CPP graphic.h in codeblock - c++

I have included graphics.h in Codeblock and used initgraph() to rezise my console window. It can compile but it only outputs a default black window which return "Process returned -1073741819 (0xC0000005) execution time : 2.970 s
Press any key to continue.."
#include <iostream>
#include <graphics.h>
using namespace std;
int main(){
initgraph(1000,800);
getch();
closegraph();
}

Solution:
Abandon graphics.h and use a modern graphics library. graphics.h is the header for the Borland Graphics Interface (BGI), a library shipped with the Borland development tools of the 1980s and early 1990s and intended for use with the DOS operating systems. It is old. Use of it professionally is exceptionally rare, so there is minimal value in learning it when you could be learning a graphics library that is used professionally and supported by modern development environments and hardware. For example, the graphics tools built into SFML and SDL.
If this is for school and you must use an implementation of graphics.h to satisfy the marking criteria, either
Exactly duplicate the set-up used by the marker. This minimizes the risk of differences between your environment and the marker's resulting in a program the marker cannot mark. You may be able to make a virtual machine that emulates the the marker's environment.
Download, install, and configure a modern implementation of graphics.h like SDL_BGI (Source if you need to build it yourself). The risk here is you may write code and use functionality that is not available to the marker's environment or write code that behaves differently.
What's likely happening:
As I recall the implementation of graphics.h most commonly suggested online required GCC3.4, and the odds of you getting Code::Blocks with GCC less than 4.8 these days is astonishingly small. And even version 4.8 is horribly out of date. Mainstream GCC is on 10.2.
To add to the fun, the library will have been written to run on the then-flagship Windows XP operating system and the graphics cards available at the time. Both have changed dramatically since then. So even if you track down GCC 3.4, successfully install it, and configure Code::Blocks to use it, you may find yourself needing Windows XP and a vintage 2005 graphics card because there's no way Windows XP will have a driver for whatever graphics card you are using.
This means your code can be 100% correct but the library you are using simply does not run as expected with the tools you're using. Your only option is to use other tools or use a different graphics library.

Related

Can a C++ program run on Mac OS?

I have watched a video in which one of the director of scs software (who makes a EURO TRUCK SIMULATOR game) saying that the game is written entirely in C++, yet the game runs on Windows and Mac OS as well. How could they achieve it? Is it possible to run a C++ program on MAC OS?
Yes.
...OK, stack overflow wants at least 30 characters. OS X comes with the C++ compiler clang++, which is built on top of llvm. In fact, Apple stopped supplying a port of gcc some time ago, so developers either have to build it themselves or adapt to clang. According to Wikipedia, Apple itself develops clang.
It is possible, either to run gcc in terminal or to use Xcode to compile it, however you cannot then use Cocoa but alternatives such as Qt are available for mac.
Sure, there are C++ compilers for Mac OS X as well. One is even included in xcode (the standard development environment on a Mac).
But that does not mean, that you can compile just any C++ program on a Mac. It has to be designed to use libraries, that are available on both platforms (instead of MFC on Windows or Cocoa on the Mac). This is possible for example by using wxwidgets or QT. With these two libraries it is even possible to compile the program for Unix platforms like Linux as well.
Regardless of language a multi-platform program relies on some basic support parts that are implemented differently on each platform. With pure standard C++ this is the standard library and the runtime support, but in practice a game, say, will also rely on 3rd party libraries with platform specific implementations. So given that the platform itself is compatible with the basic platform assumptions of the C++ language, and the Mac is, achieving such portability is conceptually very straightforward, although difficult to get perfect.
As an example of a platform that's not entirely compatible with C++, Microsoft's .NET virtual machine is apparently so at odds with the ideas of C++ that Microsoft has found it necessary to define two different non-standard variants of C++ for it, and offers no way to produce GUI programs for it in pure standard C++. It's not impossible to use only standard C++ for .NET, and indeed one main reason to use C++ with .NET is to combine standard C++ parts with more .NET-y parts; it's just that using only standard C++ the code becomes complex, inefficient and generally impractical. For example, my first questions here on SO concerned how to do a simple .NET message box in standard C++ by way of COM technology as an intermediate layer, and that worked, but with a ridiculous amount of complex non-general support code.
As another example, using C++ in web pages is very much an impedance mismatch, so to speak. Again Microsoft is the main player who has attempted this, with their ActiveX technology. It turned out to be a good way ensure that PCs all over the world got infested with malware, because C++ is not the kind of language where it's easy to constrain what the code can do. As far as I know only Microsoft's own Internet Explorer browser ever supported ActiveX in web pages. And as of Windows 10 the IE browser is being phased out and replaced by the newer Edge browser, that does not support ActiveX in web pages.

C++ Code for Windows & Linux

First of, I am very new to programming, but took an interest in it. I have successfully built a C++ Console program for Windows which is a simple Database program, which can edit / delete / input entries.
I am less and less relying on Windows for day to day stuff. I had an old HP Netbook which was impossible to use with Windows, but I put in a Linux Distro and works like a charm.
As I sometimes do use Windows, as well as having built the program to use in Windows, I am wondering if the same code can be used to compile a Linux program? I could use WINE to run it but would prefer running something specific to Linux. Is this possible with the same code or would I have to make another Linux version of it?
I would assume that since you are new to programming, that you did not make the extraordinary effort to make your code portable across platforms. That takes a significant skill set, especially if you are accessing external resources such as a database. So the answer is you will probably have to re-write for Linux, and specifically the database interface.
I guess that you want your C++ code to be compilable both on Linux and on Windows. You'll need operating-system specific compilers for that (a different one on Linux and on Windows).
I am wondering if the same code can be used to compile a Linux program?
The program to compile your C++ code is called a compiler. On Linux you will use GCC as the g++ command (which you could even customize with MELT, but that is not for newbies), or Clang/LLVM as the clang++ command. You'll use a builder like make (see here for why, and this example). Be sure to install a recent version (GCC 4.9 or Clang 3.5 at least in start of 2015) to get good C++11 support. Focus on learning C++11 (or C++14) not some earlier variant (so use a C++11 compiler).
I don't know Windows so I cannot recommend any good C++ compiler for it (but I heard of MinGW, CygWin and of Microsoft Visual C++; look also into recent Clang...).
You might be interested in cross-platform C++ framework libraries like Qt or POCO (and perhaps also Sqlite for database related stuff). They will help you to code some C++ usable on both systems (after recompilation).
BTW, you can always encapsulate your system specific code with preprocessor directives à la #if LINUX ;take care of putting all the OS specific (or OS related) code in a few source files.
It could happen (and I wish that for you) that you get fond & happy of Linux and will, in a few months, prefer to code for Linux only (you'll then install Linux on all your machines). BTW, study the source code of existing free software you like and use on Linux. That will teach you a lot.
The advices I gave here and here are still relevant today when coding on Linux. Read also something about porting & portability, and Advanced Linux Programming.

Writing a cross-platform program

How could I write a program which runs on both Windows 7, Mac OS X (and maybe linux too)?
I heard Qt are a great framework to build cross-platform GUIs, but I think every program version need a recompile, isn't that right? And should I compile the win version under windows, the mac version under mac os x, the linux version under linux and so on?
I'm getting ideas and/or suggestions
The underlying binary format is different on each platform, so unless you're using a virtual machine (like Java or Flash does) you will have to recompile your program on each platform.
Some compilers (like GCC) allow cross-compiling, but it is not trivial to set up. Probably the easiest system to cross-compile on is Linux (there are several open source projects that have cross compilation set up from Linux to Windows).
In case of a GUI application, it depends on the language -- if you're stuck with C++, Qt or wxWindows might be a reasonable choice providing an abstraction layer over the native windowing system.
If you can go with Java, it makes life simpler, however the windowing system is Java's and not native.
Another language to think about is FreePascal w/ Lazarus -- it has a pretty good GUI designer that compiles to the native windowing system on every platform (WinAPI on Windows, Cocoa on OSX and GTK on Linux).
Not sure if C++ is a must, but Adobe Air is a great cross platform development environment for desktop, and its growing for mobile development as well. If you need an example of a major application using Adobe Air to deploy to multiple desktop OSes, just check out tweetdeck http://www.tweetdeck.com/
I'd highly suggest also looking into Flex and Flash Builder if you go that route.
There are two separate issues I would highlight when writing cross-platform programs -- how to make your code portable, and how to arrange for it to be built on the various different platforms.
As far as the building side of things goes, I would look into a cross-platform build system like CMake (http://www.cmake.org). You essentially write a script and CMake will generate the appropriate project file/makefile for a specific platform. You then build your program on each platform as you would normally. For example, on Windows, you might use CMake to generate a Visual C++ project for you, and then use Visual C++ to actually build your executable. On Linux, you might use CMake to generate a makefile, and then build the executable using g++.
The other aspect is how to make your code portable -- the key is to write C++ standard-compliant code and make use of libraries that are themselves portable across the platforms you're interested in. You can (and may sometimes need to) write platform-specific code for each of the different platforms -- if you do, you should hide it behind a portable interface and have the rest of the code use that.
Yes, you need to compile for each version when using C++.
The only thing that prevents you from compiling a program, for example, for Windows on Mac is to get a tool for doing that. It is possible, but the problem is finding the toolset.
Also you can use a virtual machine for running diferent OSs and compiling code for all platforms on the same machine.
Java runs on Windows, OS X and Linux

How can I compile code that uses graphics.h in DOSBOX?

i write a code and in this code i use graphics.h ,in borland c++ or visual I can't open and run it, now i want run this code ,and i have DOSBOX 0.72 , how open this code with DOSBOX?
my windows is 7 32bit
I see you're still trying to write and compile code that uses legacy and unsupported libraries...
At least you've discovered now that you aren't going to be able to do this natively in Windows 7, and have installed a DOS emulator. Now, you'll need to find and download a compiler that will run in that environment.
Since graphics.h is a proprietary Borland library, I recommend you use one of their compilers. The company who now owns Borland hosts an online museum of their vintage products that are free for download. Grab a copy of Turbo C 2.01 or Turbo C++ 1.01, load it on your DOSBOX, and marvel at the little piece of computer history you've unearthed.
Also, Turbo C 3.0 is available online from here, but I'm not sure this has been released to the public domain. I can't imagine anyone would really care, but legally and all, you're on your own.
But seriously, why not download Visual Studio C++ 2010 Express free from Microsoft and use a modern compiler instead? Sure you can't use graphics.h, but there have been a significant amount of developments made in computer graphics technology in the past 25+ years. A modern IDE will be much easier to use than the old Borland compilers, and the time you invest will actually be worth something.
May be download and install borland c++ 3.11 compiler and use graphic.h library (i'm use it 4 years ago).
I think that this compiler isn't ran in Win 7, but may be try.
You can use Virtual Box, with installing Win XP (borland c++ 3.1 100% work in WinXP).
The complete solution of running turbo C++ 3.0 in windows 7 is just disable graphics driver of your computer from device manager and use like windows Xp.
It will run turbo c++ in full screen as well as run graphics program in windows 7

Crosscompiling C++; from Linux to Windows, does it really work?

I have the source code for some very simple command line programs. I was considering the option of compiling them on a Linux machine (they were deveoped here) so they can be used on Windows. If I am not wrong this is called Cross-compiling. I have never tried it, but reading yesterday some information, it seems to be kind of complicated or not successful. I would like to hear about your opinions, and how could I port a simple "hello world" program, which compiles on Linux with g++.
Thanks
Look into mingw, a suite of tools for building Win32 applications in Linux. If the programs don't depend on any Linux-specific functionality not supported by mingw, you should be fine.
Note that cross-compilation is not the same thing as cross-platform. With cross compilation, you compile the code to a Windows executable on the Linux box, then transfer the executable to a Windows box. With cross-platform, you transfer the source code to the Windows box and compile to a Windows executable using a Windows compiler.
The former is quite difficult (but not impossible), the latter is very easy, using a compiler such as MinGW, a others have mentioned.
I cross-compile on a daily basis. But I don't set up cross-compilers on a daily basis. It can be tricky, but it's certainly possible.
As long as you use standard C++ your code will be cross-platform. You can also use cross-platform libraries like STL, boost, Poco, Qt, etc...
Only when you start to use platform specific code you lose portability. For example including <windows.h> will make your code only compilable on Windows. (There are techniques around this like the #ifdef macro. This enables certain code portions only on one platform.)
So a simple hello world program should work on Linux, Mac, Windows or any other platform. You don't need anything special for this.
Note:
Some may mention Cygwin or mingw32. I'll briefly explain what they are:
Cygwin allows you to compile Linux applications using gcc/g++ on a Windows machine.
Mingw32 allows you to compile Windows applications using gcc/g++ on a Windows machine.
Edit:
If you want to setup a system for cross-compilation, then I recommend that you have a look at cmake.
Yes. We are currently compiling a 250 kloc app, running Qt with daily builds. It's working prefectly everyday, although I've to admit it is not distributed outside the company, but only used internal. For official releases, Visual Studio is prefered.
Compiled using mingw standard packages on Debian.