxr-xr-x. 2 root root 60 Jul 23 07:31 net
I can also list /dev/net, but will get a "permission denied error":
# ls -l /dev/net
ls: cannot access '/dev/net/tun': Permission denied
total 0
-????????? ? ? ? ? ? tun
Trying --privileged
If I try with --privileged:
podman run -v $(pwd):/vpn:Z --privileged --cap-add=NET_ADMIN --device=/dev/net/tun -it peque/vpn
Then instead of the permission-denied error (errno=13), I get a no-such-file-or-directory error (errno=2):
ERROR: Cannot open TUN/TAP dev /dev/net/tun: No such file or directory (errno=2)
I can effectively verify there is no /dev/net/ directory when using --privileged, even if I pass the --cap-add=NET_ADMIN --device=/dev/net/tun parameters.
Verbose log
This is the log I get when configuring the client with verb 3:
OpenVPN 2.4.7 x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu [SSL (OpenSSL)] [LZO] [LZ4] [EPOLL] [PKCS11] [MH/PKTINFO] [AEAD] built on Feb 20 2019
library versions: OpenSSL 1.1.1c FIPS 28 May 2019, LZO 2.08
Outgoing Control Channel Authentication: Using 160 bit message hash 'SHA1' for HMAC authentication
Incoming Control Channel Authentication: Using 160 bit message hash 'SHA1' for HMAC authentication
TCP/UDP: Preserving recently used remote address: [AF_INET]xx.xx.xx.xx:1194
Socket Buffers: R=[212992->212992] S=[212992->212992]
UDP link local (bound): [AF_INET][undef]:0
UDP link remote: [AF_INET]xx.xx.xx.xx:1194
TLS: Initial packet from [AF_INET]xx.xx.xx.xx:1194, sid=3ebc16fc 8cb6d6b1
WARNING: this configuration may cache passwords in memory -- use the auth-nocache option to prevent this
VERIFY OK: depth=1, C=ES, ST=XXX, L=XXX, O=XXXXX, emailAddress=email#domain.com, CN=internal-ca
VERIFY KU OK
Validating certificate extended key usage
++ Certificate has EKU (str) TLS Web Server Authentication, expects TLS Web Server Authentication
VERIFY EKU OK
VERIFY OK: depth=0, C=ES, ST=XXX, L=XXX, O=XXXXX, emailAddress=email#domain.com, CN=ovpn.server.address
Control Channel: TLSv1.2, cipher TLSv1.2 ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384, 2048 bit RSA
[ovpn.server.address] Peer Connection Initiated with [AF_INET]xx.xx.xx.xx:1194
SENT CONTROL [ovpn.server.address]: 'PUSH_REQUEST' (status=1)
PUSH: Received control message: 'PUSH_REPLY,route xx.xx.xx.xx 255.255.255.0,route xx.xx.xx.0 255.255.255.0,dhcp-option DOMAIN server.net,dhcp-option DNS xx.xx.xx.254,dhcp-option DNS xx.xx.xx.1,dhcp-option DNS xx.xx.xx.1,route-gateway xx.xx.xx.1,topology subnet,ping 10,ping-restart 60,ifconfig xx.xx.xx.24 255.255.255.0,peer-id 1'
OPTIONS IMPORT: timers and/or timeouts modified
OPTIONS IMPORT: --ifconfig/up options modified
OPTIONS IMPORT: route options modified
OPTIONS IMPORT: route-related options modified
OPTIONS IMPORT: --ip-win32 and/or --dhcp-option options modified
OPTIONS IMPORT: peer-id set
OPTIONS IMPORT: adjusting link_mtu to 1624
Outgoing Data Channel: Cipher 'AES-128-CBC' initialized with 128 bit key
Outgoing Data Channel: Using 160 bit message hash 'SHA1' for HMAC authentication
Incoming Data Channel: Cipher 'AES-128-CBC' initialized with 128 bit key
Incoming Data Channel: Using 160 bit message hash 'SHA1' for HMAC authentication
ROUTE_GATEWAY xx.xx.xx.xx/255.255.255.0 IFACE=tap0 HWADDR=0a:38:ba:e6:4b:5f
ERROR: Cannot open TUN/TAP dev /dev/net/tun: No such file or directory (errno=2)
Exiting due to fatal error
Error number may change depending on whether I run the command with --privileged or not.
It turns out that you are blocked by SELinux: after running the client container and trying to access /dev/net/tun inside it, you will get the following AVC denial in the audit log:
type=AVC msg=audit(1563869264.270:833): avc: denied { getattr } for pid=11429 comm="ls" path="/dev/net/tun" dev="devtmpfs" ino=15236 scontext=system_u:system_r:container_t:s0:c502,c803 tcontext=system_u:object_r:tun_tap_device_t:s0 tclass=chr_file permissive=0
To allow your container configuring the tunnel while staying not fully privileged and with SELinux enforced, you need to customize SELinux policies a bit. However, I did not find an easy way to do this properly.
Luckily, there is a tool called udica, which can generate SELinux policies from container configurations. It does not provide the desired policy on its own and requires some manual intervention, so I will describe how I got the openvpn container working step-by-step.
First, install the required tools:
$ sudo dnf install policycoreutils-python-utils policycoreutils udica
Create the container with required privileges, then generate the policy for this container:
$ podman run -it --cap-add NET_ADMIN --device /dev/net/tun -v $PWD:/vpn:Z --name ovpn peque/vpn
$ podman inspect ovpn | sudo udica -j - ovpn_container
Policy ovpn_container created!
Please load these modules using:
# semodule -i ovpn_container.cil /usr/share/udica/templates/base_container.cil
Restart the container with: "--security-opt label=type:ovpn_container.process" parameter
Here is the policy which was generated by udica:
$ cat ovpn_container.cil
(block ovpn_container
(blockinherit container)
(allow process process ( capability ( chown dac_override fsetid fowner mknod net_raw setgid setuid setfcap setpcap net_bind_service sys_chroot kill audit_write net_admin )))
(allow process default_t ( dir ( open read getattr lock search ioctl add_name remove_name write )))
(allow process default_t ( file ( getattr read write append ioctl lock map open create )))
(allow process default_t ( sock_file ( getattr read write append open )))
)
Let's try this policy (note the --security-opt option, which tells podman to run the container in newly created domain):
$ sudo semodule -i ovpn_container.cil /usr/share/udica/templates/base_container.cil
$ podman run -it --cap-add NET_ADMIN --device /dev/net/tun -v $PWD:/vpn:Z --security-opt label=type:ovpn_container.process peque/vpn
<...>
ERROR: Cannot open TUN/TAP dev /dev/net/tun: Permission denied (errno=13)
Ugh. Here is the problem: the policy generated by udica still does not know about specific requirements of our container, as they are not reflected in its configuration (well, probably, it is possible to infer that you want to allow operations on tun_tap_device_t based on the fact that you requested --device /dev/net/tun, but...). So, we need to customize the policy by extending it with few more statements.
Let's disable SELinux temporarily and run the container to collect the expected denials:
$ sudo setenforce 0
$ podman run -it --cap-add NET_ADMIN --device /dev/net/tun -v $PWD:/vpn:Z --security-opt label=type:ovpn_container.process peque/vpn
These are:
$ sudo grep denied /var/log/audit/audit.log
type=AVC msg=audit(1563889218.937:839): avc: denied { read write } for pid=3272 comm="openvpn" name="tun" dev="devtmpfs" ino=15178 scontext=system_u:system_r:ovpn_container.process:s0:c138,c149 tcontext=system_u:object_r:tun_tap_device_t:s0 tclass=chr_file permissive=1
type=AVC msg=audit(1563889218.937:840): avc: denied { open } for pid=3272 comm="openvpn" path="/dev/net/tun" dev="devtmpfs" ino=15178 scontext=system_u:system_r:ovpn_container.process:s0:c138,c149 tcontext=system_u:object_r:tun_tap_device_t:s0 tclass=chr_file permissive=1
type=AVC msg=audit(1563889218.937:841): avc: denied { ioctl } for pid=3272 comm="openvpn" path="/dev/net/tun" dev="devtmpfs" ino=15178 ioctlcmd=0x54ca scontext=system_u:system_r:ovpn_container.process:s0:c138,c149 tcontext=system_u:object_r:tun_tap_device_t:s0 tclass=chr_file permissive=1
type=AVC msg=audit(1563889218.947:842): avc: denied { nlmsg_write } for pid=3273 comm="ip" scontext=system_u:system_r:ovpn_container.process:s0:c138,c149 tcontext=system_u:system_r:ovpn_container.process:s0:c138,c149 tclass=netlink_route_socket permissive=1
Or more human-readable:
$ sudo grep denied /var/log/audit/audit.log | audit2allow
#============= ovpn_container.process ==============
allow ovpn_container.process self:netlink_route_socket nlmsg_write;
allow ovpn_container.process tun_tap_device_t:chr_file { ioctl open read write };
OK, let's modify the udica-generated policy by adding the advised allows to it (note, that here I manually translated the syntax to CIL):
(block ovpn_container
(blockinherit container)
(allow process process ( capability ( chown dac_override fsetid fowner mknod net_raw setgid setuid setfcap setpcap net_bind_service sys_chroot kill audit_write net_admin )))
(allow process default_t ( dir ( open read getattr lock search ioctl add_name remove_name write )))
(allow process default_t ( file ( getattr read write append ioctl lock map open create )))
(allow process default_t ( sock_file ( getattr read write append open )))
; This is our new stuff.
(allow process tun_tap_device_t ( chr_file ( ioctl open read write )))
(allow process self ( netlink_route_socket ( nlmsg_write )))
)
Now we enable SELinux back, reload the module and check that the container works correctly when we specify our custom domain:
$ sudo setenforce 1
$ sudo semodule -r ovpn_container
$ sudo semodule -i ovpn_container.cil /usr/share/udica/templates/base_container.cil
$ podman run -it --cap-add NET_ADMIN --device /dev/net/tun -v $PWD:/vpn:Z --security-opt label=type:ovpn_container.process peque/vpn
<...>
Initialization Sequence Completed
Finally, check that other containers still have no these privileges:
$ podman run -it --cap-add NET_ADMIN --device /dev/net/tun -v $PWD:/vpn:Z peque/vpn
<...>
ERROR: Cannot open TUN/TAP dev /dev/net/tun: Permission denied (errno=13)
Yay! We stay with SELinux on, and allow the tunnel configuration only to our specific container.
I am new to AWS IoT. I am following the example in the link below about setting up JITP (Just In Time Provisioning). Everything goes fine such as registering the Root CA, private key verification certificate etc.
https://aws.amazon.com/blogs/iot/setting-up-just-in-time-provisioning-with-aws-iot-core/
I don't normally post "what is wrong with my code" kind of questions, but i'm out of ideas with this one. When I try the last step to use the MQTT Mosquitto client to connect and publish to AWS IoT Core with the below command
mosquitto_pub --cafile root.cert --cert deviceCertAndCACert.crt --key deviceJITPCert.key -h a9bqki6ij1hx9.iot.us-east-1.amazonaws.com -p 8883 -q 1 -t foo/bar -I anyclientID --tls-version tlsv1.2 -m "Hello" -d
I get the error :
Client anyclientID4406 sending CONNECT
Error: A TLS error occurred.
I can't understand whatsoever what is the problem here with the handshake. All the keys and certificates are generated correctly. I have tried it from the start time and time again. Perhaps i'm missing one obvious step. If anyone with some experience might know what is going wrong i'd greatly appreciate it.
I have installed the wireshark on amazon linux through the following command:
sudo yum install wireshark
The following commands gives me this output:
Package wireshark-1.8.10-25.22.amzn1.x86_64 already installed and latest version
But when i try to run wireshark command it gives the following error:
bash: wireshark: command not found
Am i missing something. Please note that i have access as root user. Any help is appreciated.
The wireshark command does not work. I resolved the issue by using the command below:
tshark -i eth0 -f "udp port 8080" -w captureFile.pcap
The following command captures the packets on eth0(interface name) with the filter on udp port number 8080 and then saves it to the file captureFile.pcap
I am a beginner with aerospike with Python client. I have an aerospike [build - 3.9.1.1] installed in a google instance.
How can I connect to the server from another instance?
I tried the following in shell and wouldn't budge:
import aerospike
config = {'hosts': [('xx.mmm.nn.oo', 3000)]}
# the IP from ifconfig | grep "inet addr"
client = aerospike.client(config)
client.connect()
This yields exception as below:
ClientError: (-1L, 'Failed to connect', 'src/main/aerospike/as_cluster.c', 459)
In the remote I tried the following:
This works fine:
asinfo -v "namespaces"
Also this works when I do:
telnet xx.mmm.nn.oo 3003
....
namespaces
...
Going desperate, I have tried setting access-address in the local with the IP of the server [xx.mmm.nn.oo] and that didn't work either!
Please help folks!
Issue apparently resolved by allowing connections by editing the iptables:
/sbin/iptables -A INPUT -p tcp -s XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX -j ACCEPT /sbin/iptables -A OUTPUT -p tcp -d XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX -j ACCEPT –